[dropcap]B[/dropcap]hanwata–Kolyala is not easy to find on the map, not even for a resident of Rajasthan. So deep is it embedded within Sariska forest, that not many locals are even aware of its existence. But it was in this inhospitable, rocky terrain that I met King Charles III of Great Britain, then Prince Charles, on November 2, 2003, at the invitation of the British High Commission.
The invite came as I had documented the conversion of the dark zone into a water surplus area via my documentary “River Reborn”. I was informed that the Prince wished to understand the rebirth of the river Arvari that had vanished nearly sixty years ago and I was required to not just explain the nitty-gritty of the project but also be the communicator between the royal visitor and the rural folk. I was happy that the stupendous work of villagers alongside Magsaysay Award winner Rajendra Singh of Tarun Bharat Sangh (TBS), after kudos from the President of India, was now receiving international recognition.
So, along with Rajendra Singh, I met the British heir that day after he and his entourage disembarked from the ME-8 and ME-17 helicopters. Amidst the huge welcome roar by the crowd standing on the fringes, the Prince complimented Rajendra Singh for his outstanding work. Informed I was the documentary filmmaker who had documented the project, he shook my hand and said he had heard of it and looked forward to seeing it soon.
The three of us, along with the British High Commissioner Sir Michael Arthur, then walked to a nearby site where local children welcomed him with traditional garlands. Trooping down the heavily guarded Aravali tract, we were joined by Dr MS Rathore (a geologist) and the village headman since only the four of us were to accompany the Prince and the High Commissioner to explain the intricacies of terrain and the methodology and logistics of water conservation.
Deepak Mahaan with King Charles III
I recounted how fetching water in the desert state was a back-breaking affair in the absence of a free-flowing, year-long river but how water was now available in the rugged topography at just 10 feet below ground level!
“Yes, I can imagine the difficulties. Water scarcity can make life immensely difficult in the rural countryside”, Charles replied.
After I conveyed Rajendra Singh’s immaculate synopsis of how water conservation became a people’s movement and how skepticism turned to cooperation, the keen listener asked, “Were water conservation techniques well known or did people need some training?”
We informed the old age wisdom had rusted but was quickly adopted, leading to the construction of numerous Johads (earthen check dams), Anicuts and water bodies along the Arvari basin, helping recharge water bodies and raising the water table.
Charles noted it was akin to “what Israelis had done to save themselves from a water crisis.”
A group of buffaloes was taking a bath in the pool of water at a curve. He stopped and asked, “Do villagers need permission to use any of the water resources?”
We explained that as conservation had become a people’s movement, “rules made regarding water bodies, cutting trees or protecting the environment were respected by everyone.”
If walking wasn’t easy on the trail full of thorns, stones and dung, the flies, the mosquitoes and foul smells of carcasses added to the misery of the hot and humid weather. But there was no complaint from the famous visitor; on the contrary, he was enthusiastic.
As he surveyed the scenery, I asked: “Sir, have you enjoyed your visit?”
(L to R) Rajendra Singh, King Charles III and Deepak Mahaan
“Oh absolutely! India fascinates me like no other country. So much colour, vibrancy and the people are marvellous”, he gushed in sincerity. The future King also informed how his parents had enjoyed the warmth extended to them during their visits. Walking along an incline, he gently prodded me about my background and I informed him how I had studied in a Jesuit convent, held a secular outlook and lived happily in a joint family, only to add that my childhood friend-turned wife’s zodiac sign was Scorpio like his.
He replied: “Hope you have no complaints,” saying that broke into a mischievous smile.
Soon after, he interjected: “Did the water conservation movement strengthen the democratic functioning of village committees?”
Answering in the affirmative, I detailed how benefits flowed with better water availability. With inputs from Rajendra, I explained how self-discipline led to people refraining from cutting trees or polluting water bodies and how economic prosperity paved the way for women’s self-help groups and empowerment, thus improving the numbers of school-going children.
At this, he exulted: “Rajendra is an amazing man” and in a spontaneous gesture took off some of his garlands and put them on Rajendra, myself, Dr Rathore and the village headman. It was apparent that Rajendra’s pioneering work had stirred him deeply.
Even after the long walk to Bhanwata lake and back, he was unfazed. Much to the annoyance of his security staff, he acquiesced to the villager’s request for an audience with him, exhibiting his warmth for the ‘water warriors.’ After spending 15 minutes, he asked me to convey his deep sense of appreciation for their efforts and how overwhelmed he was with the love and affection showered on him. My translation was met with sustained applause from all quarters especially since he also garlanded and patted a few children.
As we bid farewell, he confided, “I love India and I’ll cherish this visit for a long time. Thank you so much, Deepak. Do extend my best wishes to your wife. And yes, have a wonderful anniversary.” He waved goodbye and I realised Charles had wished me for my wedding anniversary the next day and whose date had inadvertently slipped out of my mouth during our conversation. The greetings left a fine taste in my mouth but also revealed that the man had a sensitive breast beneath the severe countenance. Since “each happiness of yesterday is a memory for tomorrow”, I hope we’ll get to meet again and relive our trek in Aravalli.
इन कुछ सालों का भारत का इतिहास जब लिखा जाएगा तो बड़ा ही विचित्र रहेगा, क्योंकि इन कुछ सालों से जेलें उन लोगों द्वारा भरी जा रही है जो समाज के लिए जी रहे हैं, सामाजिक कार्यकर्ता, वकील, शिक्षक, जनपक्षीय पत्रकार, गायक, प्रोड्यूसर तथा अन्य न्याय पसंद लोगों को जेल भुगतना पड़ रहा है, वह भी अपने जन सरोकार के कारण। सत्ता के द्वारा असहमति की हर आवाज को जेलों में भरा जाने वाला यह समय स्पेशल इतिहास रचेगा।
17 जुलाई 2022 को भी ऐसी ही गिरफ्तारी झारखंड के पत्रकार रूपेश कुमार सिंह की हुई थी, जिसका कारण उनकी जनपक्षीय लेखनी ही है, जिन्हें अभी मंडलकारा सरायकेला में रखा गया है।
रूपेश को जेल के पहले दिन से लेकर अब तक खाने-पीने, रहने, शारीरिक सुरक्षा को लेकर बार-बार सवाल उठाने की जरूरत पड़ती रही है। जेल में भी वे अपनी जनपक्षधरता से दूर नहीं है, और जेल की बदतर व्यवस्था में बदलाव के लिए आवाज उठाने की पहल उन्होंने शुरू कर दी है। हमारे शहीद क्रांतिकारी जतिंद्र नाथ दास उर्फ जतिन दास जिन्होंने अपनी जान की कुर्बानी तक ब्रिटिश काल की बदतर जेल व्यवस्था के खिलाफ 62 दिनों तक के भूख हड़ताल के कारण दे दी थी, कि शहादत दिवस 13 सितंबर को रुपेश कुमार सिंह सरायकेला जेल की वर्तमान बिगड़ी व्यवस्था में बदलाव के लिए एक दिवसीय भूख हड़ताल करने की घोषणा की है और यदि फिर भी व्यवस्था में बदलाव न किया गया तो शहीद जतिन दास की विरासत को आगे बढ़ाते हुए अनिश्चितकालीन भूख हड़ताल पर बैठ जाएंगे, इस संबंध में रूपेश ने एक आवेदन राष्ट्रपति महोदया के नाम भी लिखा है।
चूंकि रूपेश जेल में बंद हैं इसलिए पत्र उन्होंने जेल सुपरिटेंडेंट को सुपुर्द कर दिया गया है, इस उम्मीद के साथ कि जल्द से जल्द उसे राष्ट्रपति द्रौपदी मुर्मू को भेज दिया जाए।
नीचे रूपेश का आवेदन पत्र दिया गया है जिसे उन्होंने जैसा बताया, वैसा ही लिखा गया है।
सेवा में,
माननीय राष्ट्रपति महोदया, भारत सरकार
द्वारा-जेल अधीक्षिका मंडलकारा सरायकेला,
विषय- जेल में बंदियों को मूलभूत सुविधा उपलब्ध कराने एवं महान क्रांतिकारी अमर शहीद यतींद्र नाथ दास उर्फ जतिन दास के शहादत दिवस 13 सितंबर को जेल में एक दिवसीय भूख हड़ताल करने के संबंध में,
महाशया,
सविनय निवेदन यह है कि मैं रूपेश कुमार सिंह, पिता-अरविंद प्रसाद सिंह, 18 जुलाई 2022 से झारखंड के मंडलकारा सरायकेला में बतौर विचाराधीन बंदी बंद हूं, मैं पेशे से एक पत्रकार हूं, जैसा कि आप जानते हैं कि ब्रिटिश काल में हमारे देश के महान क्रांतिकारी जतिंद्र नाथ दास उर्फ जतिन दास ने तत्कालीन लाहौर जेल में बंदियों के मूलभूत सुविधा उपलब्ध कराने एवं जेल में बंदियों के शोषण के खिलाफ 13 जुलाई 1929 से भूख हड़ताल प्रारंभ किया था, जो अनवरत 62 दिन तक उनके शहादत तक चला, अंततः 13 सितंबर 1929 को बंदियों के अधिकार के लिए भूख हड़ताल के कारण जतिन दास शहीद हो गए।
हमारे देश से अंग्रेजों को गए हुए 75 साल हो गए, आज हमारा देश आजादी का अमृत महोत्सव मना रहा है, लेकिन आज भी हमारे देश की जेलों की स्थिति बहुत बेहतर नहीं है। आज हमारे देश की जेलें क्षमता से अधिक कैदियों से भरा हुआ है। जेलों में न तो पर्याप्त सिपाही है, और न ही पर्याप्त कर्मचारी। जेल कर्मियों को प्रत्येक दिन दो शिफ्ट में लगभग 10 से 11 घंटे ड्यूटी करनी पड़ती है, जो की भारतीय श्रम कानून 8 घंटे कार्य दिवस के खिलाफ है। इन सिपाही को साप्ताहिक छुट्टी भी नहीं मिलती है।
जेल में सबसे बूरी स्थिति विचाराधीन बंदियों की है, छोटे-छोटे मुकदमों में भी उन्हें वर्षों बिना जमानत के जेल में रहना पड़ता है। यहाँ ना तो बंदियों को पौष्टिक भोजन मिलता है, और ना ही बंदी मरीजों को पर्याप्त स्वास्थ्य सुविधा, यहां नाश्ता में सप्ताह में तीन दिन मूढ़ी-प्याज, तीन दिन चना-प्याज, एक दिन चूड़ा-गूड़ मिलता है। दोपहर भोजन में प्रत्येक दिन चावल, दाल और सब्जी एवं रात के खाने के लिए रोटी, दाल और सब्जी मिलती है (जिसकी गुणवत्ता बिल्कुल बदतर होती है, जिससे पौष्टिकता की उम्मीद नहीं की जा सकती) । हाँ खानापूर्ति के लिए 15 दिन में एक दिन दो पीस मुर्गा का मिट भी मिलता है।
क्या यह बंदियों के लिए पौष्टिक आहार है?
यहां पर कुष्ठ रोगी बंदी एवं एड्स रोगी बंदी को अस्पताल में रखने के बजाय सेल में बंद कर रखा जाता है, क्या यह बंदी मरीजों के मानवाधिकार का उल्लंघन नहीं है?
यहां कैदियों को अपने परिजनों को फोन करने में प्रति मिनट के लिए 2:50 रूपये देना होता है। मुलाकात 15 दिन में एक दिन होता है, जिसमें सिर्फ 10 मिनट बात करने की अनुमति है, क्या यह बंदियों की आर्थिक व मानसिक प्रताड़ना नहीं है?
अतः हम माननीय राष्ट्रपति महोदया से मांग करते हैं कि-
बंदियों को उचित पौष्टिक आहार दिया जाए।
मरीज बंदियों को अस्पताल में रखा जाए।
बंदियों को मुफ्त फोन सुविधा उपलब्ध कराया जाए। झारखंड जैसे राज्य जहां की अधिकांश जनता ग्रामीण क्षेत्र से आती है जो आर्थिक रूप से बेहद कमजोर होते है,टेलीफोन सुविधा के नाम पर प्रति मिनट 2:50 रू अदा करना बहुत ही कष्टदायक है।
मुलाकात सप्ताह में एक दिन किया जाए व कम से कम 20 मिनट बात करने की अनुमति दी जाए।
मैं माननीय राष्ट्रपति महोदया को बताना चाहता हूं कि उपरोक्त मांगों के समर्थन में मैं 13 सितंबर 2022 को महान क्रांतिकारी जतिन दास की 93 शहादत दिवस के मौके पर मंडलकारा सरायकेला में एक दिवसीय भूख हड़ताल करूंगा और फिर भी मेरी उपरोक्त मांगों पर उचित कार्रवाई नहीं हुई तो मैं अनिश्चित कालीन भूख हड़ताल के जरिए महान क्रांतिकारी अमर शहीद जतिन दास की क्रांतिकारी विरासत को आगे बढ़ाऊंगा।
Kolkata: Come December, and India will witness the first literature festival exclusively for child authors. The three days long Muskaan Literature Festival by Prabha Khaitan Foundation and Education for All Trust will take place in the national capital.
The first-of-its-kind literary festival will feature around 25 child authors, aged 8-14 years, from different parts of India.
Ruskin Bond, the renowned children’s author, unveiled the logo of Muskaan Lit Fest for Child Authors earlier this month.
The veteran author said, “I applaud this noble and first-of-its-kind initiative for children. Literature festivals are held annually but this unique festival will showcase children and their writings, and we will get a chance to listen and engage with the young minds.”
The fest will acknowledge and applaud the literary creations of young storytellers through a host of engaging sessions, interactive activities, workshops, story booths, crafts, games among others.
An excited author, 10-year-old Devyani Bharadwaj from Indore reacted, “I am happy that I will get a chance to discuss two books written and illustrated by me and my twin sister Shivaranjani at the Muskaan Literature Festival. The first book ‘Sun Salutations’ was published when I was eight years old.”
The book on yoga for children got a letter of appreciation from Prime Minister Narendra Modi and was applauded by His Holiness Dalai Lama and several others.
Muskaan has earlier showcased several children’s authors – Sudha Murty, Roopa Pai, Khyrunnisa A, and Shobha Tharoor Srinivasan to name a few – to popularise literature among children.
The festival is supported by Shree Cement Limited and held in collaboration with IGNCA (Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts), with Sahitya Akademi as a knowledge partner.
भारत के सबसे पुराने राजनैतिक दल, भारतीय राष्ट्रीय कांग्रेस, ने 7 सितम्बर से कन्याकुमारी से कश्मीर तक भारत जोड़ो यात्रा शुरू की है. देश के 12 राज्यों और दो केन्द्रशासित प्रदेशों से गुजरते हुए यह यात्रा कुल 3,500 किलोमीटर की दूरी तय करेगी. भारत जोड़ो यात्रा एक राजनैतिक दल का उपक्रम है परन्तु करीब 200 सामाजिक कार्यकर्ताओं, जिनका चुनावी राजनीति से कोई प्रत्यक्ष लेनादेना नहीं है, ने भी राहुल गाँधी से मुलाकात की और ऐसी सम्भावना है कि वे और उनकी संस्थाएं इस यात्रा में सक्रिय भागीदारी करेंगे. जानेमाने सामाजिक कार्यकर्ता और स्वराज इंडिया के मुखिया योगेन्द्र यादव से सामाजिक संस्थाओं से यात्रा में भागीदारी करने की अपील की है. इस अपील में उन्होंने इस यात्रा की आवश्यकता का अत्यंत सारगर्भित वर्णन किया है. उनके अनुसार:
इससे पहले हमारे गणतंत्र के मूल्यों पर कभी उतना नृशंस हमला नहीं हुआ, जितना कि पिछले कुछ समय से हो रहा है.
इससे पहले कभी नफरत, विघटन और बहिष्करण के भाव देश पर उस तरह से नहीं लादे गए जिस तरह से इन दिनों लादे जा रहे हैं.
इससे पहले कभी हम पर उस तरह से निगाहें नहीं रखी गईं और हमें उस स्तर के प्रचार और दुष्प्रचार का सामना नहीं करना पड़ा, जितना कि अब करना पड़ रहा है.
इससे पहले हमने कभी ऐसी निष्ठुर सरकार नहीं देखी जिसे अर्थव्यवस्था के बर्बाद होने और लोगों के हालात की कोई परवाह ही नहीं है और जो केवल अपने कुछ चमचों की सेवा में लगी है.
इससे पहले कभी वास्तविक राष्ट्रनिर्माताओं – किसानों और श्रमिकों, दलितों और आदिवासियों – को राष्ट्र के भविष्य को आकार देने के प्रक्रिया से उस तरह बाहर नहीं किया गया जिस तरह इन दिनों किया जा रहा है.
देश के वर्तमान निराशाजनक हालात का योगेन्द्र यादव ने अत्यंत सटीक वर्णन किया है. भाजपा जब अटलबिहारी वाजपेयी के नेतृत्व में पहली बार सत्ता में आई थी, उस समय कई सामाजिक कार्यकर्ताओं को लगता था कि कांग्रेस और भाजपा एक ही सिक्के के दो पहलू हैं. जल्द ही उन्हें समझ आ गया कि भाजपा ‘सबसे अलग’ है. जिस दौर में भाजपा का अपने दम पर बहुमत नहीं था और वह एनडीए गठबंधन का नेतृत्व करती थी, उस समय भी वह दूसरों से ‘अलग’ थी. संघ परिवार के सदस्य बतौर वह हिंदुत्व के एजेंडे के प्रति प्रतिबद्ध थी. वह भारतीय राष्ट्रवाद के बरक्स हिन्दू राष्ट्रवाद की पैरोकार थी. उस दौर में उसने शिक्षा का भगवाकरण किया और आरएसएस की शाखाओं की संख्या में जबरदस्त वृद्धि हुई.
भाजपा का प्रत्यक्ष और परोक्ष अल्पसंख्यक-विरोधी रवैया सबके सामने था. मुसलमानों के अलावा, ईसाईयों के खिलाफ भी हिंसा हुई. सन 1999 में पास्टर स्टेंस को बजरंग दल के दारा सिंह ने जिंदा जला दिया. इस भयावह कृत्य का उद्देश्य था उन लोगों को धमकाना जो प्रजातान्त्रिक मूल्यों के हामी थे. अल्पसंख्यकों के अधिकारों की रक्षा, प्रजातान्त्रिक मूल्यों का हिस्सा है. कॉर्पोरेट संस्थाओं की बन आई थी और मीडिया की खरीद-फरोख्त शुरू हो गई थी. गुजरात कत्लेआम ने सांप्रदायिक हिंसा में अमानवीय और बर्बर क्रूरता की नई मिसाल कायम की.
सन 2014 में भाजपा ने अपने बल पर पूर्ण बहुमत हासिल कर लिया. एनडीए की भूमिका नाममात्र की रह गई और भाजपा-आरएसएस ने पूरे जोशोखरोश से अपना एजेंडा लागू करना शुरू कर दिया. प्रजातंत्र को बनाये रखने के लिए जो संस्थाएं निर्मित की गईं थीं उन्हें कमज़ोर किया गया और आरएसएस एवं उसके संगी-साथियों ने बड़ी होशियारी से दलितों, आदिवासियों और यहाँ तक कि अल्पसंख्यक वर्गों के एक तबके को भी अपने झंडे तले लाने में सफलता प्राप्त कर ली. वर्तमान राजनैतिक परिदृश्य गरीबों और धार्मिक अल्पसंख्यकों के लिए अत्यन डरावना है. भारतीय संविधान के मूल्यों, विशेषकर बंधुत्व, को किनारे कर दिया गया है.
एक बेहतर भारत के निर्माण के लिए प्रतिबद्ध सामाजिक समूह प्रजातान्त्रिक मूल्यों को पुनर्स्थापित करने और समाज के हाशियाकृत तबकों के उनके अधिकारों के लिए संघर्ष के लिए ज़मीन तैयार करने की कोशिशों में लगे हुए हैं. शायद इसलिए अनेक सामाजिक समूह भारत जोड़ो यात्रा से जुड़ना चाहते हैं. इस यात्रा का उद्देश्य बंधुत्व को बढ़ावा देना और आम लोगों की ज़िन्दगी की परेशानियों के प्रति समाज का ध्यान आकर्षित करना है. आर्थिक असमानता बढ़ती ही जा रही है और समाज के एक बड़े तबके के नागरिक अधिकार केवल कागज़ पर रह गए हैं. बिलकिस बानो प्रकरण से पता चलता है कि समाज की सामूहिक सोच कितनी बदल गई है. बलात्कारियों और हत्यारों को जेल से रिहा किया जा रहा है और उनका स्वागत फूलमालाओं से हो रहा है. दूसरी ओर, कमजोरों और दमितों के लिए संघर्ष करने वाले उमर खालिद जैसे लोग जेलों में है. यह अत्यंत संतोष का विषय है कि तीस्ता सीतलवाड़ को जमानत मिल गई है.
भारत में यात्राओं ने सकारात्मक और नकारात्मक दोनों तरह की भूमिकाएं निभाईं हैं. महात्मा गाँधी की दो यात्राओं ने पूरे समाज को बदल डाला था. डांडी यात्रा औपनिवेशिक शासन के विरुद्ध संघर्ष का एक महत्वपूर्ण अध्याय थी. इस यात्रा ने आज़ादी हासिल करने के भारत के संकल्प को मज़बूत किया और सामाजिक सुधार और औपनिवेशिक शासन को उखाड़ फेंकने की इच्छा को बलवती किया. आश्चर्य नहीं कि सांप्रदायिक संगठन इस यात्रा से दूर रहे. इस यात्रा का आयोजन इस तरह से किया गया कि देश के नागरिक धर्म और जाति की सीमाओं के ऊपर उठकर अपनी पहचान को भारतीय पहचान में समाहित करें.
अम्बेडकर के महाड तालाब और कालाराम मंदिर आंदोलनों, जिनका उद्देश्य सामाजिक न्याय की स्थापना थी, के बाद गांधीजी ने जाति और अछूत प्रथा के खिलाफ संघर्ष शुरू किया. वे इस मामले में इतने गंभीर थे कि उन्होंने ब्रिटिश सरकार के विरुद्ध अपने आन्दोलन को विराम देते हुए, 1933 के बाद से अनेक यात्राएं निकलीं. इनका उद्देश्य जातिगत पदक्रम और अछूत प्रथा का उन्मूलन था. इन यात्राओं से भी भारत को एक करने में मदद मिली.
इनके अतिरिक्त जगन मोहन रेड्डी ने चुनावी लाभ के लिए, एनटीआर ने सत्ता हासिल करने के लिए और चंद्रशेखर ने मुख्यतः भारत को एक करने के उद्देश्य से यात्राएं निकलीं. परन्तु जिस यात्रा ने भारत को सबसे ज्यादा विभाजित किया वह थी भाजपा के लालकृष्ण आडवाणी द्वारा निकली गई रथयात्रा. इस यात्रा को मंडल आयोग की सिफारिशों को अमल में लाने के सरकार के निर्णय के परिप्रेक्ष्य में निकाला गया था. आडवाणी की यात्रा का एक लक्ष्य देश को धार्मिक आधार पर विभाजित करने भी था. इसके नतीजे में सांप्रदायिक हिंसा बढी और अंततः बाबरी मस्जिद को गिरा दिया गया. पिछले आठ वर्षों में विघटनकारी राजनीति का बोलबाला तेजी से बढ़ा है और देश की एकता और बंधुत्व के भाव पर गंभीर नकारात्मक प्रभाव पड़ा है.
यद्यपि भारत जोड़ो यात्रा एक राजनैतिक दल द्वारा निकाली जा रही है तथापि राष्ट्रीय एकता के व्यापक लक्ष्य को हासिल करने के लिए सामाजिक संगठन उससे जुड़ रहे हैं. यहाँ तक कि ऐसे संगठन भी इसका समर्थन कर रहे हैं जो कई मुद्दों पर कांग्रेस की राजनीति से सहमत नहीं है. उन सबको यह अहसास है कि सांप्रदायिक राजनीति और देश की एकता पर उसके कुप्रभाव का मुकाबला करना आवश्यक है. हमें यह आशा है कि गैर-भाजपा दल, क्षेत्रीय दल और सामाजिक कार्यकर्ता व संगठन, जो स्वाधीनता आन्दोलन से उपजे भारत के विचार में आस्था रखते हैं और उन मूल्यों में विश्वास करते हैं जो हमारे संविधान का हिस्सा हैं, यह समझते हैं कि इस समय आवश्यकता इस बात की है कि हम गाँधी और पटेल, मौलाना आज़ाद और नेहरु, सुभाष बोस और अम्बेडकर की सपनों को भारत को नष्ट होने से बचाएँ.
London: The crowning achievement of Britain’s Queen Elizabeth, who died on Thursday after 70 years on the throne, was to maintain the popularity of the monarchy across decades of seismic political, social and cultural change that threatened to make it an anachronism.
A dignified, dependable figure who reigned longer than any other British monarch, Elizabeth helped steer the institution into the modern world, stripping away court ritual and making it somewhat more open and accessible, all in the glare of an increasingly intrusive and often hostile media.
While the nation she reigned over sometimes struggled to find its place in a new world order and her own family often fell foul of public expectations, the queen herself remained a symbol of stability. She also tried to transcend class barriers and earned the grudging respect of even hardened republicans.
To much of the world she was the personification of Britain, yet she remained something of an enigma as an individual, never giving an interview and rarely expressing emotion or offering a personal opinion in public – a woman recognised by millions but known by hardly anyone.
“I think she’s brought life, energy and passion to the job, she’s managed to modernise and evolve the monarchy like no other,” her grandson Prince William, who is now the heir to the throne, said in a television documentary in 2012.
THE YOUNG QUEEN
Elizabeth Alexandra Mary was born on April 21, 1926 at 17 Bruton Street in central London.
The young princess never expected to ascend to the throne: it was only after her uncle King Edward VIII abdicated in 1936 because of his love for American divorcee Wallis Simpson that the crown passed to her father, George VI, when she was 10.
Queen Elizabeth II
She was just 25 when her father died and she became Queen Elizabeth II on February 6, 1952, while on tour in Kenya with her husband Prince Philip. Winston Churchill was the first of 15 prime ministers who served during her reign.
“In a way I didn’t have an apprenticeship, my father died much too young and so it was all a very sudden kind of taking on, and making the best job you can,” she said in a 1992 documentary.
“It’s a question of maturing into something that one’s got used to doing and accepting the fact that here you are and it’s your fate. It is a job for life.”
During her 70 years on the throne Britain underwent dramatic change.
The austere postwar 1950s gave way to the swinging 60s, the divisive leadership of Margaret Thatcher in the 80s, Tony Blair’s three-term New Labour era, a return to economic austerity and then the COVID-19 pandemic.
Labour and Conservative governments came and went, feminism changed attitudes to women, and Britain became a much more cosmopolitan, multi-ethnic society.
Elizabeth was on the throne for most of the Cold War from the death of Soviet leader Josef Stalin. During her reign there were 14 U.S. presidents, from Harry S. Truman to Joe Biden, and she met all bar Lyndon Johnson.
Britain’s vote to leave the European Union in 2016 exposed deep divisions in British society, while nationalists continued their push for a new referendum on Scottish independence that had the potential to rip apart the United Kingdom.
“As we look for new answers in the modern age, I for one prefer the tried and tested recipes, like speaking well of each other and respecting different points of view; coming together to seek out the common ground; and never losing sight of the bigger picture,” the queen said ahead of a 2014 referendum on Scottish secession, in what appeared to be a message to politicians. Scots voted to remain in the United Kingdom.
MORE EGALITARIAN
Over time, Britain evolved into a more egalitarian society, where the ruling class had to make way for a burgeoning middle class, where aristocrats no longer dominated the top universities and the majority of hereditary peers lost their seats in parliament’s House of Lords.
At first, Elizabeth relied heavily on her father’s old circle of advisers but gradually she brought in more career diplomats and business executives to the royal court as she and her husband Philip sought to modernise the monarchy.
“She’s shrewd, she’s compassionate, she has a good deal of insight, and she has the typical and traditional virtues that you associate with the British,” former Prime Minister John Major said amid celebrations to mark her 90th birthday.
“If you were designing someone to be monarch here in Britain, I think you would design someone exactly like Elizabeth II.”
In 1992, the queen responded to criticism about royal wealth by offering to pay income tax and cutting the number of her family members on the state payroll.
But her years on the throne were often far from smooth sailing.
She spent much of the early part of her reign saying farewell to the British Empire amassed under her forebears, from Kenya to Hong Kong. Barbados was the most recent country to dispense with her as head of state in November 2021.
However, she remained the monarch of 15 countries and head of the Commonwealth.
Her marriage to Philip, a Greek prince she wed aged 21, stayed solid for 73 years until his death in April 2021, but her sister, daughter and two of her sons were – very publicly – not so lucky in love.
She famously described as an “annus horribilis” the 40th anniversary of her accession in 1992 after three of her four children’s marriages failed and there was a fire at her Windsor Castle residence.
Queen Elizabeth II
PRINCESS DIANA’S DEATH
The death in 1997 of Princess Diana, the divorced wife of Elizabeth’s eldest son Charles, inflicted even more damage on the family’s public prestige.
It was the only occasion during her reign when there was any serious suggestion that the monarchy’s days might be numbered. The period was famously captured in the 2006 Oscar-winning film “The Queen”, when Elizabeth was portrayed as earnest but misunderstood.
But while her children and other royals at times blundered in and out of tabloid headlines with marital woes and public indiscretions, Elizabeth’s own behaviour remained above reproach.
“It’s not that she’s never put a foot wrong, it’s more positive than that – she understands the British people,” said Professor Vernon Bogdanor, an expert in British constitutional history.
The main criticism levelled against her was that she was too solemn, distant and aloof.
Critics said the only time she had shown real emotion in public was when the royals bid a tearful farewell to their magnificent yacht Britannia, months after her stoical response to Diana’s death.
But according to those who worked closely with her, in private she was not the detached public figure most saw, but perceptive, funny, and keenly aware of the nation’s mood.
LESS FORMALITY
In the last 20 years, backed by a far more professional and sophisticated media operation, there was still pomp and pageantry, but less formality around the queen and her family.
Millions turned out for celebrations to mark her 50th, 60th and 70th years on the throne, while her starring role in a spoof James Bond film became the highlight of the opening ceremony of the 2012 London Olympic Games.
In the short sequence she greeted Bond actor Daniel Craig at Buckingham Palace, uttering just four words before visual effects showed her apparently joining him on a helicopter and parachuting into the stadium.
A decade later at the start of a Platinum Jubilee pop concert, she again won huge plaudits for a pre-recorded comic sketch with Paddington Bear, in which she told the famous fictional character that she always kept his favourite snack – a marmalade sandwich – in her ever-present handbag.
The queen was said to crack jokes with world leaders, enjoy an easy familiarity with long-serving Commonwealth heads of government, and relish a wager on race horses. Racing was an enduring passion.
She was also accompanied for most of her reign by her corgi dogs, which earned a reputation for snapping at the heels of royal retainers and were descended from the dog called Susan she received as an 18th birthday gift from her parents.
“What we actually know about the queen is remarkably little,” said Matthew Dennison, a biographer of Elizabeth.
“We know that she enjoys racing. We know that she likes corgis. We know that she prefers blankets and sheets to duvets. But beyond that, we know almost nothing about her.”
During World War Two she learned to be a driver and a mechanic while serving in the women’s Auxiliary Territorial Service.
Her love of the outdoors and of animals was well documented and commentators said she came across as more at home in tweeds than tiaras.
“I do rather begrudge some of the hours that I have to do instead of being outdoors,” she once said.
Prince William’s wife Kate said that behind closed doors, the queen eschewed royal pomp.
“You would expect a lot of grandeur and a lot of fuss… but actually what really resonates with me is her love for simple things, the lack of fuss and I think that’s a special quality to have,” Kate told a TV documentary to mark Elizabeth’s 90th birthday.
CORONATION
Elizabeth became queen in 1952 and was crowned on June 2, 1953 in a televised ceremony in Westminster Abbey, becoming the first queen in her own right since Queen Victoria and the 40th monarch in a royal line that traces its origin back to William the Conqueror in 1066.
“Horrible,” she said of the carriage ride which took her from Buckingham Palace to the Abbey. “It’s only sprung on leather, not very comfortable.”
In September 2015, she overtook Victoria to become the country’s longest ever reigning monarch, an achievement to which she said she had never aspired, and the following year there were more celebrations for her 90th birthday.
She ascended the throne at the same age as Elizabeth I, but while the first Elizabeth saw her country attain the status of an important trading nation in the 16th century, her namesake presided over a Britain slipping from its position as a world leader in industry and technology.
As Britain’s place shifted, so the queen came to stand for unity, and the pomp around her family – with gilded carriages and spectacular royal weddings – a source of national pride for many.
Prince William’s marriage in 2011 to commoner Kate Middleton, which saw more than a million people throng London’s streets and drew an estimated two billion global viewers, was testament to that.
Opinion polls showed the country still largely believed in the hereditary monarch as head of state.
However, with her death, the monarchy’s future is set to face scrutiny like never before. Some commentators say the British public will not feel as strongly towards Charles, and polls suggest he is far less popular.
The decision of Prince Harry, William’s younger brother, and his American wife Meghan, a former actress, to give up their royal roles has also robbed the institution of two of its most popular global figures, while their accusations of racism against the institution linger.
The U.S. sex abuse civil lawsuit against second son Prince Andrew, which he paid to settle, has also inflicted damage on the family’s reputation. Andrew did not admit any wrongdoing in the case. He was not accused of criminal wrongdoing.
FAMILY LIFE AND PUBLIC DUTY
At her side for nearly all her reign was her husband, who she credited with being her “strength and stay”.
“I was blessed that in Prince Philip I had a partner willing to carry out the role of consort and unselfishly make the sacrifices that go with it,” she said in February 2022 when she marked 70 years on the throne.
The couple had four children: Charles born in 1948, Anne in 1950, Andrew in 1960 and Edward in 1964.
She had eight grandchildren and 12 great-grandchildren.
During much of her reign she was often upstaged for attention by three flamboyant women – her popular mother, Elizabeth the Queen Mother, her younger sister Margaret and later Princess Diana.
But the personal sorrow of losing her mother and sister – who died within weeks of each other in her Golden Jubilee year of 2002 – helped the queen establish her own position, leaving her the undisputed matriarchal figure of the nation.
Her working life included thousands of official engagements, varying from trips to schools and hospitals, to the grand ceremonies of state visits and national occasions.
She was famous for wearing brightly coloured outfits with a matching hat on royal engagements, to ensure she stood out from the crowds on her many “walkabouts”.
“I have to be seen to be believed,” she is said to have quipped.
She also took her religious duties as Supreme Governor of the Church of England very seriously, saying in 2012 the established Church was “commonly under-appreciated”.
She travelled further than any previous monarch, undertaking more than 250 overseas visits to well over 100 countries. She was renowned for her stamina and began cutting back on a once hectic timetable of foreign tours only as she moved into her 80s.
Even in her 90s she regularly carried out engagements. On one such event at the age of 93, she told officials she was still capable of planting a tree before shovelling the soil into the hole, and it was another two years after that before she needed to use a walking stick in public.
When she was hospitalised in March 2013 with symptoms of gastroenteritis, it was the first time she had needed hospital treatment in a decade.
It was not until October 2021 that she next spent a night in hospital, and she doggedly carried on with light duties even after testing positive for COVID in February the following year.
Her enduring importance was demonstrated at the start of the pandemic in 2020. With an anxious nation under a rigorous lockdown, the government turned to the queen to provide reassurance in a televised broadcast. Usually she gave such addresses only in her annual Christmas broadcast.
The queen had a few notable security scares. In 1981, a British youth fired blank shots near her during the military Trooping the Colour ceremony. Her horse shied but she was unhurt.
The same year, a “severely disturbed” teenager tried to assassinate the monarch while she was on a visit to New Zealand but he missed with his rifle shot.
In July 1982, an unemployed labourer called Michael Fagan made his way into her Buckingham Palace bedroom. He spoke briefly to Elizabeth, who was in her nightclothes, before being hauled off by security guards.
THE FUTURE
“It has been said that ‘the art of progress is to preserve order amid change and change amid order’, and in this the queen is unparalleled,” then-Prime Minister David Cameron said in a speech to parliament in 2012.
“She has never shut the door on the future; instead, she has led the way through it.”
The queen’s family and Britain’s political elite spoke in admiration of her ability to adapt without losing any of the dignity of her role.
The future success of the monarchy could depend on how much Britons admire the next person on the throne.
“Monarchy is only as good as the people doing the job,” said royal biographer Robert Lacey, who was historical consultant to the Netflix drama “The Crown”.
“We are essentially, when you look at the structure and the way the country runs, a republic with this glorious bauble that we all enjoy on top. And we can always unscrew the bauble any time we want.”
Elizabeth herself set out her life’s goal at an early age.
“I declare before you all,” she said in a 21st birthday broadcast, “that my whole life, whether it be long or short, shall be devoted to your service and the service of our great imperial family.”
Chicago, IL/Kolkata: World-renowned human rights activist Dr Gregory Stanton once again stated that India is preparing for ‘genocidal massacres’ of 200 million Muslims.
Dr Gregory Stanton was speaking at a panel discussion organized by the Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC) at the Islamic Society of North America’s (ISNA) annual convention.
The panel was also attended by senior investigative journalist turned author Niranjan Takle. Takle book- Who Killed Judge Loya, based on his investigative work got published recently. And Ajit Sahi, Advocacy Director of IAMC.
“India has all of the preparatory stages for more genocidal massacres,” Dr Stanton said at ISNA’s 59th convention in Chicago, citing the discriminatory Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), the dehumanization of Muslims through hate speech, and the “non-prosecution of lynchings and other crimes committed by Hindus against Muslims.”
“Persecution of Muslims is reflected in termination of Kashmir’s autonomy. Much Muslim property has been expropriated or destroyed, and Muslims have been displaced into enclaves,” Dr Stanton added.
“A climate of impunity reigns, in which eyewitnesses to mass murders of their own families have been terrorized into recanting testimony, and the killers have been acquitted.”
He warned about the influence of the Hindu supremacist paramilitary group Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), which is the parent ideologue of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), saying that the RSS now pushes its violent supremacist ideology in, “schools, trade unions, cultural societies, and religious groups all over India.”
“[The RSS also] runs camps of the Bajrang Dal, where young Hindu boys are taught the ideology of Hindutva and where hatred and fear of Muslims are openly advocated. These camps receive large financial contributions from Indians abroad, especially through the India Development and Relief Fund,” said Dr Stanton.
He further warned that the BJP has already played a role in instigating violent and genocidal violence in the past, especially during the Gujarat pogrom of 2002, and that, “preparation for more massacres has already begun.”
“The killers clearly expressed their genocidal intent in their slogans: ‘Kill them all, destroy their society;’ ‘finish off all Muslims;’ ‘our people were not spared by them, don’t have mercy,’” he quoted. “Police officials said that BJP party officials instigated the mobs. ‘This was not a riot,’ said one senior police official. ‘It was a state-sponsored pogrom.’”
Takle stated that the BJP is implementing ideas put forth by the founders of the Hindutva ideology, including the weaponization of rape and cow vigilantism to spread fear among Indian Muslims.
Takle further raised the issue of Hindu extremism rising outside of India, naming several US-based organizations as channels for spreading the ideology.
“This Hindutva ideology I know for sure has spread across the world through several organizations like Vishwa Hindu Parishad, Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh، and they are trying to influence policies of foreign countries right now, apart from spreading hatred because it’s only hatred on which they can survive,” he said.
“I am a Hindu myself. This fight is against Hindutva. Hindutva is bigotry,” pointed out Ajit Sahi. “If Indian democracy goes down, it will have a terrible effect around the world, including the United States.”
Ranchi: In the battle of perception, Hemant Soren-led United Progressive Alliance defeated the opposition or more precisely Bharatiya Janata Party in Jharkhand on Monday.
A trust vote, which was called by the ruling party itself given the confusion engulfing the state for a fortnight now over the issue of chief minister Hemant Soren’s disqualification. UPA got 48 votes, including endorsement from CPI-ML and an independent MLA as well. The majority mark is 41 in the Jharkhand assembly. BJP and Ajsu walked out of the assembly during the voting.
Last month, the state election commission, which was hearing the case of Hemant Soren’s office of profit, sent its report to Governor Ramesh Bais. However, the governor is yet to make the report public, while media reports suggest that Soren has been disqualified.
But today, Hemant Soren gave a fiery speech inside the assembly. There seemed no fear in him concerning the uncertain future of his government,
The chief minister not only attacked the BJP and the Governor for creating confusion and political crisis in the state, but also mentioned his government’s future course of action.
“Since August 25, an environment of uncertainity has been created by the Election commission, Governor. When the UPA went to meet the Gov, he accepted that he had received the letter. And now he has moved from the backdoor to Delhi. A sense of insecurity, confusion has been created,” Soren said.
The tribal chief minister made his intent clear and stated, “Isliye Hum Ye Batana Chahte Hain Ki Hum Sadan Ke Andar Mazboot Hain Aur Bahar Bhi. Ye Shibu Soren Ka Beta Hai, Andolankari Ka Beta Hai, Aapse Kabhi Darega Nahi (That is why we want to show that we are strong in or outside the assembly. I am a son of Shibu Soren, son of a revolutionary, who will not fear from you).”
He lashed out at the BJP for doing politics of hate and division, “Aaj Kahin Bhi Hindu-Muslim Ki Ladayi Hoti Hai, Jahan Hoti Hai, Ye Pahunch Jaate Hain. Is Sarkar Mein Chahe Koi Bhi Ho Usko Marne Ke Liye Nahi Chor Sakte (Today, wherever Hindu-Muslim conflicts take place, they reach there. But in our government, we do not let people die, whoever they are).”
Hemant Soren with Ramgarh MLA Mamata Devi’s child after trust vote | Courtesy: Twitter/HemantSorenJMM
Soren did not miss the opportunity to point out that the two BJP legislators—Babulal Marandi and Samri Lal are also facing a disqualification issue which will be decided by the speaker.
“They (centre government) are drunk in power, and they think they can do anything. They talk about my membership. But see (BJP’s) Samri Lal Ji, who has got a fake certificate from another state. See Babulal Marandi, even chameleons do not change colour as many times as he does colour (Hinting at the change of party by Marandi).”
Soren also attacked RSS, “Inki Sakhao Mei Adivasi, Dalit, Alpsankhyak Ko Kaise Bewakoof Banaya Jaaye Inki Training Hoti Hai. Their (BJP) real face is very dangerous. It is not easy to understand. But the ruling alliance understands. We will crush the ideology of the BJP.”
“In the country, 90 percent of the drug supply comes through Adani’s port, but there is no one to question about it. And here the ED is unleashed.”
And then Soren said, “I want to tell everyone that the government will soon announce its decision on the 1932 year cut-off year domicile policy.”
Earlier, JMM MLA Sudivya Sonu in his speech pointed to the party’s plan of action in near future, “When we will make domicile policy, with the cut-off year 1932, they (BJP) won’t be able to do anything. If they will play with fire, they will become ashes, their politics will end.”
After winning the trust vote, Sonu told eNewsroom, “For the last 15 days, an environment was created to show that the government has no support from its alliance as well as legislators. Every day one or other rumour was being spread. But with this win, we not just giving a message to BJP but also to the Governor also that Hemant Soren government has got a comfortable majority.”
However, BJP’s Neelkanth Munda in his speech said that Jharkhand’s people believe that the government is in fear. “None from the Opposition, judiciary or the governor have asked for a trust vote. By bringing a no-confidence motion, the government shows that they have no faith in their own MLAs,” he said.
Congress’ Pradeep Yadav mentioned, “Four byelections happened in Jharkhand, but the people threw BJP away. So they want to buy the MLAs and create confusion. This is BJP’s old tactic. In 2014, BJP bought then Jharkhand Vikash Morcha’s six MLAs Babulal Marandi (now with BJP) party’s six MLAs.”
Vinod Singh of CPI-ML said that Jharkhand has a chequered history, horse trading always happened. And the centre with its full might, trying to destabilise the government.
The trust vote of Soren government was being watched from several quarters. Trinamool Congress’s MP Mahua Moitra took a jibe at BJP MP Nishikant Dubey after the voting concluded. Dubey had claimed that the Soren government will not see the light of September.
“Some advice for BJP- stop relying on a certain Jharkhand MP to deliver- he doesn’t even succeed in making me sit down in the Lok Sabha let alone bring down an elected government (sic).”
Dubey was also the center of criticism by Jharkhand UPA leaders as he not only predicted the fall of the Soren government by August but also forecasted that is in the EC’s report that has been submitted to the governor.
The Godda MP was also in news recently for the wrong reasons, as he has been slapped with FIR by the Deoghar administration for entering ATC (Air Traffic Control) tower at Deoghar airport forcefully.
रामलीला मैदान में कांग्रेस की रैली थी। महंगाई के ख़िलाफ़ हल्ला बोल रैली। इस नाम से चैनलों में प्रोग्राम चलते हैं मगर हल्ला बोलने के नाम से होने वाली रैली कवर न हों, इसके लिए पहले से ही गोदी पत्रकार अफ़वाहें उड़ा रहे थे कि कांग्रेस की रैली को लेकर ट्विट करने वाले पत्रकारों को पैसे दिए गए हैं। रैली से पहले ही कुछ पत्रकारों ने इस तरह के ट्विट कर दिए। गोदी पत्रकारों को अच्छी तरह पता है कि विपक्ष को कवरेज नहीं मिलेगा। अख़बारों में भी भीतर के पन्ने पर कहीं होगा और राहुल गांधी ने मीडिया को लेकर जो कहा है, वह तो छपने से रहा। वैसे आप कल का अख़बार देख लीजिएगा और आज चैनलों को देख लीजिएगा। कितना छपता है, कितना दिखता है। बच गया सोशल मीडिया तो वहाँ भी कवर न हो इसके लिए पहले से ही पत्रकारों को ताना मार कर डराया जाने लगा। जो निर्लज्जता से गोदी मीडिया बने हुए हैं वो कांग्रेस की रैली पर ट्विट करने वालों को निष्पक्षता के नाम पर ताना मार रहे हैं। जो ख़ुद सत्ता पक्ष में समाहित हो चुका है, वह निष्पक्षता पर ताना तो मारेगा ही। मोहल्ले के बदमाश लोग कभी नहीं चाहते कि पढ़ने वाले शरीफ़ छात्र की घर-घर तारीफ़ हो।
रामलीला मैदान में राहुल गांधी ने मीडिया को लेकर विस्तार से बात की। राहुल ने कहा कि देश में मीडिया नहीं है। मीडिया अब केवल दो उद्योगपतियों के हाथ में चला गया है। इन दो उद्योगपतियों का सारा मीडिया मोदी जी के लिए काम करता है और मोदी जी इन दो उद्योगपतियों के लिए काम करते हैं। मीडिया अब जनता की आवाज़ नहीं उठाता। विपक्ष की आवाज़ नहीं दिखाता। इसलिए कांग्रेस और विपक्ष को जनता के बीच जाना होगा। कई महीनों से राहुल के हर भाषण के केंद्र में मीडिया होता है। बिना मीडिया को उजागर किए उनका कोई भाषण पूरा नहीं होता है। उन्हें इस बारे में और विस्तार से बात करना चाहिए। कार्यकर्ताओं को बताना चाहिए कि उन्हें गोदी मीडिया से लड़ने के लिए क्या करना चाहिए। उसके कार्यक्रम क्या होने चाहिए। अख़बारों और चैनलों को लेकर कैसे जनता के बीच जाना चाहिए। उनका भाषण मुद्दों को रेखांकित तो करता है मगर विस्तार नहीं देता। जिस तरह से महंगाई का डिटेल दिया उसी तरह राहुल गांधी को अब नाम लेकर बोलना होगा, अपने अध्ययन के साथ बोलना होगा तभी उनके कार्यकर्ता को पता चलेगा कि जनता को क्या बताना है। विपक्ष गोदी मीडिया की आलोचना तो कर रहा है मगर अभी भी उसकी आलोचना में तैयारी की कमी दिखती है। यह एक असंभव लड़ाई है और इसकी तैयारी आधे-अधूरे तरीक़े से नहीं की जा सकती है।
मैं हमेशा से मानता रहा हूँ कि जब तक विपक्ष जनता के बीच गोदी मीडिया को उजागर नहीं करेगा, लोकतंत्र की कोई भी लड़ाई पास टाइम है। हर नागरिक को इस गोदी मीडिया से लड़ना पड़ेगा। कांग्रेस के लिए नहीं, अपने लिए। गोदी मीडिया से लड़ाई बीजेपी के ख़िलाफ़ लड़ाई नहीं है। गोदी मीडिया से लड़ाई नागरिकों के आज़ाद अस्तित्व और स्वाभिमान के लिए है। उसे अपने लिए गोदी मीडिया से लड़ना होगा और विपक्ष को जनता की मदद करनी होगी। जनता को अंदाज़ा नहीं है कि उस पर किस तरह का गोला गिरने वाला है। उसकी चीख पुकार उसके भीतर ही दब कर रह जाएगी।
इस समय जनता मीडिया से लड़ रही है मगर पूरी तैयारी के साथ नहीं। कभी वह अपने मुद्दों को लेकर ट्विटर पर ट्रेंड कराती है तो कभी लोकल चैनल के पास जाती है। वहाँ कवर नहीं होता है तो राष्ट्रीय चैनलों के पास जाती है। अख़बार भीतर के पन्नों पर जनता की ख़बरें छाप देते हैं। जनता महसूस कर रही है लेकिन वह गोदी मीडिया के ख़तरों को ठीक से नहीं समझ रही है। अख़बारों और चैनलों से थक-हार कर आप यू-ट्यूबर के पास जाते हैं। एक दिन वहाँ भी दरवाज़े बंद होने वाले हैं बल्कि बंद हो रहे हैं। सूचनाएँ कम हैं। विश्लेषण ही ज़्यादा है।
गोदी मीडिया से लड़ने में राहुल गांधी ने देर कर दी लेकिन वे अब गोदी मीडिया के ख़िलाफ़ बोलने लगे हैं। 2014 के पहले मीडिया विपक्ष की तरफ़ से सरकार से सवाल करता था,आज मीडिया ने विपक्ष को ही ग़ायब कर दिया है। तब बीजेपी की प्रेस कांफ्रेंस कांग्रेस से पहले कवर की जाती थी और बीजेपी के सवाल पर कांग्रेस से जवाब माँगा जाता था। आज कांग्रेस की बात रखने पर गोदी पत्रकार पत्रकारों को टार्गेट कर रहे हैं।
याद रखना चाहिए। विपक्ष का मतलब कांग्रेस और राजद नहीं होता है। विपक्ष का मतलब होता है जनता। जनता को झूठ और भय के आधार पर डराया जा रहा है। जनता हर बार पहले से ज़्यादा पीछे हट रही है जब जनता ही नहीं बचेगी तो देश कैसे बचेगा। अंग्रेज़ों के शासन में जनता ग़ुलाम थी, इसलिए देश नहीं था। तब जनता ने तय किया कि भारत माता की बेड़ियों को तोड़ देंगे। देश बन गया। जिन्हें लगता है कि वे देश के लिए कुछ करना चाहते हैं। उन सभी को गोदी मीडिया से लड़ना चाहिए। यह सबसे आसान लड़ाई है लेकिन मुश्किल है कि इसके लिए पहले ख़ुद से लड़ना पड़ता है। ख़ुद को आज़ाद कराना पड़ता है, इसीलिए यह उतनी ही मुश्किल लड़ाई भी है।
The battle lines are drawn for a pulsating clash with India and Pakistan both eyeing a strong start to their Super Four campaign in the Asia Cup on Sunday. For cricket fans all over the globe, India-Pakistan contests are much-awaited mega-events. Given their political tensions, however, Indo-Pak games are now played only in ICC tournaments which often means a wait for a few years. But this Asia Cup is a welcome surprise for cricket lovers as the arch-rivals will battle for a second time in a week and later possibly even in the finals of the tournament.
The face-off between Rohit Sharma’s India and Babar Azam’s Pakistan for the second Sunday in a row has aroused huge expectations. After India’s close win against Pakistan in the first match, both teams have upped their performances a notch. India beat Hong Kong easily and Pakistan thumped them by a massive margin, bowling them out for a paltry 38 as they chased 194.
Although India holds the edge after their win in the last encounter, it also implies added pressure, especially after Ravindra Jadeja’s injury which is a big blow for Team India. Jadeja had played a crucial role in India’s win in both their group stage games. In the game against Pakistan, Jadeja’s knock of 35 and his vital partnerships with Surya Kumar Yadav and Hardik Pandya helped the Men in Blue get over the line in a tense encounter. In the clash against Hong Kong, Jadeja bowled a tight spell where he gave just 15 runs in four overs and ensured that the associate nation was trounced.
Jadeja’s absence also implies a major selection headache for Team India. While Axar Patel has been drafted into the squad, who will play in the final XI is an open question. Veteran off-spinner Ashwin and Deepak Hooda with their all-round skills are other options. Given his big hitting and effective bowling ability, Hooda could well be a great choice. But filling the void left by Jadeja’s injury is a tricky task.
If Jadeja’s absence is a setback, King Kohli’s comeback is a cause for jubilation in the Indian camp. In his vital 35-run knock against Pakistan, Virat had shown signs of regaining his touch. His superb undefeated 50 in the game with Hong Kong is a clear signal that Kohli is on the verge of a return to his high-scoring self that makes him one of the all-time Greats in the game.
Besides Kohli’s welcome return to form, KL Rahul also got a 30-plus score against Hong Kong though he is still far from his best. Also, skipper Rohit looks in good nick though big scores remain elusive for him. Overall, the Top 3 of Team India seem to be getting into their groove and do not seem as vulnerable as they did before the last game against Pakistan.
On the Pakistan side too, the batting has shown signs of recovery. Though captain Babar Azam has failed twice in the Asia Cup, his opening partner Rizwan has excelled in both the games so far. In addition, aggressive southpaw Fakhar Zaman was in great form during his brisk 50. Despite the loss in the India encounter, the 155-run win over Hong Kong is Pakistan’s biggest margin of victory in T20I history and suggests that the momentum and morale are back for Babar’s boys.
Pakistan’s middle order, however, remains a worry. The way they crumbled against India in the first game is a reflection that it may be a weak link for the side. In stark contrast, the middle order is proving to be one of India’s big strengths. If Hardik Pandya’s heroics had pipped Pakistan in the last game, Surya Kant Yadav’s power-packed aggression was astounding in the Hong Kong game. Though Jadeja’s absence is a worry, with Dinesh Kartik and possibly Deepak Hooda in the mix, Team India sure has the batting riches to beat Pakistan.
In the bowling department, however, Pakistan remains a formidable force despite Shaheen’s absence due to injury. ALL their pacers seem to be sharp and are bowling well. From the fiery youngsters, Naseem Shah and Shahnawaz Dahani to the experienced veteran Haris Rauf all seem to be bowling in an aggressive fashion. Significantly, the two spinners, Shadab and leftie Mohammad Nawaz are also at their wily best. The strength of the Pakistani attack was more than obvious in the manner in which they bundled out Hong Kong for just 38.
In contrast, Indian bowling looks a tad less effective. Though Bhuvneshwar Kumar and Arshdeep Singh have been impressive, Avesh Khan’s lack of consistency is a cause of concern. While Hardik’s spells are vital, Jadeja’s absence could weaken the bowling attack.
Overall, the key contest may well revolve around India’s batting might and Pakistan’s bowling armoury. Given the form of both sides and their evenly-matched skills, the game on Sunday promises to be a humdinger. Ultimately, the team that handles pressure better on the day may well be the winners, as in most Indo-Pak blockbusters!
Kolkata: After the remission of 11 convicts in the Bilkis Bano gang rape and murder case on the 75th Independence Day of India, protests have erupted in several parts of India. From national capital Delhi, financial capital Mumbai, Kolkata, Jaipur, Varanasi to Giridih people hit the streets against the release of the rapists and murderers in the Bilkis Bano case.
During Gujarat Riots 2002, at least 14 members of Bilkis Bano’s family were gang raped and murdered. Among them was a 3-year-old daughter of Bilkis who was smashed to the wall, leading to the kid’s death. Bilkis and her mother were gang-raped in front of each other.
But, even after such heinous crimes, the criminals were released on Independence Day this year by the Gujarat government under its remission policy.
Kavita Krishnan, who attended a protest at Jantar Mander, New Delhi said in her speech that it was not remission but a reward for rapists and killers. She mentioned that it has been done to give a message that if you will rape a Muslim woman, you will be saved and rewarded.
The activist who had played a major role during the Nirbhaya agitation, said to Prime Minister Narendra Modi to speak on the Bilkis Bano issue and apologies to the nation.
Earlier, 6000 people across India condemned the remission and demanded Supreme Court to intervene.