Home Blog Page 132

Asansol belt: A repeat of 2016 or 2019 depends on Lefts too

0

Asansol/Kolkata: BJP won’t be able to repeat 2019 results in the Asansol belt in 2021 if TMC and Left Front can retain their bases. TMC bagged five out of seven assembly segments under Asansol parliamentary constituency in 2016. CPM held two. BJP was distant third even two years after its victory in the LS poll in 2014. But the saffron brigade got leads in all seven in 2019 in the aftermath of communal riots in 2018.

The Modi wave did not work in the last assembly election. But the scenario changed after the riots over Ram Navami rallies by BJP-VHP that went through Muslim mohallas while the Sangh DJ boxes disgorged provocative songs and slogans. Competition over Ram politics by some TMC-turned BJP leaders like former mayor Jitendra Tiwari who have stakes among the Hindi-speaking population worsened the situation. TMC, generally seen as a pro-Muslim party, was almost divided along religious lines in the riot-hit Asansol North and Raniganj. Some leaders from both communities instigated their coreligionists to violence. 

Consequently, BJP got a good lead in all seven segments in 2019. The victory margin for Babul Supriyo increased to the tune of around two lakh votes. The saffron party’s vote share crossed 51 percent with a phenomenal hike of around 15 percent. Correspondingly, CPM’s vote share nosedived to 7.8 percent as it lost more than 15 percent votes. Congress was also down to meagre 1.7 percent, poorer by 2.54 percent. TMC stood second by bagging more than 35 percent votes, an increase of around five percent in comparison to its 2014 tally.

left cpm tmc bjp asansol 2018 riots
File picture of Asansol’s 2018 Ram Navami procession | Courtesy: National Herald

Hindi-speaking and working-class voters

The Hindi-speaking working-class population here is generally inclined to vote for BJP, local observers said. But the saffron party is nowhere close to a clean sweep this time. TMC will make a deep cut across the belt and the Left alliance will do the same in some of the seven seats, they pointed out. 

According to a local vernacular journalist who did not wish to be named, TMC has distanced itself from Hindi-speaking voters since the 2014 victory of BJP. “TMC leaders have promoted Bengali-Bihari binary over the years. Hindi-speakers are being treated as outsiders despite having settled here for generations. There is a feeling of discrimination and grievances over Muslim appeasement during and after the last riots,” he said. BJP has already made good use of Mamata Banerjee’s ‘outsider’ tag earlier by calling it an insult to upcountry settlers. 

Nevertheless, Modi’s party won’t be able to make a cakewalk among them. “There is no Modi wave this time. The promise of Sonar Bangla hardly appeals as people know the reality of Sonar UP and Bihar. People across the communities are angry with fuel price hikes. Further, the inclusion of coal, sand and iron scrap mafias including the TMC deserters among the BJP candidates have stoked the infights,” the middle-aged scribe added.

Sudipta Bose, an independent trade union activist who works among the contract laborers of different backgrounds in Eastern Coal Field collieries in Raniganj-Dishergarh-Pandaveswar belt, said Mamata would be able to attract a section of Hindi-speaking workers by dint of her popular cash benefit schemes et al. 

“The TMC government did not discriminate in providing food to the poor during the lockdown months. Hindi-speaking students also got cycles and funds under Kanyashree. They have been listed in Swasthya Sathi health scheme also,” she observed. “Religious politics has good traction among the Hindi-speaking. But the appeal of the Hindutva ideology is much less than a pragmatic desire to see the change of guard after experiencing TMC hooliganism and corruption.” 

left cpm tmc bjp asansol 2018 riots working class Hindi-speaking industrial zone
A group of miners are at work in a mine in Raniganj | Courtesy: BBC/Arindam MUkherjee

The appeal of old Left politics of class unity above religion and language divides has nosedived following the closures of big public and private sector factories and the consequent devastation in socio-economic life in labor colonies around them. The huge surge in sectarian identity politics has been coterminous with the rise of unorganised sectors, a sharp reduction in the rank of regular factory hands, and fragmentation of workforce into small permanent staff and army of casual-contract laborers as they are made to compete over shrinking wages as well as living space, above all, job security. 

“Workers get united over their bread and butter issues. But unionised do not see non-unionised and contract labor at par when their interests clash. Moreover, religious-caste-linguistic divides are rampant now in their social-political consciousness with the Hindu-Muslim narrative being a dominant one. Even Dalit and tribal hands are not free from it,” Sudipta observed.  

The closure of the iconic Burn Standard and Hindustan Cables by the Narendra Modi government in the same year did not affect the voting pattern. Workers felt that the units, though sick for years, could have been revived with proper technology up-gradation and marketing. They are yet to receive their full dues.

Vote boycott

The wagon colony residents around Burn Standard have refused to vacate their quarters till the full payment. In retaliation, the factory authorities had stopped water and electricity supply. The supply has been partially restored at the intervention of the district administration. In desperation, the residents have called for a vote boycott this time, Rabin Pramanik, a young local scribe said.

“But the plight of the workers’ families of closed units and increasing privatisation of public sector companies including banks may affect some unionised labor, government employees and educated middle class only. A good section of Bengali and Hindi-speaking scheduled castes and tribal voters have been swayed by the religious affinities,” Pramanik observed. 

Recalling the 2018 riots in Raniganj that had witnessed massive vandalism, CPM corporator Arij Jalees there said that BJP-VHP had used mainly Hindi-speaking Dalits against Muslims. The saffron brigade has gained ground among the Left support base in the slums dominated by lower castes and tribes at the outskirts, more since 2016. Sudipta saw a much larger pattern in it. “Dalit youths who are either jobless or poorly paid workers in unorganised sectors are being increasingly criminalised by BJP moneybags in Asansol-Ranigani-Durgapur industrial zone to use them in communal violence and anti-trade union politics.” 

(To be continued…)

Amid protests in Bangladesh against PM Modi’s visit, activist writes to EC not to allow PM’s Bangladesh visit to be telecast on Bengal’s voting day

0

Kolkata: Transparency activist Saket Gokhale has filed a representation affidavit with the Election Commission of India regarding Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Orakandi in Bangladesh.

On March 26 and 27, PM Modi will be in Bangladesh as State Guest. While on his first day of the tour, the first foreign country visit by the Indian PM after lockdown forced by Covid-19, Modi will attend Bangladesh’s 50th Foundation day functions. On his second day he will go to Orakandi.

Orakandi city has a shrine for the Matua community that influences several seats in Bengal.

Saket Gokhle said, “Modi is making this two day visit 200 km outside Dhaka just for campaigning on foreign soil targeting the Matua community in Bengal.”

He also mentioned that ironically and diabolically Modi is making this visit on 27 March i.e. the 1st day of Phase 1 polling in Bengal.

BBC in its report on March 21 mentioned that students are protesting in Dhaka demanding that the Bangladesh government led by Sheikh Hasina should not invite Modi for country’s foundation year celebrations.

pm modi's bangladesh visit matua bengal elections Matuas Orakandi Saket Gokhale

Through his representation affidavit, Saket has demanded that the Election Commission should;

1. Vet an advance copy of Modi’s speech to be delivered at Orakandi in Bangladesh

2. Require all TV media to broadcast Modi’s program at Orakandi only after the close of polling i.e. 6 pm

3. Restrain BJP from using this alleged state visit of PM Modi for election campaigning.

The Matuas are a close-knit group in Bengal belonging to the scheduled caste community, who migrated from Bangladesh during and after Partition.

The Matuas have a significant presence in four parliamentary seats here, making them one of the biggest vote banks in the state. Although no official count exists, it is estimated that there are about one crore Matua voters.

Matuas, mostly who have migrated to India post 90’s have yet to get Indian Citizenship and BJP had raised this issue just before the Lok Sabha polls in 2019. It paid well to the saffron brigade and for the first time, they won 18 out of 42 seats from Bengal.

However, after amending India’s citizenship law (CAA), the Modi government has not been able to frame rules which has irked Matua voters.

The Wire reported that Modi’s visit to Orakandi during the Bangladesh visit is an attempt at wooing the Matua voters in India.

“It is unfortunate that PM Modi is using foreign soil for election purpose. We are also going to write to Election Commission about it. And as far as Matua community is concerned they are slipping out of the hands of BJP”, Trinamool Congress MP Saugata Roy told eNewsroom.

Asansol: Will voters cross communal divides to reflect on real issues of their daily lives?

0

Asansol: Politics of communal polarisation has helped Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to win Asansol parliamentary constituency for successive two terms in 2014 and 2919. Will it be able to wrest the seven assembly segments from its friend-turned-foe Trinamool Congress (TMC) and CPM in 2021 state polls? Though TMC won five and CPM retained two in 2016, the tri-corner Bengal poll this time is likely to see changes. Notwithstanding BJP’s lead in all the seven seats in 2019, local factors including inner-party feuds in both Narendra Modi and Mamata Banerjee camps are likely to impact the outcome, locals say.

Changing economy and politics in the industry zone

Asansol is the headquarters of Paschim Bardhaman district. It is one of the major industrial zones of West Bengal, though, it has retained only a shadow of its former glory. Known as mini India, the Hindu majority here is divided mainly between Bengalis and Hindi-speaking upcountry settlers (around 40 percent) while Muslims (approx 21 percent) are dominated by Urdu-speaking people known as Biharis. North Indian upper castes and Marwaris dominate business here while scheduled castes (28 percent) dominate the slums and unorganised workforce in all the towns.

Tribals (approx. 7 percent) reside in outlying areas remanding the rural landscape before the British Raj turned the belt close to Bihar and Jharkhand into a colliery cum heavy industry hub as well as a railway junction. Sikhs and Christians have also been a small but important part of the social mosaic since the days of early settlers in the 19th century. 

Narendra Modi waves helped Babul Supriyo, a singer turned political rookie to sail through successfully in 2014. But his increased margin in 2019 was largely attributed to the communal polarisation following a series of communal violence in 2018 March over Ramnavami processions, mainly in Asansol north and Raniganj. 

asansol communal divide bengal elections bjp tmc cpm
File picture of Asansol-Raniganj riots 2018. Affected women from both Hindu-Muslim families had narrated their plights together. Credit: Swatilekha Mondol

The closure and sickness of much big public and private sector units for various economic-political reasons have turned the zone into a veritable graveyard of industries since the eighties. CPM held its citadels during three decades of Left Front rule. But the writing on the wall was clear as the gradual decline of organised industry, traditional labor economy and trade union movements made the ground fertile for social fragmentation and divisive politics, particularly after the demolition of Babri Mosque. 

The nexus of land mafias-big money- corrupt politicians and police who have been grabbing factory lands has played on the fight for increasingly scarce livelihood and living space among the toilers and the jobless youth. Illegal mining in this area under the Eastern coalfield region has furthered mafia control over the economy and politics here at the cost of society and nature. The mafia machination over competitive identity politics over religion, languages, places of origin et al has blossomed fully now with the increasing saffron offensive in Bengal.

The BJP-VHP-Bajrang Dal penetration in this zone has been spearheaded mainly by Marwari businessmen who have used Hindu lower castes, particularly Hindi-speaking poor Dalits as foot soldiers in violence against neighboring Urdu- speaking, highly ghettoised but relatively better off Muslims.

asansol communal divide bengal elections bjp tmc cpm
A gutted home in Raniganj after riots in 2018 | Credit: Swatilekha Mondol

After Mamata Banerjee unseated the LF in 2011, the TMC brand of identity cum vote-bank politics has only facilitated the surge of Hindutva forces in Asansol and elsewhere. According to local observers, Mamata had first courted the conservative Muslim clergy. The latter brought out huge rallies on the day of Milad-Un-Nabi or celebration of the birthday of prophet Muhammad as well as on Muharram day to assert their strength in response to BJP-VHP’s increasingly provocative Ram Navami shows. Mamata’s men later tried to grab a share of the Ram cake by organising parallel Ram Navami rallies as well as Bajrangvali and Ganesha pujas to win over Hindi-speaking Hindus. 

2018 riots

The dance of death and destruction in March 2018, mainly in Asansol North (AN) and neighbouring Raniganj, took place in the backdrop of this mutually polarizing politics. Both Hindu and Muslim elders in the slums of AN Rail Par area (dubbed as mini Pakistan by the Sangh Parivar) whom I had met after the mayhem, recalled wistfully how they had taken parts both in Muharram and Durga Puja-Dussehra processions earlier. Similar refrains were heard in Ronai on the way to Raniganj where people across the faith line thronged a Mazar. At least four persons lost their lives in the violence including a teenager and a woman. All of them were poor. 

The cry of the women across the religious divide at the slums of Raniganj’s Rajabadh-Hatkhola area still haunts this correspondent. Their dilapidated homes were vandalised and looted by avenging youth of both sides, politically aligned to BJP-VHP and TMC. Both BJP MP Babul Supriyo and TMC mayor cum Pandebewar MLA, Jitendra Tiwari instigated competitive violence. Babul’s communal campaigns online shocked even his Bengali fans. 

https://www.facebook.com/enewsroom.in/videos/163175828872101

Muslims are rooting for TMC

A revisit to Asansol North a few days back makes it evident that minorities mostly favour Mamata Banerjee. Imdadul Rashidi, the middle-aged imam of Noorani mosque off the Ok road in the railpar area was a voice of sanity amid the ugly communal frenzy in 2018 even after he had lost his teenage son. The boy became a victim of the cycle of mutual killings and mayhem. But the bereaved father refused to stoke the fire at his son’s janaza and called for peace and amity. His message saved the situation in Asansol and adjoining areas including Jharkhand. The imam and his clan hailed from the neighbouring state. 

Last time he declined to speak in clear political terms. But Modi 2 government’s majoritarian moves and BJP’s aggressive drive to bag Bengal have changed his mood. Now he stands for Mamata. 

“Her government has worked for common people, both Muslims and Hindus, the best in the last 50 years in Bengal. So I want it to come back for peace and amity. The beauty of India and Bengal lies in its Ganga-Yamuna tehzeeb. That cherished heritage is being destroyed now. I am sure politics of hatred will be defeated and the culture of love and peace will win,” the imam said.  

Disclosing, he was a Congress supporter but never got involved in active politics till the ground reality changed rapidly. “I still have no hatred against those who had killed my son. I still hope my message for peace and amity has melted their hearts. I know that Ram Navami’s violence was engineered to polarize local people along the communal line. I still meet my Hindu neighbours and don’t hold the community as a whole responsible for my son’s death. But BJP is taking India back towards the time of the partition,” he commented.

Referring to the visit of Sanyukt Kisan Morcha leaders from Delhi borders in Asansol who appealed to Bengal voters not to vote for BJP, the imam supported their demands. “My prayers are with them. Rakesh Tikait had strengthened BJP after the Muzaffarnagar riots. Modi Ji could have used that support for the welfare of the common people. But that didn’t happen.” 

Muslim families in the railpar area echoed the sentiments of imam Rashidi. “Babul Supriyo never visited our areas even after the riots. Mamata didi serves poor people of all religions. Modi Ji has virtually thrown us out of frying pan into the fire. His latest gift is the staggering hikes in fuel prices,” Noor Jahan Khatun, a housewife said. Abdus Samad, a middle-aged private tutor was caustic. Modi Ji will not provide us bread and jobs. At least, he should allow us to live in peace in Bengal,” he said.

( To be continued)

Re-examining a judgment

The judgment of the trial court in the defamation case of MJ Akbar versus Priya Ramani is the first judicial response in India to the MeToo movement, a cause which has made significant, and positive, impact on the handling of professional relationships at the workplace, to ensure sensitivity and safe space for women to share their traumas and encourage healing. Its impact has been recorded as progressively affirmative, with organizations updating the workplace policies on sexual harassment more broadly; including sexual harassment training and renewed regulations to investigate allegations of sexual transgressions.

The movement in India has essentially been a social media driven movement, and at variance with other countries where criminal prosecution was triggered in some high profile cases.

There has been much media comment on the judgment, including for its notable effort to coordinate the broader social movement to the Indian criminal justice system.

The judgment has also invoked Constitutional law extensively. However, very little attention has been drawn to the question of whether its legal reasoning has been sound, especially while invoking the Constitution.

The principal aim of this piece is to highlight gaps in the judgment from the standpoint of established Constitutional principles; rather than to scrutinise the outcome of the judgment. Looked at it through this lens, the judgment seems to have thrown up more questions than answers, which may attract further judicial, Constitutional and jurisprudential scrutiny.

Dignity versus Reputation

The first is over the ‘right to reputation’ versus ‘right to dignity’ debate. One paragraph of the verdict says: “….the right of reputation cannot be protected at the cost of the right of life and dignity of woman as guaranteed in Indian Constitution under Article 21…”

The judgment seems to have clearly given preferential treatment to right to dignity over right to reputation. In the absence of a direct encapsulation of both these rights in the text of any Constitutional provision, the Supreme Court of India has in a catena of judgments included both as a subset of “life and personal liberty” under Article 21. Moreover, the judgment is silent on any judicial precedent or a larger jurisprudential and constitutional principle for placing one subset over the other. In the absence of  settled law,  the judgment is found wanting on what test it has relied upon to choose one over the other.

This point becomes even more significant considering that trial courts are not conferred with the jurisdiction to lay down the law on Constitutional matters. This aspect may, therefore, interest the attention of Constitutional courts.

Last year, a seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court, in a review petition before it in Kantaru Rajeevaru v. Indian Young Lawyers Association and Ors (2020), referred a question to a nine-judge bench to decide, “Which fundamental right takes precedence over the other in such cases where two fundamental rights appear to be competing and conflicting in application?” The case relates to the issue of interplay between the freedom of religion under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution and other fundamental rights, particularly right to equality under Article 14.

The judgment also cited provisions of international legislative framework on protection of right to dignity: Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948, International Labour Organisation (Discrimination and Occupation) Convention 1958, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1966 etc. to drive home the importance of right to dignity.

But it has not taken cognizance of the international framework protecting right to reputation. Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966 recognises ‘respect for the right to reputation of others’ as a restriction on exercise of freedom of expression. Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 protects an individual’s ‘honour and reputation’. Similar provisions are there under the American Convention on Human Rights 1969 and the European Convention on Human Rights 1950.

While efforts of the judgment in amplifying right to dignity are creditable, it would have been much more convincing had the judgment also taken cognizance of international conventions on reputation, and made a reasoned case for its conclusions.

Moving forward, it is important for judicial discourse to comb situations where there may be conflict between fundamental rights inter se generally, and right to reputation versus right to dignity in defamation suits, specifically.

A clearer enunciation of guidelines should be proposed to cater to sexual harassment cases where defamation suits may be seen as standing in the way of victims from narrating their stories or retracting their formal complaints.

Process as punishment

The judgement further observed that “…woman cannot be punished for raising voice against the sex abuse on the pretext of criminal complaint of defamation”. Here, the judgment deserves credit for flagging the sociolegal issue of ‘process as punishment’- a systemic plague affecting the criminal justice system. ‘Process as punishment’ describes the taxing process through which an accused wades through during the criminal trial until adjudication.

The recognition of this malaise and its subsequent invocation to benefit women is welcome. However, its specific application in a case as a ground for judicial decision- making raises interesting questions. Is it suggesting that access to a legal right to defamation cannot be invoked in sexual harassment cases? Or that voices against sexual harassment enjoy immunity from criminal defamation law if they form a part of a broader social movement? Or what situations qualify where recourse to a legal right by an aggrieved party be termed as punishment for accused?

Instead of limiting itself to defamation, the judgment unnecessarily enters into the slippery domain of open questions of constitutional interpretation.

Is Secularism a threat to Traditions of India?

0

India got independence from British colonial rule on 15th August 1947 after a long struggle which was inclusive and had plural dimensions. Foundation of Indian Constitution is Liberty, Equality, Fraternity and Justice. The values of secularism are deeply ingrained all through and particularly in Articles 14, 19, 22, and 25. It gives us freedom of religion, to practice, preach and propagate the same.

Not all Indians were for such plural values which respect diversity. The communal streams immediately attacked the constitution saying it does not reflect the glorious contribution of Indian past, the values given in holy tomes like Manu Smriti. Communal stream was critical of the Constitution and did not accept the tricolor as our national flag. Nearly seven decades down the line those opposing Indian Constitution and its values are rearing their heads from the last few decades. There are top leaders like the Prime Minister Narendra Modi who on one side claim to be Hindu nationalists and on the other level for electoral purposes claim that “We are secular not because the word was added in our Constitution. Secularism is in our blood. We believe in Sarva Pantha Sambhava.”

There is yet another types of leaders like Yogi Adityanath, the Chief Minister of UP who detest this ideology out and out. Recently he stated that secularism was the “biggest threat” to the traditions of India getting recognition on the global stage.” At an earlier occasion he had stated that “The word “secular” is “the biggest lie”, and suggested that the people who propagated it should apologize to the nation, a reference to the Congress party.”

Adityanath who has taken the oath on Indian Constitution has no qualms in denigrating one of its core values. He himself is the Mahant (Chief Priest) of Gorakhnath Math. He is saffron clad like few others in his party.

Let us see how secularism is a threat to traditions of India. India is inherently plural with rich diversity in religious traditions, languages, ethnicities, food habits, dressing pattern, ways of worship etc. In a way the Hindu religion, in whose pretext he is taking secularism to the task itself is so diverse; from the Brahmanical traditions of hierarchy to the Bhakti tradition talking of equality; there is a wide range. Has this diversity hampered the path to recognition of India on the global stage?

The rich contributions of India are recognized all over the World. The contributions of philosophers like Buddha are appreciated in large parts of the World, more particularly South East Asia. During freedom movement Mahatma Gandhi rose like a colossus and based on Indian tradition he propagated non Violence and Satyagriha (invocation to truth). These were the contributions which inspired many great leaders in the World including Martin Luther King (Jr) and Nelson Mandela who followed his path to take their goals towards fruition. Indian philosophy influenced global thinking in multiple ways.

Even though global culture is diverse and learns from each other, the astronomical and mathematical contributions from India made their place in the global knowledge systems. Further the first Prime minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru, gave the unique concept of ‘non alignment’, which was picked up by large sections of the World and many nations joined this unique movement at the peak of its success.

Contrary to what Adityanath is stating; it is precisely due to the secular path which we followed that we could achieve miraculous progress in the first 5-6 decades of our republic in the areas of industrialization, education, irrigation, atomic and space research among others. As such we seem to have stagnated during the last couple of decades as the path of secularism has been denigrated and mocked at. Lately the communal party is gloating that in the last elections nobody dared to utter this word!

There is also criticism that the introduction of this word in 1976 during emergency was uncalled for and so should be done away with. As such the whole constitution is seeped with the values of secularism. While at one level secularism says that the state has no religion, Indian model of secularism respects all religions without being guided by it. Secularism is unique in another way that it respects those communities which are in minority and provides for affirmative, protective clauses for them. These are currently being labeled as ‘appeasement of minorities’ and are being made a rallying point for electoral mobilization of the majority community.

While Adityanath is lamenting against secular plural diverse values and propagates for Hindu Nation, the ideology of the ruling party, he is not alone in that. At the moment multiple articulations are being put forward. One Anant Kumar Hegde the Union minister bluntly stated that BJP is in power as it wants to change the constitution. One earlier Sarsanghchalak K. Sudarshan also put it forward by saying that Indian Constitution is based on Western values and so not suitable for our country. We should bring a Constitution based on Indian Holy books!

Religious nationalists all over the world abhor the secular-plural values they limit their power to impose their own values on society, to create a value system of hierarchy, the overt expression of which comes in the books like Manusmriti. The pre modern structural hierarchies of class, caste and gender are their ideal, be it the Talibans, Muslim Brotherhood (Egypt based communal organization) or those indulging in politics in the name of Buddhism in Sri Lanka and Myanmar.

The plight of Pakistan, where communal forces had been dominant, is there for all of us to see. Neither it could remain united as Islamic nation nor could it make headways in areas of science, education, health and industrialization.

The communal mindset needs to be overcome to focus on the progress of society in the areas of education, health, employment and nutrition rather than celebrating religious festivals at the expense of the state or taking up issues related to temple-mosque and putting to the margins the issues of marginalized sections of society.

Singur: Voters differ on aborted Tata factory but soaring fuel prices and falling rates for locally grown potatoes unite them

0

Singur: Elderly Kakoli Manna and Sameer Kumar Das, neighbours at Mallickpur, a few kilometres away from the ‘Tatar Math’ felt that the Nano car factory could have provided jobs to some unemployed youth including locals. But they admitted that they were not farmers who had sold their land voluntarily or lost it during the hasty and coercive acquisition drive by the Left Front government in 2006.

“We need a balance between industry and agriculture. Unfortunately, this is not happening,” Das, a retired government employee, said. He indicated his earlier preference for the Lefts while being soft on the BJP now. Many CPM loyals had voted for the Hindutva party in the last few polls because of TMC’s corruption and highhanded manner, he said.

“Every party indulges in mandir-masjid politics. I think that Modi is the most courageous prime minister after Indira Gandhi. Some of my friends still prefer BJP in 2021. Others would have voted for the Left-Congress but their alliance with Abbas Siddiqui has made my friends hesitant. Lefts should have waited till 2026 for a comeback on its strength rather than depending on a conservative and upstart Pirzada,” Das said, revealing the dilemma of the LF Hindu voters.

singur voters bengal elections fuel prices potatoes rate farmers
Kakoli Manna | Courtesy: Dalit Camera

Manna, a housewife who runs a grocery shop with her husband, immediately contradicted her neighbour. “It matters little whether Modi is courageous in other fronts or not. But he has made our life miserable by an unprecedented and ever-increasing price of domestic gas as well as petrol-diesel. It has snowballed into an overall price rise. Modi is so insensitive that he does not spare the poor dependent on kerosene. Priced at Rs 45 per litre, our regular customers are not able to buy it. So the kerosene stock at our shop is still unsold making it a bad investment for us,” Manna said.

Das readily agreed but criticised TMC supremo and chief minister Mamata Banerjee for not being ‘vocal enough’ against the price hike. Manna, however, made it clear that she would vote for Mamata. “We have many complaints about civic amenities. But I will still go for her. She has provided food to the poor during the lockdown months. Young students and girls have got cycles and stipends from the government,” she reasoned.

Courtesy: Dalit Camera

https://www.facebook.com/DalitCameraDC/videos/875914652981363

Nayantara Dhara and Purnima Adhikari, both from Gopal Nagar close to ‘Tatar Math’ tried to make a balance between the past and present. “We did not sell our land for the factory. But we would have welcomed it if there was a negotiation with farmers first before the takeover,” elderly Dhara said. Both the women listed better roads and security for women as well as financial assistance to girl students as well as pensions to widows and old persons among the reasons for their support to Mamata.

Not everybody is fortunate enough to sail through the ruling party hierarchy to get the government’s benevolence as the tradition of clientele politics continues in Bengal. Sukhi Malik and her sister-in-law Sushmita from Purushottampur were going to attend the TMC-facilitated farmers’ meeting at Ratanpur as the party leaders had told them. They hoped to get financial assistance to build a home under Indira Awas Yojana by underlining their allegiance to the ruling party.

“We are very poor and can’t afford a latrine at our present place. My mother-in-law does not like my presence in political rallies. However, my father-in-law was a CPM supporter. He knows how things work. So he asks me to attend if it helps to get us the early sanction,” Sakhi said. Her two school-going sons have got cycles under a scheme. They know Modi too runs some schemes for the poor. “We know he often speaks on TV. But we don’t have a TV,” Susmita added.

Potatoes farmers and business worry over the falling price

Singur is part of South Bengal’s potato-producing belt. Farmers and businessmen here are greatly dependent on the state government’s procurement, though there is no proper Mandi system in Bengal. Both local and Calcutta businessmen purchase potatoes from small farmers and store the bags in cold storage to make a better profit after the harvest season is over. But overproduction and falling purchase prices from the government’s end have led to a double whammy for them this year.

Abdul Kadir, a manager of MA Tara cold storage in Singur explained the situation. According to him, bumper production also in UP has made their marketing outside Bengal more difficult. The state government had purchased a 50 kgs bag at the rate of Rs 680 last year. Farmers get half of the price only. Nevertheless, last year’s rate encouraged them and they invested more in potato cultivation this time. The increasing fuel prices and electricity charges have already made paddy farming non-remunerative. But the state government has halved the price this time. Now businessmen are not interested in purchasing from farmers.

Does it not fit into prime minister Modi’s arguments in favour of new farm laws which will allow corporate companies, a la Adani and Ambani groups to buy from farmers directly because of the volatile market situation? Kadir felt otherwise. “In a big country like India, we cannot wish away the army of intermediaries to make room for big corporates. What is the guarantee that the latter will not exploit the farmers more in the name of ensuring a market? Farmers can be helped more if the central and state governments ensure MSP for all major food crops. It will also help common consumers,” he reasoned. This is what the farmers are asking for.

Wife of Tabrez Ansari, whose lynching case was raised at the UN, seeks justice from Jharkhand govt

Ranchi: Jharkhand, which had witnessed around 30 mob lynchings between 2016 and 2020, is again witnessing a rise. Within a week two people got killed by lynching. On March 14, a 27-year-old man was beaten to death in the state capital, Ranchi.

Amid these, Shaishta Perween, wife of Tabrez Ansari, who was beaten to death in June 2019, that led to an uproar all over the country and his issue was raised even at the United Nations, released a video appeal to chief minister Hemant Soren for speedy justice for her late husband.

25-year-old Tabrez was lynched for allegedly stealing a bike. He had got married only two months back, in April. After Tabrez’s killing, Shaishta had a miscarriage and lost her unborn child.

While 13 people were named as accused in the heinous crime, at present only prime accused Pappu Mandal is in jail, the rest all are all out on bail. The case is under-trial at court of 1st Additional Session Judge, Saraikela.

Shaishta Perween’s appeal to CM Soren:

 

“I met chief minister Hemant Soren three times since he came to power in Jharkhand. I had also met ministers Alamgir Alam and Haji Hussain Ansari when he was alive. Hemant Soren and others assured me that justice will be done soon, but it has been more than three months and I have not noticed any progress. I do not know when I will get justice,” Shaishta told eNewsroom.

In the video statement Shaishta mentioned that had people like her got speedy justice such lynching cases would not have taken place again.

When contacted Tabrez’s lawyer Altaf Hussain informed, “On March 12 charges were framed against 13 accused. The next hearing is scheduled for April 12.”

mob lynchings in jharkhand tabrez ansari lynching

In June, Tabrez’s lynching will complete two years. In the absence of fast track court and not hearing of case on day to day basis, it will take few more years to deliver justice.

“There are around forty eyewitnesses in the case. And if the court will give a date in one month’s difference, it will take many more years to complete. I request to the court to hear the case on day to day basis,” added the lawyer.

Meanwhile, Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha, an umbrella body of civil society also tweeted after the Ranchi mob lynching case and regretted that since no system of the time-bound trial has been developed so far, which is why lynching of people is continued in the state. Along with a time-bound trial, the Mahasabha demanded from the Soren government to appoint experienced Public Prosecutors in lynching cases and compensation to victims within a month.

Delhi farmer leaders remember Singur martyrs but Tapasi Malik’s father resents denial of justice

0

Kolkata: The battle for Bengal 2021 has once again catapulted Singur, along with Nandigram as one of the key political flashpoints for all three rival camps; ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC), its main challenger BJP and old adversary CPM-led Left Front (LF) and its alliance partners, Congress and Indian Secular Front (ISF). It is here the last LF government’s land takeover for Tata’s Nano factory in 2006 went horribly wrong and ignited a fierce anti-acquisition agitation that had not only led to violence and deaths but also the fall of three decades-long LF rule and Mamata Banerjee’s rise to the power in 2011.

A revisit to Singur now cannot escape the irony of history as the thousand acres of fertile farmland which was taken over for the factory is now called Tatar Math or Tata’s field even after demolition of the factory shades and its boundary walls. After the SC court has nullified the hasty acquisition, the Mamata government has returned some parts of the land to the farmers for reuse as farmland.

But all the land could not be restored to its original use because of earlier changes made for industrial purposes. So as one travels on a reinforced concrete road through the sprawling landscape, farming on some parts comes into sight. The rest has been left as fallow land with overgrown bushes where snakes have made their home. We met one which was crossing the road.

https://www.facebook.com/enewsroom.in/videos/486900612310497

At one end of the former factory compound, stands village Bajemelia, one of the epicenters of the agitation in 2006-7 and home of its most renowned martyr, Tapasi Malik. The charred body of the young girl who was an enthusiast of movement was found on the ground on December 18, 2006. She had gone there to attend nature’s call at the wee hours. CBI arrested two local CPM leaders, Sruhid Dutta and Debu Malik for alleged rape and murder but they later got bail.

Mamata Banerjee unveiled the bust of Tapasi and Rajkumar Bhul, another martyr who died on September 26, 2006, after she became chief minister in 2011. As we entered Tapasi’s home, we found the TMC flags over and around the busts.

Tapasi’s father was missing at the farmers’ meet

Medha Patkar, a veteran of Singur-Nandigram land wars in 2006-7 paid homage to both at a public meeting a few kilometres away on March 14. The meeting, held under the banner of Kisan Mahapanchayat was addressed by Sanyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM) leaders who had come to urge Bengal voters not to vote for BJP. Speakers recalled the bond between Bengal and Punjab since the days of RasBihari Bose-Subhash Bose and Kartar Singh-Bhagat Singh during India’s freedom struggle.

singur tata factory bengal elections farmers protest Kisan Mahapanchayat farmer leaders
Monoranjan Malik|Picture: eNewsroom

They also tried to connect between Singur-Nandigram agitations and the ongoing farmers’ movement against the Narendra Modi government’s pro-corporate farm laws. “This government is by the companies and for the companies. Vote to punish it so that Modi climbs down from his tower of arrogance and listens to farmers and other common people,” they said.

But Tapasi’s father, Monoranjan Malik was not there, though local TMC satrap and Mamata’s minister, Becharam Manna was supervising the arrangement. Manna has managed to bag party tickets both for Singur, at the cost of sitting MLA, elderly Rabindranath Bhattacharya while fielding his wife, Karobi in adjoining Haripal to replace him. Sulking, retired teacher Bhattacharya, known as Mastermoshi has joined BJP and got the nomination for Singur.

Monoranjan is also opposed to Manna but has not switched sides. Sitting at his two-storied home, he said he was not invited to the farmers’ rally at Ratanpur. “Medha ji knew me and came to my home. But I was not informed this time. Who bothers for my slain daughter and me?” the middle-aged said ruefully. He has grievances against Mamata too. “I am still with Didi. But neither Tapasi nor I have got any justice. Both of us were used by the party in its campaign till Didi came to power. Now she gives tickets to TV serial players but ignores people like us,” Malik added.

According to him, Mamata government has only provided him a small shop in the Kisan market named after Tapasi along with 16 other affected families. He still pays EMI for the home loan. Neither his political aspiration was met as local party feuds denied him even a panchayat membership. The aggrieved man claimed that BJP had tried to entice him but he refused.

Srijan Bhattacharya, CPM youth leader and Singur candidate this time has met Malik during his campaign. “I wished him good but I have no regret for opposing the Tata factory. I lost my daughter because of it,” he said. Both BJP and LF-Congress-ISF alliance are training their guns on Mamata for ruining industrialization since the Singur-Nandigram episode. CPM state secretary Surya Kanta Misra made it clear at the latest Brigade rally that the party would rerun its corporate-driven industrialization policy, albeit ‘with people’s support’.

 

This is the first part of the two parts report from Singur

Medha Patkar and Rakesh Tikait endorse Mamata Banerjee against BJP in Nandigram

0

Nandigram: West Bengal’s political divide and violence over the turf war is now taking a communal turn before the assembly polls that begin on March 27. A revisit to Nandigram after more than a decade underlines the painful but unmistakable fact.

The predominantly agricultural constituency sprawling over two administrative blocks close to Haldia port and industrial area in East Midnapore district came to fame after violence erupted over the move to acquire farmland for a controversial chemical hub and special economic zone by the Buddhadeb Bhattacharya government in 2007.

Along with similar agitation in Singur, the Nandigram episode was the key catalyst for a change of guard in Bengal that ended 34 years long Left Front rule and heralded Mamata Banerjee’s rise to power in 2011.

The spiral of prolonged violence claimed the lives and properties of both CPM supporters and rival Bhoomi Uchched Pratirodh Committee (BUPC), across the faith line. But the emergence of BJP as the main challenger to Mamata’s Trinamool Congress(TMC) in this Hindu-dominated area with a sizable Muslim population has changed the political discourse, now aimed at communal consolidation.

Mamata fights her former key protege

Mamata Banerjee is fighting her former protege and cabinet minister, Suvendu Adhikari, now one of the BJP wannabe chief ministerial faces and born-again Hindutva hero in this key constituency. Adhikari is playing the Hindu card brazenly calling Mamata ‘an aunt of infiltrators from Bangladesh and Rohingya refugees from Myanmar’, mostly Muslims.
A desperate Mamata is also visiting temples and invoking Hindu deities, more than relying on her developmental claims. Both are claiming to be true inheritors of the spirit of Nandigram’s defiance against the dominant power.

It may worry Mamata and anti-BJP civil society that there was hardly any Hindu presence at a public meeting addressed by top leaders of the ongoing farmers’ movement around Delhi borders.

As the Narendra Modi government has refused to repeal the pro-corporate farm laws and ensure legal guarantee for minimum support price on the farmers’ products, Samyukt Kisan Morcha has urged voters of four poll-bound states not to vote for BJP. Punish the regime at the polls as it is run by the corporates for the corporates and selling off national wealth, from agriculture to airports, they said at rallies in Kolkata, Singur, Nandigram and Asansol.

https://www.facebook.com/enewsroom.in/videos/1050686502108358

The rise in fuel prices: does not it hurt Hindus too?

The spirited speeches by SKM leaders including Rakesh Tikait, Rajendra Singh Rajewal, Gurnam Singh Chaduni and Medha Patkar could have generated ripple effects in favor of Mamata in Nandigram. But the thin presence at the rally held a day before the anniversary of the infamous Nandigram police firing on March 14, 2007 made TMC’s half-hearted effort for the mobilisation evident.

The meeting, held under the banner of farmers’ mahapanchayat was organized with the help of local TMC leaders who had put up some festoons and posters welcoming the leaders of SKM on the way to the venue. But the uneven field beside a narrow bypass road between Hindu and Muslim neighbourhoods near was unsuitable for a big footfall.

“Many more locals would have turned up had we been informed properly, particularly about Medha di’s presence. Women here are fond of her,” Anwaraun Bibi, a middle-aged grandma with her daughter’s child on her lap, said. Medha had visited both Singur and Nandigram many times during the anti-land acquisition protests.

Bibi, the diehard Mamata supporter, felt that her Hindu neighbors should have come more in numbers to listen to farmer leaders. “We too are from farming families. Modi’s friends Ambani and Adani will make us buy rice at Rs 200 per kg which is still available at Rs 25. The fuel prices have already skyrocketed. Does it not hurt Hindus too?”

Medha and Tikait endorsed Mamata

Officially, the SKM only called for an anti-BJP vote leaving the choice of alternatives from other parties to them. But Medha did not hide her close relation with Mamata this time too. She met the chief minister at SSKM hospital where she had been admitted following a foot injury during a roadshow after filing her nomination for Nandigram.

Both Mamata and her party have claimed it an ‘attack’ on her by some unknown men from the rival side indicating a BJP conspiracy. But BJP has called it a ‘drama’ and demanded a high-level enquiry. The Election Commission has so far called it an ‘accident’.

In an impassioned speech, Medha recalled the heydays of united farmers’ resistance against land grab and exhorted locals not to fall into the BJP’s trap of religious divide. “Think of the future of your next generation before you vote,” she urged.

Unlike other leaders, Medha named Suvendu and criticised him tersely. ” Suvenduda, you were with us, the farmers. Now you have changed sides after receiving the CBI notice. If you try to poison people’s minds by raking up Hindu-Muslim divisive issues, people of Nandigram will not forgive you.”

Tikait, who knows neither contestant, also endorsed Mamata. “They have caused injury to the sole woman chief minister of the country. Now you should hurt the BJP by casting your votes against the party,” he thundered. Echoing Mamata’s popular poll-time tune, ‘ Khela Hobe (now there will be a great game)’ the Western UP leader said: “Khela Hobe. The lotus flower (BJP poll symbol) will begin to wither away from Nandigram. The great game now starts from Bengal,” he said pithily.

Left’s woman candidate against Mamata

Nevertheless, there is a game within the game. Left Front-Congress-Indian Secular Front alliance, the third arm in the triangular battle for Bengal has put Minakshi Mukherjee, a CPM youth wing leader in Nandigram. Both TMC and the alliance have been labelling each other as ‘BJP’s B team’.

Hannan Mollah, a CPM politburo member and an important leader of the SKM was initially reluctant to attend the Nandigram meet. After he reportedly changed his mind and reached the venue, he was denied a place on the podium. Molla complained of a ‘TMC takeover to humiliate him and undermine the farmers’ unity’.

But the Sikh youths in charge of the security of visiting leaders insisted that his name was not in the changed list of the scheduled speakers. Some Sikh organizers from Kolkata went to the CPM peasant wing leader to salvage the situation but the air was not cleared till late.

The ISF led by Abbas Siddique, one of the scions of a popular Pir Clan, has aimed at cutting a big slice of Mamata’s Muslim votes including in Nandigram. But a random interaction with the audience gave an impression to the contrary.

The majority of Muslims are for Mamata

“We fully stand by Mamata Didi. It was Didi who rushed to help us after the police firing on March 14. Suvendu may make a dent into Hindu votes but we hope majority Hindus here will not approve his betrayal to Didi and his new zeal for divisive issues,” an elderly Lutfa Bibi said.

Others complained of communal instigation from BJP. “We have never experienced communal tension earlier. Now the turncoats are threatening us over petty quarrels. BJP policies are completely different” Sk. Abdul Hi, an aged tailor said.

Kamirul Islam, a youth private tutor who teaches children at Hindu homes, agreed. “My father says he never faced such an explicitly communal mindset during Congress or CPM. Now BJP lingo is scary. So we have to support TMC despite its many shortcomings. I want a regular job. But security comes first,” he added.

Most are happy over Mamata’s old and new popular projects like Kanyashree, Rupashree aimed at girl students, distribution of cycles under Sabuj Sathi as well as rice for RS two per Kg, pension for old age and health insurance scheme, Swastha Sathi. They are angry over rampant corruption and high-handedness by TMC leaders. But Mamata still enjoys their confidence.

कॉर्पोरेट के नजरिए से बंगाल चुनाव का विश्लेषण

पने कभी ध्यान से सोचा कि आखिरकार पश्चिम बंगाल में ऐसा क्या खास है जो पिछले कई सालों से भाजपा अपनी पूरी ताकत लगा कर यहाँ के राजनीतिक समीकरण को अपने पक्ष में करने मे इतनी आतुर नजर आती है?

राजनीतिक विश्लेषण तो बहुत से समीक्षक करते हैं लेकिन वे नही बताते कि पश्चिम बंगाल का इलेक्शन जीतना पूर्वोत्तर भारत और उसके जरिए पूरे उत्तर पूर्वी एशिया के देशो तक अडानी अम्बानी के कॉर्पोरेट गैंग की पकड़ बना देगा।

दरअसल बंगाल चुनाव में भाजपा के पीछे अडानी अम्बानी की कॉर्पोरेट लॉबी पूरी ताकत से धन बल के साथ जुटी हुई है, साम दाम दंड भेद का हर सम्भव तरीके से इस्तेमाल हो रहा है।

दस साल पहले सोची समझी रणनीति के तहत वाम का किला ढहाया गया और अब उस किले को ढहाने वाले को ढहाया जा रहा है। वाम के किले में सेंध ममता ने लगाई और अब ममता के किले में सेंध बीजेपी लगा रही है ममता को 21 सदी के पहले दशक में कॉर्पोरेट घरानों और नए उदार अमीरों का अंध समर्थन मिला था लेकिन 2021 में तो असली डाकू आए हैं।

दरअसल अभी तक वाम के लाल रंग के कारण बंगाल एक ऐसा मजबूत गढ़ था जहाँ अडानी अम्बानी अब तक अपना खेल खुल कर नही खेल पा रहे थे। इसलिए अडानी अम्बानी गैंग के लिए 2021 में पश्चिम बंगाल विधानसभा चुनाव जीतना करो या मरो जैसा प्रश्न है वह बंगाल को भी देश की ‘मुख्य धारा’ में शामिल करने के लिए हर कीमत देने को तैयार है। बीजेपी का विकास ‘मॉडल’ अब बंगाल में भी दोहराए जाने को तैयार है।

हम सब जानते हैं कि अडानी का कब्जा पूरे देश की कोस्टल लाइन पर हो गया है, अडानी ग्रुप के पास देश का सबसे बड़ा पोर्ट नेटवर्क है। पश्चिमी तट के जितने भी प्रमुख बन्दरगाह है वह मोदी के गुजरात के मुख्यमंत्री बनने के बाद से उसके नियंत्रण में आना शुरू हो गए थे 2014 से 2019 के दौर में पूरी तरह से उसके कब्जे में आ चुके हैं देश के पूर्वी तट पर भी एक एक करके बन्दरगाह वह अपने कब्जे में कर रहा है, अब सिर्फ बंगाल का हल्दिया पोर्ट ही ऐसा है जहाँ उसे राज्य सरकार के प्रतिकार का सामना करना पड़ता है, हल्दिया पोर्ट से नेपाल तक को माल सप्लाई होता है।

अडानी अम्बानी इस वक्त बंगाल को साउथ-ईस्ट एशिया और नॉर्थ-ईस्ट इंडिया को जोड़ने के लिए एक गेटवे की तरह देख रहे हैं।

बिहार में कॉर्पोरेट की पहली जीत हो चुकी है, भाजपा नीतीश कुमार को इस चुनाव में वह सबक सिखा चुकी हैं, अब भाजपा बड़ा भाई है और जेडीयू छोटा भाई, नीतीश के पर कतरे जा चुके हैं, वहाँ वे बीजेपी के रबर स्टैंप के बतौर मुख्यमंत्री की कुर्सी पर बैठे हैं।

अडानी समूह ने 2018 में  कह चुका है कि वह पश्चिम बंगाल के हल्दिया में कंपनी की खाद्य तेल रिफाइनरी की क्षमता को दोगुना करने के लिए 750 करोड़ रुपए का निवेश करेगा मुकेश अंबानी भी पश्चिम बंगाल में 5,000 करोड़ रुपए का निवेश करने का ऐलान कर चुके हैं। यह निवेश पेट्रोलियम और खुदरा कारोबार में किया जाएगा।

वाराणसी से हल्दिया के बीच गंगा में विकसित हो रहे जलमार्ग पर अडानी ग्रुप 10 जलपोतों का संचालन करने जा रहा है पटना टर्मिनल तक भी वह दो हजार टन क्षमता के जहाज चलाना चाहता है।

इसके अलावा उन्हें एक पूरी तरह से अनछुआ व्यापार क्षेत्र मिलने जा रहा है, भारत को जमीन के रास्ते दक्षिण-पूर्व एशिया से जोड़ने की योजना है। भारत-म्यांमार-थाईलैंड को सड़क मार्ग से जोड़ने के लिए भारत के सहयोग से ट्राई लेटरल हाईवे का निर्माण चल रहा है। अब थाईलैंड और भारत के मध्य व्यापार बढ़ाने के लिए थाईलैंड के रानोंग बंदरगाह से भारत के चेन्नई व अंडमान को भी समुद्र मार्ग से जोड़ने की योजना है।

बांग्‍लादेश भी तीनों तरफ से पूर्वोत्तर भारत से घिरा हुआ है यानी वहाँ भी व्यापार की अपार संभावनाएं हैं और मोदी अपने हर दौरे में अडानी अम्बानी के लिए वहाँ जाकर बड़े बड़े प्रोजेक्ट हासिल करते आए हैं।

साफ है कि अडानी अम्बानी जैसे गुजराती पूंजीपतियों के लिए बंगाल चुनाव जीतना बहुत महत्वपूर्ण है इससे उन्हें पूर्वोत्तर भारत और उस रास्ते के जरिए दक्षिण-पूर्व एशिया तक पैर जमाने का मौका मिल जाएगा।

इसी के लिए हिंदुत्व की जमीन तैयार की जा रही है जब बिहार में कॉरपोरेट पूंजीपतियों ने अपने कदम बढाने शुरू किए तो उन्होंने बेगुसराय जिले के सिमरिया में कुंभ के नाम एक बहुत बड़ा धार्मिक इवेंट करवाया था इस इवेंट में गुजरात के कई उद्योगपतियों ने अपना पैसा लगाया था। इस पैसे से बीजेपी ने वहाँ वोटों की तगड़ी फसल काटी है।

इसी पैटर्न पर पिछले कुछ सालों से बंगाल में धार्मिक ध्रुवीकरण का माहौल बनाया जा रहा है, ओर जमकर पैसा झोंका गया है। 2019 के लोकसभा चुनाव में इस पैसे से मिली सफलता हम देख चुके हैं और 2021 में भी भाजपा लोकसभा चुनाव जैसी सफलता की उम्मीद कर रही है।

बंगाल चुनाव में भाजपा के पीछे से जो अडानी अम्बानी जैसे बड़े कॉर्पोरेट घरानों का एजेण्डा है उसे एक बार ध्यान से समझना जरूरी है।

ऐसा आपने कितनी बार देखा है कि निवर्तमान 4 सांसदो को केंद्र का सत्ताधारी दल विधायक बनाना चाहता हो?

खेल बहुत गहरा है!

ये लेखक के निजी विचार है।