Home Blog Page 127

Bengal chief secretary retires leaving speculation to rest, Mamata appoints him chief adviser

Kolkata: Moments before his retirement, chief secretary Alapan Bandyopadhyay received a show-cause letter from the Centre asking him why he did not join work at 10 am in New Delhi as directed. The letter was received by the top IAS officer in the state a little before 5 pm, said chief minister Mamata Banerjee at Nabanna on Monday.

It now remains to be seen what will be the reply of the outgoing chief secretary or will the letter have any meaning after he did not take up his extension as granted by the Centre earlier.

Earlier in the day, Mamata Banerjee had written a five-page letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi stating it was not possible for the state to release its chief secretary as he is involved in overseeing relief work after the widespread devastation from cyclone Yaas.
The game of one-upmanship between the Centre and the state started right after the Centre’s order recalling the West Bengal chief secretary reached the state secretariat Nabanna on Friday.

Just after his retirement, Alapan Bandyopadhyay, who was at the centre of the tussle between the central government and the state, was appointed chief adviser to the state, who keep overseeing all the disaster management, just as he was doing before his retirement.

The chief secretary was given a three-month extension on May 24 by the Centre at the state’s request. A department of personnel and training order on May 28, marked to the state had mentioned about the officer to report in New Delhi on May 31 at 10 am.
In the war of words that followed, Mamata Banerjee had expressed her anguish and shock over the Central order.

Experts, who have been tracking the developments, say that the Centre-state tussle will only lead to further straining of relations.

Former chairman of Calcutta Port Trust Bikram Sarkar feels bureaucrats have always been easy pawns in any political tussle. Sarkar, who has also been a former Lok Sabha MP, feels civil servants should not be dragged into any political tussle between parties. Civil servants run the country and the system works like a machine. If the machine is fiddled with in any way then the people of the country suffer as a result, said Sarkar.

The IAS officer though feels in the present case the outgoing chief secretary handled the situation in a dignified manner. “For a bureaucrat his self-respect is paramount. Had I been in the shoes of Alapan, I would have also told the chief minister to let me go on my appointed day and to find a suitable person instead. In fact, I think things moved in that direction after the chief secretary met the chief minister on Sunday,” said Sarkar.

Embittered by the treatment meted out to bureaucrats by the political bosses, Sarkar said, “There should be a healthy understanding between the bureaucracy and the political dispensation for the larger good of the people. It is getting diminished gradually. It is leading to a fear psychosis. The politicians think the bureaucrats are servants and can be moulded the way they want. They forget that we are not servants, but public servants. Personally, I have suffered for doing my duty when I was CoPT chairman. But it could not break me.”

Political analyst Udayan Bandopadhyay feels that keeping to the true nature of a political party, the Trinamool Congress will try to use the situation to their advantage. “I feel Alapan Bandyopadhyay was granted extension in his capacity as a chief secretary and recalling him after that makes little sense. As he has chosen to retire today, Mamata Banerjee will now say that at these difficult times, when the state is trying to give service to the people, the Centre is playing spoilsport. Every party will try to exploit the chinks in the armour of their opposition. The decision is bound to create a negative impact in the minds of the common man.”

“The CM’s asking if the Centre’s move against Alapan is because he is a Bengali can also become an important issue and people might start thinking on the lines of outsider-son-of-the-soil debate, which had such a deep impact during state elections. This surely is going to tickle the Bengali sentiment,” added Udayan.

Political analyst Biswanath Chakraborty, though, believes that such Centre-state tug-of-war has no impact on the minds of the common man. “The common man has no direct interest on such issues. Political parties always claim that everything they do is for the benefit of the people, but for the man on the streets, basic issues like social security, food and family are more important,” said Chakraborty.

Debadyuti Karmakar, sociologist feels that rather than indulging in the game of one-upmanship, every political party, in these pandemic situations, made worse by the devastation caused by the cyclone Yaas, should rise above the political divide and follow their responsibility towards the citizens of India. They should focus on the national development and the betterment of people in these hard times.

‘खेतों में जानवर खा रहे सब्जियां, हम क्या खाएं!’

कोल्हापुर: महाराष्ट्र के पश्चिम की ओर कर्नाटक से सटे कोल्हापुर जिला मुख्यालय से करीब 20 किलोमीटर दूर हसुर गांव में नामदेव पाटिल ने इस बार अपने खेत के आधा एकड़ खेत हिस्से में भिंडी और ग्वारी जैसी सब्जियां उगाई थीं। लेकिन, कोरोना की दूसरी लहर में वायरस के बढ़ते संक्रमण के खतरे को देखते हुए राज्य सरकार द्वारा महामारी पर काबू पाने के लिए लगाई गई पाबंदी ने उनके अरमानों पर पानी फेर दिया। दरअसल, जिला प्रशासन द्वारा सभी थोक और साप्ताहिक बाजारों पर कड़ाई से लगाई गई रोक के कारण गांवों से शहरों में होने वाली सब्जियों की आपूर्ति बाधित हो गई है और किसानों की सब्जियां खेतों में ही बर्बाद हो रही हैं।

लॉकडाउन और सब्जियां

नामदेव पाटिल अपना दर्द बयां करते हुए कहते हैं, “हमने अपने खेत में 25-30 हजार रुपए की सब्जियां इस उम्मीद से बोई थीं कि जब हमें गन्ना का भुगतान समय पर नहीं मिलेगा तब भिंडियों को बाजार में बेचकर गुजारा कर लेंगे। एक तो गन्ना फैक्ट्री ने तीन महीने से हमारा ढाई लाख रुपए का भुगतान रोका हुआ है और उस पर कोरोना लॉकडाउन के चलते यदि हम सब्जी तक न बेच सकें तो बताइए छह सदस्यों के परिवार का खर्च कैसे चलाएं, क्योंकि हमारे पास दूसरा भी तो कोई काम नहीं है!”

नामदेव पाटिल की तरह यहां किसान मुख्य तौर पर गन्ना उत्पादन करते हैं और साथ ही सहायक आमदनी को ध्यान में रखते हुए अपने खेतों में सब्जियां भी उगाते हैं। लेकिन, जहां गांवों में कोरोना पाबंदी के कारण सब्जियां माटी मोल हो चुकी हैं वहीं कोल्हापुर और सांगली जैसे शहरों में सब्जियों के दाम आसमान छू रहे हैं। सभी तरह के फल व सब्जी बाजार और परिवहन सुविधाएं बंद होने से लोगों को रोजर्मरा की ऐसी जरूरी चीजें एक तो मिलनी मुश्किल हो रही हैं, वहीं यदि मिले भी तो उनके दाम चार गुना अधिक तक बढ़ गए हैं।

इस बारे में कोल्हापुर शहर में किसान नेता नामदेव गावडे बताते हैं, “जरुरी चीजों के नाम पर सिर्फ दूध ही आसानी से उपलब्ध हो रहा है, जबकि ग्रामीण इलाकों से आने वाली फल-सब्जियां आसानी से नहीं मिल रही हैं। इसलिए 20 रुपए किलो में मिलने वाले बैगन का भाव इन दिनों 25 रुपए पाव चल रहा है, 5 रुपए जोड़ी में मिलने वाली मैथी 40 रुपए में मिल रही है। यही हाल आलू प्याज, टमाटर, मिर्च और धनिया का है। इधर, रेस्टोरेंट और ढाबे वगैरह भी बंद होने से मांग घटने के बावजूद सब्जियों के दाम बढ़े हैं। इस तरह आप कह सकते हैं कि महामारी और बीमारियों के दिनों में जब आम लोगों को फल और हरी सब्जियां सबसे ज्यादा जरूरी थीं तभी उनकी सबसे ज्यादा कमी होने का असर हर वर्ग पर पड़ रहा है।”

कोल्हापुर जिले के ही बीड गांव में रहने वाले किसान दिनकर सूर्यवंशी ने भी लगभग अपने आधा एकड़ के खेत में टमाटर उगाए थे। वह कहते हैं, “यह सुनकर ही बड़ा दुख होता है कि जिस टमाटर का दाम शहर में 40 या 50 रुपए किलो हो गया है वही टमाटर हमसे दस रुपए किलो में नहीं बिक पा रहा है। इस बार तो हमें टमाटर की लागत भी नहीं मिलेगी।”

वहीं, नामदेव पाटिल कहते हैं, “मेरे गांव से कुछ दूरी पर सडोली, हरदी और रसोडी जैसे कस्बाई इलाके में हर हफ्ते बाजार लगते थे। लेकिन, फिलहाल फुटकर बाजार भी बंद होने से सिर्फ ढाई हजार की भिंडी बिकी वह भी बहुत मुश्किल से। इस तरह, हमें कम से कम 25 हजार रुपए का घाटा हुआ है। दूसरी बात यह है कि खेती में हम इतना भी न निकाल सकें तो अगले साल हम खेती के लिए पैसा लाएंगे कहां से?”

अंत में दिनकर सूर्यवंशी कहते हैं, “सरकार को चाहिए कि वह फैक्ट्रियों से होने वाले गन्ने का भुगतान इस बार जल्दी करा दे। क्योंकि, आप खुद सोचिये कि सीजन में ही हम सब्जियां न बेचें तो अपना पेट कैसे पालें। आज खेतों में लगी सब्जियां जानवर खा रहे हैं, हम क्या खाएं, क्योंकि यही सब्जियां बेचकर हम रसोई का दूसरा सामान खरीदते हैं।”

By keeping away from PM’s meeting, Mamata Banerjee averted an ugly situation

0

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee is under attack from BJP leaders, from party president downwards, for skipping the meeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi had called for taking stock of the damage caused by the Cyclone Yaas in the State. Party president J P Nadda called it “murder of constitutional ethos and the culture of cooperative federalism” while Defence Minister Rajnath Singh described “this type of behaviour with the Prime Minister” as “painful”. What the BJP leaders will find more painful is to admit that Banerjee has averted an extremely ugly situation by keeping away from the meeting.

The Prime Minister visited on May 28 Odisha and West Bengal, the two States which suffered heavily from the Cyclone Yaas. After visiting Odisha where he held discussions with Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik on the damage the State has suffered, Modi reached Kalaikuda Air Base in West Midnapore district of West Bengal. He was scheduled to hold a meeting with Chief Minister Banerjee about the State’s losses. Reports say that the Chief Minister kept him waiting for half an hour; then came, submitted a memorandum about the assessment of the damage and financial help required from the Centre and left, “with the permission of the Prime Minister”, as she had another scheduled meeting. She was accompanied by Chief Secretary Alapan Bandyopadhyay. Within hours Modi displayed his anguish as the Centre recalled Bandyopadhyay to Delhi and asked him to join Department of Personnel and Training.

Prima facie, Mamata Banerjee was wrong as it does not behave the Chief Minister of a State to treat the Prime Minister so shabbily. But here the Prime Minister had himself invited this type of behaviour by his insatiable itch to humiliate Banerjee for the mortifying defeat inflicted by her on the BJP in the recently held Assembly elections in the State. Modi had taken with him for the meeting West Bengal Governor Jagdeep Dhankar and Leader of Opposition in the Assembly Suvendu Adhikari who, after spending almost his entire life in Trinamool Congress, had defected to BJP just before the Assembly elections and become Modi’s confederate against Banerjee. There is no history that Modi had been taking Governor and Leader of Opposition during his meetings with Chief Ministers of other States to discuss and assess the damages caused by cyclones. Then why in West Bengal?

The presence of the two at the meeting was to provoke Mamata Banerjee who is already worked up with Modi’s frequent resort to devious methods to harass her. Adhikari is a new “Mullah” who would like to fortify his loyalty to Modi by taking on Banerjee. As for Dhankar, he has never displayed the dignity of Governor’ office but behaved like an uncultured bully almost on every occasion. If Banerjee had attended the meeting, there was bound to be an extremely ugly situation. Thus by courting some criticism for showing “disrespect” to Prime Minister, Mamata Banerjee has averted a catastrophe and also foiled Modi’s nefarious design.

Modi Vs Big Tech, No Bets On Who’ll Lose This War

0

A few years ago Narendra Modi’s supporters were bragging about his Twitter followers (which critics of course say is bloated by 60% fake profiles) being more than the head of the Roman Catholic church. Early this week the Indian government had sent lawmen to Twitter’s office in New Delhi as a warning to toe the line or face consequences. Modi is in a curious situation; he had lived by Twitter all these years, now he’s losing control over the same platform that hosts millions of his supporters. His global stage is being taken away.

The police visit was set off by labels that Twitter applied to tweets posted by senior members of the party tagging those ‘manipulated media.’ BJP Party leaders posted documents that they called irrefutable proof that opposition politicians had planned to use India’s stumbling coronavirus response to tar Mr Modi and India’s reputation itself. But Twitter undercut that campaign when it labeled the posts “manipulated media.” Indian disinformation watchdog groups had said the documents were forged.

Civil liberties at stake

Twitter responded with a statement; “We, alongside many in civil society in India and around the world, have concerns with regards to the use of intimidation tactics by the police in response to enforcement of our global Terms of Service, as well as with core elements of the new IT Rules.”

A flawed democracy

This is just the latest round of battle between Indian authorities and global media and technology giants. The country has already been tarred as a ‘flawed democracy,’ by Economist Intelligence Units (EIU). India slipped two places to 53rd position in the 2020 Democracy Index’s global ranking, according to the EIU, which said the “democratic backsliding” by authorities and “crackdowns” on civil liberties has led to a further decline in the country’s ranking. However, India is ranked higher than most of its neighbouring countries.

Narendra modi and social media twitter whatsapp facebook
In happier times: PM Modi and Mark Zuckerberg | Courtesy: PTI

WhatsApp sues the government

Meanwhile, WhatsApp has filed a legal complaint in Delhi against the Indian government seeking to block regulations coming into force on Wednesday that experts say would compel the California-based Facebook unit to break privacy protections. The lawsuit, asks the Delhi High Court to declare that one of the new rules is a violation of privacy rights in India’s constitution since it requires social media companies to identify the “first originator of information” when authorities demand it. The rules, which would essentially require WhatsApp to make people’s messages traceable, which would violate people’s privacy.

While the law requires WhatsApp to unmask only people credibly accused of wrongdoing, the company says it cannot do that alone in practice. Because messages are end-to-end encrypted, to comply with the law WhatsApp says it would have break encryption for receivers, as well as “originators,” of messages.

Modi and the BJP have worked for several years to corral the power of the tech companies and more strictly police what is said online. In 2019, the government proposed giving itself vast new powers to suppress internet content, igniting a heated battle with the companies.

Modi a pale copy of XI Jing Ping

Modi isn’t the only government taking on Big Tech which most countries feel has become bigger than governments in their power to influence citizens. The Chinese government has cracked down on social media with a vengeance, effectively stifling its flagship technology company Alibaba. Modi would love to have powers like Xi Jing Ping, but that can only be a pipedream given his pathetic performance across all fronts that pales before the Chinese leader.

Modi was the darling of social media and global media when he came to power in 2014 and even in 2019 it seemed that his reputation was Teflon coated as the disruptions, he caused with the demonetization and a poorly designed GST, failed to dent his popularity.

Narendra modi and social media twitter whatsapp facebook

The media honeymoon is over – a global pariah

Things looked different this time around. The honeymoon with the media is over. Modi is on the covers of global publications and he wished he wasn’t there; for alongside his pictures are the burning funeral pyres of millions of Indians who lost their lives in the pandemic that turned into a catastrophe by his callous mismanagement. No one believes the government data on deaths which the global media puts at 40 million.

Modi has not only wrecked India, but he has caused global disruptions as he has stopped vaccine supplies to the poorest in Africa and other countries which had placed orders with Indian suppliers. Narendra Modi has now turned into a global pariah. Modi just doesn’t have the financial clout like China to make social media listen to his wishes; it’s a battle he can’t win. He’s in a bizarre situation; he has a platform with millions of followers which he can no longer make it bow down.

Govt decision to conduct offline exams affecting the mental state of students

0

[dropcap]I[/dropcap]ndia is witnessing an unprecedented surge of Covid-19 resulting in a high death toll and fatality rate. Reports suggest the peak has passed, but the decline as we see is considerably slow. The government’s decision to hold board exams in offline mode, amidst the intense virus spread is gathering much criticism. The PIL filed in SC on behalf of students seeking cancellation of exams has been accepted for hearing on an urgent basis. Let’s go through a few points on how the decision for offline exams would affect the stakeholders in the present scenario.

Keypoints:

  • Exposing the students to the virus poses a high risk to their lives
  • Quality coaching has not been imparted and portions not fully covered
  • The exam centres can be possible hotspots that can trigger an early third wave
  • Lack of proper infrastructure to hold offline exams during the virus spread
  • Delay in exams will reduce the duration of next academic year
  • Prolonged academic year, uncertainty regarding future creates severe mental stress in students
  • The highest court has taken the matter for urgent hearing considering the severity of the situation
  • Admission to foreign universities will be denied for inability to submit final result on time
  • Students face discrimination as class 10 exams are cancelled due to the same pandemic
  • Several state boards substituting home exams and internal assessment for exams causes unfair treatment of students across different boards
  • Boards of other countries have already cancelled the exams leaving the Indian students at a disadvantage
  • Children who have been infected or lost family members find it difficult to overcome the trauma
  • No discussions with students or parents who are stakeholders
  • Mental health of students is of prime importance
  • Vaccinations still not planned for students
  • Doctors and educationists strongly advise against offline exams
  • Prominent leaders and organisations have written to the PM and education ministry in support of students
  • Lives matter more than exams

The students of different boards have been campaigning on platforms like Twitter and Change.org demanding the cancellation of board exams owing to restrictions and reasons related to Covid conditions existing in the country. The plight of students of class XII especially those belonging to the CBSE board is evident in their tweets as the government plans to go ahead with physical exams during the peak of the pandemic. 2.5 Lakh cases per day is not a small number to be taken lightly.

The student-parent community has come together in an amazingly brilliant manner to address the issue during a lockdown-like situation when meeting each other is impossible. The petition in Change.org has gained the support of more than 6 lakh people. The hashtags demanding cancellation of exams have been trending several times in Twitter too. Simultaneously the government held discussions with state officials about the possibilities of conducting exams offline and has shortlisted two options without consultation with student representatives.

However, the children are undergoing extreme stress, agony as well as mental fatigue due to the fear of virus exposure and also lack of quality coaching throughout the year. The question from their side is how can they focus on exams with a clear mind while concentrating on Covid protocols. The students can’t be blamed either for their question if exams are important than their lives.

Quite naturally the kids raise concerns of being discriminated against as class 10 exams have been cancelled and results are being declared based on internal assessment. According to them they merely fail to understand how class XII students are resistant to the virus if class 10 students are not. Parents have also come up in full support of students as they consider sending their wards out of homes is dangerous. The contradictory stand of the government forcing the students out of their homes for the exam itself invites dissent from all quarters as the slogan for the whole nation is ‘Stay at home, Stay safe’

As per the reports, state boards including that of CGBSE, CISCE, UP, Maha, Delhi have already decided to cancel exams and provide home exams or internal assessment procedure to their candidates which would leave CBSE students in a pathetic state due to unfair treatment where they would be left considerably behind in performance with the stressful and newly altered offline exam pattern on short notice when their counterparts give open-book exams. The proposed new pattern of exam is not being much favoured as fresh preparations are required after being in the same class for more than a year.

It is of common knowledge that no institutions can guarantee 100% compliance with Covid protocol which again will contribute to push the kids to the highest exposure to the virus in exam centres. Teachers and staff on exam duty will be drastically affected too. The country has witnessed what happened after the elections and do we need a repetition of that? When the whole world stays at home for safety from infection, these unfortunate people are forced to spend hours in exam centres that might turn to be virus hotspots.

To ensure equal opportunity to all, results can be declared using the internal assessment method or by calculating the average marks of previous year performances of the students without any harm to anyone whatsoever, then why unnecessarily create a risk for the lives of students! The whole aim is to find another amicable way of assessing the knowledge of candidates as ‘pen and paper’ tests cannot be the sole method to declare results at any point of time. Assignments or project work can also be used for evaluation.

A PIL filed in the SC has been accepted for hearing on an urgent basis. Meanwhile, the government is all set to declare the date sheet by May 30. Around 300 students and parents have also written to CJI citing urgent resolution of the issue. Another letter by around 8000 parents has also been sent to CJI separately, says news reports. Experts are also of the opinion that it’s sheer hypocrisy on the side of officials to meet virtually and push children towards offline exams.

The big problem here is when most other countries have cancelled exams in favour of their students India’s stubbornness to hold exams though conditions are not favourable is noticed.

The tentative dates for offline exams are from July to Aug which means the results will be published after a month at the least. This will delay and shorten the first academic year of the courses the students get enrolled into. Many candidates who eyeing foreign universities to secure higher education would be denied admission as they cannot submit their final results on time.

The need of the hour is to ensure the safety, health and lives of children as no exam can be important than the lives of people in the country. Prevention is anyhow better than trying to cure after the damage is done. This is an issue of significance where egos and politics need to be left behind and the whole country has to come forward to take care of its future generation to avert possible complications. The vaccination process not planned for students is another area of concern.

Moreover, protecting the mental and physical well-being of students from deterioration is equally important as physical health. As already mentioned, students are experiencing severe psychological trauma, anxiety and insecurities as a result of the decisions imposed against their collective will arising out of worst circumstances harming their lives and future, even after genuine efforts to cope. Appropriate care should be taken to ensure mental wellness for adolescents and to encourage their growth as clearly thinking citizens.

The matter no doubt is an urgent and national concern hence the huge uproar on behalf of the students and parents to cancel offline board exams and to declare the result using any alternative method this year, which does not require the physical presence of candidates. The student community remains hopeful that the highest organ of the judiciary will take cognizance and intervene to avoid any unpleasant decisions affecting their future.

In a democratic country where there is a government elected by the people, listening to the voices of citizens is most essential. Devoid of political motives, the innocent minds put forth the question to the nation – “Shouldn’t the students have a say in matters involving their future?”

Cyclone Yaas wreak havoc in coastal West Bengal

Kolkata: Watch cyclone Yaas wreak havoc in coastal West Bengal– East Medinipur, South 24 Parganas, Digha, Mandarmani among others. Lunar high tide added on to the agony of the locals as the rivers swelled with tidal and sea water. Several embankments breached. However, Kolkata narrowly escaped the wrath of the severe cyclone, which is now about to reach Jharkhand.

what is a cyclone?

According to Outlook India, The term ‘Cyclone’ comes from the Greek word Cyclos which means a coiling snake. It is a system of wind rotating inwards around a low-pressure area. Caused by atmospheric disturbance, cyclones are usually accompanied by severe weather conditions such as storms.

When are Cyclones named?

When the speed of a storm wind reaches or crosses 74 mph then it is considered to be a Cyclone, hurricane, or typhoon. Only when a storm becomes a Cyclone it is given a name.

How are Cyclones named?

The naming of cyclones is done by World Meteorological Organization/United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (WMO/ESCAP) Panel on Tropical Cyclones (PTC), according to an NDTV report.

Thirteen countries on the panel, including India, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Pakistan, the Maldives, Oman, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Iran, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Yemen, name cyclones in the region. In 2020, a new list of names was released that had 169 names of cyclones, having 13 suggested names each from 13 countries.

In the past years, the world as well as India too has witnessed so many destructive cyclones. India faced hits by cyclone Fani (2019), Vayu (2019), Nisarga (2020), Amphan (2020), Gulab (2021), Yaas (2021) and Tauktae (2021) passed on.

 

Calcutta High Court sets Narada case hearing on May 26

Kolkata: Ahead of the hearing of Narada case by the larger bench of Calcutta High Court on Monday, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) moved the Supreme Court over the case.

“Be it in Sarada ponzi scam or Narada sting scam or even during the arrest of former Commissioner of Police Rajeev Kumar, Mamata Banerjee was seen demonstrating on the road so we thought of moving the Supreme Court,” said a CBI officer.

Though the plea is refused by the Apex Court the CBI sources confirmed that they will again move the Supreme Court.

Meanwhile, during the virtual session of the hearing at the Calcutta High Court, the Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appealed before a division bench of five judges to adjourn the hearing as the CBI has filed a special leave petition (SLP) before Supreme Court over the verdict of High Court on May 19 and 21.

Refuting the plea the larger bench of the High Court held the hearing on Monday and Justice Indraprasanna Mukherjee asked the CBI why did arrest did not get done earlier.

“We didn’t get any mention of the Supreme Court so the hearing will take place. If the CBI fears that the heavyweight leaders will tamper the witness then why was the arrest not done earlier,” said the Justice referring to CBI’s earlier plea of moving the case out of West Bengal.

However, even on Monday the Calcutta High Court didn’t pronounce their verdict and set the next date of hearing on May 26.

Notably, the CBI had arrested four Bengal politicians in connection with Narada case, including three TMC leaders, out of which two are ministers– Firhad Hakim, Subrata Mukherjee and a legislator Madan Mitra. Sovan Chatterjee, the fourth one, is former Kolkata Mayor. All were arrested from their residence on May 17.

However, the CBI court itself granted bail to all four, but the central government, through an additional solicitor general moved to Calcutta High Court who had given stay on the bail and gave the verdict of judicial custody for the leaders.

Following the dramatic verdict, all the four were sent to Presidency Correctional Home, from there Madan Mitra, Subrata Mukherjee and Sovan Chatterjee due to health issues were admitted to SSKM hospital.

On May 21 after a difference in opinion between Justice Rajesh Bindal (acting) and Arijit Bandhopadhyay, the arrested leaders were sent to house arrest and the two ministers were allowed to take part in meeting virtually.

Firhad Hakim and Sovan Chatterjee are under house arrest, while Madan Mitra and Subrata Mukherjee are under treatment at the hospital.

Significantly, when the arresting was made, from TMC party to netizens on social media had raised serious questions on the act of the agency, as two more accused in the case, Suvendhu Adhikari and Mukul Roy (now both are BJP MLAs) was not arrested by the CBI.

Questions were also raised on the timing of the arrest. Assembly polls in Bengal have just concluded and Covid-19 cases are rising in the state. Many claimed, a pandemic is not the time for political vendetta, which Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), against whom people of Bengal gave mandate, is doing in the state using country’s premier ageny, the CBI.

CBI is never honest while investigating politically sensitive cases

0

[dropcap]J[/dropcap]ulio Ribeiro, who has held top positions in the police and was Ambassador to Romania, feels that the deep frustration felt by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah at BJP’s humiliating defeat in West Bengal Assembly elections has made them open the ‘cage’ of CBI and direct it to take on Mamata Banerjee. The case which the CBI has taken up – Narada Scam – is seven years old when six Trinamool Congress leaders were caught on tape receiving cash. The case was entrusted for an investigation to the CBI in 2014. Even now the CBI has arrested only four of them and left out the other two because they are now in the BJP.

In an article in Scroll.in, Ribeiro points out that “Suvendu Adhikari, the designated leader of opposition BJP, and Mukul Roy, another of those elected on the BJP ticket, who had crossed over from the Trinamool Congress just before the elections, had also received bribe money and were captured taking the cash on tape. But the governor does not seem to have inquired from the CBI how and why they have been left out of the net when the papers were placed before him for sanction to prosecute. In fact, Adhikari received Rs 5 lakh whereas the others got only Rs 1 lakh.”

Nothing is surprising if the CBI is behaving like the private army of Modi and Shah. It has always acted like this in politically sensitive cases. Here are just two instances to prove the point.

A zealot RTI activist, Shehla Masood was shot dead in front of her house around 11 AM on August 16, 2011. Soon thereafter top police officers, led by then State police chief S K Raut and then Additional DGP (Intelligence) R K Shukla (who recently retired as CBI director) , reached there and were said to have tampered with the evidence. The inquiry was handed over to the CBI which, after spreading a web of lies, got convicted by a pliant judge of two ordinary Muslim women for conspiring to murder Shehla. Before the case was handed over to the CBI, a sting operation was conducted by Headlines Today. When D S Tomar, Inspector-in charge of the police station of the area, was asked about the ‘shoddy investigation’ by his team, his reply was, inter alia: ‘Within half an hour, the DGP, IG, SSP, SP, Additional SP, almost everyone was there. We started following their instructions and took only those things which they asked us to and left the rest.’ For disturbing evidence in a murder case, these police officers would have gone to jail with their post-retirement benefits forfeited. It is anybody’s guess who could have assured them that nothing would happen to them. The CBI did not interrogate them nor did it interrogate those influential politicians about whose certain activities Shehla had sought information through RTIs.

Special CBI Judge at Indore B K Paloda wrote the verdict as CBI dictated, blatantly in violation of law at places.

The Godhra train burning case and its aftermath resulting in a massacre, in which both Modi and Shah were involved, were investigated by the CBI and also by high-profile retired Supreme Court judges forming part of Inquiry Commissions. Till today we do not know how Modi had promptly identified the 58 ‘Kar Sevaks’ whom he claimed were burnt inside S-6 coach of Sabarmati Express and announced a compensation of Rs 2 lakh to the family members of each of them because those travelling in that coach did not have reservations barring a few. Besides, it was claimed that the train was stopped at Signal Falia, at a little distance from Godhra station, where some people poured petrol inside S-Coach through its windows and set it afire. However, Government Forensic Science Laboratory at Ahmedabad probed the matter thoroughly and concluded that the fire was ignited by someone from inside the coach.

The CBI never tried to find out who had lighted fire inside the coach and at whose behest.

“Urgent need to shift Stan Swamy to a good hospital,” say human rights organisations

Ranchi: Strong demand has been raised to shift Stan Swamy, 84-year old Adivasi rights activist from Jharkhand, who is in Taloja Jail in Maharashtra to a good hospital.

Stan was arrested by NIA under UAPA in the Bhima Koregaon case on the 8th of October 2020 and has been lodged in Taloja jail, near Mumbai. He has spent his entire life fighting for Adivasi rights and the rights of the underprivileged.

Several human rights organizations released a press communiqué and not only appealed to Chief Minister Hemant Soren to intervene in the matter as the health of 84-year-old activist is deteriorating fast, but also pressed for the bail of the octogenarian prisoner during the pandemic time.

Stan is a Parkinson’s disease patient with severe tremors in both hands. As a result, he has trouble drinking from a glass, taking bath and washing clothes on his own. He also has a serious hearing problem and needs a hearing aid for both ears. He was operated on twice for a hernia in the recent past.

On the 14th of May, Stan called up his colleague and shared that he was unwell. For the first time since his arrest, he said that he was feeling very weak and fragile. This was surprising as Stan usually prefers to bear his pain quietly as he does not want to bother others. Following that he was too weak even to speak on the phone and his condition had to be described by others. Stan has fever, cough and a running stomach. He was given antibiotics by the ayurvedic doctor of the jail. Those medicines did not help much. He was not tested for Covid in jail. He had also not received vaccination against covid.

There are reports of rising Covid cases in the Taloja jail, where testing and treatment facilities are minimum. According to reports, a 22-year old man died in the last week in Taloja jail. Some of the other co-accused in the Bhima Koregaon case has been seriously ill in the jail and tested positive on being taken to hospital after prolonged requests from family members. After incessant requests and appeals from friends and colleagues, Stan Swamy was finally taken to J.J. hospital at 5 pm on the 18th of May, but only to be taken back to the jail after doing some tests around midnight. In this situation, we are greatly concerned and fear for Stan’s life if he is not shifted immediately to a hospital with proper facilities for adequate medical treatment.

“We, the undersigned, demand that Stan be urgently shifted to a good hospital. We must add that Stan is an elderly and ailing person, with limited mobility and no history of violence against others. He should also be immediately released on bail. We implore the Chief Minister of Jharkhand to immediately intervene on his behalf,” reads the letter issued.

Sikhs United donates six Oxygen Concentrators to Jharkhand in fight against Covid-19

Ranchi: Professor Arun Roy from Mumbai, with the help of his students and friends, has managed to arrange six Oxygen concentrators, each of seven litres capacity, at the Jharkhand office of Indian Medical Association, Ranchi. These concentrators arrived in the state capital on Tuesday.

Out of these, five will be sent to Bagodar (1), Giridih Sadar (2) and Anjuman Islamia Hospital (2). One will be used at IMA’s Ranchi campus. The Giridih MLA, Sudivya Kumar and Bagodar’s Vinod Singh have expressed gratitude to the donors.

Reeza Garewal from Amsterdam, the Netherlands and Mohd Abdul Qadir from Houston, US have donated four and two concentrators, respectively. Dr Raj Chandra Jha and Dr. Vishnu Rajgadia, Director of Jharkhand Foundation, both from Ranchi, had coordinated with Prof Roy to scout for the most suited receivers and on other operational matters.

Reeza Grewal, a friend of Prof Roy, with her brother and friends has formed a group called Sikhs United, with the purpose of reaching out to people struggling with Covid-19 infection and its after-effects. Their focus is on serving people mainly in the interiors of India. Jharkhand is the first state chosen by them. 

The friends of Prof Roy had collected rupees four and a half lakhs for this purpose. One oxygen concentrator costs between Rs 55,000 to 95,000 in India. They have purchased and sent concentrators and masks to Koderma, Daltonganj, Giridih and in areas of Doranda, Ratu Road in Ranchi. They plan to distribute fifty thousand masks which are being manufactured in Ranchi itself employing women, mostly.

Prof Roy is a Ranchite, having been educated at St John’s School and St Xavier’s College before moving to Mumbai in 1994. He taught there till 2004. After that, of his initiative, he started visiting the rural areas of the country, taking free sessions on conceptual learning for the students and teachers of the government schools.

“As I am from Jharkhand, and worked in the rural parts of it, I am well aware of the situation, how much people in Jharkhand need such support. And thanks to Vishnu (Rajgadia) Ji, we have chosen Bagoder, Giridih and Islamia Hospital to donate Sikh United’s oxygen concentrators,” Prof Roy told eNewsroom.

Prof Roy is coordinating with her team also to offer financial help to the families which have lost their bread-earners. Some people from Europe, Canada and the US have already approached the group for offering further help to the people in Jharkhand. For further information on Sikhs United to receive and offer help, one can visit http://SikhsUnited.nl.

During the labourers’ migration from Mumbai and then Farmers’ movement, his friends had collected more than rupees eight lakhs, separately, to serve those who needed immediate help. They intend to serve Jharkhand for at least a year from now onward.

For offering and receiving help for this venture, one can write to him at, we.the.people.india30@gmail.com.