Home Blog Page 139

No Vote to BJP: Activists launch campaign in Kolkata before Assembly Polls

Kolkata: A section of Anti-Bharatiya Janata Party Left groups and individuals together have launched a campaign– No Vote To BJP in Kolkata on Monday under a forum named ‘Bengal against Fascist RSS-BJP’ urging people of the state not to vote for the BJP in the coming assembly poll.

Most of the activists, both of Naxalite and non-Naxalite origins who joined the citizens convention recalled the pre-lockdown growing agitation against the Narendra Modi-Amit Shah regime’s communalised citizenship matrix– CAA-NRC-NPR. They wanted to regain the momentum in the context of the assembly poll before it is too late.

One of the organisers reflected the sense of urgency by pointing to BJP’s growing graph in Bengal vote-shares that has not only pulled up the party second to incumbent TMC in 2019 general election but also increased the violent show of strength by the larger Sangh Parivar outfits both in Kolkata and districts. “Lynch mobs and riot-mongers are no more restricted to Gujarat, UP and other BJP-ruled states. We are already late in rising to the occasion,” she said to a packed hall.

The footprints of corporate-Hindutva tango

The resolution passed by the convention enumerated the footprints of Ambani/Adani-Modi tango, a la Hitler and Mussolini, the original icons for RSS ideologues. It focussed on the very fascist nature of the Narendra Modi regime by highlighting its successive onslaughts on the secular democratic edifice of Indian federal republic by sweeping attacks on the rights of the minorities and systemic subversion of the independent constitutional institutions including judiciary and media. The declaration described such moves as the testimony to the agendas of the crony corporates and the RSS-led majoritarian religious nationalists to fast forward the pluralist polity’s turn towards an one nation-one election-one party-one leader rule.

The moves towards the neo-Nazi terror-state included de facto abrogation of article 370 of the Constitution (to annul the special status of J&K and the abolition of its statehood), amendment to the Citizenship Act (to make nationality religion-based) and announcements for countrywide National Register of Citizens (to weed out Muslim infiltrators) and National Population Register (that forces individuals to be state informers on neighbors).

Stringent anti-terror laws (to muzzle every dissent against the government as anti-national and to put civil society members behind bars for years under false charges) and anti-‘love jihad’ laws in BJP-ruled states (to penalise Hindu-Muslim marriages) were the other signposts. The on-street attacks on Muslims and Dalits by cow-vigilantes and targeted killings of left-liberal intellectuals like Kalburgi-Pansare-Davolkar-Lankesh were also counted among the corollaries.

The prime minister has epitomized this politics of communal hatred and religious bigotry by taking a personal role in the construction of the Ram temple at the very site of demolished Babri mosque after the Supreme Court made a mockery of constitutional principles and rule of law over the century-old land dispute.

Bengal Election no vote to bjp campaign kolkata assembly polls
Participant activists at the meet I Picture by Mrinal Jana

The design for over centralization has already been dovetailed to the wish list of the neo-liberal market forces through demonetisation- nationwide GST (general service tax) in the first term of Modi regime. The regime has made rapid moves to pro-corporate labor, farm and environment laws either to sell off or simply reward the cronies with the state-owned companies in core industries as well as state-built infrastructures and institutions in telecom, banking, aviation, railways, mining and insurance. Most alarming are such arbitrary steps in health, education and essential food supply sectors.

The government’s inhuman treatment of migrant laborers during the prolonged lockdown and the meagre doles to those millions who have lost livelihoods, in contrast to generous bailouts to the billionaires also revealed the DNA of this ultra right wing regime.

Import of the electoral battle

Despite garnering only 37 percent of the popular votes, the  brute majority of the BJP in the parliament has facilitated all the sweeping constitutional and legal amendments. Particularly, in the second term of the Modi government as it has added to his parliamentary strength.

In this backdrop, many participants cautioned against ideological or practical scepticism to electoral politics as it would be suicidal for the farmers and workers as well as Dalits and Adivasi masses to ignore the battle at the hustings. Import of battle for Bengal is now being appreciated beyond its borders as struggling farmers of Punjab and Haryana who have seized Delhi darbar against pro-corporate farm laws.

“They are wary of BJP-RSS takeover here and urged us to put up a spirited resistance as they have done,” a speaker who had visited farmers at Singhu and Tikri border to Delhi, said. Echoing the spirit, many felt that there is no Chinese wall between the sustained mass movements and electoral battles.

Others noted the Sangh Parivar’s sinister game to appropriate Bengal’s departed icons like Rabindranath Thakur, Swami Vivekananda and Netaji Subhas Bose at one hand and attacks on living conscience-keepers like Amartya Sen on the other. While rejecting any provincial or regional chauvinism over Bengali identity and culture, some spoke on the need for resistance to BJP-RSS move to impose Hindi-Hindu-Hindustan project on states outside Hindi heartland.

But which forces to vote for in Bengal?

Danger of fascism notwithstanding, the tricky question of vote to non-BJP parties is yet to be resolved when the incumbent TMC and Left Front-Congress combine are still at loggerheads. While a good section of activist milieu and larger public opinion is worried about the advantage to BJP in a multi-pronged fight, strong misgivings about both LF & TMC dispensations has remained another big divider.

Noting that reality, the resolution blamed the anti-people misdeeds of non-BJP ruling parties in states including violation of democratic norms, human rights, abuse of state power as well as corruption and administrative failures to deliver to the commoners for the advent of the fascist forces. It particularly named the decade-long TMC rule in this context while some participants wanted to include the three decades of the CPM-led LF rule in the same account. Others pointed to the role of non-BJP parties in communalising politics and social fabric that has triggered unprecedented numbers of riots in the last decade .

Delving into the dilemma over the imminent danger of BJP takeover and sordid records of non-BJP rulers, many speakers suggested a middle road by asking voters to go for the best possible challenger to the BJP in each constituency. Others wanted to build public pressure on non-BJP parties to ensure an ‘one-to-one’ fight against the hegemon. Organisers admitted that people would certainly ask for the alternative to the BJP but felt it would be premature to formulate a position on it as the political equations are yet to take shape.

Pending that eventuality, the campaign must widen its social base by including Dalit, Muslim and Adivasi groups in districts. Speakers of different age groups shared this urge to augment the collective outreach efforts, especially among the youth who had largely voted for Modi in 2014 and 2019. The forum has planned to hold a big rally in Kolkata on March 10 after the first round of its campaign in districts.

BJP ruled states in India is undoing of Indian Constitution by attacking minority’s worship places– IAMC

Kolkata: On January 26 India will celebrate its Republic day which honors the date on which India adopted the Constitution of India. The Constitution is a collective resolution of the people of India to secure for all its citizens justice, liberty and equality and to promote fraternity among them all, without regard to caste or creed. But persecution of Muslims under the rule of Bharatiya Janata Party, has increased beyond one’s imagination, the concerned has expressed by the Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC), an advocacy group dedicated to safeguarding India’s pluralist and tolerant ethos.

“The Narendra Modi government must demonstrate to all Indians and the international community that the Constitution is still in effect,” said Ahsan Khan, President of IAMC. “This will require putting a stop to the violence against Muslims by groups affiliated to the larger ideological fraternity of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS),” added Khan.

The strongly statement of the IAMC president, came after a series of incidents, suggesting Indian state legitimized the persecution of Muslims, encouraged, and enabled violence against the largest minority community in the country.

The advocacy group mentioned that the vandalization of Brigadier Mohammed Usman’s grave marks yet another low in India’s rapid descent into fascism. The fact that the grave of a true national hero and martyr like Brigadier Usman was targeted shows that the nationalism of Hindutva is not about the nation at all, nor does it adhere to the norms of any religion. Rather, it is a narrow, bigoted creed that does not regard anything as sacred in its naked drive for power and supremacy.

“Be it Uttar Pradesh or Madhya Pradesh, there is no limit to persecution of Muslims by the state. Being a Muslim in India has become a nightmare and that needs to stop,” said Khan. He referred to the anti-conversion ordinance passed by Uttar Pradesh which is being governed by the Islamophobic, hate mongering, Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, now increasingly the poster boy for radical supremacist groups aligned with Hindutva.

It further said that the Ordinance targeted Muslim men who happened to marry Hindu women. In its aftermath numerous cases of harassment of interfaith couples were reported. Over a hundred former civil servants from the IAS, IFS, IPS and other branches of the services, declared that the Ordinance turned the state into “the epicenter of politics of hate, division and bigotry.” They wrote to the state chief minister Adityanath, urging him to withdraw the controversial law. These former civil servants include former National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon, former Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao and former Adviser to the Prime Minister TKA Nair.

While Mohammad Jawad, the national general secretary of the IAMC, said on the recent attack on Muslim households and places of worship in Ujjain, following rallies carried out by Hindu right wing groups, “In Ujjain district of Madhya Pradesh on January 31, police razed the house of a daily wager who had built his house over the past 35 years, pushing a family of 19 to the street. It was done in a one-sided action by the police after the local Muslim community resisted vandalism of Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha workers who tried to create communal disturbance by chanting Hanuman chalisa in front of a mosque, and later damaging its minaret.”

Jawad pointed out that members of right wing Hindu groups used collection of donations for the construction of Ram temple as a pretext to create fear among Muslims.

“The agitation for demolition of Babri mosque during the 1990s was turned into a source of majoritarian violence. Hindutva groups are following a familiar model of violence,” he added.

Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren’s cavalcade attacked in Ranchi

Ranchi: Violent protesters created panic for a few hours on Monday evening at Ranchi’s Kishoreganj Chowk when they attacked the Road Opening Party (ROP) of Chief Minister Hemant Soren. The demonstrators, who were protesting against an incident of rape, even blocked the road that CM Soren’s cavalcade was to cross to reach the Chief Minister’s residence in the state capital.

Later, policemen diverted CM Soren’s route to avoid any major untoward incident.

Several policemen were  injured including a traffic inspector who suffered  serious injuries and had  to be admitted to Medanta Hospital. The protestors also damaged several vehicles.

After the incident, several videos related to the incident circulated. In one video, a young man leading a group of people, reasoned for stopping the CM cavalcade that they want to ask the CM till when women of the state will face atrocities? In another one, a man who was recording the incident of the stoppage of CM cavalcade was stopped by protesters to record.

Video of Hemant Soren’s cavalcade attack

“This incident is not a common one, and it is a direct attempt to take law and order in their own hand. A police officer has been injured and had to be hospitalised. It is a well-planned conspiracy to incite communal violence. It is a conspiracy against the government and the people’s mandate that this government has earned,” JMM’s General Secretary (central committee) and spokesperson Supriyo Bhattacharya told newsmen after the incident.

He also warned, “One has every right to protest democratically and the law permits it, but this was done to push society and the entire state toward a dangerous direction. Those who premeditated and executed such a dangerous plan should now get ready to face the consequences.”

The Hemant Soren led government recently completed its first year in office. In 2019, JMM, Congress and RJD alliance defeated BJP led NDA and ousted Raghubar Das from power.

When a genius thrives in isolation

0

What happens when a happily married middle-aged man decides to abandon his family and pursue his passion to become a painter? In W. Somerset Maugham’s famous novel, The Moon and Sixpence, the central protagonist, forty-year-old Charles Strickland, who is a stockbroker by profession, refuses to embrace the seduction of certainty that his boring and unexciting job affords him; he tries to snap out of an existential vacuum that eats him up from within; in the end, the painter, stricken with leprosy, dies a tragic death, but not before painting his magnum opus. Published in 1919, this novel continues to resonate with bibliophiles even today for its compassionate and sensitive study of the psyche of a genius for whom creativity takes precedence over everything in life. The novel remains a testament to the human spirit.

Freedom from Emotional Bondage

Painting for Strickland becomes some sort of a zahir, an objective, a kind of madness, but the road to achieving it is paved with difficulties and innumerable odds. The metastasizing absurdities of life hit him like a ton of bricks and accelerate the spinning circle of depression and aloofness. He wipes the slate clean to restart life and lead an unfettered existence in pursuit of his ambition, which he finds finally sublimated in his creations.

At the age of forty, Strickland, in a flash of epiphany, perceives the horizon of a world in which he can seek freedom from any sort of social and emotional bondage. As a painter, he wants to rise above prosaic and mundane concerns; even at the expense of isolating his family and children. Till the end, Strickland, not even once, feels tormented by the phantom of guilt.

Embracing a Life of Uncertainty

Mrs Strickland is convinced that her husband is maniacally self-centred. Strickland, on the other hand, prefers to accept the grab bag of uncertainty for creative fulfillment, and maybe even for insight-giving satori. For the painter, like Larry, the carefree and feckless protagonist in Razor’s Edge, “the greatest ideal man can set before himself is self-perfection.’’ Anyone looking for some vestigial traces of conscience in this man would be hugely disappointed. To his wife, the decision comes as a punch in the solar plexus: she labours under the delusion that her husband must be busy pursuing the matters of the heart. His bolshie cheekiness at times pulls people up short, including his family members. Maugham says, “Here was a man who sincerely did not mind what people thought of him, and so convention had no hold on him…”

In the course of the novel, the writer informs us that parental dictates and opposition thwart Strickland’s dream of becoming a painter. Perhaps, he wasted the first flush of his talent during his teenage years. He says, “I rather wanted to be a painter when I was a boy, but my father made me go into business because he said there was no money in art.”

Satisfied to Lead His Chosen Life

Strickland wants to be no more than himself. In the painter, Maugham portrays a man, who always “lived a life wholly of the spirit…He lived in a dream, and the reality meant nothing to him.” Strickland is averse to the idea of selling his paintings for self-aggrandizement. It is believed that Strickland’s character is based on the famous French painter Paul Gauguin, who never sold his paintings. Strickland is not after fame and fortune. It appears that he chooses to lead a life of creative isolation. He is often accused of being incorrigibly selfish. Henrik Ibsen once said that personal liberation is at bottom self-centred and heartless. He also believed that the basic essence of creativity is to protect one’s essential self, to keep it free from all intrusive elements. At one point, Strickland says, “I look forward to the time when I shall be free from all desire and can give myself without hindrance to my work.”

No wonder, when Strickland moves to France, he cuts himself off from his family and friends to become a painter. For him, his masterpiece will be the apotheosis of his life. He shows much equanimity at times of stress; and ennobles the free life of the mind till the very end. According to him, “art is the greatest thing in the world.” After having seen some of his marvelous paintings, art lovers realize that they have hit upon a gem of purest ray serene.

The Final Masterpiece

Despite living in abject penury with his second wife and children, Strickland paints his final masterpiece on the wall of his hut at a small island in Haiti. The theme of the painting is the “Beginning of the world, the Garden of Eden.’’ The painting serves as a hymn to the “beauty of the human form” and Nature. He instructs her to burn the painting after his death. She does just that, depriving the world of a magnum opus. Perhaps, Strickland does not want it displayed in the halls of the rich bourgeois who would not be able to recognize its true value. It would just be an artifact for them. He never wants his art to fall into the hands of mercenaries. An avant-garde genius, Strickland always lived and created in the moment and not for an unseen tomorrow. His artistic integrity shines like a beacon through his life.

How Rajiv Gandhi stood up against public opinion, and eventually bowed to it

0

Rajiv Gandhi was a gentleman, without any experience of statecraft and uninitiated in political roguery. But the same cannot be said about those who had become his close advisers when he became Prime Minister following his mother Indira Gandhi’s assassination in 1984. Towards the fag end of his tenure, Rajiv was under attack for various lapses of his government. He decided to reign in the Press. A Bill with the draconian provisions was drafted. As he had a massive majority in Parliament, there was no problem in passing the Bill. It was popularly known as Defamation Bill.

The Bill broadened the definition of defamation, shifting the burden of proof from the aggrieved to the accused — generally a newspaper – and forced editors, publishers and printers to be present in the court at all hearings.

This led to an unprecedented unity among journalists and non-journalist employees of newspapers and news agencies – both left-wing and right-wing — to protest against the Bill. Public meetings were held to explain to the people the disastrous consequences of the Bill. Government functions and Assembly sessions were boycotted. Senior journalists and editors led the protests at several places. In Delhi a procession was taken out (on September 5, 1988) on a four-km route from India Gate to Boat Club with Ramnath Goenka, Khushwant Singh, B G Verghese, Kuldip Nayyar and others carrying placards against the Bill. On September 6, newspaper and news agency employees all over the country observed strike. The following morning the only newspaper that came out in Delhi was ‘National Herald’, founded by Jawaharlal Nehru and run by a Congress Trust. From September 14, the journalists in the country went about their work wearing black badges for three days.

Rajiv Gandhi only got more stubborn. He told journalists in Guwahati on September 15 that the Defamation Bill was a ‘prestige issue with the Government’. He had earlier issued a statement imputing (in Modi style) a lack of proper understanding of the contents of the Bill to protesting journalists. His statement said, inter alia: ‘we will like them (the Press) to read the Bill. We are totally convinced that the Bill is needed. I am myself convinced that we are proceeding on the right path.’

A fallout of the countrywide anger against the Bill was a feeling of panic among Congress MPs as they feared certain defeat in the elections due within a year. Several Congress MPs tried to reason with Rajiv Gandhi. Some of them displayed rare courage and publicly appealed to the Prime Minister to withdraw the Bill.

On September 22, Rajiv Gandhi decided to bow to the public opinion and issued a statement saying that the Bill would not be made into law. A press release signed by the Prime Minister said: ‘a free Press is an integral part of the inner strength and dynamism of our democracy. Without a free Press, there can be no democracy. The imperishable values of our freedom struggle have gone into making the Press in India. We uphold this legacy.’

Owaisi-Abbas alliance: A boom for Muslim identity politics or doom for Bengal’s secular opposition to BJP?

0

Kolkata: Muslim politics in Bengal has taken a potentially divisive turn as Asaduddin Owaisi, the leader of the AIMIM met Abbas Siddiqui, a vocal and young scion of the Pir clan that presides over the influential Furfura Sharif on order to spread the Hyderabad-based party’s wings in West Bengal before the assembly polls which is due by May 2021. The MIM chief visited the clan’ s citadel around the Mazar of its founder Abu Bakr Siddiqui, revered as Dadahuzur in undivided Bengal on Sunday and met Abbas along with a few other Pirzadas from the feud-torn family. 

Lavishing praises on the young man, Owaisi later announced that he would work in Bengal with the younger Siddiqui while being behind him. His gesture to work under the leadership of the politically rookie and rustic youth from a popular Pir clan is well-planned. Abbas is a Bengali-speaking rural Muslim while the MIM is still a party of Urdu-speaking and mainly urban Muslims who comprise a small portion of Bengal’s 30 per cent Muslim population. 

It is not clear whether Abbas and his allied Pirzadas would join MIM or form their own political outfit to contest the coming polls in alliance with the MIM. Holding rallies in south Bengal districts in post-Lockdown months, Abbas has already made it clear that he would enter the electoral fray and field candidates in a sizable number of seats. He wants Mamata to share some seats with his unborn outfit which she has not responded to so far. Earlier, Congress and Left too had warmed up to the Pirzada but could not make any deal.

Whatever may be their next course of action, it will likely to provide a good foothold for the Hyderabad MP,  particularly in south Bengal. Owaisi is bolstered by the result of recently held Bihar polls in which his party (in alliance with BSP et al) has secured five seats in Seemanchal close to Bengal. He is now keen to open his account in the neighboring state where incumbent Mamata Banerjee government is facing a tough challenge from the BJP and Sangh Parivar. 

Mamata’s party Trinamool Congress (TMC) which has got 43 per cent of vote share as against 40 per cent of the BJP in 2019 Lok Sabha polls is heavily dependent on the Muslim support base. The largest  minority community which has been mainly targeted by the reigning majoritarian right wing regime is decisive in around 130 seats, mostly in south Bengal. Any division in Muslim votes will surely hurt Mamata’s defence against the surging Hindutva forces which is working overtime for communal polarisation in order to bag Bengal.

This is why Mamata is worried about Owaisi and both have increased the decibel of their verbal duel since the Bihar polls. The Bengal chief mInister has called the MIM chief an ‘outsider’ and the ‘head of BJP’s B team’. She accused Owaisi of helping the ruling party at the Centre not only to retain power in Patna along with the JD(U) but also to emerge stronger. Owaisi has retaliated by reminding her blow-hot blow-cold relation with the BJP as the NDA minister under AB Vajpayee and with Narendra Modi even after Gujarat 2002. He also ridiculed the TMC chief for her inability to arrest defection of her minions to the Sangh fold.

The blame game notwithstanding, it is pertinent to remember that both sides have skeletons in their cupboards. Mamata cannot wish away her role in opportunist politics in helping BJP to make a dent in Bengal in post Babri demolition and post Gujarat 2002 years in pursuance of her blind opposition to CPM-led Left Front. Similarly, Owaisi can’t sweep his party’s communal politics under carpet in successive polls in Hyderabad and its role in the politics of polarization that paved the way for BJP’s advent in the recent civic election in his home turf.

asaduddin owaisi abbas Siddiqui bengal election politics
AIMIM President Asaduddin Owaisi had a close door meet too with Pir clan of Furfura Sharif I Courtesy: Anonymous

BJP is happy

Bengal BJP is clearly elated with his entry in the state politics as it has justified MIM intent on ground of any registered political party’s right to contest in states. The saffron camp had garnered 17 per cent vote in Bengal in 2014 during the Modi wave but it dipped to 10 per cent in the 2016 assembly election. 

It has resurged again as a close rival to the TMC not only in vote share but also by bagging 18 out of 42 seats, mainly at the cost of the Congress and the Left Front. 

The party of Sonia-Rahul Gandhi has reduced its vote share to 5.6 per cent in 2019 from 12.4 per cent in 2016. The LF is the biggest loser at mere 7.5 per cent in 2019, a pale show in comparison to its 26.6 per cent in 2016 which was three per cent lesser than its 2014 tally. It’s a far cry from its impressive share of 41 per cent in 2011 when it lost power to Mamata after 34 years.

Nevertheless, bitter over Mamata’s role in opposition as well as her poaching into Congress-LF camp and persecution of its supporters after she has assumed office since 2011, the latter combine has been following a politics of vengeance. The bengali coinage of ‘ aage Ram pare Bam’ (first vote for BJP in 2021 then for LF in 2026) reflects the crux of that politics. The CPM top guns in Bengal have virtually justified it by refusing to make any difference between TMC and BJP.

In this backdrop, If Muslim vote divides mainly between TMC and Owaisi-Pir assorted alliance in 2021, with a little fraction to LF-Congress, it will further help BJP which is ahead of the ruling party in 120 seats out of 294. 

Larger Issues at stake

Beyond electoral arithmetic, larger considerations can not be shelved. Many observers among Indian Muslims as well as those outside the community are worried about the advent of Muslim identity-based politics at the cost of secular or cross-faith pluralist opposition to majoritarian BJP’s politics of religious nationalism and communal polarization. Some fear the gradual advent of another Muslim League and repeat of pre-Partition years. Others consider the fear far-fetched but caution against the minoritarian religious consolidation.

They largely agree that the main opposition party, Indian National Congress is still running like a headless chicken. The disarray in the entire opposition camp has failed to galvanise a spirited resistance inside and outside the parliament against successive onslaughts on the minority as well as farmer and labor rights.

This has made room for Muslim politicians like Owaisi whose vociferous role in the parliament has caught the imagination of a section of Muslim youth. They consider him and his party as a radical and independent alternative for the community. 

Abbas Siddiqui is one of them who seems to have made Owaisi a role model in Bengal. Both of them harp on the growing Muslim sentiments about being used as mere vote-bank by the opposition parties, to the elation of the BJP and urge Muslims to float their own political outfit. Both, of course, are careful to swear by secular republican constitution of India and want Dalit-Muslim unity against Brahminical Hinduism of the Sangh Parivar. 

Abbas and his maverick uncle Twaha Siddiqui, despite their angularities over politics have been underlining the unity of poor Hindu and Muslims across faithline and Bengal’s liberal social fabric. 

The efforts for Dalit-Muslim alliance had a strong current in undivided Bengal which died in the killing fields of the Partition and post-partition riots. Nevertheless, it has gained currency in recent years in West Bengal politics as BJP has been wooing Matuas or Namo Shudras and other Dalit/lower caste Hindus in Its fold. 

Harping on the influx of Hindus and other religious minorities in Bangladesh following persecution by Jamate Islami and other Islamist fundamentalist outfits, the Sangh is promising citizenship to those non-Muslims under the CAA (Citizenship Amendment Act). Abbas has publicly admitted the persecution across the border, a rarity in mainstream politics and urged for electoral and social understanding between the minorities at two sides of the border, now neighbors. 

Ironically, Mamata too depends on Matua votes and any further division in the largest SC community vote beyond BJP and TMC may cost Bengal’s big sis more. 

Observers also pointed to the political aspirations hidden under the grandstanding among the Pirzadas of Furfura and other Pir clans and Ulemas in pollbound Bengal. Their increasing rivalries for public devotion in rural areas and clamor for bargains are surely the signs of template shifts in Bengal politics. The state did not witness such openly political roles by those who claimed hereditary or otherwise acquired religious authority in post-independence decades.

পশ্চিমবঙ্গে আসন্ন বিধানসভা নির্বাচনে কেন বিজেপিকে ভোট নয়: একটি বিশ্লেষণ

২০১৯ সালের লোকসভা নির্বাচনে বিজেপি এ রাজ্যে পাগলের মতো টাকা ঢেলে এবং মিথ্যে প্রচার ছড়িয়ে ইতিহাসে প্রথমবার প্রধান বিরোধী পার্টির স্থানটা নিয়ে নিয়েছিল। ব্যাপক ভোট কমেছিল বাম ও কংগ্রেসের।

২০২১ সালের বিধানসভা (ও তার ফল অনুসারে রাজ্যসভা) নির্বাচনে বিজেপি আবারও পাগলের মত টাকা ঢেলে ও মিথ্যে প্রচার চালিয়ে প্রথমবার বাংলার বিধানসভাতে প্রধান বিরোধী পার্টির জায়গাটা নিয়ে নিতে চাইছে। সে চাইছে বাম ও কংগ্রেসের জায়গাটা দখল করে নিতে।

একবার এই জায়গাটা পেলে তারপর সে চেষ্টা করবে আরও এগোতে।

এটা কোনও ভাবেই হতে দেওয়া যাবে না। বিজেপির কট্টর ভোটার খুবই কম এ রাজ্যে। বেশিরভাগই ফ্লোটিং ভোটার, যারা হাওয়া দেখে ভোট দেয়। প্রচারে বিশ্বাস করে ভোট দেয়। যে বেশি টাকা ছড়ায় তার প্রচার দেখে ভেবলে যায়। গোদি মিডিয়ায় যা দেখে তাই বিশ্বাস করে। এছাড়া অন্যান্য পার্টিগুলোর ভেতরে বিশ্বাসঘাতক আছে। অন্তর্ঘাত করে, বিজেপির টাকা খেয়ে দালালি করে কিছু লোক। তলে তলে লুকিয়ে লুকিয়ে রাতের অন্ধকারে ফিস্ ফাস্‌ করে, গুজব ছড়ায়। তারা নাকি “হাওয়া” জানে।

“হাওয়া”-র চক্করে, গুজব, কানাঘুষো, ফিসফাসের চক্করে পড়ে আসামের ১৯ লক্ষ বাঙ্গালি-গোর্খা-আদিবাসীদের মতো মারাত্মক ভুল করবেন না। আপনি খোঁজ খবর নিয়ে যা ঠিক করবেন, সেটাই হাওয়া। অন্য কেউ হাওয়া ঠিক করে দেবে না। অন্তত সবথেকে ক্ষতিকারক ভাইরাস বিজেপি-কে চিনুন। মিডিয়ার কথা না শুনে কৃষকদের কথা শুনুন। মিডিয়ার কথা না শুনে ছাত্রদের কথা শুনুন। মিডিয়ার কথা না শুনে রাজনৈতিক বন্দীদের বাড়ির লোক, বন্ধু-স্বজনদের কথা শুনুন।

দেশের সবচেয়ে বড় দেশপ্রেমিকদের বিনা বিচারে গারদে পুরল বিজেপি কার স্বার্থে? নিরপরাধ সহনাগরিকদের পিটিয়ে মারছে বিজেপি কার স্বার্থে? কোন ব্যবসা দখলের স্বার্থে? রেল থেকে বিএসএনএল থেকে এয়ারপোর্ট বেচে দিচ্ছে কার স্বার্থে? এরকম শিক্ষা নীতি বিজেপি কেন এনেছে যাতে গরীব বাড়ির ছেলেমেয়েরা ক্লাস এইটেই স্কুলছুট হয়, যাতে গ্রামের পর গ্রাম লক্ষ লক্ষ স্কুল বন্ধ হয়ে যায়, বেসরকারি পুঁজি ঢুকে পড়ে প্রতিটা কলেজ বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়ে, যাতে গরিবের সন্তানের লেখাপড়ার সমস্ত সুযোগই বন্ধ হয়ে যায়? বিজেপি এমন বিল আনল যাতে দেশের সমস্ত অরণ্য, নদী, পাহাড় ধ্বংসের ছাড়পত্র পায় কর্পোরেটরা? বিজেপি-র আমলে সুপ্রিম বিচারব্যবস্থা একেবারে নাঙ্গা হয়ে গেল কেন – সর্বোচ্চ বিচারপতি বিজেপি নেতার ছেলের বাইক চেপে ঘুরছে আর একের পর এক কলঙ্কিত রায় দিচ্ছে কেন? কোভিড মহামারীকে রুখতে শুরুতেই দেশের বিমানবন্দরগুলি সীল না করে কোটি কোটি শ্রমিককে বিনা রেশনে, বিনা মাইনেয়, বাড়ি ফেরার ব্যবস্থা না করে মাসের পর মাস অমানুষিক যন্ত্রণা কেন দিল বিজেপি? শ্রমিকদের কুকুর বেড়ালের মতো করে খেদাল, গায়ে ব্লিচিং স্প্রে করল, আর বড়লোকদের বেলায় সমাদরে অভ্যর্থনা, ফাইভ স্টার হোটেল?

বিজেপি-কে চিনতে হলে শেফালি হাজং-এর কথা শুনুন। আদিবাসী শেফালি হাজং অনাহারে বাধ্য হয়ে নাম মাত্র মজুরিতে নিজের হাতে বানাচ্ছেন নিজের ডিটেনশন ক্যাম্প। ক্রীতদাস হতে আর বেশি বাকি নেই তাঁর।

বিজেপি-কে চিনতে হলে ফাতিমা নাফিস-এর কথা শুনুন। ফাতিমার ছেলে নাজীবকে শুধু তার ধর্মের কারণে বিশ্ববিদ্যালয় থেকে গায়েব করে দিল বিজেপি। গুপ্তহত্যা করে এতদিনে নিকেশই করে ফেলেছে, কিন্তু পুলিশ, আইন, আদালত কেউ কিচ্ছু জানে না।

বিজেপি-কে চিনতে হলে রাধিকা ভেমুলা-র কথা শুনুন। রাধিকার ছেলে রোহিত ভেমুলা তার বাড়িতে প্রথম প্রজন্মের বিশ্ববিদ্যালয় পড়ুয়া। সে ছেলেটি দলিত হয়ে বিজেপির বিরোধিতা করেছিল বলে তাকে হোস্টেল থেকে বের করে দিয়ে, স্কলারশিপ বন্ধ করে দিয়ে এমন অবস্থা করল যে সে আর বেঁচে থাকতেই পারল না।

বিজেপি-কে চিনতে হলে জুনেইদের মায়ের কথা শুনুন। কিশোর জুনেইদ এর অপরাধ ছিল সে পরবের দিনে বন্ধুদের সাথে ট্রেনে করে যাচ্ছিল উৎসবে আনন্দ করবে বলে। ধর্মের কারণে এক কিশোরকে পিটিয়ে মারল। মালদার শ্রমিক আফরাজুল-এর মেয়ের কথা শুনুন। আফরাজুলকে পিটিয়ে মারল রামের নাম করে। তারপর পুড়িয়ে দিল। সেই খুনিকে নির্বাচনের আগে সম্বর্ধনা দিয়ে প্যারেড করালো বিজেপি।

বিজেপি-কে চিনতে হলে আসিফা-র পরিবারের কথা শুনুন। পশুপালক যাযাবর পরিবারের ছোট্ট মেয়েকে মন্দিরের ভেতরে গণধর্ষণ করে খুঁচিয়ে মেরে তারপর জাতীয় পতাকা নিয়ে ধর্ষকদের সমর্থনে মিছিল করল বিজেপি। হাথরাসে দলিত পরিবারের মেয়েটিকে গণধর্ষণ করে পুলিশ দিয়ে প্রমাণ লোপাট করে পুড়িয়ে দিল। ধর্ষকদের সমর্থনে খাপ বসাল, মেয়েটির চরিত্রহনন করতে মিডিয়া লেলিয়ে দিল। এই হচ্ছে বিজেপি।

এতদিন যে মতুয়ারা এ দেশের নাগরিক ছিলেন, আজ সবাই বলে বেড়াচ্ছে তারা অবৈধ বাংলাদেশি। তাদেরই ভোটে জিতে এসে, তাদেরই ভোটার কার্ডকে মিথ্যে বলছে। এই হচ্ছে বিজেপি।

যে বাংলায় দেশভাগের পর কোনওদিন দাঙ্গা হয়নি। সেই বাংলায় দিকে দিকে বহিরাগতদের প্রত্যক্ষ সাহায্যে, ফেক নিউজ ও পরিকল্পিত ধর্ম-আমদানির সাহায্যে দাঙ্গা লাগিয়ে বেরাচ্ছে। মানুষ খুন করছে। দোকান, বাড়ি জ্বালাচ্ছে। ধর্মের নামে গরীব মানুষকে পেটাচ্ছে। মানুষের মনের সুন্দর দিকগুলো মুছে দিয়ে নিকৃষ্ট দিকগুলোয় হাওয়া দিচ্ছে। মাতৃভাষাকে রোজ অপমান করছে। এই হচ্ছে বিজেপি।

চার ঘন্টার নোটিসে লকডাউন করিয়ে গরীবদের ভাতে মারল। বড়লোকরা বারান্দা থেকে থালা বাজাল। আগে যখন মেয়েদের সতী সাজিয়ে পুড়িয়ে মারত তখন খুনের আওয়াজ চাপা দিতে ঠিক যেমন করে ব্রাহ্মণরা, গ্রামের পুরুষ মুরুব্বিরা ক্যানেস্তারা বাজাত। ঠিক সেরকম অশালীন ছিল মৃত্যুমিছিলের মাঝে বড়লোকদের থালা বাজানোর মহড়া। এই হচ্ছে বিজেপি।

এক রাতের নোটিসে নোটবাতিল করিয়ে আবারও গরীবদের ভাতে মারল। দুশ’ গরীব মানুষ লাইনে দাঁড়িয়ে মারা গেলেন। ভারতের অর্থনীতি খুচরো ক্যাশে চলে। সেই ছোট ছোট মানুষরা পথে বসল। অর্থনীতির মন্দা তখন থেকেই শুরু। আর আম্বানি আদানি টাটা থেকে শুরু করে অমিত শা’র ছেলের মত পুঁজিপতিরা ফুলে ফেঁপে উঠল। এই হচ্ছে বিজেপি।

করোনার নাম করে পি এম কেয়ার্স ফান্ড বানিয়ে প্রধানমন্ত্রীর ছবি লাগিয়ে লক্ষ লক্ষ কোটি টাকা তুলল। তাতে পুঁজিপতিদের টাকা, সরকারি সংস্থার টাকা, জবরদস্তি বেতন কেটে নিয়ে সেই টাকা, মানুষের দানের টাকা সব ঢুকল। করোনার নামে। তারপর থেকে কোর্ট কাছারি আইন আদালত করেও সে টাকার হিসেব দিচ্ছে না পাবলিককে। সৎ প্রধানমন্ত্রী সব টাকা খাবে। বিজেপির পার্টি ফান্ডে যাবে এই টাকা? হিসেব দেবে না। এই হচ্ছে বিজেপি।

লকডাউন ঘোষণার পরের দিন সব কাগজে পাতা জোড়া বিজ্ঞাপন মনে আছে? চীনা কোম্পানি পে-টিমের মডেল হাসি মুখে বলছে – পেটিএম করো। নোটবাতিল জিন্দাবাদ। সেই মডেল ছিল নরেন্দ্র মোদী। এখন পাব-জি ব্যান করেও চীনা আগ্রাসনের একটি চুলও ছিঁড়তে না পারা মোদী, যার আমলে পুলওয়ামার ঘোরতর সন্দেহজনক ঘটনায় কারুর শাস্তি হয়নি, বাংলার মৃত সৈনিক বাবলু সাঁতরার স্ত্রীর জরুরি ও চোখা প্রশ্নের উত্তর না দিয়ে তাঁকে জঘন্য নোংরা কথা বলেছিল মোডিভক্ত মিডিয়া, এবং তারপর সীমান্ত পেরিয়ে কয়েকটা পাইন গাছের ওপর বোমা মেরে মিডিয়ার সাহায্যে তিলকে তাল করে ফেক ইমেজ ফাটিয়ে ইলেকশন জিতেছিল। এই হচ্ছে বিজেপি।

গ্যাসের দাম, আলু পেয়াজের দাম, চালের দাম, ডালের দাম – কোনও কিছুই এখন আর সরকার নিয়ন্ত্রণ করবে না। সবই বাজারের খেলায় চলবে। মানুষ মরবে কিন্তু মানুষের ভোটে নির্বাচিত সরকার কিছুই করবে না। সরি, ভুল বললাম। করবে। তারা মানুষকে না খাইয়ে মারার কাজ করবে। তাই অত্যাবশ্যক পণ্যের তালিকা থেকে মানুষের শেষ সম্বল চাল, ডাল, আলু, পেঁয়াজও সরিয়ে নিয়েছে। এই হচ্ছে বিজেপি।

তাই বিজেপি-কে যে বা যারা ভুল কারণে ভোট দিয়েছিলেন, তারা সেই ভোট ফিরিয়ে নিন, অন্যত্র দিন বা দেবেন না বা যা খুশি করুন। *একমাত্র দেশদ্রোহী ছাড়া কেউই বিজেপিকে ভোট দেবেন না।*

 

এটি লেখকের ব্যক্তির মতামত

আজকের কৃষক আন্দোলনঃ কেন নেতৃত্বে পাঞ্জাব?

[dropcap]স্বা[/dropcap]ধীন দেশের ইতিহাসে সর্বাপেক্ষা বৃহৎ কৃষক আন্দোলন, যা আমরা দেখছি চোখের সামনে, তাকে কালিমালিপ্ত করার জন্য, ছোট করার জন্য মোদি সরকার, আর.এস.এস-বিজেপির আর গোদি মিডিয়ার কতই না প্রয়াস! একটা কথা বলা হচ্ছে যে এই আন্দোলন মূলত পাঞ্জাবের আন্দোলন। MSP বা সরকারের দেওয়া সর্বোচ্চ সাহায্য মূল্য বাতিল হয়ে যাবার ভয়ে ওখানকার কৃষকরা এই আন্দোলন করছে।

প্রথমত, একথা বলে সরকার নিজেই প্রমাণ করছে যে, তারা এমন কিছু একটা ঘটিয়েছে যাতে সাহায্য মূল্য বাতিল হয়ে যাবার ভয়টা কৃষকদের মনে ঢুকেছে। অথচ, আবার তারাই কৃষকদের প্রবোধ দিতে চাইছে, MSP বহাল থাকবে। এদিকে কৃষক নেতারা যখন বলছেন, মুখের কথায় হবে না, আইন করো, পার্লামেন্ট ডাকো। তখন কিন্তু তারা তা মানতে রাজি হচ্ছে না।

যাই হোক না কেন, এই আন্দোলন কিন্তু শুধুমাত্র পাঞ্জাবের কৃষকদের আন্দোলন নয়। সিঙ্ঘু এবং বিশেষ করে টিকরি বর্ডারে ভালো রকম উপস্থিতি রয়েছে হরিয়ানার কৃষকদের। হরিয়ানায় কৃষকদের পক্ষে জনমত কতটা তীব্র হয়ে উঠেছে তা বোঝা যাচ্ছে খাপ পঞ্চায়েতের আচরণে। এই খাপ পঞ্চায়েতের কর্তাব্যক্তিরা কিন্তু সামাজিকভাবে বিজেপির কাছাকাছি, তাদেরই সমর্থক। কিন্তু হৈ হৈ করে তারা নেমে পড়েছে কৃষকদের সমর্থনে। রাজস্থানে এনডিএ-তে ফাটল ধরেছে। রাজস্থান সীমান্তে সেখানকার কৃষকদের জমায়েত দমনপীড়ন উপেক্ষা করে বাড়ছে। গাজিপুরে উত্তরপ্রদেশ সীমান্তেও সেখানকার কৃষকরা বেশ জমিয়ে বসেছেন। মনে রাখতে হবে উত্তরপ্রদেশ, মধ্যপ্রদেশ প্রভৃতি বিজেপি শাসিত দিল্লির সীমান্তবর্তী রাজ্যগুলির পুলিশ কিন্তু ভয়ংকর দমন-পীড়ন চালাচ্ছে কৃষক আন্দোলনের ওপর। সে সব উপেক্ষা করেই কিন্তু এগোতে হচ্ছে।

সর্বভারতীয় কিষাণ সংঘর্ষ সমন্বয় কমিটি প্রথম যখন দিল্লি অভিযানের পরিকল্পনা করে তখনই ঠিক হয়েছিল দিল্লিকে ঘিরবে কাছাকাছি রাজ্যগুলির কৃষকরা। অপেক্ষাকৃত দূরবর্তী অঞ্চলের কৃষকরা নিজ নিজ রাজ্যে সংহতিমূলক কর্মসূচি নেবে। এই পরিকল্পনা দারুনভাবে সফল হয়েছে। তাই, উত্তরভারতীয় রাজ্যগুলির কৃষকদেরই এই ঘেরাবন্দীর সৈনিক হিসাবে দেখা যাচ্ছে।

কিন্তু ফসলের ন্যয্যা এবং উচিত দাম পাওয়ার বিষয়টা একটা সর্বভারতীয় সমস্যা। পাঞ্জাব, হরিয়ানার মত পশ্চিমবঙ্গ বা বিহারের কৃষকদের কাছেও এটি আক্ষরিক অর্থেই জীবনমরণের প্রশ্ন। কৃষক আত্মহত্যা সব রাজ্যেরই বৈশিষ্ট্য, পশ্চিমবঙ্গেরও। আর সেটা কিন্তু ‘বউ-এর সাথে ঝগড়া করে’ হয় না, যা বোঝাতে চান মমতা বন্দ্যোপাধ্যায়রা।

কিন্তু সব কিছু সত্ত্বেও এই আন্দোলনে পাঞ্জাবের কৃষকদের মধ্যে৷ যে একটা অভূতপূর্ব স্বতঃস্ফূর্ততা দেখা যাছে তা কিন্তু অস্বীকার করা যাবে না। বিপুল অংশগ্রহণ, সঙ্গে চমৎকার সাংগঠনিক দক্ষতা তাদের একটা বিশিষ্টতা হয়ে দাঁড়িয়েছে। সংযুক্ত কিষাণ মোর্চার মধ্যে পাঁচশোর বেশি কৃষক সংগঠন রয়েছে। তার মধ্যে যে চল্লিশ পঁয়তাল্লিশটা অগ্রগামী বলে চিহ্নিত তার বেশিরভাগটাই পাঞ্জাবের। সচেতনাতেও তাঁরা অত্যন্ত এগিয়ে। পাঞ্জাবের জমায়েত থেকে যেভাবে কর্পোরেট-বিরোধী স্লোগান উঠছে তাতে বোঝা যাচ্ছে বর্তমানে ভারতের কৃষিক্ষেত্রে কর্পোরেট বনাম কৃষক দ্বন্দ্বটিকে তাঁরা অতি স্পষ্টতায় চিনে নিয়েছেন। পশ্চিমবঙ্গের কৃষকরা কর্পোরেট চিনেছেন এই সেদিন, সিঙ্গুর-নন্দীগ্রাম আন্দোলনের সময়ে। কিন্তু পাঞ্জাব কি সেই “সবুজ বিপ্লব”-এর সময় থেকেই কর্পোরেট চিনতে শেখেনি? সার, বীজ, কীটনাশক প্রভৃতির ওপর দেশি-বিদেশি কর্পোরেটদের একচেটিয়া আধিপত্য কি ইতিমধ্যেই নরক বানিয়ে তোলেনি? আর এখন, কৃষি উৎপাদের ওপর বহুজাতিকদের একচেটিয়া দখলদারি যে সেই নরককে আরও ভয়াবহ করে তুলবে তা বুঝে নিতে তাঁদের ভুল হয়নি। ভারতীয় কৃষিক্ষেত্রের কর্পোরেটীকরণ যদি আমাদের কৃষিব্যবস্থার নবীনতম প্রবণতা হয়ে থাকে তাহলে কর্পোরেটদের চরিত্র সম্পর্কে অভিজ্ঞতায় প্রবীন পাঞ্জাবের কৃষকরাই যে এই আধুনিক দ্বন্দ্বকে সর্বোত্তমরূপে উপলব্ধি করে এ আন্দোলনের নেতা হয়ে উঠবেন তাতে তো আশ্চর্যের কিছু নেই।

কিন্তু তার পরেও আরও কিছু কথা থাকে। শুধু এইটুকু দেখলেই ‘ভারত দর্শন’ সম্পূর্ণ হয় না। সিঙ্ঘু সীমান্তে একটা স্টলের ব্যানারে আমার চোখ আটকে গেল যথারীতি। সেখানে লেখা, ‘আর্য হোমিওপ্যাথিক ক্লিনিক’। সাথে সাথে আমার চোখে ভেসে উঠল সপ্তসিন্ধুর দেশের মহাকাব্যিক ইতিহাস। কতই না কান্ড ঘটেছে এই সিন্ধু, বিপাসা, পারুষনি অথবা শতদ্রুর তীরে। সুদাসের নেতৃত্বে আর্য বাহিনী দখল নিয়েছিল এই বিস্তীর্ণ জনপদের। এখানে বসেই ঋগ্বৈদিক ঋষিরা রচনা করেছেন বেদ। বৈদিক সভ্যতার পীঠস্থান এই অঞ্চল। বৈদিক দর্শন এবং ধ্যানধারণারও। কিন্তু মধ্যকালীন সময়ে এসে সহসা ভাবনা-চিন্তা, দর্শনের পাশা ঘুরিয়ে দিলেন মহাগুরু নানক। গাঙ্গেয় উপত্যকায় যা বহু আগেই ঘটিয়েছিলেন গৌতম বুদ্ধ। বৈদিক ধ্যানধারণায় ইতিমধ্যে জাঁকিয়ে বসা জাতি-বর্ণের ভেদবিচার আর অসমানতার বিরুদ্ধে নানকের সমানতা, সৌভ্রাতৃত্ব আর সেবার বাণী পাঞ্জাবকে ভাসিয়ে নিয়ে গেল। আদি-বৈদিক সমানতা আর সৌভ্রাতৃত্ব যেন নেতির নেতি হয়ে ফিরে এল নানকের হাত ধরে। শিখরা আজ তাই বিশ্বের যে প্রান্তেই থাকুন না কেন, তাঁদের উপার্জনের একটা অংশ নিয়ম করে গুরুদুয়ারাতে দান করে থাকেন। আর প্রতিটি শিখকে, তিনি যত বড় ব্যাপারী বা শিল্পপতিই হোন না কেন, মাসে একদিন গুরুদুয়ারাতে কায়িক শ্রম বিনা বিনিময়ে দান করতেই হয়। আজ সিঙ্ঘু বা টিকরি সীমান্তে যে অভূতপূর্ব সাংগঠনিক দক্ষতা দেখা যাচ্ছে তা কিন্তু একদিনে অর্জিত হয় নি। দশম গুরু গোবিন্দ সিং এর মধ্যে প্রবিষ্ট করে দিয়েছিলেন বীরত্ব, সাহস আর আত্মত্যাগের ধারণা। তৈরি হয়েছিল ‘খালসা’, অর্থাৎ যোদ্ধাবাহিনী। খালসাতে কিন্তু শুধুমাত্র পুরুষই নয়, মহিলারাও আছে। খালসার পুরুষ সদস্যরা নিজেদের “সিং” বলে অভিহিত করে, মহিলারা “কাউর”। তৈরি হল হার না মানার মনোভাব, যে কোন ধরণের পরাধীনতাকে ঘৃণার মনোভাব। ব্রিটিশ বিরোধী স্বাধীনতা সংগ্রামে, বা পরবর্তীকালের কমিউনিষ্ট আন্দোলনে পাঞ্জাব যে গুরুত্বপূর্ণ ভূমিকা নিতে পেরেছিল তা তো এমনি এমনি নয়!

আর এ সবের সঙ্গেই কোথাও যেন ওতপ্রোতভাবে মিশে রয়েছে কৃষক হিসাবে এক প্রবল গর্ববোধ। বঙ্গদেশে যেমন আমরা “চাষাভুষো” বলে বেশ খানিকটা নিচু নজরেই দেখেছি কৃষক বা কৃষিকাজ, পাঞ্জাবে কিন্তু তা হয়নি। শিখবাদের সঙ্গে প্রবল কৃষক-অস্মিতার উপস্থিতি এবং তারই সঙ্গে বহুজাতিক এবং কর্পোরেটদের প্রকৃত স্বরূপ চিনে নেওয়ার সৌভাগ্য —- এই ত্রহ্যস্পর্ষই বোধহয় আজ পাঞ্জাবকে আজকের লড়াইয়ের নেতা করে তুলেছে।

ওয়াহে গুরুজী কী খালসা

ওয়াহে গুরুজী কী ফতে!

লেখক রাজনৈতিক কর্মী।

 

এই গল্পটি প্রথম প্রকাশিত হয়েছে Ground Xero

Hemant Soren’s high leap from his contemporaries

0

Ranchi: Towards the end of 2019, Jharkhand got its youngest Chief Ministers in Hemant Soren. One year down the line, its chief minister has achieved what none of his predecessors ever attained.

45-year-old Hemant has been invited to speak at the India Conference being hosted at the prestigious Harvard University, on the issue of tribal indigenous politics with a welfarist development agenda and on his impressive way of handling the Covid-19 crisis.

On scanning India Conference’s site revealed that no chief minister from India had ever been invited as a keynote speaker till its 17th edition. However, in the past, few political leaders including Sachin Pilot, Asaduddin Owaisi and Jayant Patil have addressed Harvard’s India Conference. But till date, most of the speakers remain from academic, journalistic, policy making and industry backgrounds.

When contacted, Suraj Yengde, the Senior Fellow of Harvard Kennedy School, who sent the invite to the CM informed eNewsroom, “Chattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel had addressed India Conference in 2020.”

Significantly, Hemant Soren was invited for 2020 conference too. “But he had gracefully turned the invite saying, it is too early and that he wants to spend time on working for the people,” added Suraj over phone from the US.

In 2021, there will be a panel of chief ministers and Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee as well as Maharashtra CM Uddhav Thakery can also be the part of the panel.

Hemant Soren, took charge of the Chief Minister office at the end of December 2019, was able to form his cabinet by January-February, but had to face the massive challenge of handling the Covid-19 crisis.

Jharkhand is among the top states when it comes to migrants, working at different parts of India. Right from India’s financial capital Mumbai, to textile and diamond cutting hub Surat, to mountaineering region of Leh, youths from Jharkhand will be seen toiling to eke-out a living.

However, they were the ones most affected during sthe pandemic. The Hemant Soren government stood by these individuals and brought back migrant workers not only from Surat by arranging special trains but also flew down hundreds of workers from Leh and other places during lockdown.

As soon as Hemant was sworn in as Jharkhand’s CM, he during his first cabinet meeting decided to remove all cases slapped on the tribals for the Pathalgadi movement by the previous government.

He even promised that in future no or less migrant workers would have to go to other states to earn their living. The Jharkhand government has initiated some rural projects recently and plan to provide jobs to 15000 youths by March, 2021.

The invite from Harvard to a Jharkhand chief minister has its significance, as the state has also been known for having unstable government, unpopular chief ministers, some of whom have even landed in jail on corruption charges.

Hemant, son of Shibu Soren – Rajya Sabha member and three time chief minister of Jharkhand, who fought for the creation of a separate state, is now serving his second term as the chief minister.

The Jharkhand chief minister will be addressing (virtually) the India Conference on February 20, 2021.

Was Poush Mela politicised to polarise votes in Bengal?

0

Kolkata: Visva Bharati University (VBU) while celebrating its centenary year chose to break away from its century-old tradition of hosting the Poush Mela on its university grounds. A move that shocked many in West Bengal and forced a group of culturally aware individuals to even host the ‘alternate’ poush mela called the Poush Parbon on the scheduled date (December 23-25) with intention of upholding Bengal’s secular tradition but also to promote the local trade and artwork.

Lauding the move of the social group Bangla Sanskriti Mancha (BSM), Manisha Banerjee, headmistress of a government high school near Shantiniketan said, “Poush Mela, traditionally has been a secular fair. Unlike hundreds of other religious fairs, this century-old fair flagged off by Debendranath Tagore, father of Rabindranath Tagore promotes not just the local art and traders but also secularism. So, the news of it not being hosted on my alma mater’s campus was a bit disheartening. But thanks to BSM’s Poush Parban, we were able to celebrate a mini poush mela this year.”

The fair, unlike the previous years, was smaller in size, especially as the organisers tried their best to pull it off in the best possible manner even after following the Covid-19 protocols.

Speaking to eNewsroom, Samirul Islam, president of BSM said, “This fair is part of Bengal’s heritage, we just couldn’t let it go. Also, given the fact that the artisans and local trade had suffered a lot due to the pandemic, people were looking forward to this mela to sell their products. With the university deciding to do away with the fair, we planned this alternate Poush Praban to help the local traders and artists.” Islam, along with his team took on the daunting task of having organised the fair in such a short notice.

A must listen song by Baul singer, Basudev Das Baul at Poush Mela

Adding to that Tanmoy Ghosh, secretary of BSM pointed out, “The move of not holding the century-old mela, has its roots in the agenda of outsiders wanting to ruin Bengal’s heritage.  This stems from their monolithic agenda of one nation, one religion and one language. We will resist any attempt being made to tamper with Bengal’s heritage of inclusiveness. This fair is a secular fair that has people of different religions and sects assemble together not just to celebrate the harvesting period but also to do trade.”

He maintained that the already economically hit poor artisans have had to suffer a lot because of this decision of the university. Interestingly, when the artisans were showcasing their art during this three-day event, Prime Minister Narendra Modi during a virtual conference with the university students and officials, requested to help the artisans in selling off their work online.

rabindranath tagore poush mela visva bharati
A stall selling wooden handicrafts at Poush Mela

Reacting to that, Professor Sabuj Koli Sen, former officiating VC of VBU, said, “It’s a good gesture on behalf of the PM but I don’t think that it will be that easy to have it done.” She added, “Poush Mela, is not just a fair for the people of this region, but also their main source of income as people from across the globe come to witness this event.”

While Banerjee further said, “It’s more like damage control. The VC of VBU has been making outrageous comments on poush mela and even Rabindranath Tagore. We need to remember that Tagore and his university stands for diversity and this is a direct attack on him and his idea of education and pluralism.” She added, “With election round the corner all this is being done to polarise the tribal votes by hinduising them, doing away with the mela is just the method to achieve the agenda.”

Meanwhile, Basudev Das Baul, the Baul singer with whom Amit Shah had a meal with, reacting to the entire episode, said, “It’s sad that VBU didn’t host it this year. I am hoping that they will organise it in 2021.” On being asked if he had spoken to Shah regarding the same, he said, “We just had the meal together. I didn’t get a chance to speak to him about it. Poush mela is very important for we performers.” He then added, “I am glad that the alternate mela was hosted by BSM, I have even performed on a Hindu-Muslim unity baul song.”