Home Blog Page 109

Dynamics Of Social Exclusion And Its Impact On Mental Health

0

“I wear a hijab (headscarf) and I’ve never felt scared or had a feeling of apprehension while going out thinking I’ll lose out on an opportunity because of one piece of cloth. I’ve given interviews, got a job, taught kids abroad, studied at a prestigious university all wearing a hijab. But the day I heard about the Hijab Ban in Karnataka, a part of my country, I had a sinking feeling and I cried for hours. If they can be deprived of education because of the hijab, the day is not so far that I’ll be deprived of opportunities too. I feel so unsafe. I am always anxious now when I go out thinking someone will stop me at the metro or someone will ask me to remove my hijab to frisk me or to enter a certain institution (this has never happened before). This does feel like social exclusion. I’m scared for my sisters, my friends, everyone who chooses to wear a Hijab,” says Nazia Khan, a student in Delhi.

Social exclusion is a process that involves denial of rights and opportunities which a section of the society enjoys, resulting in the inability of individuals from excluded groups to participate in the basic political, economic and social functioning of the society. This enforces inequality, human poverty and deprivation. History has witnessed several instances of social exclusion in terms of colour when blacks were discriminated against in major areas of their lives – unfortunately, it still prevails in some places. Social exclusion can impact different areas of an individual’s life. Caste, religion, gender, class, body image, colour of an individual, mental health, family dynamics are some crucial areas where social exclusion prevails.

Caste and class exclusion

Social exclusion can lead to an increased risk of mental health issues, due to stress arising from decreased opportunities, living circumstances and political environment. It leads to difficult coping mechanisms and impacts the self-esteem of an individual.

social exclusion mental health hijab ban
Dalits at a ceremony honouring survivors of caste-based atrocities. Dalits in Bihar have long faced massacres and gang-rapes | Courtesy: Alessio Mamo/Redux/eyevine

Social exclusion not only deprives the individual of their rights but also adds to issues about their mental well-being. “Being an Indian Muslim, a minority community which is at the receiving end of exclusion, we face systematic discrimination at different levels. Muslim-dominated areas lack basic amenities like government schools, colleges, hospitals and banks. It makes a huge impact on our lives. It reduces the opportunities for us to develop socially and economically. It made us believe we can’t enjoy all government facilities as the majority community does. We don’t have an equal stake in the national resources,” says Waquar Hasan, a Delhi-based Journalist.

“Social exclusion can do significant harm to a person’s mental health. I recently read the first-person account of a Dalit student pursuing a PhD, who had been routinely derided and insulted by the very institutions and people who were supposed to guide that student. This had a severely detrimental effect on the student’s psyche and made their task of pursuing higher education an uphill battle. It shouldn’t be that way. We need to not only be cognizant of socially deprived groups but take a step further and work proactively for creating inclusive environments that celebrate diversity and nurture equity,” says Bhaswati Ghosh, an author and translator.

social exclusion mental health hijab ban

Social exclusion and its impact on mental health

“The systematic denial of rights, benefits, facilities, opportunities and resources is seen often in a country like ours that is constantly evolving socio-economically. The power of the voice makes people question and fight for social integration and upholding the basic human dignity of choice. Recent examples of the “hijab order” or the lack of oxygen & life-saving medicines in certain states of India showed how the system collapses on itself as the borrowed identity of society structures influence stereotypes and prejudices. The way exclusion is carried forward, creates trauma and deep-rooted trauma bonds that we as therapists see a manifest increased risk of mental health difficulties, such as the result of stress or managing on a low income, living circumstances, local environment, discrimination and decreased opportunities for positive self-esteem. Most evidently seen in family and relationship therapy in my experience for the past 7 years. The social exclusion faced by one generation leaps into the mindset of the other and with a deeper understanding of family systems and emerging trauma bonds. I work with individuals and families to change the prejudices and stereotypes and facilitate a new sense of self-esteem in them throughout therapy,” says Aarti Ahuja, Holistic Psychologist and Founder of Tatava Connect.

social exclusion mental health hijab ban
Courtesy: cdc.gov

Disability exclusion

Social exclusion is closely related to the mental well-being of an individual. People with severe mental illness have a high risk of experiencing social exclusion from mainstream society. “In the case of children with disabilities, as a person managing school, I have witnessed many parents trying to get their kids admitted to schools which are not designed to handle such children. However, out of their insecurities, parents want their children to study with commonly-abled children. Neither the teachers are trained to handle such children nor the parents accept the reality (under the pressure of society) that the child requires specially trained teachers. So the first thing is that the parents should accept their child as the child is. They should feel proud of the child, with whatever abilities the child is born with. They should not feel shy or ashamed of sending their kid to those schools which are specially designed to handle such children and their needs. The infrastructure is also according to the child’s needs and requirements. These special schools can even help the child to overcome many of the disabilities and lead a better life. A child doesn’t know that it is differently-abled, neither does it feels insecure or inferior. It is through the parent’s behaviour, words, the expression that the child starts getting the feeling of being inferior. So the health infrastructure should be designed in such a way that at the time of birth only if the disability is identified then the parents should be made to undergo major mental health training. Such training should be mandatory. There should be a special department in Government or a ministry to transform the overall societal acceptance and importance of mental health,” says Amit Monga, Manager, Sunrise Public School.

Gender exclusion

Gender is inter-linked with social exclusion. Women are often socially excluded from mainstream opportunities. Due to the patriarchal nature of the society, women, in general, have felt excluded from various opportunities and the concept of double exclusion also takes place when caste is involved. If a woman belongs to a minority class then caste and gender both enforce social exclusion at some level. It is pertinent to understand the impact social exclusion has on the mental health of an individual.

“I believe social exclusion starts from our families and we are more prone to this as women. I have experienced this in my own life. Women tend to have an almost negligible say in family affairs. How does a woman assert herself in later years when she never got a chance at home. Social exclusion has a very deep impact on mental health, it makes one develop feelings of unwanted and uselessness. It puts one in a deep well where there seems no escape,” says Ramsa Jaan, an entrepreneur.

social exclusion mental health hijab ban gender
Courtesy: jbtc.com

“Social exclusion affects a person’s decisions and choices in both professional and personal life; where growth and development in those aspects may take a back seat and the need for acceptance and assimilation may loom large in all of our lives. I had my first tryst as an army kid moving from place to place every 2-3 years, changing schools, neighbourhoods, friends and everything familiar more frequently than anyone else. It was like drifting through faces that constantly changed. The exclusion that emerged out of that life was dulled by the close bonding in army circles but in the non-army population, no one wanted to befriend, take a stance for and invest in a person who would not be there after a year or two,” says Urmila Chanam, a menstrual health activist, journalist and social entrepreneur in women’s health and empowerment.

In terms of the sexuality of a person, social exclusion can leave a deep scar on the psyche of a person. “Social exclusion does not only damage the identity of a person, but it also damages the entire community. We see people discriminated against for the way they look and the way they make their living. I have been a victim of social exclusion myself and I know how traumatizing it can be because I felt it was my safe space, but it never was. When I opened up about my sexuality to my friends and family, I felt socially excluded from them,” says Aayush Sharma, who is a journalist by profession.

“Ostracism has paved its way in almost all the domains of the society & honestly, it could be best implied as escapism & shunning away from the responsibilities. Patients with severe mental illness or patients with intellectual disabilities, who are deprived of basic amenities & care by their family members are often seen wandering around in misery. Somewhere, there is a sheer lack of concern & negligence towards them however, nobody shies away from putting a label across without even assessing the reality & magnitude of the situation. Similarly, we have people from the LGBTQIA+ community who are ostracised based on their choices for life, otherwise known as human rights for any individual of this society but not for them. This is nothing short of an astonishing discernment.

A special case came to me of a patient who had been suffering from mental health problems after being neglected by her family for years together. Why it is special because she also was not satisfied with her assigned gender & wished otherwise. This specific situation added fuel to the fire among family members. They rather thought of this issue as a part of her mental illness and failed to acknowledge it. Let alone she was given an ultimatum to have been renounced of her family title. Here, there are two cumulative situations – one having suffered from serious mental illness & another about the choice of her gender. What could be worse than being ostracised at this point?” says Dr Ankita Priyadarshini, a mental health professional and Psychiatrist.

Arrested Policemen Say, They Visited Anish’s House After OC Order

0

Kolkata: The two arrested policemen home guard Kashinath Bera and civic volunteer Pritam Bhattacharya over the Anish Khan death case on Thursday claimed that they visited Anis’s house as the OC (officer in-charge) of Amta police station had ordered them.

While being produced to Uluberia session court, the two policemen claimed that they were being ‘framed’.

“We have not gone to Anish’s place on our own. We have been instructed by the OC to visit there. We are being framed,” said one of the policemen.

Asked whether they had pushed Anish from the terrace to which the accused said that they didn’t know as they were not there.

The wife of home guard Kashinath Bera also alleged that her husband is being ‘framed’ as without instructions of top officials they cannot operate.

However, the Uluberia session court has given 14 days of Judicial Custody to the two arrested policemen and also permitted the Test Identification Parade as ordered by Calcutta High Court in presence of the District Judge.

Slamming the police, Anish Khan’s father Salim Khan said, “The police are claiming that there is a separate pipeline in my house and according to them while escaping from that pipeline, Anish fell down and died. Not just OC even officials higher than OC is also involved in my son’s murder case,” said Khan.

Anis’s elder brother Shabir Khan alleged that they don’t have any ‘faith’ in the police.

“Even if the two policemen are arrested, we don’t know whether they are actual culprits. Four came to our house and the remaining two are still not arrested,” said Shabir.

Meanwhile, Calcutta High Court orders for the second autopsy of Aliah University’s deceased student, Anis Khan.

Following a plea by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) formed by chief minister Mamata Banerjee to the Calcutta High Court, the court on Thursday ordered a second post-mortem, under the monitoring of the District Judge.

“Not just a second postmortem, but the court has also asked the family members to submit the mobile phone of Anish to SIT which will be sent to Hyderabad forensic department and also allowed Test Identification (TI) Parade,” said the High Court sources.

Notably, Anish’s father had time and again claimed that he can identify the policemen who had allegedly visited their house before his son was allegedly murdered as according to him none of the policemen were wearing masks.

However, Salim Khan was not happy with the decision of the court, to continue with the SIT inquiry.

“I will talk to my lawyer before taking any step. I am not happy with the verdict of the Calcutta High Court as we still demand a CBI probe and will do whatever is needed till a CBI probe is ordered,” said Khan.

Khan along with other villagers assembled in front of Amta police station on Thursday to meet the top police officials amidst protest from students of Aliah University and Congress’ Chhatra Parishad, who even tried to break the barricades done by the police to prevent the crowd.

Advocate Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya said that the court has instructed to give a copy of the autopsy and the forensic report of Anish’s mobile to both, the court and SIT and after analysing it the court will further the proceedings after 15 days.

Meanwhile, at the time of reporting police officials visited the burial ground where Anish is cremated to install CCTV cameras and lights so that no ‘unscrupulous’ incident happens.

Falsafa-e-Taalimaat: A book ‘document’ for Urdu lovers

0

A book titled ‘Falsafa-e-Taalimaat’ (Philosophy of Education) in Urdu has hit the stands which deals with the state of affairs in the field of education at the school level and at other stages too through Urdu medium.

The book highlights the problems of education and its solutions, course corrections and revamping strategy of imparting education to the school students opting Urdu medium.

The book has been penned by educationist Dr Mohammad Nauman Khan of Bhopal. He retired as a Professor in the Department of Education in Languages in NCERT (National Council of Educational Research and Training), New Delhi. The 534-page book, which has two sections, is of documentary importance for Urdu students and teachers, both. It has been published by Educational Publishing House, New Delhi.

The first section of the book is a compilation of articles written by the author in his four decades of being keenly associated with various aspects of education. The articles are on not only about the education system in India but on global system too. While the second segment of the book discusses imaginings of eminent educationists of yore such as Sir Syed Ahmad Khan, Maulana Muhammad Hussain Azad, Ismail Merthi, Allama Shibli Naumani, Maulana Abul Kalaam Azad, Nawab Sultan Jahan Begum, Gandhiji, Rabindranath Tagore, Allama Iqbal, Dr Zakir Hussain, Swami Vivekananda, Maulana Abul Hasan Nadvi, Mulla Fakhruddin and Prof Haneef Naqvi.

Urdu language in India

The topics of the book includes articles on ancient and modern philosophy, teachings, modern trends, ideas and goals, teaching skills, strategies, educational issues, methods, ideological imaginings, expertise, procedure, planning, problems, perspectives and different teaching methods for the benefit of the new generation. The author has discussed at length in the book the position of Urdu language in India (past, present and future), educational services of Indian Muslims, the role of Urdu teachers in education and teaching, mother tongue teaching and trilingual formula, the importance of regional languages, the teaching of Urdu as mother tongue, secondary teaching Urdu as a language, teaching science subjects in Urdu, problems in the preparation of textbooks among others. in subjects where they have expressed their views objectively and analytically.

On the other hand, the distance education system, situation of Urdu language in religious madrasas, constitutive and inclusive education in teaching, gender equality, and psychological factors in education will bring these aspects to the fore.

Dr Nauman has not only commented and analyzed but has also criticized wherever necessary the subject matter and issues demanded. He did this while arguing threadbare with references. He had continuously kept himself abreast with the affairs and issues of education and the reforms required to rectify it to make it more effective so that it becomes more and more comprehensive and reachable to the lowest strata of society.

It is believed that in a vast country like India, many books in the name of literature get published every day, but these books are unable to meet the need for teaching Urdu. In such a situation, the book becomes a document for Urdu students as well as also for those who are involved in teaching Urdu which can never be forgotten.

Document

Dr Nauman has discussed the prevailing method of education in India in a comprehensive manner. In the light of the prevailing philosophies of education in the world, he has tried to take an overview of how the present method of teaching is prevalent in India is not only important but also the need of the hour.

Now, a few words about the author Dr Mohammad Nauman Khan’s literary journey since he came on the scene after completing his education with a doctorate after post-graduation in Urdu. He blossomed in the Urdu literary field after tutelage under the watchful eyes of his mentor eminent Urdu litterateur late Prof Abdul Qavi Desnavi during his college days as a student in Saifia College in Bhopal. He has to his credit about 50 books that have been published so far while nine are in the pipeline. He also has to his standing about 400 research papers and analytical articles, interviews, reviews, forewords. published in Indo-Pakistan literary magazines, newspapers and books.

Meanwhile, the book was released in a function organised by the Maulana Barkatullah Bhopali Education Society. The president of the society Haji Muhammad Haroon on the occasion said that it is a matter of great pride for us that a son from Bhopal has written a comprehensive book on the Philosophy of Education. Dr Nauman was also honoured by the society and a citation was presented to him on the occasion.

Amid continuous protests, two security personnel arrested in Anish Khan murder case

0

Kolkata: As the protest of students in Kolkata and other parts of Bengal fifth day, on the alleged brutal murder of student leader Anish Khan, Bengal police arrests two people, a home guard and a civic volunteer.

The day also remained significant as chief minister Mamata Banerjee addressed a press conference on the issue and claimed that those who are culprits will be punished.

Significantly, Calcutta High Court will hear the case on Thursday, February the 24th.

On Friday night, four persons– three wearing civic volunteer uniform and one in policemen dress reached Anish residence under Amta police station. Father had alleged that while one person with police uniform stayed with him, three others took his son to upstairs and pushed off him from three storey building, after which the student leader died on spot.

“The family members of the deceased student are obstructing the Special Investigation Team (SIT) from conducting a second autopsy of Anish. The media is also showing the dark side and not promoting the good works done by the government,” said Mamata Banerjee to newsmen.

Slamming the demand for a CBI probe in the alleged murder, Bengal CM said that those who cannot do anything are trying to insult the state police.

“Nobel Prize of Rabindranath Tagore cannot be retrieved by the CBI. Hathras, the Unnao case is pending with the CBI. During Assembly polls, in Sitalkuchi central forces shot dead four people and CBI couldn’t do anything. Maybe some police can be wrong but all cannot be the same. Police will soon punish the culprits,” reiterated Banerjee.

The chief minister also slammed the students for taking out protest rallies across the city and throwing traffic out of gear in central Kolkata.

Meanwhile, the Director-General of Police (DGP) Manoj Malviya too, held a PC and informed that home guard Kashinath Bera and Civic Volunteer Pritam Bhattacharya of the Amta police station were arrested after interrogation.

“Even though the family member of Anish is not cooperating with SIT, still we have a breakthrough. The two arrested were booked under IPC section 302. Within 15 days we will clear the case. The family did not hand over the mobile phone of the victim to the SIT,” said Malviya.

However, the elder brother Shabir Khan and actor Badsha Moitra who visited Anish’s house on Wednesday questioned how can the home guard and civic volunteer ‘kill’ someone without any permission from the seniors.

When the SIT team revisited the residence of the killed student leader on Wednesday, the Shabir had shown them an old clipping of then opposition leader Mamata Banerjee, demanding a CBI probe into the death case of Rizwanur Rahman in 2007.

Whereas, the students of Aliah University, Presidency University once again took out protest rallies even on Wednesday and claimed that they will ‘regularly’ hit the streets till the culprits are punished.

Anish’s family adamant for CBI inquiry, refuses to hand over phone to police

0

Kolkata: Parts of Kolkata turned into a battlefield throwing away life out of gear after police clashed with Aliah University students while they were protesting against the brutal murder of fellow student Anish Khan at his Amta residence.

Protest rallies have erupted since Saturday evening, as the news of student leader Anish’s alleged murder reached the state capital. Students of Aliah University, where he was a student, have been active in rallying to create pressure and demand for justice for their slain peer. The 27-year-old was allegedly pushed from the terrace of his house, a three-storey building by three men, wearing a police uniform, claimed his father. 

Anish, a student of MBA, was very active socially and had not just participated in the anti-CAA-NRC movement in Bengal but was also holding a 137-day long protest in the varsity itself, before being killed.

On Tuesday, the protesting students of Aliah University took out a protest rally from the Park Circus area in south Kolkata to submit a deputation to Minister of Minority affairs Ghulam Rabbani at Writers’ Building.

Following the clash with the police, the students changed their route of the protest march and crossed Moulali, Sealdah, Rajabazar and visited the College Street area where they were finally stopped by the police again.

Anish’s friend Sadikul Rehman said that they will cross all ‘hurdles’ being posed by the police and that they will submit the deputation to Rabbani.

“The death of a student is a serious issue. The lives of protesting students are also important. The police can stop one day but we will keep on agitating,” said Rehman.

The College Street area in Central Kolkata turned into a battlefield after police resorted to lathi-charge and stopped the protesting students who were later arrested.

Students of Presidency University and Jadavpur University also protested to show their solidarity with protesters demanding justice for Anish.

Following the arrest of the protesting students of Aliah University, later in the evening, students of Jadavpur University took on to the streets and burnt a picture of Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee in front of Jadavpur police station.

Meanwhile, SIT team formed by Mamata Banerjee visited the deceased Anish’s house today.

According to his elder brother Shabir Khan, the police forced them to accept a notice brought by them stating that the police wants to take Anish’s mobile in ‘their custody’.

“The police even threatened us, saying that they would take action against us if we didn’t accept the notice. According to them, they can get the evidence from my brother’s phone. We have refused to take the notice as we will not hand over the mobile of Anish,” said Shabir.

Anish’s father Salam Khan said that he had requested the police to arrest the alleged ‘culprits’ before demanding his son’s mobile phone.

“I have asked the police whether they have arrested the culprits or not? Without answering the query they forcibly wanted to take the mobile and charger of Anish. They want to establish that my son is a criminal,” said the father.

Two days after the alleged murder, the family member had found his mobile at the residence but refused to hand it over to police as they believe that police might ‘tamper’ with it.

The family wants to hand over the phone to either Calcutta High Court or CBI to investigate Anish’s death.

Incidentally, following the verbal petition over Anish Khan’s death case by the lawyer of his family, the Justice of Calcutta High Court had asked the lawyer to submit a written petition which the court had taken a suo moto cognizance.

The hearing of the case is due on February 24.

Earlier today, the SIT team headed by DIG operations CID Miraz Khaled and Joint CP Barrackpore Drubojyoti De visited Anish’s residence to take the statement of the father.

Refusing to comment anything before the SIT team, elder brother Sabir Khan said that they only ‘believe’ and ‘trust’ CBI probe on this issue.

“Let SIT probe their way but we want a CBI probe. My father, me and the entire village want a CBI probe. Mamata didi should instruct CBI probe immediately,” demanded Sabir.

However, three policemen were suspended from Amta police station.

According to Amta police station, an assistant sub-inspector Nirmal Das, a constable Jeetendra Hembrom and a civic volunteer Kashinath Bera of Amata police station have been suspended for negligence in duty.

कांग्रेस यूनियन ऑफ स्टेट देश को जिंदा रखती है, लेकिन भाजपा उस पर ही हमला करती है: राहुल गांधी

गिरिडीह: अखिल भारतीय कांग्रेस कमेटी के पूर्व अध्यक्ष राहुल गांधी ने कहा कि कहा कि भारत की सबसे पुरानी पार्टी की विचारधारा सभी को साथ लेकर चलने की रही है। और यह कांग्रेस के डीएनए में है। राहुल गांधी मधुबन, गिरिडीह में आयोजित तीन दिवसीय चिंतन शिविर के आखिरी दिन कांग्रेसजनों को वर्चुअल माध्यम से संबोधित कर रहे थे।

ये शिविर, आरपीएन सिंह, जो झारखंड काँग्रेस के प्रभार में थे, के पार्टी छोड़ने के बाद पहली अहम बैठक थी।

मौके पे राहुल गांधी ने कहा कि राज्यों के गठन से देश बनता है। देश के सभी प्रदेशों की अपनी परम्परा, सस्कृति  और इतिहास है। हिंदुस्तान में छोटा-बड़ा कोई भी प्रदेश हो, हमारे लिए सबका महत्व एक समान है।

उन्होंने कहा कि झारखंड, उत्तर प्रदेश से छोटा जरूर है, लेकिन इसका एक अलग इतिहास और अनूठा कल्चर है। यहां अलग अलग धर्म और विभिन्न जातियों के लोग निवास करते हैं कई भाषाएं बोली जाती हैं।  उन्होने झार२वंड कांग्रेस पार्टी कार्यकर्ताओं का अहवान किया कि आप सब को इस राज्य के संस्कृति की रक्षा करने की जरूरत है। सभी कांग्रेसी मिलकर  इस प्रदेश की आत्मा और डीएनए की रक्षा करें। बीजेपी और आरएसएस झारखंड में ऊपर से एक अलग विचारधारा थोपना चाहती है। शिक्षण संस्थानों की विचारधारा भी प्रभावितr करना चाहती है। जिसेसे बचाने की जरूरत हैा सिर्फ कांग्रेस ही यूनियन ऑफ स्टेट की रक्षा करती हैा उन्होंने कहा कि झारखंड में कांग्रेस सरकार में हैं तो बेहतर काम भी करें।

उन्होंने मंत्रियों से कहा कि अपनी सरकार में बेहतर काम करें.देश को दिखाएं कि आदिवासी और गरीबों के लिए बेहतर काम हो रहा है। झारखंड में पार्टी को जड़ से मजबूत करें और यह काम आसान नहीं है, इसका ख्याल रखें। राहुल गांधी ने प्रदेश कांग्रेस के चिंतन शिविर की सराहना करते हुए कहा की पार्टी सगंठन मजबूत करने की दिशा में अच्छी पहल है।

भाजपा पर हमला करते हुए कहा कि बीजेपी का कांसेप्ट गलत है। जबकि कांग्रेस यूनियन ऑफ स्टेट देश को जिंदा रखती है, लेकिन भाजपा उस पर ही हमला करती है। अगर इस तरह के हमले करते जाएंगे तो बाहरी शक्तियां लाभ उठाएंगी।चीन ने वही किया है और लद्दाख में अपनी सेना बैठा दी है। उसने अरुणाचल प्रदेश में भी डिस्टरवेंस पैदा करना शुरू कर दिया है।

अपने ही सरकार पे सवाल

तीन दिन के इस शिविर कि खास बात ये रही कि जहाँ पार्टी के नेताओं ने झारखंड सरकार के साथ कॉमन मिनीमुम प्रोग्राम को पूरी तरह लागू करने कि बात करी, वहीं ईटीवी बिहार-झारखंड के अनुसार, विधायक दीपिका पाण्डेय और मंत्री बन्ना गुप्ता ने हेमंत सोरेन सरकार के काम काज़ पे सवाल उठाया और बोला के कांग्रेस को इससे नुकसान हो रहा है।

नए प्रभारी अविनाश पांडे ने कहा की राज्य भर से पार्टी डेलीगेटों के सुझाव के बाद पार्टी ने फैसला लिया है हेमंत सरकार में कॉमन मिनिमम प्रोग्राम के माध्यम से कांग्रेस अपने उन सभी एजेंडा को लागू करेगी। जो चुनाव में मैनिफेस्टो के जरिए इस राज्य की जनता से वादा किया था। और शीध्र राज्य में पंचायत चुनाव कराकर पंचायती राज व्यवस्था को मजबूती देने का काम करेगी। पिछड़ों से किया गया 27 फीसदी का आरक्षण का वादा भी दो सालों में से लटका है। जिसे कॉमन मिनिमम प्रोग्राम के जरिए पूरा कराना मकसद है।

A vocal student leader killed brutally in Bengal

0

Kolkata: Anish Khan, a 23-year-old MBA student of Aliah University, was murdered by throwing off from the third floor of his house at his native place Amta, less than 50 kilometers from Kolkata on Friday night. The student activist was very active on social issues and was an active participant of the anti-CAA, NRC movement, students’ protests in the university itself.

The incident has shocked and angered many across Bengal as the alleged killers who pushed Anish from his building and he died on spot, were in police uniform.

“It was around 12:30 am that four people came to our house and identified themselves as policemen from the Amta police station. One of them stood with me on the ground floor. He was carrying a firearm. The other three took my son upstairs. Moments later I heard a huge thud and found that my son was lying in a pool of blood. As I raised an alarm, following which all the four people fled,” said Salim Khan, Anish’s father.

However, Soumya Roy, SP, Howrah rural, claimed that no police personnel had gone to Anish’s residence. He added that had those imposters been police then they would have brought him to the police station, quoted The Hindu.

Anish was participating in a 138-day long protest by the students in Aliah University on several issues related to students at the varsity and had gone to his house a few days back. He was associated with the Students’ Federation of India (SFI). But the newly formed Secular Front of India claims Anish had joined them.

“He was not only very active in activism but when he used to speak, he used to mention names, if he had to speak about somebody. Anish was present at Park Circus anti-CAA protest site from day one,” told a devastated Nousheen Baba Khan, a rights activist, who participated with Anish in many protests, to eNewsroom.

eNewsroom has also accessed an old FIR dated June 24, 2021, in which the student leader had apprehended he could get murdered by a local panchayat leader for his social work.

As the news reached the state capital on Saturday, Aliah and Jadavpur University students held a candle march at Park Circus’ 7-Point Crossing. 7-Point Crossing at Park Circus is the most busiest crossing in the capital. The protesters also clashed with police as they removed the barricade put by Kolkata police.

The protesting students were claiming that it was a well-planned murder and demanded a thorough investigation.

Social media also started trending with #JusticeforAnish and #JusticeforAnishKhan.

Most political parties including CPIM, ISF, CPIML, AIMIM, Congress and BJP condemned the alleged killing.

CPM’s Mohammed Salim described the incident as one of the most “gruesome murders” of a student leader in the state in decades.

Naushad Siddiqui, ISF MLA said, “Just because I am an ISF legislator I won’t blame the ruling party. But the assailants had come wearing police uniforms. If the police don’t arrest the culprits, people will lose their faith. The assailants must be identified and arrested.”

While Dipankar Bhattacharya of CPIML tweeted, “Students demand #JusticeForAnishKhan. West Bengal demands #JusticeForAnishKhan. Protest vigils condemn the shocking killing of student leader #AnishKhan and demand punishment for the perpetrators of this brutal murder (sic).”

AIMIM issued a press release demanding a CBI inquiry into the murder.

Meanwhile, Trinamool Congress leader and Minister Firhad Hakim said there was a “deep-rooted conspiracy” over the incident and expressed hope that the police will get to the bottom of it.

انڈین امریکیوں کا کرناٹک میں غیر آئینی، اسلامو فوبک حجاب پر پابندی کے خلاف احتجاج

0

واشنگٹن، ڈی سی: ہندوستانی امریکی مسلمانوں نے ٹیکساس کے شہر ہیوسٹن میں کرناٹک ہائی کورٹ کی جانب سے اسکولوں میں طالبات کے حجاب پہننے پر پابندی کے خلاف احتجاج کیا۔

سو سے زیادہ لوگوں نے، جن میں خواتین سب سے آگے ہیں، کرناٹک حکومت سے مطالبہ کیا کہ وہ مسلم طالبات کے ساتھ امتیازی سلوک کو فوری طور پر بند کرے، جنہیں ان کے حجاب اتارنے پر مجبور کیا جا رہا ہے۔

عدالت کا یہ عبوری حکم ریاست کرناٹک کے کئی کالجوں کی طرف سے مسلم طلباء کو حجاب پہن کر کلاس رومز میں داخل ہونے سے روکنے کے بعد منظور کیا گیا، جس کی وجہ سے ملک گیر احتجاج اور بین الاقوامی تنقید ہوئی۔

ہیوسٹن میں مظاہرین نے پلے کارڈ اٹھا رکھے تھے جن پر لکھا تھا کہ “حجاب ہمارا آئینی حق ہے،” “ہندوستان میں حجاب پر پابندی بند کرو”، “ہندوستان میں اسلامو فوبیا کو روکو”، “حجاب پر حملہ مسلمان لڑکیوں کو تعلیم سے محروم کرنے کی سازش ہے،” اور “بھارت میں حجاب پر پابندی ہے۔ رنگ برنگی.”

سنگاپور کے وزیر اعظم کا انڈین اراکینِ پارلیمان سے متعلق متنازع بیان جس نے انڈیا کو سخت ردِ عمل دینے پر مجبور کیا

سنگاپور کے وزیراعظم لی سین لونگ نے 15 فروری کو اپنے ملک کی پارلیمان میں بحث کے دوران انڈیا کی پارلیمنٹ کا حوالہ دیتے ہوئے ایک تبصرہ کیا۔ انڈیا نے اس پر نہ صرف ناراضگی کا اظہار کیا بلکہ لی سین لونگ کے اس بیان پر انڈیا میں بحث چھڑ گئی۔

پارلیمنٹ سے خطاب کرتے ہوئے وزیر اعظم لی نے میڈیا رپورٹس کا حوالہ دیتے ہوئے کہا کہ ’نہرو کے انڈیا میں تقریباً 50 فیصد ممبران پارلیمنٹ کے خلاف قتل اور ریپ کے الزامات زیر التوا ہیں۔‘

تاہم انھوں نے اس بیان کی فوری طور پر وضاحت کرتے ہوئے کہا کہ ’یہ بھی کہا جا رہا ہے کہ ان میں سے بہت سے الزامات سیاسی محرکات پر مبنی بھی ہیں۔‘

اس کے بعد انڈیا نے وزیر اعظم لی کے بیان پر سخت اعتراض ظاہر کرتے ہوئے کہا کہ ان کا بیان ‘ناقابل قبول اور غیر ضروری’ ہے۔

سنگاپور کے وزیراعظم نے ایسا کیوں کہا؟

سنگاپور کے وزیراعظم اپنی پارلیمان کی کمیٹی آف پریویلیجز کی رپورٹ پر بحث میں اظہار خیال کر رہے تھے جس میں وہاں کے حزب اختلاف کے 5 بڑے رہنماؤں پر ‘جھوٹ بولنے’ کا الزام لگایا گیا تھا۔

چالیس منٹ کے اپنے خطاب میں، 70 سالہ لی نے انڈیا کے پہلے وزیر اعظم جواہر لعل نہرو اور اسرائیل کے سابق وزیراعظم ڈیوڈ بین گوریون کی مثال دیتے ہوئے کہا کہ ان رہنماؤں نے ’اپنے ملکوں کو آزادی دلوائی، لیکن بعد کی نسلوں کے رہنماؤں نے اقدار کی بربادی کو نہیں روکا۔‘

لی نے یہ بھی کہا کہ بہت سے ممالک کے سیاسی نظام ایسے ہو چکے ہیں کہ ان کے بانیوں کے لیے انھیں پہچاننا بھی مشکل ہو جائے گا۔

ان کا کہنا تھا کہ ‘بین گوریون کے اسرائیل کی حالت ایسی ہو گئی ہے کہ وہاں چار سال سے ایک مستحکم حکومت تک نہیں بن پا رہی۔‘

دوسری جانب وزیر اعظم لی کے بیان پر انڈیا کی وزارت خارجہ کی جانب سے ملا جلا ردعمل سامنے آ رہا ہے۔ انڈیا کے بعض سیاسی حلقوں میں کہا جا رہا ہے کہ وزیراعظم لی کے بیان پر انڈیا کا ردعمل ’ضرورت سے کچھ زیادہ‘ تھا۔

کانگریس لیڈر جے رام رمیش نے کہا کہ سنگاپور کے وزیراعظم نے نہرو کی مثال دی کہ ملک میں جمہوریت کیسے چلنی چاہیے جبکہ ہمارے وزیر اعظم پارلیمان کے اندر اور باہر ان کی توہین کرتے رہتے ہیں۔

کیرالہ سے کانگریس کے رکن پارلیمان اور سابق وزیرِ مملکت برائے امور خارجہ ششی تھرور نے ٹوئٹر پر لکھا کہ ’یہ ناانصافی ہے کہ سنگاپور جیسے دوست ملک کے ہائی کمشنر کو ان کی پارلیمنٹ میں ان کے وزیر اعظم کے بیان پر طلب کیا جائے۔ کبھی کبھی تھوڑا کم حساس ہونا سیکھنا چاہیے۔‘

ششی تھرور نے کہا کہ انڈیا کو اس معاملے میں ایک بیان جاری کرنا چاہیے تھا کہ صرف یہ کہتے کہ ’ہم نے وزیر اعظم کے بیان کو بہت سنجیدگی سے سنا۔

’تاہم ہم نہ تو دوسرے ممالک کے اندرونی معاملات میں مداخلت کرتے ہیں اور نہ ہی ان کی پارلیمنٹ میں۔ ہم دوسرے ممالک سے بھی اسی پالیسی پر عمل کرنے کی درخواست کرتے ہیں۔‘

بی بی سی سے بات کرتے ہوئے راجیہ سبھا میں راشٹریہ جنتا دل کے رکن پارلیمان منوج جھا نے کہا کہ جب دوسرے ممالک سے اس طرح کے ردعمل آتے ہیں، جیسا کہ سنگاپور میں ہوا، تو اس پر غور کر کے خود احتسابی ہونی چاہیے۔

وہ کہتے ہیں کہ ‘اگر کوئی ہمیں آئینہ دکھا رہا ہے تو ہمیں سوچنا چاہیے کہ وہ اس طرح کیوں بول رہا ہے۔‘

منوج جھا کو لگتا ہے کہ وزیر اعظم لی کے بیان پر انڈیا کا ردعمل ’انتہا پسندانہ‘ تھا۔ اس کے علاوہ ان کا یہ بھی کہنا ہے کہ انڈیا کو عام طور پر دوسرے ممالک کی پارلیمان میں ہونے والی بحثوں پر اس طرح کا ردعمل دینے سے گریز کرنا چاہیے۔

ان کے مطابق انڈیا کی پارلیمان میں بحث کے دوران پاکستان اور دیگر ممالک پر تبصرے کرتے رہتے ہیں۔ لیکن ان ممالک کی طرف سے کبھی کوئی ردعمل سامنے نہیں آیا۔

ترنمول کانگریس کے رکن پارلیمان سکھیندو شیکھر رائے نے بھی بی بی سی سے بات کرتے ہوئے کہا کہ ہماری پارلیمان کے حالیہ اجلاس میں کئی ارکان نے چین اور پاکستان کا نام لے کر بحث کی۔

انھوں نے کہا ’انڈیا کو سنگاپور کے وزیر اعظم لی ہسین لونگ کے پارلیمنٹ میں بیان پر سفارتی بیان دینا چاہیے تھا، یہ تھوڑا زیادہ ہو گیا ہے۔‘

سنگاپور وزیر اعظم لی سین لونگ جواہر لعل نہروسنگاپور کو انڈیا پر بات کرنے کا کوئی حق نہیں

تاہم بہت سے لوگ سنگاپور اور اس کے وزیر اعظم کے بیان اور وہاں کی جمہوریت کی حالت پر شدید تنقید کر رہے ہیں۔

خارجہ امور کے ماہر برہم چیلانی کا کہنا ہے کہ ’سنگاپور میں اظہار رائے کی آزادی اور دیگر قسم کے شہری حقوق پر بہت سی پابندیاں ہیں، اس لیے سنگاپور کو ‘انڈیا اور اسرائیل’ جیسی اصل جمہوریتوں کو لیکچر دینے کا کوئی حق نہیں ہے۔‘

 

برہم چیلانی نے ٹوئٹر پر لکھا کہ ’یہ عجیب بات ہے کہ انڈیا کی اپوزیشن جماعتوں کے ارکان سنگاپور کے وزیر اعظم کے بیان کی تعریف کر رہے ہیں۔ جبکہ سنگاپور ایک ایسا ملک ہے جہاں اپوزیشن کی آواز کو دبا دیا گیا ہے۔‘

ایک اور سیاسی تجزیہ کار آنند رنگناتھن نے بھی ٹوئٹر پر لکھا کہ ’یہ ستم ظریفی ہے کہ ایک طرح سے ایک پارٹی کی آمریت والا ملک انڈیا کو جمہوریت پر نصیحت دے رہا ہے۔‘

ساتھ ہی سابق سفارت کار کنول سبل کا کہنا ہے کہ سنگاپور کو جمہوریت کے طور پر بھی تسلیم نہیں کیا گیا۔ انہیں امریکی صدر جو بائیڈن کی جانب سے منعقدہ ڈیموکریسی کانفرنس میں بھی مدعو تک نہیں کیا گیا۔

کس موضوع پر بول رہے تھے وزیر اعظم لی؟

وزیر اعظم لی نے تاہم یہ نہیں بتایا کہ وہ انڈین پارلیمان کے ارکان کے بارے میں کس حوالے سے بات کر رہے تھے۔

اسوسی ایشن فار ڈیموکریٹک ریفارمز نے 2019 کی اپنی رپورٹ میں کہا ہے کہ اس وقت انتخابات میں جیتنے والے لوک سبھا کے 43 فیصد ارکان ایسے ہیں جنھیں کسی نہ کسی عدالتی مقدمے کا سامنا ہے۔

سنگاپور کی پارلیمنٹ میں اپوزیشن کی رکن اور ورکرز پارٹی کی رکن رئیسہ خان کو کمیٹی آف پریویلیجز نے ایوان میں جھوٹ بولنے کا مرتکب پایا اور ان پر 26 ہزار سنگاپوری ڈالر جرمانہ عائد کیا۔

وہاں کی پارلیمان میں استحقاق کمیٹی نے اپنی رپورٹ ایوان کے فلور پر پیش کی۔ خان کے علاوہ، استحقاق کمیٹی نے ان کی پارٹی کے رہنما فیصل مناپ اور صدر پریتم سنگھ کے خلاف فوجداری مقدمہ درج کرنے کی سفارش کی ہے۔

جب وزیر اعظم لی نے پارلیمنٹ میں اپنی بات کہی تو اسی رپورٹ پر بحث چل رہی تھی۔

بی بی سی سے لیا گیا

The Djokovic Dilemma and The Kohli Crisis

0

Novak Djokovic, the world’s number one tennis player has created what is being called a ‘Djokovic Dilemma’ in the world of sports celebrity sponsorships by super-brands. With assets of over US$220 million, Djokovic’s earnings from sponsorships are several times more than his court winnings. And this is at risk now, after his refusal to get vaccinated which resulted in him being disqualified from playing in the Australian Open tournament. He’s not the only one who’s at risk, his sponsors too with millions riding on him, face a rub-off, that might not be entirely desirable.

Lacoste weighs the impact

Djokovic’s lead sponsor Lacoste has said it wants to discuss events leading up to the player’s visa battle, which led to him being detained by Australia’s Border Force at the airport and subsequently in a hotel for asylum seekers before he was freed to contest the issue in court. Lacoste is thought to be Djokovic’s biggest sponsor with an annual contract worth a reported US$9m. The deal runs until 2025. Lacoste has an entire product line built around him, which could prove challenging to transition if they went their separate ways.
Sponsorship is a huge business; most are seen as a partnership that is mutually beneficial for both sponsor and endorser. When entering such an arrangement having a carefully considered sponsorship strategy is key to protecting both brands. This is not the first time that athletes have pulled out of tournaments causing financial losses to their sponsors. However, some sponsors have also turned this obstacle into an opportunity with some deft marketing messaging.

The Kohli crisis

Closer home, Indian cricket star like Virat Kohli is generating a fair amount of controversy that is making sponsors watch carefully how things pan out. A straw poll conducted by the Indian Institute of Human Brands (IIHB) just after he lost his captaincy, shows that he is losing popularity. Kohli is among one of the highest-paid endorsers of the country and holds the top position in the Duff & Phelps’ Celebrity Brand Valuation Report 2020 with a brand value of US$237.7 million. He endorses over 40 brands including MRF Tyres, Mobile Premier League (MPL), Myntra, Puma, among others.

Turning a problem into a prospect

Research by the University of Connecticut and Free University of Berlin found that even crisis situations would generate positive returns when handled properly. The researchers studied the speed of the response by the company, the nature of its reaction, and how it impacted returns. They found that a faster response in the form of an announcement or statement from the company increases firm value by 2.10% over the next four trading weeks. Further, they learned that when companies issue statements about suspending or maintaining the celebrity endorser it is more likely to contribute to positive returns, than if there were no response at all. They had analysed 128 events of negative endorser publicity which affected the sponsors in 230 actual cases.

Nike’s woke messaging

A few years ago, a celebrity athlete dropping out of a major tennis tournament over mental health issues might have been seen as a sign of weakness. Today, at least for the world’s number one women tennis player Naomi Osaka’s corporate sponsors, it is being hailed as refreshingly honest. Her sponsors seized the opportunity to stick with her and come out with ‘woke’ messaging after she dropped out of the French Open.

Osaka, who also acknowledged suffering “long bouts of depression,” received criticism from some who say that it came with the job. But global footwear maker Nike, and Sweetgreen, an American casual restaurant chain serving salads, besides other sponsors put out statements in support of the 23-year-old star after she revealed her struggles.“Our thoughts are with Naomi,” Nike said in a statement. “We support her and recognize her courage in sharing her own mental health experience.” Sweetgreen tweeted that its partnership with Osaka “is rooted in wellness in all its forms.” And Mastercard tweeted: “Naomi Osaka’s decision reminds us all how important it is to prioritize personal health and well-being.”

Like most business relationships, there’s a natural, normal evolution as brands shift focus, athletes become more or less relevant, and the value and impact of the relationships are evaluated over time. Hitching the brand wagon to a celebrity can be risky. Humans are human, and it’s inevitable that at some point, celebrity and star athletes will misstep.

The nuclear option

When celebrities falter, the brand damage can range from minor to catastrophic. In October 2012, Lance Armstrong lost eight significant sponsors in a single day after the news of his doping and related cover-ups reached an inflection point. It is called the ‘nuclear option’ in brands terminating sponsorships in the event of a calamitous event, like what happened to golf superstar Tiger Woods.

In the wake of Tiger Wood’s late 2009 car accident and following his admission of marital infidelity, some sponsors cut ties with the golfer in 2009 and 2010. The first of Woods’ big-time sponsors to break its deal was Gatorade. Through 2010, several other of Woods’ sponsors dropped Tiger, and those were all certainly (although not publicly acknowledged as such) the result of his scandals. AT&T and Accenture both announced in December 2009 they were dropping their sponsorship deals with him. Late in 2010, Gillette (owned by Proctor & Gamble) said it would not renew its sponsorship agreement with Woods.

The dilemma- to act or wait

One of the dilemmas companies often face is concern whether an over-reaction could draw unnecessary attention to a negative event, exacerbating a negative reaction on the part of investors. There can be a tendency for companies to want to wait before responding or not responding at all.

If the firm decides to remain quiet when a celebrity endorser is at the centre of controversy, investors do not receive any signal whether the firm is aware of the event and motivated to counteract the negative spillover effects. Ongoing uncertainty will lead to doubt among investors and as a consequence, stock returns will trend downward in the following days.

On the contrary, a firm that responds to the event reduces uncertainty because it discloses its intentions to the stock market, relieving investor concerns about the firm’s commitment to managing the event effectively. This makes investors more confident about the company, and returns are less affected.