The Spirit of Resistance: Why Iran and Global South Nations Defy the West

The massive anti-war rallies or No Kings protest across the United States and other Western countries have categorically demonstrated that Donald Trump and his government’s war on Iran have become highly unpopular. They also reflect that people understand the huge propaganda that is being unleashed through the crony corporate media, which is part and parcel of the entire US game plan to create a fake narrative and legitimise their intervention.

The US kidnapped a duly elected president in the name of his support for the “drug mafia” and then pushed its puppet as president in Venezuela, simply because it wanted to shamelessly capture Venezuelan oil. So the Venezuelan president was bad, but what about the Colombian president, whom the deep state now wants to target? The tiny island nation of Cuba has been facing American barbarism for the past 70 years. What is so great about not allowing basic amenities to Cuba? Why do you hate Cuba that much when you consider yourselves shining, the best, the greatest people on earth? When you are the greatest of the greatest, special people, God’s chosen ones, then why do you need to steal the natural resources of other countries?

From Cuba to Venezuela: A Century of US Intervention for Resources

Now, Venezuela, Cuba and Colombia are in America’s backyard and are very small countries, despite the fact that they are strategically important for the United States due to their enormous natural resources. Why did the US decide to jump into the Persian Gulf at the behest of Israel to target Iran? They bombed Iran last year and suddenly claimed victory, suggesting that Iran’s nuclear programme was completely destroyed. If you destroyed everything last year, then why did you go again?

Every country has the right to defend itself fully when war is imposed on it. Iran was within its rights to retaliate. The media narrative as to why Iran was targeting “innocent” neighbours is simply laughable when it is well known that these countries host American military bases. Without them, US forces could not have done anything. In the last thirty years, we have seen American and NATO interventions from Kosovo to Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Gaza and the West Bank, and now Iran. Obviously, NATO is not part of the last two, as Israel has become the senior partner. Can the US and its allies ever say that all their interventions “brought democracy” to these countries?

The thing is that the Western media first creates an uncivilised image of a society and a system to legitimise American violation of the sovereignty of those countries. Libya was a great nation, united under one leader who wanted to unite Africa, but that was not acceptable to France. Saddam Hussein was a “secular” liberal dictator when he attacked Iran with the help of Americans, but became a villain when he started asserting himself. We have seen how a liberal president in Syria, Bashar al-Assad, was replaced by men who were part of ISIS and other such organisations banned by the United States. Despite all the wrongs with these countries and societies, they were definitely not a threat to the United States, which is far away and far more powerful.

West Asia Crisis: Assessing the Human Cost of Gaza and Iran Clashes

The latest in the series, prior to intervention in Iran, was the genocide carried out in Gaza. Who will hold Israel accountable for all its crimes against humanity? The problem with the “liberal democratic” West is that anything questioning Israel is termed anti-Semitism. Experts say that even war has rules. That warring nations or parties will not target civilians, hospitals, aid workers, schools, colleges, energy infrastructure, or media. What has happened in Gaza puts humanity to shame. An entire generation of people was killed, and nations watched helplessly. The United Nations looked useless during the entire period, except for making a few statements; it had no courage.

A pattern has been developed by Israel and the United States over the years. It looks like their main agenda is to destroy civilian infrastructure, hospitals, aid workers, universities, and institutions. The killing of 160 innocent children was not an isolated incident, as these things continue to be targeted. Israel has killed numerous journalists in this war, as well as in Gaza and Lebanon. Some of these journalists worked defiantly and were committed to bringing their reports to the people.

The Literacy Myth: Why Iran’s Social Progress Defies Western Media

Now Iran has given a befitting reply that neither Israel nor the United States ever expected. This happens when we are arrogant and feel that all others who disagree with us know nothing. This war has definitely brought destruction to Iran, but elsewhere too. The global economy is collapsing, but the brighter side is that the de-dollarisation process will accelerate. It has already started growing as countries will find ways to get away from so-called sanctions. Today, the world is interconnected, but all parties need to show respect to each other. You cannot bully nations and decide who should get their business.

This war has also broken the lies carefully woven around the “liberal” media about Iran. Yes, Iran is a powerful country with a great civilisation. Moreover, any country which has self-respect will fight to the end to protect its sovereignty. We fought against the British Empire, and at that time, too many suggested how we could fight against a mighty empire, but our freedom movement leaders had faith in the people. No self-respecting country would ever accept how to govern and what is good for them from an external force. Iran and the Iranian people are the sole deciders of their country’s way of life, and that should be respected. It is the spirit of Iranian nationalism that people are ready to fight.

The war must end, but no peace is possible if it is just meant to buy time and regroup. For the last fifty years, Iran has faced economic sanctions like Cuba, but it has stood its ground. The image created around Iran was one where women live within four walls, where Mullahs speak loudly, and nobody goes to school. Today, one can see that Iran has more than 99% literacy, and its Majlis have the most educated leaders in the world. The percentage of women doctors in Iran is much higher than in India. Iran is a powerhouse of science and philosophy. If the Western media want to make comparisons, they should compare Iran with their friends in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and elsewhere. The AI memes being created by Iranians are simply outstanding. You can watch men and women reporters reporting so well. So, this war has broken the myths and lies created around Iran by the corporate media.

De-dollarization and Global Shifts: Can Russia and China Forge Peace?

Iran is actually fighting a war against Western cultural, economic, and military hegemony. That does not mean they should not have any relations. We all must have relations, but it is time that a long-term peaceful solution is found to the problems in different parts of the world. But what is the problem? Can’t Iran, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, etc. speak to each other on their own? The issue is not that simple. Private monopolies on energy are the root cause. Iran nationalised its energy industry in the mid-1950s, and that is why it became a hate figure.

Indira Gandhi did it in India in 1970, and the CIA turned against her. I can bet that if we dig further into what resulted in Indira Gandhi’s defeat in 1977, we will find that chaos and anarchy were engineered because of the nationalisation of banks in 1969, which was opposed by people like Morarji Desai, who was the finance minister. Historically, every country which nationalised its banks and natural resources like coal mines, forests, land, and water became a target of vicious Western propaganda. The history of South Africa, Cuba, Bolivia, Colombia, Libya, and Iran is the same, related to the rights of indigenous people, management of natural resources, and opposition to privatisation.

Let us see what happens in the Persian Gulf. We hope good sense will prevail. The people everywhere are against war, but no peace is possible unless a lasting solution is found. Will that be possible if the interests of big corporations are not taken care of? More importantly, where are Russia and China in this entire game? India could have played a bigger role, but at the moment it cannot because of its relations with Israel. Negotiations are important, but somewhere Russia, China and India will have to be part of the peace process in West Asia; otherwise, no peace would be achievable there.

Murshidabad Ram Navami Violence: 45 Injured, RSS Leader Among 30 Arrested, CM Flags ‘Conspiracy’

0

Kolkata: Violence broke out in parts of Murshidabad district on Friday during a Ram Navami procession in Raghunathganj under the Jangipur subdivision, injuring approximately 45 people and triggering widespread tension in the area. The administration confirmed that the situation has now been brought under control following the deployment of central forces, including the Rapid Action Force (RAF), along with local police.

According to officials, several injured individuals are currently undergoing treatment at the Jangipur Sub-Divisional Hospital. Security forces continue to patrol sensitive areas to prevent further escalation.

As per local sources, Ram Navami processions were organised across the subdivision, with smaller rallies from different villages converging at Mackenzie Park in Raghunathganj, following an annual tradition.

Trouble reportedly began in the Sisatala area under the jurisdiction of Raghunathganj Police Station, where participants in one of the processions allegedly made derogatory remarks targeting the Muslim community. When local residents protested, a verbal altercation ensued, which quickly escalated into a volatile situation.

Tensions intensified further at Phultala Crossing when the main procession reached the area. Eyewitnesses alleged that a section of the processionists vandalised several shops belonging to Muslims and set some of them ablaze. In addition, vehicles—including cars, motorcycles, and vans—were reportedly damaged, spreading panic across the locality.

Locals Allege Premeditated Attacks as Shops and Rallies Targeted

Residents claimed that the attacks were targeted and premeditated. Some alleged that religious flags and posters put up during Eid celebrations—bearing messages such as “I Love Muhammad”—were torn down during the procession. There were also allegations of stone-pelting directed at shops and residential houses.

A local resident, Bariul Islam, stated that the area had long been known for communal harmony but was disrupted by “outsiders” who allegedly carried out the attacks.

Eyewitness accounts further described scenes of chaos. A fruit vendor claimed that a procession of nearly 2,000 people suddenly turned violent, assaulting him and vandalising his shop. Another trader alleged that Muslim-owned establishments—including fruit stalls, eateries, and small businesses—were specifically targeted, looted, and set on fire.

Mofizul Islam, Chairman of the Jangipur Municipality, questioned the role of law enforcement, alleging that “even in the presence of police, attackers selectively targeted shops,” and suggested that the violence appeared to be pre-planned.

Local residents also expressed anger over the losses suffered by small business owners, raising concerns about compensation and accountability. Some questioned whether the real perpetrators would be brought to justice, pointing to previous instances of unrest in nearby areas such as Shamsherganj and Omarpur.

On the other hand, BJP’s Jangipur organisational district president, Subal Chandra Ghosh, rejected the allegations, claiming that the violence was orchestrated to disrupt the Ram Navami procession. He alleged that stones were thrown at the procession and also criticised police action, accusing them of using force against party workers.

The incident triggered sharp political reactions across parties. Senior Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury criticised the administration, calling the violence “deeply concerning and condemnable,” and questioned why preventive measures were not taken despite the scale of the procession.

Jangipur TMC MP Khalilur Rahaman condemned the violence and urged people to maintain communal harmony, stressing the long-standing coexistence between communities in Murshidabad. He also called for an impartial investigation and swift arrests.

Trinamool Congress leader and former state minister Zakir Hossain appealed for calm and stated that he had contacted the police to ensure the immediate restoration of law and order.

ISF chairman Nawsad Siddique alleged that there was a “deliberate conspiracy” to destabilise the district for political gain and urged residents not to fall prey to communal provocation.

30 Arrested Including RSS Leader; Bengal CM Blames ‘Planned Riots’

According to police sources, 30 individuals—including an RSS leader—have been arrested in connection with the unrest. Those arrested include RSS leader Kingshuk Bhattacharya and Hindu nationalist leader Babai Chakraborty.

Security forces, including central paramilitary units and RAF personnel, were deployed promptly after the violence was reported. Officials said that the joint operation helped bring the situation under control.

Ajeet Singh Yadav, Deputy Inspector General (DIG) of Murshidabad Range, confirmed that the situation is currently stable. He stated that several individuals have been arrested and that police forces remain deployed in the area. An investigation into the incident is underway.

Mamata Banerjee Alleges ‘Planned Riots’, Warns Strict Action

On Saturday, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee addressed a public rally at Khandra Football Ground in Raniganj. Referring to the clashes that took place in Raghunathganj on Friday (March 27), Mamata alleged, “Officers were transferred in order to orchestrate riots. Who gave anyone the authority to incite such violence? Money is being pumped in. No one will be spared.”

She further added, “I expect those currently in charge to act impartially and maintain peace and order in the area. No one will be spared.”

The Trinamool Congress supremo also alleged that Ram Navami processions were carried out while openly brandishing weapons, yet no action was taken. She expressed regret over the clashes between the two groups and apologised for the alleged laxity of the administration, which is currently under the control of the Election Commission.

Amid rising tensions, leaders and residents alike have called for restraint and communal harmony. Authorities have urged citizens not to spread or believe rumours as the administration continues its efforts to stabilise the region. While the situation is presently under control, the incident has raised serious concerns about law and order and communal tensions ahead of the upcoming elections in West Bengal.

Civil Society Demands Accountability and Compensation for Victims

Condemning the violence, the SUCI (Communist) party submitted a deputation to the Superintendent of Police of Jangipur Police District, demanding strict action against those responsible. The party called for the identification of culprits through CCTV footage and media evidence and urged the government to provide immediate compensation to those affected by arson and looting.

They also appealed to the administration to conduct public awareness campaigns to counter rumours and maintain peace.

From Gazetted Officer to Deleted: The Faces of Bengal’s Voter Purge

0

Kolkata: Reshma Shirin Iqbal has had a three-decade-long professional career with the central government. A Gazetted Officer with the Accountant General of West Bengal (AGWB), she has served as a Micro Observer, Presiding Officer, supervised Ladies’ Booths, and assisted in conducting elections on several occasions over the past thirty years. She holds a valid passport and has travelled abroad multiple times. Yet, on March 28, when the Election Commission published the second supplementary list, she found her name deleted.

From Gazetted Officer to Deleted Voter: Reshma’s Story

Her case in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process is deeply intriguing. On February 28, when the Election Commission (West Bengal) published the final electoral roll, her name was present. On March 23, in the first supplementary list, her name appeared under “Under Adjudication.” In the second supplementary list, however, her name was missing.

Reshma’s name has been part of the electoral roll since 2002.

“When my name appeared under the ‘Adjudication’ category, I was told that my father’s name was mismatched. But that is not true. My father, Jalil Ahmed, a WBCS officer, has his name recorded consistently across all documents. I also own a flat and have a registered land deed,” Reshma said. She added that she has held a passport since 2001 and possesses almost all required documents.

“But today, I do not know where to go or whom to approach. When I contacted the BLO, he said they could not do anything and advised me to fill Form 6. But why should I fill Form 6, which is meant for new voters? If, for any reason, it is not accepted, my voting rights could be lost forever,” she added.

Voters in Limbo: Decades of History vs. Sudden Deletions

Like Reshma, Ajmira Begum, wife of Sheikh Rezaul Haque and a voter from Shyampur (AC 179), also holds a passport. The 61-year-old voter’s name has been deleted from the recently released list.

Her son, Sheikh Ashad ul Rahman, an Assistant Professor at Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), said, “My mother has cast her vote more than twenty times in different elections throughout her life. My younger brother secured Rank 45 in NET-JRF 2025 and is pursuing a PhD from NCL, Pune. Another brother is working after completing his BTech.”

He added, “My mother has given us her entire life. She was born before Bangladesh was created. And, we will not let her voting rights go away in allegations of Bangladeshi. If needed, we will not hesitate to hit the streets for her and for genuine voters whose voting rights have been taken away.”

Abhijit Mitra, a renowned artist whose exhibition was recently held in London, is also a worried father. The names of his two sons, Aranya and Roddur Mitra, have been deleted from the electoral roll.

Aranya studied at St. James School, Kolkata, completed his BTech from BITS, and pursued an MTech in the United Kingdom. The 34-year-old software engineer is currently working on an Artificial Intelligence-related project in the UK. Roddur also studied at St. James, completed a Master’s in International Relations, and has worked in Bengaluru.

Ancestry vs. Algorithms: 350-Year City Roots Face Deletion

“In the February 28 final list, both my sons and I were marked ‘Under Adjudication.’ I was told that the age difference between my father and me was only 15 years. But according to documents, it is 42 years. When I raised this during the hearing, officials admitted it was an AI-related error. In the latest list, my name has been cleared, but both my sons’ names have been deleted,” Abhijit told eNewsroom.

Speaking about his family’s long association with the city, he said, “Do you know how old our connection to this place is? It is more than 400 years. Not only have my sons studied in Kolkata, but there is a street—Neel Mitra in Dorji Para—named after my ancestors. We have been organising Durga Puja there for over 350 years.”

“Actually, the SIR is being carried out in India, especially in Bengal, to remove Muslim voters. Hindus are the collateral damage, as happens during wars. Banerjees, Chatterjees, and Mitras are the collateral damage,” he alleged. And added, “According to election commission, my two sons are Bangladeshis or Rohingayas.”

The Missing 15 Lakh: Unanswered Questions in the SIR Process

Data from the second supplementary list appears to raise serious concerns. In Malatipur (AC-47), Part No. 129, out of 1,274 voters, 363 were deleted—and all were reportedly Muslims. In Palashipara (AC-79), Part No. 135, 250 voters were deleted, with Muslims accounting for 98.8% of those removed. Several among them reportedly hold passports but still found their names missing from the electoral roll.

Following the publication of the final roll, around 60 lakh voters were placed under adjudication. After two supplementary lists, the Election Commission stated that 37 lakh cases had been disposed of by judicial officers. However, only 22 lakh names have appeared in the published lists so far, including 12 lakh in the second list.

The Commission has not specified how many names have been deleted, though sources suggest the figure could be around 40%. This leaves several questions unanswered: What happened to the remaining 15 lakh voters whose names have neither appeared nor been accounted for? And where do genuine voters, whose names have been deleted, go to reclaim their voting rights?

Eid Message to a Restless World: Why the Alchemy of the Conquest of Mecca is Needed Today

0

After a month of rigorous spiritual training and self-purification, Muslims across the globe celebrate the auspicious festival of Eid al-Fitr. However, unlike the conventional festivals of many nations, this sacred day is not merely an occasion for amusement or luxury. It is a profound manifestation of sacrifice, compassion, gratitude, and collective awakening.

While the Muslim Ummah has endured severe trials and internal divisions for decades, and colonial interests have long sought to marginalise Islamic civilisation, the gravity of the current moment is unprecedented. Today, the world witnesses a harrowing contrast: while an unholy alliance pursues aggressive posturing in the Middle East—threatening the stability of sovereign states like Iran—the innocent children of Gaza endure starvation and a brutal genocide. The pursuit of the sinister “Greater Israel” project is targeting Muslim nations in a pattern that echoes the horrifying destruction of Iraq, Syria, Libya, Sudan, and Somalia.

In these critical times, when the Ummah should stand as a “fortified wall” against global fascism, it is tragic that sectarian and regional fissures are being exploited to further weaken us. This Eid-ul-Fitr, therefore, must be more than a celebration; it must be a catalyst for collective self-reflection, a resolve to resist conspiracies, and a mission to offer hope to a suffering humanity.

Reclaiming the Prophetic Code of Conduct

Amidst this darkness, the timeless principles demonstrated during the Battle of Badr, the Battle of Uhud, and the Conquest of Mecca serve as a beacon of light. Through these events, the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ—the Benefactor of Humanity—established a code of conduct that upheld human dignity even in the heat of battle. Today, we must not only reclaim these lessons but also hold a mirror to the hypocrisy of those who claim the mantle of “civilisation” while presiding over modern-day brutality.

It is a faith-inspiring coincidence that these three pivotal events—the Battle of Badr (17th Ramadan), the Conquest of Mecca (late Ramadan), and the Battle of Uhud (5th Shawwal)—are historically clustered around the season of Eid. Each offers a universal message for the contemporary world:

The Battle of Badr teaches us to uphold human values even in the wake of absolute victory. Rather than succumbing to the intoxication of triumph, the early Muslims established an unparalleled standard for the humane treatment of prisoners of war, prioritising justice over vengeance. This historical context serves as a reminder: the joy of Eid should not breed complacency. Instead, it should invigorate our vigilance and strengthen our resolve against those who seek our undoing. True peace will not be found in the stockpiling of weapons, but in the Islamic system of mercy and justice that once transformed the world.

The Conquest of Mecca: An Ocean of Mercy

The Conquest of Mecca stands as a unique miracle in human history. It was a moment that offered every justification for retribution after two decades of relentless persecution, systemic conspiracies, and the staggering loss of Muslim lives and property. Yet, instead of vengeance, an ocean of mercy and compassion overflowed—an example unparalleled in the annals of time. By declaring a general amnesty, the Prophet ﷺ proved that Islam does not conquer through the sword, but through the profound strength of morality and human dignity.

In contrast, today’s world prides itself on being “developed,” operating under the delusion that human civilisation and moral values have reached their zenith. While modern technology and scientific innovation have indeed transformed the structure of human existence, the tragedy lies in their application: these advancements are increasingly weaponised for the destruction of humanity rather than its welfare. We have engineered devastating arsenals capable of erasing flourishing cities in the blink of an eye.

Furthermore, the rule of law has effectively collapsed on the global stage. The very “superpower” that publishes annual sermons on international human rights employs a defence minister who, embodying a fascist mindset, openly declares that “he only wants to win the war.” In this framework, human life, ethical values, and the established laws of war are deemed irrelevant. Even more tragic is the deafening silence of the global conscience. No one possesses the courage to ask: What has become of your lofty moral claims?

Confronting the Hypocrisy of Modern Civilisation

These same powers justified their aggression against Iran by citing the suppression of dissent and the curtailment of women’s freedoms. Yet, the world must ask: what justification exists for the slaughter of 40,000 innocent children in Gaza? Under what tenet of international law was a girls’ school in Iran bombed, claiming the lives of over 150 young students? Those who once championed the slogans of female education and liberation—why is their rhetoric silenced by the blood of these innocent students? Why is there no global reckoning for the systemic depravity revealed by the Jeffrey Epstein case and the elite networks connected to it? This hypocrisy proves that modern “civilisation” is merely a glittering facade, concealing an ancient system of predatory brutality.

The fundamental tragedy of Western civilisation is its self-portrayal as the “saviour of humanity,” while the pages of history show its hands stained with the blood of the innocent. The West claims the mantle of freedom, yet its legacy is defined by the occupation of entire continents and systematic genocide. The slaughter of 100 million Native Americans and 4.5 million Aboriginal people in Australia remains an indelible stain on the conscience of the so-called “civilised world.”

While they baselessly accuse Islam of being “militant,” the reality is that over the last 600 years, the West has instigated more than 2,600 wars. The two World Wars alone claimed over 120 million lives. These statistics testify that the West’s claim to “peacefulness” is a political fiction.

Democracy and the Crisis of International Hegemony

Moreover, for the West, democracy is a conditional value—acceptable only when the results align with its strategic interests. Whether it was the Islamic Salvation Front in Algeria, the government of Necmettin Erbakan in Turkey, the electoral victory of Hamas in Palestine, or the constitutional presidency of Mohamed Morsi in Egypt, the West has consistently undermined democracy wherever Islamic movements gained a public mandate. The current attempts to delegitimise and attack the Islamic Republic of Iran are but another link in this chain. It has become clear: for the West, secular dictatorship is preferred over Islamic democracy.

Finally, the global order established under the United Nations has devolved into a tool of hegemony for five major powers, where the veto power is routinely used to trample the collective will of the international community. The relentless bombing of hospitals and schools in Gaza, and the recent strikes on educational institutions in Iran, provide definitive evidence that Western “humanitarianism” is a selective privilege, reserved only for those it deems worthy.

This blind struggle for power has finally begun to jolt the conscience of the West, sparking unprecedented dissent within Western nations regarding their own military involvements. Spain, in a bold departure from the status quo, has openly refused to comply with these atrocities, bluntly stating that it “cannot applaud the killing of children.” European nations that once followed Washington’s lead into the flames of war without hesitation are now—just fifteen days into the aggression against Iran—mired in doubt and delay. Exhausted by the prolonged conflict between Russia and Ukraine, they are increasingly expressing visceral disgust at this escalating brutality. Historically, American military bases were viewed as absolute guarantees of security; today, however, the United States has inadvertently proven that it can no longer ensure protection for anyone. This shifting tide in global politics serves as a flickering candle of hope amidst a dark and suffocating atmosphere.

The Moral Purpose of Struggle and Protection of Rights

On this blessed occasion of Eid-ul-Fitr, it is imperative to remind the world that war, in its essence, is not a self-contained evil; the entire moral distinction lies in its purpose. If a struggle is undertaken for the establishment of justice, the honouring of human dignity, and the supremacy of law, it becomes a remedy for the wounds of humanity, as exemplified by the Conquest of Mecca. However, when war is waged out of an arrogance of dominance or for the sake of economic colonialism, it becomes the most heinous tool for human destruction.

Whether in the Battle of Badr or the Battle of Uhud, these were not acts of aggression but defensive encounters aimed at the protection of fundamental rights. This is why the loss of life was kept to a minimum, and for the first time in history, the world was introduced to a true charter of human rights: the principle that even in the gravest theatre of war, no hand can be raised against innocent children, women, the elderly, or those fleeing the battlefield.

During the Battle of Badr, while leading a mere 313 men against a formidable army, the Prophet ﷺ did not focus solely on military tactics; he taught lessons of truth, patience, and absolute reliance on Allah. He established a standard of equality so profound that he took his turn riding the camel alongside his companions, remarking: “Neither are you more powerful than me, nor am I less in need of the reward than you.” The treatment of the prisoners of Badr was such that, despite a severe grain shortage in Madinah, the Muslims gave their bread to the captives and fed themselves only on dates. Furthermore, when two companions (Hazrat Hudhayfah bin al-Yaman رضي الله عنه and his father) were bound by a prior promise to the enemy not to fight, the Prophet ﷺ forbade them from joining the battle, proving that a Muslim’s word is an inviolable bond, even in the direst of circumstances.

Lessons of Patience and Divine Guidance from Uhud

In the aftermath of the Battle of Uhud, the Prophet ﷺ was deeply grieved by the heavy losses and the horrific mutilation (muthla) of his beloved uncle and the Leader of Martyrs, Hazrat Hamza رضي الله عنه. When a desire for retribution was momentarily expressed, divine revelation immediately descended to set a higher moral bar:

“And if you punish [an enemy], punish with an equivalent of that with which you were harmed. But if you are patient, it is better for those who are patient. And be patient, and your patience is not but through Allah…” (Quran, 16:126-127)

Following this divine guidance, the Mercy to the Worlds ﷺ abandoned any thought of revenge, choosing the path of patience and establishing strict moral limits even for a brutal enemy. Finally, on the day of the Conquest of Mecca, the Prophet ﷺ stood before the very enemies who had once wounded him, persecuted his followers, and forced him into exile. As a supreme conqueror, he held every justification for retribution. Instead, he uttered the immortal words: “la tathreeba alaykum al-yawm” (“No reproach shall be upon you today; you are all free”). In doing so, he presented a charter of humanity that even the modern Geneva Convention cannot hope to match. This was not a conquest of territory; it was a conquest of the human heart, designed to bring about an enduring inner revolution.

Guided by this divine instruction, the Mercy to the Worlds ﷺ abandoned any thought of retribution, choosing the path of patience and establishing strict moral boundaries even for a defeated enemy. On the day of the Conquest of Mecca, the Prophet ﷺ stood before the very enemies who had once persecuted him and forced him into exile. As a supreme conqueror with every means of revenge at his disposal, he instead declared: “la tathreeba alaykum al-yawm” (“No reproach shall be upon you today; you are all free”). In doing so, he presented a charter of human rights that the Geneva Convention could never match. This was not a conquest of territory; it was a conquest of the human heart, designed to spark an inner revolution.

The Contrast of Modern Superpowers and the Cry of Gaza

In stark contrast to this radiant history stands the role of today’s so-called “superpowers.” In their quest for global economic hegemony, they have descended to the extremes of devaluing human life. Israel has transformed Gaza into a slaughterhouse for innocent women and children. While the Conquest of Mecca saw the prohibition of even cutting down trees, today’s “civilised” powers carry out devastating bombings on hospitals, schools, and refugee camps. Through unjust sanctions and systemic aggression, the United States and its allies have made life unbearable for an entire nation. From Hiroshima and Nagasaki to Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Gaza—the history of the West is a weary chronicle of bloodshed and hypocrisy. Those who pose as champions of human rights have had their masks torn away by the cries of children buried beneath the rubble in Gaza.

The great events of Islamic history are not mere tales of the past; they are the magnificent intellectual and spiritual capital of humanity, offering guidance for every era. Islam is, in fact, a universal movement that seeks to align human existence with the principles of the Creator. While the detailed records of ancient Prophets have been lost to the dust of time, the Seerah (biography) of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ remains the most authentic, clear, and complete example for understanding this divine movement’s struggle and evolution.

In the life of the Prophet ﷺ, we find a blueprint for every stage of existence—from the initial call of Da’wah to the complexities of statecraft and governance. The Prophetic Seerah is our singular guiding light, whether in joy or sorrow, peace or war, prosperity or adversity. Yet, we must confront a tragic truth: today, Muslims themselves have turned away from this guiding light. Having cast the Seerah behind our backs, what right do we have to lecture the world on humanity? The global humiliation and disgrace we currently face are but the bitter harvest of our own failures. The Quranic warning is unmistakable: “Whatever misfortune befalls you is because of what your own hands have earned, though He pardons much.” (Ash-Shura 42:30).

A Call for Collective Reflection and Moral Sovereignty

Today, predatory forces are poised to consume us as we remain fractured by ethnic, regional, and sectarian prejudices. From India to the Middle East, the Muslim world faces a grave existential crisis. In these perilous times, the three great battles that occurred around the season of Eid—Badr, Uhud, and the Conquest of Mecca—serve as a vital reminder of the forgotten lessons essential for our survival.

Through the prism of these historical battles, we possess the moral authority to teach the world the true meaning of human values. Simultaneously, there is an urgent need to convey a vital message to the nations of the Middle East: surrendering sovereign land for foreign military bases to preserve individual regimes is not wisdom—it is a strategic and moral fallacy. Today, while global powers have indeed ignited regional conflicts, their lack of moral justification has ensured that defeat and despair are now their only destiny. Had these nations fortified their defensive and ethical systems in the light of the Prophetic Seerah ﷺ, rather than relying on foreign weaponry and external patrons, they would not be facing this current state of helplessness. As the philosopher-poet Iqbal poignantly observed:

“The disbeliever relies on the sword, The believer fights as a soldier even without a blade.”

When we examine the current global landscape, it is as clear as daylight that the West’s civilizational and political edifice has proven more perilous than even the most overt evil. It masterfully sells oppression and tyranny under the deceptive labels of “peace, progress, and human rights.” Muslims must break free from this sophisticated deception and return to their radiant heritage—a history that, even at the pinnacle of power, prioritises mercy and compassion.

On this occasion of Eid-ul-Fitr, we must amplify the message that Islam is not merely a collection of rituals; it is a comprehensive “system of justice and mercy.” We must remind the world that the true purpose of power is not to crush the weak, but to deliver justice to the oppressed—a principle immortalised on the day of the Conquest of Mecca. To extinguish the fires of modern hatred, we must reclaim the spirit of forgiveness and forbearance from the Seerah of the Prophet ﷺ.

Our Eid celebrations can never be truly joyous while we remain silent about the suffering in Gaza and the plight of the oppressed worldwide. If global powers truly desire stability, they must stop stockpiling nuclear arsenals and instead adopt the “alchemy of the Conquest of Mecca.” Today, Muslims should pledge to be the ambassadors of this sacred mission—a mission where revolution is achieved not through the brute force of arms, but through the invincible strength of morality and humanity. The message of Eid is, in essence, the continuation of that “Mercy to the Worlds” which provides the courage to embrace even one’s enemies.

From Jadavpur to Park Circus: The Quiet, Multifaith Struggle Against New Forms of Disenfranchisement

0

After the notification of rules under the Citizenship Amendment Act in March 2024, coinciding with the onset of Ramzan, anxieties around citizenship, documentation, and belonging resurfaced across several regions. However, they could not culminate in a full-fledged resistance as they did in December 2019. The pan-India movement had earlier paved the way for the Park Circus sit-in protest against CAA, NRC, and NPR. Former Presidency University professor, Prof. Pradip Basu, from the Department of Political Science, while delivering a speech at Park Circus, even regarded it as the fourth wave of feminism.

In the present moment, however, the concern in West Bengal is no longer limited to citizenship—it is increasingly shaped by electoral verification processes, adjudication, and the risk of disenfranchisement through SIR.

To understand this moment, it is important to recognise the structural connection many observers and activists are drawing between SIR (Special Intensive Revision) and exercises like NRC. While formally distinct, both rely on documentation-heavy verification, shifting the burden of proof onto individuals and opening up the possibility of exclusion through bureaucratic processes. In that sense, what is unfolding is not merely an administrative update of electoral rolls, but a deeper anxiety about who gets counted—and who gets left out.

The Shift from Streets to Spreadsheets: Understanding SIR

At the level of formal politics, opposition to SIR has been visible but uneven. The All India Trinamool Congress, led by Mamata Banerjee, has registered its resistance across multiple levels—political, administrative, and legal. The Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the Left Front have similarly framed the process as potentially exclusionary. However, the Indian National Congress at the state level has remained less visible in sustained mobilisation.

However, this relative absence should not be read as complete inaction. At the national level, leaders of the Indian National Congress, including Rahul Gandhi, have raised concerns around electoral integrity, questioning discrepancies in voting data and the transparency of institutional processes. Yet, the gap between national articulation and state-level mobilisation remains a critical weakness.

This reveals a crucial paradox: opposition exists, but it is not united.

The fragmentation becomes even more evident within civil society. During earlier moments of mass protest, large sections of society had come together visibly and forcefully. In the current moment, resistance to SIR exists, but appears scattered—meetings without mass mobilisation, concern without coordinated action. Civil society has not withdrawn; it has dispersed.

Geography further sharpens this unevenness. Districts such as Murshidabad, Malda, and South Dinajpur have witnessed significant mobilisations, where the perceived risks of exclusion are immediate and tangible. In contrast, Kolkata has seen more limited and symbolic responses. This divergence reflects differing perceptions of vulnerability—those who feel directly affected respond with urgency, while others remain relatively disengaged.

Political Fragmentation and the Vulnerability Gap

The timing of political developments has also shaped public response. Administrative processes unfolding alongside Ramzan, combined with an approaching electoral climate, have influenced both participation and perception. Yet, to reduce the present moment merely to fragmentation would be incomplete.

Over the past 24 hours, a different possibility briefly came into view.

At Jadavpur University, students organised a 24-hour symbolic hunger strike and sit-in protest against the anxieties surrounding electoral verification and potential disenfranchisement. Beginning on 16 March at 2 p.m., the protest continued through the night—amid storm, exhaustion, and uncertainty. The language of resistance was both political and deeply personal: land earned through struggle cannot be taken away through paperwork alone.

This act of protest did not remain confined to just outside the JU campus. Participants from the SIR Birodhi Dharna Mancha at Park Circus, where a sit-in has now entered its fourteenth consecutive day, had earlier travelled to Jadavpur in solidarity, including individuals such as Sajid, Salman, Ieaz, and Mirajul. As the 24-hour sit-in concluded, the solidarity was reciprocated. Students began moving from Jadavpur to Park Circus, joining the ongoing dharna and extending the protest beyond the university space.

Jadavpur to Park Circus: A New Architecture of Solidarity

The composition of the protest itself challenges another persistent assumption. Of the 46 individuals who participated in the symbolic hunger strike, 16 identified as Muslims, while 30 came from non-Muslim backgrounds. In the hours that followed, six more participants joined—again, largely non-Muslim. These numbers, though modest, are politically significant. They complicate the reduction of such protests into a single-community concern and instead point toward a wider, more inclusive anxiety around rights, documentation, and democratic participation.

Conversations at the protest site further reinforced this reality. What emerged was not a narrowly defined or identity-bound mobilisation, but a distinctly cosmopolitan gathering—students from different departments, different faiths, along with those who did not identify with any faith. No single group claimed ownership of the movement.

The attempt to frame such resistance as exclusively Muslim is not only analytically shallow, but also politically convenient. What unfolds on the ground, however, tells a different story—one of shared uncertainty and overlapping concerns that cut across identities.

It is here that the idea of fragmentation must be revisited. Yes, resistance today appears scattered. Yes, political parties have not been able to build a unified front. Yes, civil society struggles to convert awareness into sustained mobilisation. But within these fragments, moments of connection continue to emerge—unexpected, unstructured, yet deeply political.

Democracy is not weakened only by the actions of those in power. It is also weakened when those who oppose it fail to act together, when shared concerns do not translate into collective action.

And yet, the story does not end there.

If fragmentation defines the present, then solidarity offers a glimpse of what remains possible. The movement from Jadavpur to Park Circus may not resolve the crisis immediately, but it signals something vital: that resistance can still travel, that alliances can still be built, and that even in moments of uncertainty, democracy continues to find expression through those willing to stand together.

Bengal Polls 2026: As Parties Reduce Muslim Tickets, TMC Holds Its Ground

0

Kolkata: In a political landscape where several parties continue to invoke secularism in rhetoric but often fall short in representation, West Bengal’s ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC) has once again signalled a different approach in its ticket distribution for the upcoming 2026 Assembly elections. The party has fielded 47 Muslim candidates this time—one more than the 46 it nominated in 2021—reflecting a consistent, if cautious, commitment to minority representation.

While the increase is marginal, it stands in contrast to a broader national trend. In recent elections across states, parties such as Congress, RJD, SP, and JMM have reduced the number of Muslim candidates on their tickets. TMC’s numbers, though slightly lower than its peak of 57 Muslim candidates in 2016, remain significantly higher than most political parties in India. In 2011, the party had fielded 38 Muslim candidates.

Balancing Representation and Electoral Strategy

This assumes greater significance in a state like West Bengal, where Muslims constitute over 27 percent of the population and are considered electorally influential in 120 plus Assembly constituencies. Despite this demographic weight, no political party in the state has historically matched TMC’s scale of minority representation.

Mohammed Reyaz, Assistant Professor at Aliah University, believes the 2026 candidate list reflects both continuity and change within the party. “The TMC list for the 2026 Assembly elections has clear imprints of Abhishek Banerjee in many constituencies, although Mamata Banerjee’s old loyalists—from Madan Mitra to Firhad ‘Bobby’ Hakim—remain. It’s a balanced mix of old and new faces, including those emerging from student and youth politics without strong family backing,” he said.

Generational Shift and Changing Political Signals in Bengal

The list underscores a generational shift as well. Youth leaders such as Tirthankar, Tanmoy Ghosh, and Shamim Ahmed have been given tickets, indicating the party’s attempt to bring in fresh faces. Nearly 130 candidates are below the age of 50, including four under 31, while only 25 candidates are above 70.

Beyond minority representation, the TMC has also emphasized social diversity. The party has fielded 78 Scheduled Caste (SC) and 17 Scheduled Tribe (ST) candidates—figures that exceed the number of reserved seats. Additionally, 52 women candidates have been included, reflecting a continued push for gender representation.

At the same time, the party has made significant internal changes. Out of its 223 sitting MLAs, tickets have been denied to 74, including prominent Kolkata leader Vivek Gupta. Furthermore, 15 legislators have been shifted to different constituencies, suggesting both anti-incumbency management and strategic recalibration.

The Left Front has so far announced 192 candidates, including 27 women and 26 Muslim nominees. On Tuesday evening, CPI(ML) announced its list of 10 Left-backed candidates, including six women and three Muslim nominees.

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), on the other hand, has once again not fielded a single Muslim candidate in West Bengal. The party, often criticised for its perceived anti-Muslim stance in policy and rhetoric, appears to have maintained its pattern of minimal minority representation. Its candidate list this time also indicates a tilt towards Hindi-speaking nominees in several constituencies.

Melania’s Missing Children, Bardem’s Free Palestine, and Chopra’s Uncomfortable Silence: A Study in Hypocrisy

The beginning of this year has not been great. As the days pass, concepts we often invoke—such as the ‘rule of law’, ‘human rights’, and ‘women’s rights’—feel increasingly hollow. Those who claimed to have created these norms are now the first to demolish them. The killing of over 70,000 innocent people in Gaza by the Israeli regime has never received genuine condemnation in Europe or the USA. It was not surprising to see the First Lady of the United States, Melania Trump, presiding over a UN Security Council meeting. Never has a global body looked so hopeless and pathetic.

We are told that Melania Trump is deeply concerned about children. After the Anchorage summit in Texas between President Donald Trump and President Putin, the First Lady wrote a letter to President Putin about missing Ukrainian children, to which he responded positively.

Western Hypocrisy Over Human Rights Stands Exposed

Yesterday, at the Oscar Award ceremony, Javier Bardem declared proudly and with conviction, “No to War” and “Free Palestine.” This was not a sudden outburst but the stance of a man who has persistently spoken about the rights of the Palestinian people. Standing alongside him was India’s Priyanka Chopra, who looked visibly uncomfortable. Subsequently, social media trolls began targeting her. As a UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador, she has spoken about children’s welfare, but perhaps this concern does not extend to the children of Dalits and Adivasis in India or those in Gaza. In her capacity as a goodwill ambassador, she could have raised these issues, but it seems she is not expected to.

Bollywood’s Timid Silence vs Hollywood’s Bold Stance

Hollywood itself often functions as a propaganda tool for the Western elite. However, as I have mentioned before, it is still far better than the Brahmanical Bombay cinema; at least in Hollywood, one can see some diversity. Can you imagine Dalits or Adivasis occupying the front rows at any Bollywood event or award ceremony? Can you picture any Indian star speaking out against a policy of the Indian government? No, they are not expected to. Even without speaking against the government, they could at least celebrate India’s immensely diverse cultural heritage. But they lack the courage.

The point, however, is not to draw a comparison between the two industries. The real problem is that Western human rights discourse is largely applied in a subjective manner to serve corporate interests. Melania Trump may speak about missing Ukrainian children, yet she remained shamelessly silent on the killing of 170 schoolgirls in Iran. The United States and Israel have consistently bombed civilian areas, schools, hospitals, Red Cross facilities, and residential complexes to ‘achieve’ their goals. Have you seen the response from any of these ‘civilised’ governments? Most of them ‘condemned’ Iran for its retaliation, blaming it for firing on civilian targets. Look at Rishi Sunak, who is asking the British government to go to war in the name of achieving peace.

Given this context, Priyanka Chopra cannot be like Angelina Jolie, who has the courage to speak truth to power. Americans are already saying that ‘Indians are good actors’. I need not elaborate further.

Now, does Donald Trump want to take over Cuba? The brave people of Cuba are facing immense hardship, struggling to survive as electricity and other essential services have collapsed. Life has become miserable, yet the people continue to resist and endure these hardships. Is Donald Trump following Israel’s Gaza model by imposing an economic blockade? The reality is that all internationally recognized rules and norms have now collapsed, precisely because these ‘democracies’, ‘liberal’ nations, and ‘civilised’ states have violated them the most to protect their own interests.

I have always maintained that the world was safer and more protected when it was bipolar, or when the Soviet Union was a major power. During that time, Western powers dared not invade Cuba again. After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, they embarked on their favorite projects: dividing nations and redrawing boundaries. We must remember that they do not like ‘big’, powerful countries. Attempts have been made to encircle Russia, and when that proved impossible militarily, economic warfare began. Other countries that are not militarily powerful face the consequences. Cuba stands as a symbol of global resistance against imperialism. Why is Donald Trump, or the American administration, so afraid of a tiny island like Cuba?

India Must Reclaim Its Strategic Autonomy Now

India must understand this. The Indian elite believe that their interests lie with the West. Nobody denies that India should have a relationship with the West, but it cannot be at the expense of our farmers and common citizens. Our security concerns are paramount and must remain independent. India must have the courage of its convictions and stand tall on this principle. We were among the first to recognize Palestine and stood in solidarity with its people. We stood with the Global South. Today, however, we remain silent on the killing of innocent people. We stayed quiet when the President of Venezuela was kidnapped in violation of all international norms. We remain silent on Cuba, an old and steadfast friend. We failed to condemn the killing of a head of state in Iran. Remember, Iran is fighting a war that threatens its very existence.

All talk of nuclear disarmament is bogus and hypocritical as long as major powers maintain massive stockpiles of nuclear arms, while those without them can be punished at the whims of any madman who happens to be ‘democratically elected’. Democracies will have to redefine themselves. Majoritarian, hate-mongering postures will lead us nowhere. In this respect, our constitutional forefathers were visionary; they understood where our national interest lies. The policy of non-alignment was a well-thought-out strategy to preserve our strategic autonomy and strengthen our ties with the Global South.

The global order is changing, and multipolarity is inevitable. But before that, the world will witness numerous upheavals. It is time for true internationalism. Civil societies, social movements, people’s movements, and public intellectuals must all join hands and stand up against war—war that threatens to punish everyone beyond the physical boundaries of the nation-states involved. Secondly, why should schools, hospitals, residential complexes, and civilian infrastructure be targeted? This is the greatest challenge since the Second World War, and all countries must come together to address it. The days of global imperial hegemony are over. Attempts to preserve it will only backfire and destroy the very order they created.

Democracy Under Adjudication: When Citizens Must Prove Their Right to Vote

There was a time when elections in India carried a sense of celebration. Not because they were perfect, but because they embodied a rare democratic promise: equality. On election day, the ink on a rickshaw-puller’s finger carried the same weight as the ink on the Prime Minister’s. A domestic worker, a farmer, a corporate executive, and the head of government stood in the same queue, each with one vote. That moment—however brief—was the purest expression of democracy. Voting rights were the great equaliser. Today, that equality is under strain.

The Election Commission’s recent announcement of elections comes at a moment when millions of voters have either been removed from electoral rolls or placed “under adjudication.” This is not a routine technical correction. When such a large number of citizens suddenly find their voting status uncertain, the announcement of elections raises a troubling question: What does democracy mean when the very people who constitute it are still being asked to prove their place within it?

When Electoral Revision Turns Into Adjudication

The process has crossed the boundaries of what electoral revision was meant to be. Under the banner of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR), what should have remained a routine administrative exercise has taken on the character of something far more intrusive. When millions of voters are placed “under adjudication,” and when quasi-judicial mechanisms are introduced to decide their status, the exercise begins to resemble the logic of the NRC, where citizens are compelled to prove their legitimacy before the state.

Electoral roll revision was never intended to function in this manner. Administrative procedures exist to facilitate participation, not to transform citizens into petitioners before a tribunal. Judicial processes determine guilt, innocence, or eligibility, operating through hearings, evidence, and adjudication. When electoral revision begins to mimic those mechanisms, the basic premise of democratic participation is inverted.

Critics and activists across the country have argued that the present form of SIR departs sharply from the purpose of electoral revision itself. They point out that such revisions historically relied on field verification, local administrative checks, and continuous updating—not mass adjudication of voter status. The introduction of tribunal-like scrutiny and large-scale “under adjudication” categories effectively shifts the burden of proof onto ordinary citizens, many of whom lack formal documentation due to historical gaps in record-keeping.

For many, this transformation raises serious constitutional concerns. The right to vote may be statutory, but its exercise is central to democratic equality. When millions must appear before quasi-judicial mechanisms simply to remain on an electoral roll, the process begins to look less like an administrative correction and more like a filtering mechanism. That is why those sitting on the Park Circus Dharna Manch since March 4, 2026, have described the current SIR exercise as an unconstitutional distortion of electoral revision, arguing that it undermines the principle that participation in democracy should be presumed rather than continually proven.

This was not how electoral revision was meant to function. It was supposed to be routine, transparent, and inclusive. Instead, it now risks becoming a process that places citizens under suspicion rather than enabling their participation.

A Sequence That Raises Questions

The timing of recent political events has added another layer of unease to this situation. In the days preceding the election announcement, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar visited Bengal. His visit itself triggered protests in Kolkata, reflecting the deep anxieties surrounding the ongoing electoral revision process.

Soon afterwards, Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited the state as a political campaigner. Within days of these high-profile visits, elections were formally announced.

Each of these developments may individually fit within the normal rhythms of political life. Yet taken together, they create a sequence that many citizens find difficult to ignore. When elections are declared while millions remain under scrutiny and protests are already underway, the message received by the public is not one of reassurance but of acceleration.

It feels as though the process must move forward regardless of unresolved questions.

The silence—or cautious language—of many political actors only deepens this discomfort. One might expect that a situation affecting millions of potential voters would provoke a fierce national debate. Yet the response from large sections of the opposition has been restrained.

Why?

Why has the defence of voting rights not become the central political question of this moment?

Democracy Beyond the Ritual of Elections

Democracy, after all, is not merely the act of holding elections. Elections are only one component of a much larger democratic structure that includes rights, accountability, participation, and institutional trust.

When democracy is reduced to elections alone, it becomes dangerously hollow.

A strange form of political consolation has also begun to circulate in public discussions. Some people say, almost with relief, that at least the situation is not worse—that at least President’s Rule has not been imposed in Bengal.

But this argument reveals how dramatically our expectations have shifted.

When the standard of democratic comfort becomes the absence of a greater catastrophe, something fundamental has already changed. It is like living in a house with cracked walls and leaking ceilings, and reassuring oneself that the building has not yet collapsed.

India’s democracy is not dead. Elections still take place, courts still function, and citizens continue to protest and speak.

But democracy is not measured only by its survival. It is measured by the confidence citizens feel in their rights.

When millions must struggle simply to remain on a voter list, that confidence begins to erode.

The right to vote was once the simplest and most powerful promise of the republic: that every citizen counts equally. That promise did not require citizens to prove their belonging every few years.

If that promise begins to feel conditional, the ink on the finger—the proud symbol of democratic equality—begins to change its meaning.

It no longer represents a straightforward act of participation. Instead, it becomes a reminder that the right to vote, once taken for granted as the foundation of the republic, is slowly turning into something citizens must fight to keep.

When Memories Speak: A Kolkata Wall Challenges the Idea of Citizenship

0

Kolkata: At the Park Circus Dharna Manch—now the pulsing epicenter of Bengal’s resistance against the Social Identity Register (SIR)—a ‘Memory Wall’ has been erected with a simple yet defiant purpose. It is a space where the past is invited to speak to the present, not through the clinical lens of legacy codes or land deeds, but through the visceral fragments of lived experience that no state document can fully capture. Here, on this wall, citizenship is not a matter of paperwork; it is a tapestry of whispered stories, faded photographs, and the unshakeable truth of belonging.

The Secular Cup: A Lesson in Equality

Nisha Biswas recalls a small but powerful moment from her childhood that shaped the way she sees society today.

In her father’s office in Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, there used to be a separate cup kept aside for Shakir Miyan. It was different from the cups used by everyone else.
One day her mother quietly broke that cup.

From that day onward, tea was served to Shakir in the same cups as everyone else, even though her grandmother strongly disapproved. It seemed like a small act, almost invisible in the ordinary rhythm of daily life. Yet that quiet gesture stayed with her.
Something changed in the way she began to see society.

From then on, she started looking at the world with different eyes—eyes that noticed how discrimination hides in the smallest details of everyday life.

Years later, when she watched the processes of the NRC in Assam and the SIR in Bihar, she could not see them merely as administrative exercises. She looked at them through the memory of that broken cup and the quiet courage behind it.

On the Memory Wall today there is a simple image—a cup and a pair of spectacles. They represent that moment.

They are the glasses through which she eventually found herself joining the anti-SIR movement, seeing questions of citizenship, equality, and dignity not just as political issues, but as matters of everyday justice.

Gurucharan Murmu: Remembering a Pioneer from the Santal Community

The first voice on this wall comes from Maruna Murmu, who is currently out of town but wanted to participate in the Memory Wall we began—a place where past circles meet and connect with the present. She chose to remember her father, Gurucharan Murmu (1944–2012). Born in a small village in West Midnapore, he became the first Santal to enter the Indian Police Service in 1972. For him, this land was never merely a territory on paper; it was the soil of his childhood, the forests and villages where his people lived and struggled.

As a police officer, he believed deeply in justice and integrity, standing against corruption even when it came at a personal cost. After retirement, he returned to his village with a dream—to build a school, a hostel, and a place of care for the elderly. His life reminds us that belonging cannot be reduced to papers; it lives in memory, struggle, and the stories carried forward by those who remember him.

Maulana Mohammad Hossain: A Voice for Education and Justice

Another contribution comes from Saidur Rahman, who remembers his father, Maulana Mohammad Hossain (1930–2005). Born in the village of Bishanpur under Chanchal Police Station in Malda district, Maulana Mohammad Hossain rose from humble beginnings to become a respected religious scholar, social reformer, and advocate for education and justice. Throughout his life, he worked tirelessly to promote education and social awareness across Malda and neighbouring districts such as Murshidabad, Birbhum, North and South Dinajpur. His influence extended even beyond West Bengal into Bihar’s districts of Katihar, Purnia, Araria, and Supaul. Those who knew him remember that he never remained silent in the face of injustice or oppression. His voice was fearless, his conscience unwavering, and his commitment to truth unshakeable. For Saidur Rahman, whenever he finds the courage to raise his voice today, he knows that it is not merely his strength—it is the legacy he inherited from his father.

A Grandmother, Peanuts and the Warmth of Everyday Love

The wall also carries a small but deeply personal recollection by Himadri Mukherjee, born in 1963 in Kolkata. In his note, he remembers an ordinary afternoon from his youth in North Kolkata when he was living with his 72-year-old grandmother. One day before leaving for college, she asked him to bring cheena badaam (peanuts) from a shop on the way home so she could fry them for an afternoon snack. Concerned for her health, he protested because the doctor had advised her not to eat oily food. Yet she insisted gently.

When he returned home later, she had already prepared tea, bread, bananas, and boiled eggs for both of them. After they finished eating, she fried the peanuts and placed a single piece in his hand before eating the rest herself. Smiling, she told him that if he wanted more, he would have to go and buy them again.

The memory is simple, yet it captures the quiet warmth of everyday affection—moments that rarely appear in official histories but remain deeply alive in personal memory.

Growing Up with Stories of “Opar Bangla”

Another note on the wall reflects on the experience of growing up in a Partition-affected family. The writer describes how their family originally came from Madaripur in Faridpur, now in Bangladesh, and how childhood was filled with stories of “ওপার বাংলা”—the other side of Bengal. These stories carried nostalgia and displacement at the same time, creating a lingering sense of rootlessness while growing up in Kolkata.

Yet the writer remembers a turning point between December 2019 and March 2020, when protest sites across the country became spaces of collective expression. Standing among crowds carrying different flags and symbols—portraits of Ambedkar, banners of resistance, and voices of dissent—the writer felt, perhaps for the first time, a genuine sense of belonging.

A Family Legacy from Mangalkot Across Generations

Alongside these reflections are memories of family histories rooted in Mangalkot in Bardhaman. One section recalls the legacy of Dr Muhammad Abu Torab, remembered as a doctor who served people with dedication. The lineage continued through Qazi Abu Saleh and Qazi Nurul Islam, with younger generations trying to preserve both documents and memories of their past. Among them is Maria Khan, a fifteen-year-old student in Class Ten, who reflects on the dilemma of preserving family history. For her, documents may preserve names and dates, but memories preserve something deeper—the traditions, gatherings, and experiences that connect generations.

NRC Memories: Proving Belonging Through Old Voter Lists

The wall also carries a reflection from Komal Chakraborty of Silchar, Assam, who writes about the experience of the NRC process in 2015. At first, he did not understand what terms like family trees and legacy codes meant. His father had worked in the railway office, and the family possessed little property or documentation. Eventually, using an old voter list belonging to his late father, he managed to submit the necessary forms and prove his citizenship. Yet the experience left him with a troubling realisation: in the eyes of the state, simply living in a country is not enough. One must prove belonging through documents that trace back to one’s ancestors.

A Ninety-Two-Year-Old Teaching Chushi Pitha

Another quiet memory comes from a family story about Shaibyarani Nandi. Married at the age of thirteen, she moved from Dhaka-Narayanganj to her husband’s village in Kushtia. When she arrived at her in-laws’ home, she noticed an elderly aunt patiently cutting tiny strands of dough to make chushi pitha, a traditional sweet dish. Watching her day after day, she slowly learned the delicate craft.

Today, she is ninety-two years old, and the roles have gently reversed. Sitting beside her, her sixty-eight-year-old son carefully learns how to cut the thin strands of dough for chushi pitha. The lesson moves slowly from her experienced hands to his. In that quiet kitchen moment, memory travels from one generation to another—not through documents, but through gestures, patience, and taste.

Remembering Ammaji and Bahadur Mamu

As the wall grew, I too felt compelled to contribute. While writing, I came across an old photograph of Ammaji and Bahadur Mamu together. For a moment, I considered placing it on the wall. But the image felt too intimate, too personal to display in a public space. Instead, I kept the photograph in my mind and began writing about it.

As I wrote, emotions welled up unexpectedly.

My memory returns to the days of the 2019 anti-CAA protests, when I spent long nights at protest sites and spoke out against injustice despite threats, trolling, and attempts to silence me. During that time, my uncle would proudly tell people, “Dekho dekho, yeh meri bhaanji hai.” But my grandmother held my hand one day and said softly, “Tumko meri kasam hai… naara lagana band karo. Mujhe dar lagta hai.” She was afraid for my safety.
Today, both of them are gone—Bahadur Mamu passed away on 17 February 2019, and Ammaji on 28 April 2020 during the lockdown, when I could not even see her one last time.

Together, these stories—of a pioneering Santal officer, a fearless scholar, a grandmother sharing peanuts with her grandson, a ninety-two-year-old mother teaching her sixty-eight-year-old son how to make chushi pitha, young people searching for their roots, and citizens struggling to prove belonging through documents—form something larger than individual recollections.

They reveal a quiet truth:

Documents record facts.

But memories record life.

And that leaves us with a question that echoes softly across the entire wall:

Where do memories go?

Perhaps they do not disappear.

They move—from grandparents to grandchildren, from kitchens to public squares, from photographs kept in drawers to words written on a wall.

Perhaps memories travel like rivers across generations.

And when we pause long enough to listen, we realise that remembering is not only about the past.

It is about refusing to let life be reduced to documents alone.

LPG Queues and Petrol Panic: Why the PM’s Latest Speech is Triggering COVID-Era Trauma

0

When Prime Minister Narendra Modi yesterday compared India’s current energy crisis to its battle against COVID-19, the intent was to project a image of national resilience. However, for millions of Indians, the comparison has acted more like a trigger than a balm. As 25-day waiting periods for LPG refills become the new ‘lockdown,’ and queues at petrol pumps mirror the desperate lines of the second wave, the nation is forced to ask: Are we witnessing a triumph of spirit, or a repeat of the planning failures that left the most vulnerable to fend for themselves?

The Sudden Lockdown That Brought India to a Halt

The first shock came with the nationwide lockdown in March 2020.

The announcement came with only a few hours’ notice. Overnight, the country stopped. Trains stopped. Buses stopped. Markets closed. Factories shut down.

For many businesses and salaried employees, it meant disruption.
For daily wage earners, it meant the sudden loss of income.
For migrant workers, it meant the loss of both work and shelter.
For families with patients, it meant panic.

India has tens of millions of migrant workers who travel from villages to cities in search of work. When the lockdown began, many suddenly had no job, no wages, and no transport to go home.

What followed will remain one of the most painful chapters of that period.

Men, women and children began walking along highways to reach their villages. Some walked hundreds of kilometres. Some pushed elderly parents in handcarts. Some carried small children on their shoulders or on wheeled luggage.

Many collapsed from exhaustion.

Some died in accidents on the roads.

One tragedy shook the entire country. Near Aurangabad in Maharashtra, a group of exhausted migrant workers slept on a railway track, thinking trains were not running. A train passed over them early in the morning.

They were simply trying to go home.

Those images still haunt the memory of the country. They forced people to ask a very simple question. Could a lockdown not have been planned with a little more care for the poorest citizens?

Migrant Workers’ Long Walks Become a National Trauma

Another disturbing memory of that time was the manner in which lockdown rules were enforced in many places.

Videos circulated across the country showing people being beaten with sticks by police for stepping outside. Some were punished. Some were humiliated publicly.

In a time when people needed reassurance and compassion, many encountered fear instead.

At the policy level, too, some responses appeared strangely symbolic. Citizens were asked to beat utensils and light lamps as a show of solidarity. While the intention may have been to boost morale, families struggling for food, transport and medicines found little comfort in such gestures.

Hospitals Under Strain as Pandemic Exposes Weak Systems

The healthcare system was also under severe strain.

Doctors and nurses repeatedly spoke about shortages of protective equipment in the early months. Many hospitals did not have enough masks, gloves or protective suits. Testing kits were limited. Healthcare workers continued their duty despite serious risks, and many of them themselves became infected.

Then came the devastating second wave in 2021.

Hospitals ran out of beds. Families went from hospital to hospital searching for admission. Oxygen cylinders became a matter of life and death. Desperate appeals flooded social media. People begged strangers for help to find oxygen, medicines or a hospital bed.

Outside crematoriums, long lines of vehicles waited.

The country has rarely seen such grief in recent times.

During these difficult months, society itself stepped forward. Volunteers arranged oxygen cylinders. Community groups organised food distribution. Individuals used social media networks to help complete strangers.

It was the compassion of ordinary people that carried many families through those dark days.

Tablighi Jamaat and the ‘Corona Jihad’ Myth: A Narrative of Exclusion

But another wound was inflicted during that period. Instead of treating the pandemic purely as a public health crisis, political narratives and sections of the media began blaming Muslims, particularly the Tablighi Jamaat, after a congregation at the Nizamuddin Markaz in Delhi was linked to early infections.

Soon, the entire community began to be portrayed as responsible for spreading the virus.

Hashtags like “Corona Jihad” began circulating. Rumours spread rapidly. In several places, Muslims faced harassment, boycott of businesses, and open hostility.

At a time when the country needed unity, suspicion was allowed to grow.

Courts later observed that many of the criminal cases filed against Tablighi Jamaat attendees had little basis and that, during a calamity, authorities sometimes look for a scapegoat. But the damage to social trust had already been done.

The pandemic years also unfolded against the background of the 2020 Delhi riots, which had already left dozens dead and many families displaced. For people who had already lost homes and livelihoods in that violence, the lockdown only deepened their hardship.

Even the Supreme Court of India had to step in at different moments to question aspects of pandemic management, particularly the treatment of migrant workers and the oxygen shortages during the second wave.

All this is part of the same history.

To remember the COVID years only as a success story is to forget the long walks on the highways, the silent hospitals without oxygen, the families waiting outside crematoriums, and the fear that entered millions of homes.

Energy Crisis Raises Questions About Crisis Preparedness

And now the country is being told that it will overcome the present energy crisis in the same way.

But the early signs are already worrying.

Reports have already emerged that nearly 20 percent of hotels and restaurants in some cities have shut their kitchens because commercial LPG cylinders are not available, and industry groups warn that far more may follow if supplies do not stabilise. The government has invoked provisions of the Essential Commodities Act and extended the waiting period for LPG refills to about three weeks in order to manage the limited supply.

People have begun rushing to book cylinders.

Queues are appearing at petrol pumps.

There are reports of LPG cylinders being sold on the black market.

These are early signals of anxiety spreading through the system.

If the COVID years taught the country anything, it is this: a nation’s resilience should not mean that citizens are left to struggle through a crisis on their own while symbolic gestures and reassuring speeches continue.

Indians have always shown patience when they see sincerity and competence.

This time, too, the country will endure, Insha Allah.

But one sincerely hopes that the present crisis will be handled with better planning, deeper empathy, and far greater honesty than what many people remember from the COVID years.