Faith in the Age of Algorithms: Kolkata’s Interfaith Iftar Dissects Propaganda and Youth Radicalization

Kolkata: An annual interfaith iftar hosted by peace activist Om Prakash Shah witnessed wide participation from people of different faiths and professions, but this year’s gathering moved beyond religious discussions to address pressing geopolitical and domestic political issues.

The event, which traditionally revolves around discussions on Islam and communal harmony, saw participants engaging in conversations about global conflicts, the ongoing debates around SIR, and the evolving political landscape in India and West Bengal.

People from various religious backgrounds — including Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs and Jains — attended the gathering alongside politicians, educators, activists, advocates and journalists. The diverse participation reflected the spirit of dialogue and pluralism that such interfaith events seek to promote during Ramadan, bringing together people from different communities to exchange ideas and perspectives.

Global Politics and Constitutional Concerns

Among those who spoke was CPM leader Dr Fuad Halim, who expressed concern over what he described as a global decline in faith in constitutional principles.

“We as a society globally have lost our faith in the constitution, and then the problem begins,” he said. “We have moved from a constitutional democracy to a pure democracy.”

Drawing an international example, Halim referred to the United States and said that according to its constitution, the government must seek approval from Congress before launching a war.

“But that did not happen. Everywhere it is happening. People sitting at the top feel they have people’s mandate and therefore can do anything,” he said.

Dr Halim also argued that the conflict involving Iran did not begin with the assassination of Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei. According to him, the chain of events begun after the kidnapping of Venezuela President Nicolas Maduro but that did not receive significant international protest.

Despite the concerns he raised, Dr Halim emphasised the importance of platforms like interfaith iftars. On a personal level, he said gatherings that bring people from different religions together can help address misunderstandings and encourage dialogue.

Debate on Social Media, Youth and Communal Narratives

Rajya Sabha MP Nadimul Haque spoke about the role of social media in shaping public discourse. He said digital platforms have become powerful tools influencing political conversations and public opinion.

“Social media is playing an important role today,” Haque said, adding that it has compelled the central government and the Prime Minister to speak on issues such as the ongoing US–Israel war involving Iran.

Interfaith educator Ovais Aslam expressed concern about the growing ideological influence on younger generations. He claimed that many members of Generation Z are reacting strongly to what they perceive as the Modi government’s incompetence and rising Islamophobia, while also being influenced by what he described as “Hindutva pop culture.”

Teacher Joyeeta Basu shared her experience of facing trolling on social media after criticising the behaviour of some devotees during Shivratri. She said that many people today are unwilling to question or correct actions that may be inhuman or illegal.

Social activist Uzma Alam stressed the need for introspection within communities as well. She said elders must also reflect on their own approaches so that younger generations can connect with them.

CPM leader and educator Saira Shah Halim pointed to what she described as organised propaganda against minorities in India. She said narratives targeting Christians for alleged conversions and other accusations are often amplified by sections of the media.

“The media plays a major role in spreading these narratives,” she said. “Even when there is trolling, politicians and public figures must continue writing and speaking the truth.”

Saira Shah Halim also advocated organising more interfaith iftars in the future to deepen mutual understanding between communities.

Meanwhile, Namrata Kothari argued that religion itself has been a major source of conflict in the world. Former serviceman Tarsem Singh also addressed the gathering, sharing his perspective on social harmony and national unity. Syed Irfan Sher and advocate Touseef Ahmed Khan also joined the gathering later in the evening.

RoMedics Superspecialty Clinic Opens in Kolkata’s Mukundapur with 40+ Specialists

0

Kolkata: A new integrated healthcare facility, RoMedics Superspecialty Clinic, was inaugurated on March 7 in Mukundapur, a rapidly emerging medical hub in the southern part of the city. The clinic aims to provide advanced diagnostic services and super specialist consultations under one roof, making quality healthcare more accessible to residents of Mukundapur and surrounding areas.

Established as a modern, state-of-the-art healthcare centre, RoMedics Superspecialty Clinic is guided by its vision of “Advanced Care, Honest Commitment.” The facility seeks to combine modern medical technology, specialist expertise and patient-centred values to ensure comprehensive, compassionate and evidence-based healthcare delivery.

Strategically located near the EM Bypass corridor, the clinic is expected to serve patients from several nearby neighbourhoods including Garia, Patuli, Santoshpur and other parts of south Kolkata. With more than 40 experienced specialists and superspecialists associated with the centre, the clinic aims to provide high-quality consultations and diagnostic services at affordable costs.

Integrated Care with Advanced Diagnostic Facilities

RoMedics Superspecialty Clinic has been designed as an integrated healthcare facility that combines specialist consultations with modern diagnostic infrastructure. The model allows patients to receive medical consultations, diagnostic investigations and follow-up care at a single centre, reducing delays in diagnosis and improving overall patient experience.

The clinic offers a wide range of advanced diagnostic services including comprehensive pathological tests, ECG, Echocardiography, Fetal Echo, Ultrasonography (USG), Fibroscan, EEG, NCV, EMG, Endoscopy and Colonoscopy. Equipped with modern medical technology and supported by trained professionals, the centre aims to ensure accurate diagnosis and high standards of patient safety.

The inauguration ceremony witnessed the presence of more than 100 doctors and several distinguished members of the medical community. Among the eminent doctors present were Dr Shuvanan Ray (Director, Cardiology – Fortis Hospital), Dr Sibabrata Banerjee (Eminent Physician), Dr Animesh Kar (Senior Neurologist, RTIICS), Dr Ashish Dutta (Senior Neurologist, Institute of Neurosciences), Dr Keshab Sil (Nephrologist), Dr Arunava Roy (Gynaecologist), Dr Aveek Ghosh (Orthodontist), Dr Rupam Sil (ENT Specialist), Dr Prithwiraj (Cardiologist), Dr Priyam Mukherjee (Cardiologist), Dr Lopamudra (Paediatric Cardiologist), Dr Sananda Pati (Paediatrician), Dr Amit Ray (Medicine), Dr Arif Faizan (Radiologist), Dr Abhijit Sarkar (Pathologist), Dr Basabendra Choudhury (Cardiologist), Dr Arindam (Physician) and Dr Kaushik Basu (Rheumatologist), among several others.

Their presence reflected the strong professional collaboration and medical expertise supporting the establishment of the clinic.

Focus on Ethical Practice and Accessible Healthcare

The occasion was also attended by Dr Ujjal Kumar Sengupta, Past State President of the Indian Medical Association (Bengal Chapter), who graced the ceremony as a distinguished guest. Addressing the gathering, Dr Sengupta highlighted the crucial role played by clinics in delivering routine and specialised outpatient care.

He noted that clinics often allow doctors to build a more meaningful doctor–patient relationship compared to large hospital settings, enabling physicians to spend more focused time with patients and offer personalised treatment.

Speaking on the occasion, Dr Pallab Kumar Bose, Senior Cardiologist and Director of RoMedics Superspecialty Clinic, emphasised his commitment to creating a healthcare institution that prioritises ethical medical practice, quality treatment and affordability.

He stressed that modern healthcare must combine advanced technology with compassion and integrity to effectively serve the community.

Dr Bose also highlighted the clinic’s commitment to social responsibility through the Bose16 Foundation, an initiative aimed at supporting patients from economically weaker sections by facilitating access to quality medical care. Through this effort, the clinic intends to ensure that financial limitations do not prevent patients from receiving necessary treatment.

Dr Haseeb Hassan, eminent neurologist and Director of RoMedics Superspecialty Clinic, underlined the growing burden of neurological disorders and the need for a comprehensive medical approach that includes prevention, early diagnosis, acute care, rehabilitation and long-term guidance for patients and caregivers.

Dr Hassan brings extensive clinical experience to the institution and previously served as Head of Department at Narayana Health, Kolkata. He is also Director of Healthcare Scan Diagnostics, a diagnostic centre located in the city.

The inauguration ceremony was also attended by government officials including ACP Traffic Debal Das and ACP West Bengal Police Jayanta Das, who extended their best wishes to the founders and medical team.

Adding a cultural touch to the evening, several prominent figures from the music industry were present. Music director and singer Bonnie Chakraborty, playback singer Raj Barman and eminent classical singer, composer and musician Anjan Majumdar performed at the event, making the inauguration a memorable occasion.

With its integrated healthcare model and emphasis on ethical practice, modern technology and specialist expertise, RoMedics Superspecialty Clinic aims to strengthen access to advanced medical consultations and diagnostics in Mukundapur and surrounding areas of Kolkata. The founders hope the centre will contribute significantly to early diagnosis, preventive care and specialised treatment for patients across the region.

Hope, Freedom, Courage: Women Mark International Women’s Day with a Powerful Palm Protest

Kolkata: On 8 March, International Women’s Day, an unusual yet powerful activity unfolded at the sit-in protest at Park Circus Maidan. Titled “Identity Beyond Labels,” the collective action invited women to write words on each other’s palms—words that reflected how they saw the woman standing beside them beyond the labels society assigns.

Across societies, women are often introduced through labels that are social, biological, and political. Daughter, wife, sister, mother—identities that are deeply meaningful but often used to reduce women to relational roles rather than recognising them as individuals. Even language and everyday slurs carry gendered assumptions. In bureaucratic systems, too, a woman’s existence is frequently recorded through the names of fathers, husbands, or guardians.

“Identity Beyond Labels” sought to gently disrupt that pattern. The activity asked a simple question: How do you recognise the woman next to you, beyond these labels?

Women responded by writing words on each other’s hands—hope, freedom, courage, strength, empowerment, grace, unstoppable, iconic—each word becoming a small declaration of recognition.

Writing Identity Beyond Labels at Park Circus Protest

One of those palms belonged to Anwari Bibi.

Anwari Bibi knew a little Bengali and some Urdu. Writing was not something she was very comfortable with, but she attended the protest in solidarity. Her husband’s name had recently been deleted from the electoral rolls, and another member of her family faced a similar situation.

She stood quietly but anxiously, asking what might happen next. For many women like her, identity in official records is closely tied to the husband or the primary male member of the household. When that name disappears from the voter list, uncertainty enters the household.

Yet Anwari Bibi came to the protest.

On her palm, someone wrote “Hope.”

Hope—not because her situation was easy, but because, despite anxiety and uncertainty, she chose to stand with others and participate. When the name of the household’s breadwinner disappears from official lists, fear often silences people. But Anwari chose presence over silence. That quiet act of showing up was itself a form of hope.

international womens day sir protest voters rights bengal Kolkata park circus
Palms of women protestors during women’s day at parck circus protest against SIR | Arranged

A Journalist’s Palm and the Meaning of “Azad”

Another palm carried the word “Azad” (Free).

It was written on the hand of Pritha, a journalist who was covering the protest from the ground. She was moving through the crowd, taking photographs and observing the gathering with visible curiosity and admiration. The way she watched the women—attentively, almost in awe—suggested more than the distance of a reporter.

When asked about it, she smiled. The word Azad captured something beyond her professional role: a young reporter trying to document voices that often remain unheard. In that moment, she was not just Pritha, the journalist; she was Pritha as someone seeking and witnessing freedom in stories of resistance.

Around them, many other women joined the activity. Some were students from nearby universities; others were residents of the locality. Laughter and quiet conversations filled the space as palms slowly turned into canvases of recognition.

Words appeared everywhere: Strong. Empowerment. Power. Hope. Freedom. Courage. Iconic. Strength. Unstoppable. Grace. Waqar (Dignity). Shahasi (Courage).

Each word reflected how women saw one another—not through bureaucratic categories or social expectations, but through lived qualities.

The Spirit of Resistance at Park Circus Dharna Mancha

The activity unfolded at the Park Circus Dharna Mancha, a space that already carries deep historical resonance in the city. Over the years, this ground has witnessed women gathering in large numbers to question authority, challenge unjust policies, and defend democratic rights.

In that sense, “Identity Beyond Labels” was not merely a symbolic exercise. It echoed a longer tradition of women’s resistance in the same space.

The women who gathered there were not only responding to a contemporary bureaucratic process like Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter list; they were also continuing a historical practice of collective assertion. Time and again, women at this site have challenged draconian policies like CAA, NRC and NPR, confronted exclusion, and transformed public space into a forum of dialogue and dissent.

The palms that carried words like hope and freedom were therefore more than gestures of solidarity. They were reminders that women’s identities cannot be reduced to administrative categories or official labels.

The spirit of the Park Circus Dharna Mancha has always carried the soul of resistance—a spirit that questions authority, stands against injustice, and inspires others to imagine a more equal and humane society.

On this International Working Women’s Day, that spirit found expression once again—written quietly, yet powerfully, on the open palms of women who refused to be defined by labels alone.

From Iraq to Iran: The Recurring Questions Around US Military Interventions

0

The recent strikes by Israel and the United States on Iran have raised serious concerns. The attacks reportedly took place even as diplomatic engagement was said to be continuing.

Senior Iranian figures, including Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, were killed in the strikes, which also hit civilian areas. One such target was a girls’ school in southern Iran, where, according to Iranian media, about 180 children under the age of 12 killed. The United Nations has called for an independent investigation into the incident. UNESCO has described attacks on schools as grave violations of humanitarian law.

Civilian Sites Caught in the Strikes

Hospitals and medical facilities were also affected. Reports from health authorities and humanitarian organisations say several hospitals and clinics across Iran were damaged during the bombardment. Gandhi Hospital in Tehran was badly damaged and had to be evacuated after nearby explosions. Doctors and nurses were forced to move patients, including newborn babies, in chaotic circumstances. Officials of the World Health Organization expressed deep concern and reminded all sides that medical facilities must be protected during conflict.

In another tragic incident, an air attack hit a sports hall in Fars province in southern Iran, killing 20 female volleyball players. Local reports say the young athletes were training in a simple gymnasium when the strike took place.

These incidents show how ordinary civilian life has been caught up in the violence. Civilian deaths in any conflict weaken the moral basis of military action.

Changing Explanations for the Attack

Public explanations from the United States about the objective of the strike have kept changing. At different times it has been described as deterrence, dismantling nuclear capability, leadership targeting, bringing democracy and regional stabilisation. The latest explanation is particularly difficult to follow. It says the United States struck Iran because the U.S. expected that, after Israel’s attack, Iran might target American bases. Such a justification raises obvious questions about the real purpose behind the strike.

The bombing of a school, a sports complex and medical facilities also raises another question. The United States often speaks of the accuracy and precision of its weapons. When such places are hit, it becomes difficult to believe that everything was accidental. Yet such deaths are often brushed aside as “collateral damage”.

According to the Iranian Red Crescent Society, the civilian toll from the strikes has risen sharply, with more than 1,000 people reported dead and many more injured across different cities. These numbers show that the suffering has gone far beyond the stated initial targets.

A Pattern Seen in Earlier Wars

This attack fits into a longer pattern of interventions carried out in the name of democracy. The 2003 invasion of Iraq was justified on the claim that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction and that the war would bring democratic reform. Those weapons were never found. The invasion instead led to the collapse of institutions and years of instability. Research by the Costs of War project estimates that the wars launched by the United States after 9/11 have contributed to about 4.5 million deaths and displaced more than 38 million people.

It was during the build-up to the Iraq invasion that George W. Bush made the famous statement: “Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.” That line shaped global politics at the time and left little room for disagreement. And of course, there have always been governments and commentators ready to support whatever the United States does.

Similar outcomes were seen elsewhere. In Libya, the removal of the government led to fragmentation and fighting between rival groups. Syria has endured a long war involving several foreign powers. Egypt too saw major political turmoil after external and internal pressures reshaped its political path. These cases show a repeated pattern where intervention did not bring the stability that was promised.

From Panama to Venezuela

Latin America has also experienced direct U.S. military action. In 1989, the United States invaded Panama and arrested Manuel Noriega, who had once been a close ally. More recently, in January 2026, U.S. Special Forces carried out a military operation in Caracas and captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife. They were taken to New York to face drug-trafficking charges, which they deny. The removal of a sitting head of state in this manner by a country that calls itself a defender of democracy is deeply troubling.

The United States’ steady support for Israel has also drawn criticism over the years, particularly during military operations in Gaza and the West Bank, where large numbers of civilians have lost their lives.

International Reactions and Growing Concerns

Not every country has supported the recent actions. The Spanish government refused to allow the United States to use military bases on Spanish soil for attacks on Iran. Spain said such use should comply with international agreements and legal norms. The U.S. response was swift: President Donald Trump threatened to cut off trade with Spain after its refusal. Many in Spain and other European countries supported Madrid’s position, saying it was a stand for sovereignty and international law. Cutting off trade relations and imposing high tariffs are the new weapons in the President’s arsenal.

Some commentators have also suggested that domestic political pressures within the United States sometimes coincide with sudden military actions abroad. These claims are debated and may not always be supported by clear evidence. Even so, the perception itself is significant. When military action appears to distract from internal problems, it weakens credibility.

The Question of Democracy and Intervention

Across many regions the results have often been similar: weakened institutions, civilian suffering and long-term instability. If democracy and stability are truly the objectives, it is reasonable to ask why undemocratic methods are repeatedly used to achieve them. Like several past actions carried out by the United States and its allies, the attack on Iran too deserves strong condemnation.

Selective Targeting? The Firestorm Over Bengal’s 60-Lakh ‘Adjudication’ List

0

Kolkata: In Polling Booth No. 118 of the Shyampur Assembly Constituency in Howrah district, the number of Hindu and Muslim voters is almost equal. Yet, when the Election Commission of India released the final electoral roll for West Bengal, only Muslim voters in the booth were marked “Under Adjudication.”

The anomaly came to light after Partha Das, a psephologist, posted about it on X. Soon after, several netizens responded, claiming similar patterns in their respective wards — alleging that Muslim voters alone were flagged despite comparable demographic compositions.

The issue has snowballed into a larger controversy following the publication of the final list on February 28, which placed nearly 60 lakh voters under adjudication across the state. A substantial number of them are concentrated in Muslim-majority districts such as Murshidabad and Malda. Together, the two districts account for nearly 20 lakh voters under adjudication.

Passports Ignored, Muslim Voters Flagged: Is SIR Targeting Selectively?

The experience of Mohammed Reyaz, an assistant professor, has further fuelled concerns. Ahmed said his entire family — except his mother — possesses valid Indian passports. During the verification hearing, all relevant documents were submitted.

“Except for my mother, all of us have been put under adjudication,” he wrote on Facebook.

Following his post, several acquaintances shared similar experiences. Many said they had submitted passports and other official documents during the hearing process, yet their names appeared in the adjudication list.

For many, the passport — considered one of the strongest proofs of citizenship — being disregarded raises troubling questions about the criteria being applied in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process.

bengal 60 lakh voters under adjudication sir controversy voter list

60 Lakh Under Adjudication: Why Minority Districts Dominate the List

The publication of the final list has triggered fresh protests across Bengal. Activists and civil society groups argue that more than half a crore voters placed under adjudication risk being disenfranchised ahead of the upcoming Assembly elections.

Demonstrations have resumed in parts of Kolkata and several districts, with protestors alleging selective targeting of minorities and marginalised communities.

Jawhar Sircar, former state Chief Election Commissioner and ex-Rajya Sabha MP, told eNewsroom, “The Chief Election Commissioner has not hidden his motive to harass Muslims and Dalits by deleting as many names as possible, as part of the Hindu Right’s agenda. His legally dubious SIR operation was first carried out in Bihar and is now specifically targeting West Bengal.”

Sircar further alleged, “The BJP has submitted Form 7 applications to delete Muslim voters in targeted localities and districts. However, no such action is reported from pockets where Hindu immigrants without valid citizenship papers are present in large numbers.”

From Booth 118 to Statewide Outrage: Allegations of Electoral Bias Grow

Mahasweta Samajhdar, journalist and social activist who has opposed the SIR process from the beginning, described the development as deeply alarming.

“The entire process seems to be a conspiracy. BJP and the Election Commission have colluded to exclude non-BJP voters so that the BJP may win the Bengal election. The judiciary also appears compromised.”

Mahasweta and others will have a protest march till the state Election Commission on March 5, asserting: “We want every citizen to have voting rights.”

Meanwhile, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee announces a March 6 dharna in Kolkata as allegations of “selective targeting” and “disenfranchisement” intensify ahead of the 2026 Assembly polls.

bengal 60 lakh voters under adjudication sir controversy voter list TMC

International Spotlight on Bengal: IAMC Condemns Voter Roll Purge

The controversy has drawn international attention too. The Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC), a US-based advocacy organisation, issued a strong condemnation of the SIR exercise in West Bengal.

In a statement, IAMC said the process has resulted in the deletion or suspension of voting rights of over 12 million citizens, with Muslim and marginalised communities bearing a “disproportionate and deeply alarming share” of the burden.

IAMC President Mohammed Jawad stated, “We are gravely concerned that the SIR has functioned as a targeted operation against Muslim voters and marginalised communities. What is unfolding in West Bengal is a constitutional crisis. When over 12 million voters, concentrated mostly in Muslim-majority districts, are stripped of their democratic rights without explanation or recourse, we are witnessing the systematic dismantling of minority citizenship in India.”

From Gaza to Tehran: How Western Power Politics Undermines Global Peace

The American-Israeli attack on Iran is cowardly and a betrayal of diplomatic norms and practices. The assassination of the Supreme Leader of Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini, reflects the American establishment’s policy of regime change through killing or abducting leadership. Donald Trump came to power to make America Great Again, but it seems his main concern is to protect the Israeli regime of Netanyahu, who destroyed Gaza and killed thousands of children there. An action of this kind by Russia in Ukraine would have rushed the so-called human rights defenders and hypocritical democracy lovers into singing choruses against Vladimir Putin. Russia can do the same with Ukraine. It can destroy Kyiv, but it has charted a very careful path. Americans, on the other hand, have often been careless about the “rules-based order” they speak so loudly about, along with their European allies. I am sorry to say that the crisis has grown vast due to the shameless surrender of European leadership. They remain deeply hypocritical.

One may not agree with everything about the Iranian regime, but that is a question the Iranian people have to resolve. Why should the West interfere so much in the name of democracy in Iran? How are gender rights defended by killing 150 schoolchildren, all of whom happened to be girls? Why is Iran being targeted? Is there any outrage over the brutal killing of these innocent schoolgirls in Iran?

Selective Outrage and the Politics of Intervention

In this era of American hegemony, Europe appears as a minor partner of American corporate politics. Democracy in the Western world is widely believed to be controlled by the deep state as well as powerful corporate lobbies. They influence the media, information, and narratives. Those who do not surrender to their agenda are targeted. You decide who is evil and who is a saint. They are experts in media propaganda and narrative-setting, as Vladimir Putin has said.

The irony is that the Muslim world itself has become a puppet of these hegemonists. Those who stood looking straight into the eyes of colonial powers were defamed. Popular leadership in Iraq and Libya was eliminated as it challenged American and Western hegemony. Ayatollah Khomeini has become a hero in the Global South, particularly in parts of the Islamic world, for not bowing to the US-led Western imperial order. He paid the price, but with his sacrifice, he united Iran, as can be seen in the massive protests happening not only in Iran but in other parts of the world.

us-israel war on iran global power order crisis India Brics
Protest against the US-Israel war on Iran in the United States on February 28 | Courtesy: wgbh.org

The Muslim World, Resistance, and Regime Change

The question is: how can the Western world dictate terms at its whims and fancies? How can one kill anyone without being held accountable? The fact is that Donald Trump’s actions and the failure of European leadership have already isolated them from the rest of the world. Indian leadership remains shamelessly tame in countering and confronting the American-Israeli action against Iran.

Those who shout against Jawaharlal Nehru must remember that, despite Chinese pressure, Nehru allowed the Dalai Lama and other Tibetan refugees into India, gave them respect, and never compromised on the issue until the end. Today’s leadership has betrayed the cause of the Indian people and the Global South. Narendra Modi and his government have not been able to condemn the killing of the head of a sovereign nation that has always been friendly with India and supported it. Because some within the Sangh ecosystem hate Muslims, the Indian foreign policy establishment has allowed itself to be influenced by the street politics of the Sangh Parivar, thereby undermining our independent foreign policy.

India’s Foreign Policy and the Question of Moral Authority

With this act, will India really be able to claim a moral high ground to lead the BRICS nations? Would India prefer to remain in it or distance itself from it? India is going to host the BRICS summit this year, but given its current position, will BRICS leaders trust the present regime? The Indian government has also kept quiet on the issue of Venezuela and Cuba. It tried to play a balancing role in the Russia-Ukraine war. It cannot afford to antagonise Russia, and Russia knows this well. Vladimir Putin’s visit to India was more about signalling his global acceptability to the West than anything else.

The Crisis of Global Leadership and the Future of Multipolarity

We hope good sense will prevail. The UN must revive itself and take on the role of mediating disputes between countries. It is also time for the American people to reflect on why their system continues to betray the public interest. American democracy appears corporate-controlled, and it is time for a real pro-people party that truly represents Indigenous people, African Americans, minorities, and other communities. It is important to have a party outside corporate control that serves the interests of the American people.

The world is at a crossroads, and we need statesmen to handle such a crisis. India needs a Nehru more than ever — someone who commanded huge respect and had the moral authority to lead the Global South. The United States needed a Kennedy to handle matters with care and diplomacy. Sadly, the world’s largest democracies are controlled by crony corporations and leaders who have little understanding of the crisis and are more interested in event management than addressing the serious challenges their countries face.

Let us hope that peace returns. But will it be possible without asking uncomfortable questions about the American-Israeli idea of regime change through killing the heads of sovereign states? As long as Americans and the West enjoy impunity for their actions, there cannot be lasting peace. Will Russia or BRICS take a stand to protect the rights of the Global South?

झारखंड में भाजपा की शहरी जमीन खिसकी: 48 निकायों के नतीजों ने बदला सियासी समीकरण

रांची/कोलकाता: झारखंड में 23 फरवरी को हुए 48 नगर निकायों के चुनाव के परिणाम अब सामने आ चुके हैं। इन नतीजों से एक अहम राजनीतिक संकेत मिला है—राज्य के शहरी इलाकों में भी भाजपा की पकड़ पहले जैसी मजबूत नहीं रह गई है। खासकर बड़े नगर निगमों के परिणामों ने यह दिखाया कि मुकाबला अब एकतरफा नहीं रहा।

नौ बड़े नगर निगमों में हुए मेयर चुनाव में भाजपा समर्थित उम्मीदवार सिर्फ तीन जगह ही जीत दर्ज कर सके। तीन जगह निर्दलीय उम्मीदवार जीते, दो जगह झामुमो समर्थित और एक जगह कांग्रेस समर्थित उम्मीदवार ने बाजी मारी। यह भी महत्वपूर्ण है कि भाजपा के खिलाफ कोई औपचारिक गठबंधन चुनाव नहीं लड़ रहा था, बल्कि गठबंधन की पार्टियां अलग-अलग मैदान में थीं। इसके बावजूद भाजपा को उम्मीद के मुताबिक सफलता नहीं मिली।

रांची से गिरिडीह तक: बड़े शहरों में भाजपा को झटके

रांची में भाजपा को सफलता जरूर मिली, लेकिन वहां का गणित दिलचस्प रहा। कांग्रेस ने मेयर पद पर अपना उम्मीदवार उतारा था और झामुमो ने भी अलग से प्रत्याशी खड़ा किया। झामुमो उम्मीदवार को मिले वोट भाजपा समर्थित रोशनी खलखो की जीत के अंतर से ज्यादा थे। यानी अगर विपक्ष एकजुट होता, तो नतीजा अलग हो सकता था। इसके बावजूद यह साफ दिखा कि वोटों के बिखराव के बावजूद भाजपा को बड़ी बढ़त नहीं मिल पाई।

गिरिडीह नगर निगम में झामुमो की प्रमिला मेहरा ने भाजपा समर्थित उम्मीदवार को बड़े अंतर से हराया। यहां भाजपा के प्रदेश अध्यक्ष और वरिष्ठ नेता बाबूलाल मरांडी ने खुद कैंप किया था और पार्टी ने डॉक्टर शैलेन्द्र चौधरी को पूरा समर्थन दिया था। लेकिन झामुमो की मजबूत जमीनी पकड़ ने भाजपा की रणनीति पर भारी पड़ी।

राजधनवार (गिरिडीह) में अध्यक्ष पद पर सीपीआई(एमएल) के विनय संध्या लिया की जीत ने भी सबका ध्यान खींचा। भाजपा के पूर्व प्रदेश अध्यक्ष और पूर्व सांसद रवींद्र राय ने वीडियो जारी कर अपील की थी, लेकिन इसके बावजूद भाजपा समर्थित खेमे को सफलता नहीं मिली।

देवघर में भाजपा सांसद निशिकांत दुबे ने पूरी ताकत लगाई थी, फिर भी मेयर पद पर भाजपा को जीत नहीं मिली। यहां रवि रावत मेयर चुने गए और उनकी मां वार्ड पार्षद बनीं। इससे साफ हुआ कि वार्ड स्तर से लेकर मेयर पद तक भाजपा अपने प्रतिद्वंद्वियों को रोकने में सफल नहीं रही।

मानगो, मेदिनीनगर और अन्य शहरों का संदेश

मानगो (जमशेदपुर) में पूर्व मंत्री बन्ना गुप्ता की पत्नी सुधा गुप्ता, जो कांग्रेस समर्थित उम्मीदवार थीं, ने मेयर पद पर जीत दर्ज की। यह खास इसलिए माना जा रहा है क्योंकि विधानसभा चुनाव में बन्ना गुप्ता को हार का सामना करना पड़ा था, लेकिन एक साल के भीतर उनके परिवार की वापसी हो गई।

भाजपा को रांची के अलावा मेदिनीनगर और आदित्यपुर में सफलता मिली। लेकिन हजारीबाग, धनबाद जैसे बड़े शहरों में निर्दलीय उम्मीदवारों ने जीत हासिल की। मधुपुर, जुगसलाई, बेरमो, रामगढ़ और चास जैसे इलाकों में भी भाजपा समर्थित उम्मीदवारों को जीत नहीं मिल सकी।

शहरी वोटर का बदलता रुझान?

राज्य में भाजपा पहले ही दो बार विधानसभा चुनाव हार चुकी है और सत्ता से बाहर है। हालिया लोकसभा चुनाव में भी उसकी सीटें कम हुईं। अब शहरी निकाय चुनाव के नतीजे यह संकेत दे रहे हैं कि शहरों में भी पार्टी की पकड़ कमजोर हो रही है।

चुनाव के बाद यह चर्चा भी रही कि भाजपा ने कई जगह नए और कम अनुभवी चेहरों को टिकट दिया। कई पुराने कार्यकर्ताओं की नाराजगी और बगावत ने भी नुकसान पहुंचाया। वहीं झामुमो ने अपेक्षाकृत मजबूत और स्थानीय स्तर पर सक्रिय उम्मीदवारों को मैदान में उतारा, जिसका फायदा उसे मिला।

भाजपा ने चुनाव प्रचार में राष्ट्रीय मुद्दों, राष्ट्रवाद और ‘जय श्री राम’ जैसे नारों पर ज्यादा जोर दिया, जबकि स्थानीय समस्याओं—पानी, सड़क, सफाई और नगर सेवाओं—पर अपेक्षित ध्यान नहीं दिया गया। विश्लेषकों का मानना है कि शहरी मतदाताओं ने इस बार स्थानीय मुद्दों को प्राथमिकता दी।

बैलट पेपर से चुनाव और बड़ी भागीदारी

इस बार चुनाव ईवीएम की बजाय बैलट पेपर से कराए गए। लंबे समय बाद बैलट पेपर से मतदान हुआ, जिससे कुछ जगह मतगणना में देरी जरूर हुई, लेकिन ज्यादातर उम्मीदवार इस प्रक्रिया से संतुष्ट नजर आए।

करीब 44 लाख मतदाता इस चुनाव में शामिल हुए, जिनमें 21 लाख से ज्यादा महिलाएं थीं। 48 शहरी निकायों में कुल 1087 पदों के लिए मतदान हुआ। महिलाओं की बड़ी भागीदारी भी इन चुनावों की एक अहम विशेषता रही।

कुल मिलाकर, झारखंड के शहरी निकाय चुनावों ने यह संकेत दिया है कि राज्य की राजनीति में मुकाबला अब और ज्यादा खुला हो गया है। भाजपा के लिए यह नतीजे चेतावनी की तरह हैं, जबकि झामुमो, कांग्रेस और निर्दलीयों के लिए यह मनोबल बढ़ाने वाला परिणाम माना जा रहा है। आने वाले समय में इसका असर राज्य की बड़ी राजनीतिक लड़ाइयों पर भी दिख सकता है।

Consumer Protection Act 2019: Haryana High Court Intervention Highlights Gaps in India’s Consumer Justice System

0

The Consumer Protection Act, originally enacted in 1986 to safeguard consumer rights, was significantly amended in 2019. Despite these reforms, consumer awareness in India remains low. The 2019 Act established the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) along with State and District Consumer Commissions to regulate unfair trade practices, misleading advertisements, and other violations. It also introduced provisions for quicker and more effective redressal through specialised consumer forums.

However, the government’s lack of adequate administrative resources raises serious concerns about the effective implementation of the law. No substantial, research-based reforms have yet been introduced to strengthen the consumer protection framework.

Consumer rights are as vital as the fundamental rights of citizens. Under the Act, manufacturers, service providers, and sellers can be held liable for damages caused by defective goods or deficient services. The law provides for a three-tier quasi-judicial mechanism—District, State, and National Commissions—for dispute resolution through simplified procedures.

The Act empowers regulatory authorities to promote, protect, and enforce consumer rights. These powers include conducting investigations, ordering product recalls, and imposing penalties for misleading advertisements. Importantly, the 2019 Act explicitly includes e-commerce platforms and prescribes fair trade practices for online sellers.

Why Consumer Protection Act 2019 Still Struggles Despite Legal Reforms

The law guarantees six fundamental consumer rights:

Right to Safe Products

Right to Full and Clear Information

Right to Choice

Right to Hearing

Right to Redressal

Right to Consumer Education

Consumer protection includes safeguards against hazardous goods and services. It mandates transparency regarding product quality, quantity, purity, and pricing. Consumers must have access to a variety of goods and services at competitive prices. The Act also provides mechanisms to seek compensation against unfair trade practices and makes consumer awareness promotion a statutory responsibility of the government.

From Right to Safety to Right to Redressal: What Consumers Are Guaranteed by Law

Despite these provisions, India’s consumer protection system remains complex and comparatively less effective than those in many developed countries. Several challenges hinder its efficiency.

Enforcing consumer rights in an increasingly digital marketplace poses a significant difficulty. Strong regulatory mechanisms are essential to prevent exploitation and ensure access to safe and quality goods and services.

According to a survey conducted by the National Consumer Helpline, only 30% of Indians are aware of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. While the Act has strengthened the legal framework, major gaps persist in the efficiency and accessibility of consumer courts. A study by the Indian Institute of Public Administration found that over 40% of cases in consumer courts take more than a year to be resolved, undermining the objective of timely justice.

Administrative deficiencies, particularly at the State and District Commission levels, along with poor coordination in implementation and monitoring, further weaken the system in many states.

To ensure that consumer rights are practical and not merely theoretical, reforms are urgently needed. These may include streamlining case management systems, increasing the number of consumer courts, and providing better training to judicial officers to handle complex disputes. The legal framework must also evolve to address challenges posed by e-commerce, such as online fraud, counterfeit products, and data privacy concerns.

Justice TPS Mann vs Haryana Government: Battle Over Consumer Commission Autonomy

The situation in Haryana illustrates the structural tensions within the system.

In August 2025, the Punjab and Haryana High Court intervened in a dispute between the Haryana State Consumer Commission and the state government. The court stayed certain state government orders allegedly issued against the Commission’s decisions.

The intervention followed a petition filed by the Commission’s Chairman, former High Court judge Justice TPS Mann, who accused the government of day-to-day interference in the Commission’s functioning. Justice Mann argued that such interference paralysed operations, encouraged employees to disregard lawful instructions, and weakened the institution’s independence. Senior officials reportedly described the interference as “illegal and beyond jurisdiction.”

Justice Mann, appointed Chairman on December 29, 2018, maintained that under Section 70 of the Consumer Protection Act, he is the administrative head of the State and District Commissions.

According to the petition filed before the High Court, the Principal Secretary of the Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Department had been encroaching upon the Commission’s jurisdiction for several months. The allegations include interference in transfers, disciplinary proceedings, and administrative decisions concerning appointments and postings.

Transfers, Suspensions and Jurisdiction: Inside the Haryana Consumer Commission Dispute

Several incidents have further intensified the controversy.

In one case, a Superintendent of the State Commission allegedly misbehaved with the Chairman. His transfer to the Yamunanagar Commission on charges of misconduct was reportedly halted by the Principal Secretary, and the disciplinary inquiry was suspended.

In another instance, a member of the District Consumer Forum in Panipat was transferred to Jind, but the transfer was reversed by the Principal Secretary on the grounds that it exceeded the Commission’s authority.

A letter dated March 6, 2019, from the Chief Secretary of Haryana clarified that the state government does not have authority over the Commission’s administrative and judicial proceedings. Despite this clarification, disputes have continued.

Former Additional Sessions Judge Gulab Singh, President of the Yamunanagar District Consumer Forum, also approached the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking a transfer to Fatehabad. The matter has since escalated through judicial proceedings, and related issues are reportedly pending before higher courts.

Can Supreme Court Intervention Rescue India’s Consumer Protection System?

The final clarity on the Commission’s composition, jurisdiction, and the extent of government control is likely to emerge from the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. Such judicial guidance could significantly strengthen the institutional independence and effectiveness of consumer forums.

The Haryana government must address these issues seriously to ensure that consumer rights are meaningfully protected and that redressal mechanisms function efficiently.

If implemented properly, new consumer protection policies in Haryana could mark a turning point and set an example for other states. However, without administrative autonomy, institutional coordination, and resource allocation, even the strongest legal framework risks remaining ineffective.

SIR Row Intensifies in Kolkata as Activists Flag Voter Deletion Fears

0

Kolkata: Two days before the publication of the final draft of the voter list following the Special Intensive Revision (SIR), Kolkata witnessed a strong show of dissent. On February 26, Civil Society Against SIR organised a public demonstration in the heart of the city, demanding that the exercise be scrapped, calling it “unconstitutional, inhuman and a threat to genuine voters.”

The protest comes amid legal developments, with the Supreme Court directing that a supplementary list be released along with the final draft of the revised electoral roll. However, activists claim that there is still no clarity on the timeline for the publication of the supplementary list, creating uncertainty among voters ahead of the final draft release.

Activists, students, hawkers’ representatives and concerned citizens gathered in front of the Tea Board in central Kolkata, holding placards and raising slogans against what they described as an arbitrary and exclusionary process. Protesters alleged that the SIR drive has created fear among ordinary voters, particularly marginalised communities, and risks wrongful deletions from the electoral rolls.

After brief speeches, the gathering marched peacefully towards the office of the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), West Bengal, under police escort. A three-member delegation—Shaktiman Ghosh, head of the Hawkers Sangram Committee, Manzar Jameel, and Md. Rafay Mahmood Siddiqui—was allowed to meet Additional CEO Arindam Niyogi and submit a memorandum outlining their objections and demands.

According to members of the delegation, the Additional CEO gave them a patient hearing and assured that their concerns would be forwarded to higher authorities. The protest concluded without any untoward incident.

Concerns Over Form 7 and Voter Harassment

During the meeting, Rafay Siddiqui raised specific concerns regarding alleged discrepancies in Form 7, the form used to object to a name on the electoral roll. He claimed that under the current process, “unknown senders” can file objections declaring individuals as non-citizens, following which the Election Commission issues notices to those voters. Activists argue that such provisions can be misused to harass genuine citizens and create an atmosphere of suspicion.

Manzar Jameel, speaking after the meeting, struck a sharper tone. He alleged that more than 134 SIR-related workers and voters have died in Bengal in recent months, linking the figure to stress and anxiety caused by the revision process. He further accused the Election Commission of acting under political pressure, claiming that the exercise benefits the BJP. These allegations, however, have not been officially responded to by the Commission.

Civil Society Against SIR has maintained that the revision process is not only unnecessary but also burdensome for citizens already grappling with economic challenges. Members argue that repeated document verification, public notices and objections disproportionately affect daily wage earners, migrant workers and elderly voters.

Democracy, Accountability and Public Discourse

The February 26 rally followed a press conference held on February 23 at the Kolkata Press Club, where several social activists criticised the SIR process as a drain on public funds and an avoidable exercise in what they called the world’s largest democracy. Speakers argued that democratic legitimacy rests not merely on periodic elections but on transparency, accountability and informed public debate.

Academic Himadri Mukherjee, said during the rally that institutions are human creations and therefore subject to scrutiny. “No parliament, no office, no authority is beyond accountability,” adding that democracy thrives on rational, accessible and fearless public discourse.

As the final draft of the revised voter list approaches, Civil Society Against SIR has vowed to continue its campaign. “Our fight to save genuine voters will continue,” members said, signalling that the debate over the SIR process is far from over in West Bengal.

झारखंड म्युनिसिपल चुनाव 2026: क्या शहरों में भी कमजोर पड़ रही है भाजपा की पकड़?

झारखंड से लौटकर: झारखंड का म्युनिसिपल चुनाव 2026 राज्य की राजनीति में अहम मोड़ साबित हो सकता है। अब तक आम धारणा रही है कि शहरी इलाकों में भारतीय जनता पार्टी की मजबूत पकड़ है और नगर निकाय चुनावों में उसे बढ़त मिलती है। लेकिन इस बार कई शहरों से आ रहे रुझान अलग कहानी बयान कर रहे हैं।

हालांकि चुनाव औपचारिक रूप से पार्टी बेसिस पर नहीं था, फिर भी ज़मीनी स्तर पर लगभग सभी प्रमुख दल खुले तौर पर मैदान में दिखे। ऐसे में नतीजों को दलों से अलग करके देखना मुश्किल होगा।

पार्टी बेसिस नहीं, फिर भी खुलकर मैदान में भाजपा-झामुमो

इस बार का चुनाव गैर-पार्टी आधार पर हुआ, लेकिन हकीकत यह रही कि झामुमो, भाजपा, कांग्रेस और वाम दलों ने खुलकर अपने-अपने समर्थित उम्मीदवारों के पक्ष में प्रचार किया।

भाजपा समर्थित उम्मीदवारों के कार्यक्रमों में भगवा झंडे, नारों और वरिष्ठ नेताओं की मौजूदगी साफ दिखाई दी। दूसरी ओर झामुमो ने भी अपने संगठन और मंत्रियों के जरिए उम्मीदवारों को पूरा समर्थन दिया।

ऐसे में अगर भाजपा समर्थित उम्मीदवार हारते हैं, तो यह कहना मुश्किल होगा कि यह केवल ‘व्यक्तिगत’ हार है।

झारखंड में 48 शहरी निकायों में चुनाव हुए हैं। लगभग हर जगह झामुमो भाजपा को कड़ी टक्कर देती दिख रही है। यह टक्कर कई सीटों पर जीत में भी बदल सकती है।

गिरिडीह में सीधी टक्कर—प्रमिला मेहरा बनाम डॉ. शैलेंद्र चौधरी

गिरिडीह नगर निगम के मेयर चुनाव ने सबसे ज्यादा ध्यान खींचा है। यहां झामुमो की प्रमिला मेहरा और भाजपा समर्थित डॉ. शैलेंद्र चौधरी के बीच सीधा मुकाबला है।

डॉ. चौधरी के समर्थन में भाजपा के वरिष्ठ नेता बाबूलाल मरांडी ने मीटिंग्स कीं। प्रचार में भगवा रंग और ‘जय श्री राम’ के नारे प्रमुखता से दिखे।

दूसरी ओर झामुमो ने प्रमिला मेहरा के लिए संगठनात्मक ताकत झोंक दी। स्थानीय स्तर पर मिल रहे संकेत बताते हैं कि मुकाबला कड़ा है और भाजपा के लिए राह आसान नहीं दिख रही।

राजधनवार में विनय संथालिया मजबूत, CPI(ML) समर्थित उम्मीदवार

राजधनवार सीट पर स्थिति और भी दिलचस्प है। यहां भाजपा के पूर्व सांसद रविंद्र राय ने वीडियो जारी कर विनय संथालिया को हराने की अपील की और पार्टी का नाम लेकर वोट देने की बात कही।

इसके बावजूद विनय संथालिया को मजबूत बताया जा रहा है।

अगर यहां भाजपा समर्थित रणनीति असर नहीं दिखा पाती, तो यह स्थानीय समीकरणों पर बड़ा सवाल खड़ा करेगा।

चतरा, मानगो, मधुपुर, जुगसलाई—शहरी किले में सेंध के संकेत

चतरा से मिल रहे रुझान भी भाजपा के पक्ष में स्पष्ट नहीं हैं।

जमशेदपुर के मानगो में पूर्व मंत्री बन्ना गुप्ता की पत्नी मैदान में हैं और उन्हें कांग्रेस का समर्थन प्राप्त है, मजबूत स्थिति में बताई जा रही हैं। मधुपुर और जुगसलाई जैसे इलाकों में भी भाजपा के लिए जीत आसान नहीं दिख रही।

यदि इन क्षेत्रों में भाजपा पिछड़ती है, तो ‘शहरी पार्टी’ की उसकी पहचान को चुनौती मिल सकती है।

रांची और धनबाद में तस्वीर धुंधली, सस्पेंस बरकरार

राजधानी रांची में अभी स्थिति स्पष्ट नहीं है। यहां झामुमो समर्थित उम्मीदवार आगे रहेंगे या भाजपा समर्थित, इस पर अंतिम तस्वीर सामने नहीं आई है।

इसी तरह धनबाद में भी मुकाबला बेहद कड़ा माना जा रहा है। दोनों प्रमुख दलों के समर्थक अपनी-अपनी जीत का दावा कर रहे हैं, लेकिन जमीनी रुझान मिश्रित संकेत दे रहे हैं।

इन दोनों शहरों के नतीजे पूरे राज्य के राजनीतिक संदेश को प्रभावित कर सकते हैं।

टिकट चयन, असंतोष और UGC बिल—क्या भाजपा को भारी पड़ रहा समीकरण?

भाजपा के सामने इस बार संगठनात्मक असंतोष भी चुनौती बनता दिख रहा है। गिरिडीह जैसे उदाहरणों में अपेक्षाकृत नए चेहरों को प्राथमिकता दिए जाने से पुराने कार्यकर्ताओं में नाराजगी सामने आई। कुछ स्थानों पर बागी उम्मीदवारों के मैदान में उतरने से कोर वोट में बंटवारे की आशंका जताई जा रही है।

साथ ही UGC बिल को लेकर फॉरवर्ड कास्ट के एक हिस्से में नाराजगी की चर्चा है। बिल के बाद यह झारखंड में पहला बड़ा चुनाव है, इसलिए इसके प्रभाव को भी नजरअंदाज नहीं किया जा सकता।

दूसरी ओर झामुमो ने अपेक्षाकृत जमीनी और पुराने कार्यकर्ताओं को प्राथमिकता दी, जिससे उसका पारंपरिक वोटबैंक एकजुट दिखाई दे रहा है—ठीक वैसे ही जैसे पिछले विधानसभा चुनाव में देखने को मिला था।

अब 27 तारीख को घोषित होने वाले नतीजे यह तय करेंगे कि शहरी मतदाता किस दिशा में रुख कर रहे हैं—और क्या झारखंड की राजनीति में शहरों का समीकरण सचमुच बदल रहा है।