Eight accused of Jharkhand’s first lynching case get life term for killing two

Date:

Share post:

Ranchi: All the eight accused in the Latehar Lynching case, the first lynching case of Jharkhand, have got life imprisonment by a Latehar Court on Friday. A fine of Rs 25000 has been imposed on each of the accused for the brutal killing of the two victims, one of whom was 12-year-old boy.

On the morning of March 18, 2016, 35-year-old Mazloom Ansari and his partner’s son, Imtiaz Khan were on their way to sell their oxen in a village fair, which falls under Balumath police station. Here they were picked up by a group of cow vigilantes and taken to a nearby forest area, where they were first brutally beaten to death and later hanged from one of the forest trees.

Father of Imtiaz, Azad Khan and Nizamuddin were the first to have reached the spot along with some of the villagers. They lodged an FIR (42/2016) at Balumath police station.

“The FIR was lodged by Nizamuddin and Azad Khan, and around 10 witnesses were presented before the court in connection with this case. The court (Additional District and Sessions Judge Rasikesh Kumar) awarded life imprisonment to all the eight accused under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Rs 25000 also fine on each of them,” said Public Prosecutor, Balram Shah to the media, outside Latehar court. Abdul Salam was the informant lawyer in the case.

Two days back, on December 19, court had convicted the eight accused.

The names of the killers who will serve life term imprisonment are Arun Sahu, Manoj Sahu, Vishal Tiwari, Mithilesh Kumar, Sahdeo Soni, Pramod Sahu, Avdhesh Sahu and Manoj Kumar. All of them are residents of Jhabar village, under Balumath police station.

 

Tight security arrangements had been made in the court area before the judgment was given. According to locals heavy police deployment had been made Jhabar and Nawada villages too, as the families of the killers and deceased belong to these areas.

It is only the second case of lynching, in India where a judgment has been delivered since 2015, when Akhlaque Ahmed was lynched over beef eating allegation. The first verdict came in the lynching case of Alimuddin Ansari, a resident of Ramgarh, Jharkhand. This year in March, 11 killers were sentenced for life by a Ramgarh court. However, all of them are out on bail. And Union Minister Jayant Sinha had also garlanded them when they were granted bail. Following which, he had been criticized nationally.

In July this year, wife of Mazloom Ansari, Saira Bibi had told that the killing of her husband and 12-year-old Imtiaz was a planned one as killers had threatened her husband twice. And once they had even threatened Mazloom in their residence. Following which, Mazloom and his partners, who used to buy oxen from one village fair and sell it out at other, had decided to leave the trade. It was the last time that they had gone to sell, the already purchased animals when they were picked by the killers and brutally killed.

latehar lynching mob lynchings Abdul Salam lawyer
Informant lawyer Abdul Salam

After the judgment, Saira told eNewsroom over phone, “We had lost hope that we will get justice, but we are happy to hear this. The family of the killers should face the situation, which my children and I are facing after the murder of my husband.”

She also thanked the support of several unknown people because of whom the case reached to conclusion.

“We are very poor people and we could not fight the killers, but because of the support of people, it happened today,” she added.

However, despite welcoming the verdict, brother of Mazloom Ansari, Manauwar fears that the killers might get bail from High Court. “We are satisfied with the judgment, but because of what happened in the Ramgarh case, we fear that they can also get bail from High Court,” said Manuwar to eNewsroom.

Related articles

Cyclone Arnab Explained: How Ocean Linguistics Meet Climate Chaos

Why is a cyclone named Arnab, and who chooses these storm names? Discover how 13 countries contribute culturally rooted names to the North Indian Ocean’s cyclone naming system and why naming storms matters for communication, public awareness and disaster preparedness.

15-Person Family, 12 Names Deleted: Trilokpuri Door-to-Door Audit Flags 416 Wrongful Voter Exclusions

A public hearing in Delhi’s Trilokpuri heard testimonies from voters deleted during SIR, as an MKSS-led audit flagged 416 alleged wrongful deletions. Rahul Gandhi, Dipankar Bhattacharya, Prashant Bhushan and Yogendra Yadav attended the hearing, where residents raised concerns over voter exclusion and demolitions.

SIR Fallout Reaches Bengal’s Civic Polls as Opposition Demands January 2027 Deadline

Nearly 1.6 lakh voter appeals remain pending in Kolkata and Howrah following SIR deletions. A broad coalition of opposition parties, civil rights groups and public figures has urged the West Bengal State Election Commission to delay municipal polls until January 2027 and include voters whose appeals are awaiting tribunal decisions.

Lula, Gen Z and the Algorithm: Who Owns the Battle for Democracy?

From Lula’s victory in Brazil to Neha Bora’s emergence in India’s student protests, this opinion examines how social media algorithms, corporate interests and media sensationalism shape Gen Z activism, political narratives and the struggle for democracy.