Outrageous: Tripta Tyagi is the product of ‘Zahar Ki Pathshala’ of various outfits of saffron propaganda militia

The video of a Muslim student being beaten up, slapped and humiliated in front of the entire class in a school in Uttar Pradesh, has only shown how much the hate propaganda against Muslims in India has reached inside our hearts and minds. That a teacher in the primary school is sadistically enjoying when the poor boy is being humiliated in front of the entire class reflects the power of the poison that has been injected in our minds for years and has become the hallmark of the Noida channels. Remember, the teacher is not beating the boy herself but ordering each student in the class to beat him up. She encouraged and said that all Muslim children should be dealt with like this.

The criminal and thuggish teacher identified as Tripta Tyagi is actually the head of the Neha Public School of a village in Muzaffarnagar district in Uttar Pradesh. This clearly reflects how much poison has been spread in our hearts across the nooks and corners of the country and it should not merely make us feel ashamed of ourselves but worry us. Should we allow such things to happen or do they need a strong socio-political and cultural response? Often BJP and the Sangh Parivar promote their agenda on a ‘non-political basis’ using common prejudices and cultural practices as if they are the sole guardians of the society.

The most atrocious part of these hate crimes is that they are being recorded and spread across the internet by the perpetrators of the crime. In most such cases when there is a huge outrage, the state apparatus acts like it acted in the Manipur case, to punish the person who posted the video on social media. The person who brought it to the notice of the nation becomes a criminal while the criminals who commit such heinous crimes are carefully pushed in the background for some time till someday some outfit of the Hindutva makes the person their leader. Tripta Tyagi actually does not deserve to be a teacher but for certain she is the product of the ‘jahar kee pathshala’ of various outfits of the saffron propaganda militia.

We all celebrated India on the moon yesterday. The G-20 summit is scheduled to happen in the second week of September. The prime minister Narendra MODI has already got an ‘international award’ for his ‘contribution’ but the crisis in India is much bigger than even the BJP can think of now. The poison of hatred has spread across. The Sangh Parivar outfits, and Noida Propaganda channels all have worked hard during the past 10 years. Remember, it is not merely the act of committing the hate crime but justifying it through the vilifying of those who speak up against such hatred. The vilification of the opponents is justified through whataboutery in the prime time. Criminals get normalised on TV. Media will wait for a couple of days till they find some Muslim criminal to have committed a heinous crime to deflate the story. The continuous vilification of Muslims in our media is the biggest achievement of the present dispensation.

India’s ruling party and its Ministers rarely speak on the issue. The officers will wait for the orders of the highest authority and the media will begin to cover up the incident. The Darbaris and loudspeakers on prime time will not allow ‘Hindus’ to be ‘targeted’ for some ‘isolated’ incident and blame the opponents for conspiring to ‘defame’ India when the country has landed on the Moon and G-20 is happening. The ruling party’s response to this will be on conspiracy theory while their ground staff will continue to feed the hatred against Muslims as well as the Bahujan Samaj of India.

Good thing is that the people are speaking. Many political leaders have spoken including Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi. It was essential for them to speak against hatred. I am still waiting for Uttar Pradesh and Bihar Netas to speak up on the issue and call for a full-fledged battle against hatred. More than anything else, India does not merely need a ‘Mohabbat Ki Dukan’ but complete demolition of the hate factories built up so powerfully with the help of the power elite. Hate crime flourishes on the strength of distortion of history and fake news. So, the biggest priority of our political parties today in INDIA should be to unite against the culture of violence, prejudices and hate crimes. Do not legitimise news channels that spread fake news and justify hate crimes. Speak up against hatred as otherwise, it will engulf you. You can’t build a stronger and united India on the edifice of falsehood and hatred.

Remembering Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore’s powerful lines here
‘Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high,
Where knowledge is free
Where the world has not been broken up into fragments by narrow domestic walls;
Where words come out from the depths of truth;
Where tireless striving stretches its arms towards perfection;
Where the clear stream of reason has not lost its way into the dreary desert sand of dead habit;
Where the mind is led forward by thee into ever-widening thought and action,
into that heaven of freedom, my father,
Let my country awake
Let my countrymen awake against this culture of hatred which will ultimately affect us as a society and as a citizen of India.

We must stand united and firm against the culture of hatred and bigotry.

साइंस ने इंसान को चाँद पे पहुंचाया, नफरत ने स्कूली बच्चों को भी नहीं बख्शा

किस गर्व से कहें हम चांद पर हैं?

क्यों हैं? क्यों हमारे ज्ञान–प्रज्ञान का रोवर इन जैसे नफरतियों को खोज नहीं पा रहा?

क्यों हमारी धरती का चक्कर लगा रहे दर्जनों उपग्रहों के कैमरे ऐसे जहरीले इंसानों को पहचान नहीं पा रहे हैं?

किस काम की है यह वैज्ञानिक तरक्की, जो एमपी, यूपी से लेकर मणिपुर तक की तबाही तक को देख, दिखा नहीं पा रही है?

बेशक, हम चांद पर बस्तियां बसा लें। बिना हवा के माइनस 250 डिग्री पर भी जी लें। 14 दिन की रात के बाद पतंगों की तरह सुबह का इंतजार करें। फिर मिट जाएं।

लेकिन उस सभ्यता के बीज कहां से लायेंगे? इसी जमीन से न?

जहां बलात्कार एक संस्कृति है। जहां नफ़रत एक परंपरा है।

या कोई प्रोग्राम्ड रोबोट बनाएंगे? बीजेपी ने भी बनाया है। ऐसे रोबोट, जिनका काम सिर्फ नफरत को पालना है।

बेकार है ये चंद्रयान। फेंक दो इसको। यह मानवता का कोई भला नहीं कर सकता।

सिर्फ एक इंसान की बनाई मशीन। वही इंसान, जिसने ईश्वर को गढ़ा।

एक जहाज बनाओ। बड़ा सा।

इन सब नफरतियो को बिना ऑक्सीजन मास्क के चांद पर छोड़ दो। मछली की तरह तड़पकर मरने के लिए।

उनकी कंकाल यह स्टांप लगा रही हो कि इसरो ने पहली बार एक महान काम किया है।

बस, उस एक शख्स को नहीं भूलना। जो गॉडजिला फिल्म की तरह बदस्तूर नफरत के अंडे दे रहा है।

उस एक नरभक्षी को पहले छोड़ना।

तभी मैं चांद को चंदा मामा कहूंगा।

 

ये सौमित्र रॉय की फेस्बूक पोस्ट है।

Why action came too slowly to treat victims of Bhopal gas tragedy?

Bhopal, Jabalpur, New Delhi: The entire stretch from Karbide Karkhana (Union Carbide Plant) to Hamidia Asptaal (Gandhi Medical College – largest hospital of the Indian state – Madhya Pradesh) facing Taj-ul-Masajid one of the largest mosques in India was split over with hundreds of people struggling to breathe and bodies with froth and foam settled on the mouth, burst eyes and swollen abdomen lying in the hospital premises following the 2-3 December Bhopal Gas Tragedy. On the backside of the same Hamidia Asptaal, facing Dhai Seedhi Ki Masjid, one of the smallest mosques in India a team of doctors were taking a different shot on hundreds of mangled bodies.

Today’s android-fixated generation may not even be aware that the scene was much worse than a war scene that changed the lives of many for generations and even shaped the state capital’s political and cultural history. But there was a time when the area was Bhopal’s lifeline.

On the day of the leak, Dr Chandra (Dr Hireesh Chandra, head of the Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology at Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal) and a team of doctors from the Gandhi Medical Center began performing autopsies and quickly discovered that many of the victims had been poisoned not only by MIC but cyanide as well; the reaction that led to the leak of MIC produced cyanide and several other toxic chemicals, writes Derrick Jensen in his book titled The Culture of Make Believe.

That afternoon, Chandra recommended injecting victims with sodium thiosulfate, a universally recognized antidote for cyanide poisoning, wrote Jensen in his 285-page book.

The presence of cyanide on the bodies gave a little more significant revelation than it should. In all this, a telex message titled ‘Treatment of MIC pulmonary complications’ travelled from Union Carbide Corporation’s (UCC) West Virginia plant. In his message, Dr B H Avashia wrote: “If cyanide poisoning is suspected, use amyl nitrate. If no effect, sod. nitrite -0.3 gm. and sodium thiosulphate 12.5 gm. I.V. for two to four minutes. Can be repeated [half dose] as a prophylactic measure.” His message is published on page no 5 The Hazards Bulletin & Bhopal Newsletter, dated  November 1987, February 1988, published by Bhopal Group of Information Action, c/o Eklavya organisation.

bhopal gas disaster victims survivors treatment
Picture by Prakash Hatvalne

Chandra’s recommendation and message from Union Carbide Corporation’s (UCC) West Virginia plant turned out to be the saviour both for the hundred and hundreds of children, women, pregnant women, parents, and grandparents struggling to breathe lying in semi-unconscious states in the Hamidia hospital premises and to the stressed and exhausted health care workers treating them.

The question with which I charge myself is, can UCC, now owned by Dow Chemicals, be a little prompt to send this message? A day after the autopsy reports, two -days after the arrival of the telex message and five days after the Bhopal Disaster, eminent German toxicologist Dr Max Daunderer reached Bhopal from Berlin. Max was not alone. He landed with a large supply of sodium thiosulphate, the only known antidote for cyanide poisoning.

After the briefing and the autopsy reports Dr Max made a demonstration before the healthcare officials and team.

‘With the help of a Drager Tube, he demonstrated successfully a cyanide level of about 2 ppm in the blood of dead victims (Hankinson, 1986). Until the end of December the dead bodies showed a pronounced Cherry Red Colour of the blood, and some a pink colour thereafter (Figure 3.9)’, says the 151-page report titled Health Effects of the Toxic Gas Leak from Union Carbide Methyl Isocyanate Plant in Bhopal Technical report on Pathology and Toxicology [1984 -1992] published by Director-General Indian Council of Medical Research Department of Health Research.

The hypothesis seemingly worked. Dr Chandra, Dr Avashia and Dr Max were able to find a path of recovery for the victims.

bhopal gas disaster tragedy survivors treatment
Picture by Prakash Hatvalne

Dr NR Bhandari the Medical Superintendent of the State-owned Hamidia Hospital (attached to Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal) and the first clinician to attend to the victims found victims regaining visibility and relief to distention.

In his book titled “25 Years of Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Inside Story and Untold Truths,” Dr Bhandari wrote that both (Dr Max and Dr Chandra ) had found that sodium thiosulphate, when administered intravenously, led to improvement in the patients affected by the gas with no side effects. However, Dr Bhandari was quick to make another startling revelation.

In that case, UCC was aware that MiC could decompose into cyanide once it entered the body, Dr Bhandari wrote.

Activists working among the gas victims feel that both UCC and the Indian establishment underplayed the magnitude and grievousness of the disaster in properly assessing all its ramifications.

“There was an obvious harmony of interests between Carbide officials and the Indian Establishment. The most telling instance in this regard relates to the denial of sodium thiosulphate (NaTS) therapy to gas victims because UCC was desperate to hide the presence of the highly toxic hydrogen cyanide (HCN – one of the reaction products of MIC) and NaTS was a known antidote for cyanide poisoning,” says paper titled “The path to sustainable development: Lessons from the Bhopal disaster”, presented at the Right to Development Anniversary Event organised by the office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, United Nations Organisations, Geneva on December 2, 2014, the eve of the 30th anniversary of the Bhopal disaster. The paper was presented by ND Jayaprakash, joint secretary, of Delhi Science Forum and co-convenor, Bhopal Gas Peedith Sangharsh Sahayog Samiti (Coalition for supporting the cause of gas victims).

bhopal gas disaster tragedy victims treatment
Picture by Prakash Hatvalne

However, on the background of grief and despair, medical treatment and the intended purpose of such treatment, another development was taking its own course. The Union Health Ministry abruptly banned the use of sodium thiosulphate when it was found that sodium thiosulphate, injected intravenously, had started providing relief to victims.

Subsequently, Dr Max was told to pack up and leave. Before leaving, Max met Indian officials, and explained about his works, supposedly findings and suggestions.

He met the officials of the Union Health Ministry and placed all the evidence before them, says a report titled Bhopal Gas Disaster – Mockery of Relief and Rehabilitation appeared in the Economic and Political Weekly.

A news report quoting KN Pradhan [late], the then Member of Parliament, Bhopal says that of the over one lakh needing sodium thiosulphate, only five per cent have been lucky enough to get the injection.

The fine print which has received very little media attention is that three months later in March 1985, the government reversed the treatment by recommending Sodium Thiosulphate injection only to be disrupted again in June 1985.

A regrettable feature of all this is that instead of a more favourable international environment, one more rejection and suspicion stuck with the gas victims.

The government should take up the case as one which mirrors many of the issues relating to the failure of the treatment of the gas victims to uphold law and order and protect the vulnerable. In both the cases, a good administration (both the centre and the state) would have commenced the legal process of charge and prosecution.

Indeed, asking the question is as powerful as dealing with the answer- that if streets of Bhopal were stained by bodies oozing foam, burn & burst eyes and swollen abdomen, the question with which I charge myself (not swayed by the emotion) is that the Act was Bad (deletions mine).

Of course, there are setbacks, but let us return to the key issue that needs to be reviewed: first, what the Governments (the Centre and the State) did upon receiving the telex message from UCC? What questions have the Governments (Centre and the State) slapped before the UCC for sending the message so late? Secondly, why was the use of sodium thiosulphate allowed, then stopped, restarted again and stopped finally?

The gas victims had many disappointments for not living by the truths they were told. On this one, they definitely want to hear facts and truth and doesn’t our Constitutional order guarantee them this?

 

Anup Dutta is a fellow of Vikas Samvad Constitution Fellowship 2022.

TMC MP Foresees BJP Restrained to 100 Seats in 2024 Lok Sabha Election

Kolkata: In the 2024 election (Lok Sabha), if the fight takes place on one-on-one (1:1) basis in 70 to 80 percent of the seats then BJP can be limited to 100 seats, claimed Trinamool Congress’s member of parliament Sudip Bandyopadhyay. There are a total 543 seats in the lower house of the Indian Parliament.

The five-time MP was speaking at a felicitation event organized by the Muslim Institute, Kolkata for the newly elected Rajya Sabha members of TMC and others who have been appointed as the heads of the Haj Committee and the West Bengal Minority Commission.

Among those felicitated were Samirul Islam for becoming a Rajya Sabha Member, Khalilur Rahman as the chairman of the Haj Committee and Ahmad Hasan Imran as Minority Commission chairman.

Samirul Islam (36) is one of the youngest Rajya Sabha members. Only Raghav Chaddha (35) of the Aam Aadmi party is younger than him. In his ten-minute-long discourse, the assistant professor-cum-social activist gave an inspiring speech about his modest background, journey as a social activist and the present scenario of India.

After the initial speech, the founder of Bangla Sanskriti Mancha warned and reminded the audience, “The situation has become such that wherever BJP has come into power, everything has become difficult, including offering namaz. When I went to Nuh, Haryana, a Muslim from Assam questioned us – has it become a crime to be a Muslim in India now.”

“The time has come to decide, do we want to live on the terms dictated by BJP or want to live freely as we used to live earlier,” he asked.   

The leader of TMC members in Lok Sabha, Sudip in his speech also mentioned how they gave a united fight to BJP in both houses of parliament in the recent Monsoon session after the formation of INDIA- an alliance of 36 opposition parties in India.

The North Kolkata MP narrated in detail about the Monsoon session, “We were happy when Rahul Gandhi returned to Lok Sabha, whose membership was cancelled. And we also stand with everyone who was suspended during the parliament session. They also suspended Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury.”

“Being the opposition leader, I got the opportunity to sit just in front of PM Narendra Modi. We have not seen such a PM, as Manipur was burning and more than 150 people died but the PM did not speak. To make him speak, we have to bring a No Confidence Motion. We know that the Modi government has enough majority but to make him talk, we brought No Confidence,” Sudip said.

He mentioned, “This time we did good floor management. As Samirul bhai was saying, the BJP has divided India. Our country has become the largest populous country. People of every caste, creed and religion to live together. BJP has divided everyone in recent here. So, we want to tell the countrymen to bring whoever they want but do not bring BJP and Modi in power again,” he added.

On the occasion, Amiruddin Bobby and Iqbal Ahmed, ward councillors as well as Haj Committee members, Khwaja Jaweed Yusuf and Talay Masood Siddiqui, Additional Government Pleaders for the Government of West Bengal were also felicitated

Rajya Sabha Member and President of Muslim Institute Nadimul Haque presided over the felicitation event.

Amid Beti Padhao and Stop Drop-Outs campaigns, A Topper Ganga Jamuna School in MP Faces Bulldozer and Suspension for Months

0

Bhopal: The future of Ganga Jamuna School’s students looms in darkness as the recognition suspension continues for over two months. The school has been alleged of forcing Hindu girls to wear headscarves and sing the Lab Pe Aati Hai Dua poem written by poet Mohammed Iqbal during prayers. 

Members of the Civil Society in Bhopal have submitted a memorandum to the Chief Minister’s Office for the immediate revoking of the suspension of recognition and re-opening of the school. 

The private school at Damoh district came into controversy because of a poster highlighting high school board toppers wearing head-scarf. Far-right groups Hindu Jagran Manch, Vishwa Hindu Parishad, and others protested demanding the derecognition of the school— alleging purported forced religious conversions and the imposition of hijabs on non-Muslim female students. 

Madhya Pradesh’s chief minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, home minister Narottam Mishra, and education minister Inder Singh Parmar gave statements escalating tensions on the issue. The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) chairperson Priyank Kanoongo also joined in.

The recognition of the school was suspended since the incidents and an FIR was registered leading to the arrest of the school principal and two staff members. 

Ganga-Jamuna School Hijab Controversy

Following the announcement of high school results by the Madhya Pradesh Board of Secondary Education on May 25th, a wave of achievement swept through Ganga Jamuna School with a passing percentage of 98.5 percent. To celebrate the success of these students, on May 27, the school displayed a congratulatory poster showcasing eighteen top-performing students in which four Hindu girls were donning Hijab or scarves. The poster triggered the spotlight and rage among right-wing organizations who began protests against the school. 

The initial investigation by the Collector gave a clean chit to the school. However, the issue persisted as the Hindu outfits kept demanding suspension orders. On June 2, the Madhya Pradesh School Education Department suspended the recognition of Ganga Jamuna School for inadequate infrastructure. The Hindu Jagran Manch workers on June 6 threw ink on DEO (District Education Officer). Consequently, on June 7, the Kotwali Police Station filed an FIR (First Information Report) against the school management, and school teacher under various sections including hurting religious sentiments and criminal intimidation of IPC.

ganga-jamuna school hijab controversy damoh
Ganga Jamuna School building

The contents of the FIR stated by Hindu girls include mandatory Hijab, Urdu imposition, being forced to sing the “Muslim prayer” lab pe ati hai dua, and hurting the religious sentiments of Hindu students. The police apprehended the school principal Afsha Sheikh, a math teacher Anas Athar, and a security guard Rustam Khan. And within three days of it, the administration bulldozed part of the school building. 

The High Court on the petition of the school ordered the education department to submit the report on the suspension order within three weeks from July 1.

“Yesterday it came to my attention about daughters being compelled to cover their heads at a school, which was also teaching the poem of the man who got the country partitioned,” Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan had stated in Chattarpur

He was referring to legendary Urdu poet Mohammad Iqbal who had a strong connection with Bhopal. 

Abdul Kareem, an advocate representing the school, said that the police took action under political pressure. The education department suspended the school recognition mainly for inadequate infrastructure such as toilets, classroom space, and library. The committee of gazetted officers took statements of three girls then Kotwali Police Station filed an FIR against the management and teachers of Ganga Jamuna School. At least 17 teachers were forced by the police for a statement that they used as evidence that management had ordered the teachers to attract the children towards Islam.

“The security guard was a daily wage worker. His family is hand-to-mouth after his arrest. Should those teachers not be held accountable for keeping mum even after knowing everything? This whole matter is built on political narratives giving it a communal colour. In 2021, after inspection, the officers granted recognition to the school till 2024-25. Didn’t they realize whether the school has the proper infrastructure or not? Are they not guilty? The High Court had ordered the education department to submit the report within three weeks which is yet to be submitted. Isn’t it contempt of Court? ” asked Kareem. 

Superintendent of Police Sunil Tiwari has issued a directive to attach the assets of ten school management members who according to the officer are dodging authorities.

Iqbal Shaikh, husband of Ganga Jamuna School’s principal denied any allegations of religious conversion. He said that his wife Afsha Shaikh and two other school staff members were wrongfully apprehended by the police. My daughter’s photo was among the toppers which created controversy. With so much disturbance around we did not think about her admission to another school. Both of the daughters are disturbed. “We are struggling mentally and financially. Those students have given false statements. Why was everyone silent if this has been happening for years,” Shaikh was emotional.

ganga-jamuna school hijab controversy damoh madhya pradesh
A chart in the school shows the sincerity of the authorities towards its students

School Principal Afsha Shaikh, Anita Khan, and Tabassum Khan (formerly Deepti Srivastava, Prachi Jain, Anita Yaduvanshi) belonged to different religions. They embraced Islam before joining the school. Backing the school administrator, the three of them came forward declining religious conversion by Ganga Jamuna School. They submitted their documents to the collector and superintendent of police, Damoh.

Afsha Sheikh told mediapersons that she accepted Islam in 2000 and joined Ganga Jamuna School a decade later in 2010. Tabassum Khan converted to Islam in 2004 and became part of the school in 2012. Anita Khan accepted Islam upon her consent in 2013 and joined the school in 2021. Ganga Jamuna School, on the other hand, awas established in 2009.

The fact-finding team disposes of allegations

A fact-finding team of collective organizations including Shiksha Adhikar Manch, Madhya Pradesh Mahila Manch, and Bhopal Group for action and information visited Ganga Jamuna School in Damoh and spoke with more than 350 students and their parents. They made an open appeal to the chief minister to stop communalizing education and allow the functioning of Ganga Jamuna School.

“After speaking with locals and examining the available documents we have come to the conclusion that the biased mentality of certain groups and media trials has created a situation of crisis for hundreds of students and 57 staff members. All allegations were found baseless and unjust. The team has submitted the conclusions to the school education department and the chief minister’s office,” the report reads. 

Maheen Mirza, a member of the fact-finding team speaking with eNewsroom said resembling the name Ganga Jamuna School, a minority-certified school is the epitome of communal harmony where students of different communities were learning together without discrimination. We found the reality on the ground contrary to what the media had propagated. It was a media trial more than anything else. It was not even a Hijab but a scarf. Rather than religious motives, wearing a scarf in many cultures is linked with the dignity of girls. The Hindu students confirmed that Hijab was not mandatory. Media has given it hype by spreading misinformation. Despite the majority of Muslim students non-veg including the egg was not allowed in order to comfort the minority Hindu students. 

A step depriving the poor of education

Maheen said that the majority of students in Ganga Jamuna School belong to weak socioeconomic backgrounds. The children come from families of daily wage workers such as rickshaw drivers, general stores, and factory workers. Since the school fee is ten thousand annually paid in three instalments, the shutdown is affecting the poor who can’t afford private education. We need to stop looking at it through the lens of Hindu-Muslim and focus on what kind of children can be easily deprived of education, simply poor who don’t have enough resources for negotiation. This anti-poor step by the government is not just against a particular community but people who can’t afford education.

“The students are suffering in this unfair process. Board class students have lost three months of their learning period. The English medium students are recommended to get admission to Hindi medium schools. They should be focusing on mastering the subject but now they have to do it in a different language altogether. This is harassment of students at the hands of the state. They are on a losing part. Instead of helping them build a good career they are destroying children’s education,” stated Maheen. 

Affect on girl students

Shivani Taneja of the fact-finding team said that the administration suspended the recognition of the school on the grounds of rumours jeopardizing the future of students. The claims of religious conversion are bogus. It is an English medium school with Urdu as a third language. It seems people have an allergy to Urdu not recognizing that Urdu is also a scheduled language in the constitution. There is nothing significant in FIR. The school has 98% passing results with only one Muslim student having a supplementary in Urdu. The average passing percentage in Madhya Pradesh is 65 percent. 

“Not opening the school will lead to higher drop-out rates among students. We met many girls who are the first generation studying and scoring higher marks in class tenth. An orphan girl studying in school wants to become a doctor. What about the dreams of students from such backgrounds which is common in school? The government is concerned about the education of girl children, “beti to padh rahi thi na”. Government must allow the functioning of schools if they care about education. Meantime, they can continue inquiry under the supervision of a Nodal Officer,” commented Taneja. 

Advocate Abdul Kareem said that the response obtained through the Right to Information (RTI) revealed concerning details about the recommended schools. These schools lack English teachers and do not offer Urdu as a subject. Maheen Mirza further emphasized that these schools are unsuitable for children due to their poor condition, including dilapidated walls. In contrast, the infrastructure at Ganga Jamuna School is good, with better classrooms, a library, a computer lab, and sports facilities including football and volleyball courts.

একটি ‘শোকাকুল’ মা কিভাবে ‘শক্তিশালী’ আইআইটি খড়গপুর র‌্যাগিং-এর বিরুদ্ধে লড়ল

কলকাতা: যেহেতু ফাজান আহমেদের মৃতদেহ, ইন্ডিয়ান ইনস্টিটিউট অফ টেকনোলজির তৃতীয় বর্ষ, খাড়াগুর প্রিমিয়ার ইনস্টিটিউটের হোস্টেলের ভিতরে উদ্ধার করা হয়েছিল, আইআইটি কর্তৃপক্ষ এক অসাধারণ মেধাবী ছাত্রকে খুন করা হয়েছিল তা মেনে নিতে অস্বীকার করেছিল। তারা সবসময় বজায় রেখেছিল যে রেহানা এবং আসামের তিনসুকিয়ার বাসিন্দা সেলিম আহমেদের একমাত্র সন্তান 23 বছর বয়সী আত্মহত্যা করেছে। কর্তৃপক্ষের দাবি, ফাইজান মানসিক অবসাদে ভুগছিলেন এবং এই কঠোর পদক্ষেপ নিয়েছেন। তবে মৃত্যুর সময় থেকেই বাবা-মা দাবি করে আসছেন তাদের ছেলেকে খুন করা হয়েছে।

খড়্গপুর পুলিশ ও প্রথম পোস্টমর্টেম শোকাহত পরিবারকে সন্তোষজনক উত্তর দিতে না পারলে অভিভাবকরা কলকাতা হাইকোর্টে যান।

জ্য এবং আইআইটি খড়গপুর র‌্যাগিং বিরুদ্ধে দাঁড়ানোর কঠিন চ্যালেঞ্জ

হাইকোর্টে, অভিভাবকদের কেবল শক্তিশালী আইআইটি নয়, রাজ্য সরকারকেও মুখোমুখি হতে হবে, যারা সবসময় দাবি করে আসছে যে খড়্গপুর পুলিশের তদন্ত ন্যায্য। এখানে, সেলিমের বন্ধুর সাহায্যে, পরিবারটি রণজিৎ চ্যাটার্জি এবং অনিরুদ্ধ মিত্র সহ অন্যান্যদের মধ্যে একটি দুর্দান্ত আইনজীবী পেয়েছিল।

বিষয়টি হাইকোর্টে শুনানি হওয়ায় এখানেও বিচারপতি রাজশেখর মান্তের আদালতে মৃত্যুর কারণ জানতে পারেনি পুলিশ। আদালত দ্বিতীয় ময়নাতদন্তের নির্দেশ দেন এবং ফয়জানকে হত্যা করা হয়েছে বলে প্রমাণিত হয়। বিচারপতি মান্থা পুলিশের পরিবর্তে একটি বিশেষ তদন্তকারী দল (SIT) আরও তদন্ত গঠন করেন। শুনানির সময় বিচারপতি মন্থা আইআইটি আইনজীবীদের মৌখিকভাবে উল্লেখ করেছিলেন যে আদালত মামলাটি সেন্ট্রাল ব্যুরো অফ ইনভেস্টিগেশন (সিবিআই) এর কাছে হস্তান্তর করবে না। আদালত আরও বিশ্বাস করেছিল যে যেহেতু আইআইটি একটি কেন্দ্রীয় অর্থায়িত সংস্থা, তাই স্থানীয় পুলিশ এবং সিবিআইয়ের মধ্যে মামলাটি হস্তান্তর করা ভাল।

রাজ্য সরকার এবং আইআইটি উভয়ই আদেশ বন্ধ করতে ডিভিশন বেঞ্চে পৌঁছেছে

প্রধান বিচারপতি টিএস শিবগনাম এবং বিচারপতি হিরণমাই ভট্টাচার্যের সমন্বয়ে গঠিত ডিভিশন বেঞ্চের আগে রাজ্য সরকার এসআইটি গঠনের বিরুদ্ধে আবেদন করেছিল যখন আইআইটি খড়গপুর পুরো মামলাটি বাতিল করতে চেয়েছিল। রাজ্যের পক্ষ থেকে অতিরিক্ত অ্যাডভোকেট জেনারেল (এডিজি) হাজির হন এবং আইআইটি তাদের সেরা আইনজীবীদের মামলায় পূর্ণ বিরতি দেওয়ার জন্য রেখেছিল।

শুনানির সময়, রাজ্য এবং আইআইটি-র আইনজীবীরা ডিভিশন বেঞ্চকে তাদের পক্ষে বোঝানোর জন্য বিভিন্ন কৌশল প্রয়োগ করেছিলেন। আইআইটি আইনজীবীরা তাদের মৌখিক দাখিলে বারবার দাবি করেননি যে আইআইটি থেকে চাঁদাবাজির জন্য বাবা-মায়ের দ্বারা মামলাটি নথিভুক্ত করা হয়েছে তবে এটিও উল্লেখ করেছেন যে ফাইজানের মামলাটি র্যাগিংয়ের মামলা নয়।

আইআইটি খড়গপুর র‌্যাগিং, এসআইটি প্রতিস্থাপনের রাজ্যের দাবি বা আইআইটি আইনজীবীদের দাবি যে এটি আত্মহত্যা নয়, হত্যার মামলা, তা মানা হয়নি। ডিভিশন বেঞ্চের একমাত্র আদেশটি ছিল এডিজি কে জয়রামনের অধীনে থাকা দুই অফিসারকে সরিয়ে দেওয়া। আদালত বলেছে যে ADG, যিনি SIT-এর নেতৃত্ব দেবেন তিনি নিজের দল বেছে নিতে পারেন।

এখন, ডিভিশন বেঞ্চের আদেশের পরে, চূড়ান্ত ফলাফল নির্বিশেষে, কলকাতা হাইকোর্ট প্রতিষ্ঠিত করেছে যে ফাইজানের মামলা একটি ‘হত্যামূলক’ প্রকৃতির এবং আত্মহত্যা নয়, যেমন আইআইটি কর্তৃপক্ষ দাবি করেছে।

আদেশটি 10 মাস পুরানো মামলার নিষ্পত্তিকে ত্বরান্বিত করতে পারে, যার ফলে দ্রুত সিদ্ধান্তে পৌঁছানো যায় এবং শুধুমাত্র অপরাধীদেরই নয়, ভারতের সবচেয়ে মেধাবী তরুণ ছাত্রদের একজনের নৃশংস হত্যার পেছনের উদ্দেশ্যও খুঁজে বের করা সম্ভব হয়।

বিধ্বস্ত জীবনের মাঝে ন্যায়ের জন্য যুদ্ধ

যাদবপুর বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়ে স্বপ্নদীপ কুন্ডুর কথিত র‌্যাগিং ও হত্যা মামলার একই প্রকৃতির সময়ে, বাংলা জুড়ে এবং কলকাতায় বেশ কয়েকটি বিক্ষোভ হয়েছিল। স্বপ্নদীপের জন্মস্থান নদীয়া জেলার মানুষ বিচারের দাবিতে যাদবপুর বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়ে মিছিল করেছে। বিক্ষোভের চাপেই প্রাথমিকভাবে আত্মহত্যার মামলাটি দুদিনের মধ্যেই হত্যাকাণ্ডে পরিণত হয়। এই ঘটনায় দ্রুত ব্যবস্থা নেয় কলকাতা পুলিশ।

কিন্তু রেহানা এবং সেলিম আহমেদ গত 10 মাস ধরে রাজ্য সরকারের শক্তিশালী দলের পাশাপাশি আইআইটি-র বিরুদ্ধে একাকী লড়াই করছিলেন।

দ্বিতীয় পোস্টমর্টেমের সময় ফাইজানের মা মৃতদেহ নিয়ে ২১ দিন কলকাতায় ছিলেন।

“দিনে আমরা আদালতে যাই এবং আইনজীবীদের সাথে দেখা করি এবং রাতে আমরা ন্যায়বিচার পাওয়ার জন্য প্রার্থনা করি। রেহানার জীবন একেবারেই নষ্ট হয়ে গেছে। সে ভালো খায় না রাতে ঘুমায় না। কখনও কখনও সে সারা রাত জেগে থাকে এবং আমাকে বলে যে আমাদের ছেলে যে কোনও সময় ফিরে আসবে,” সেলিম বলেছিলেন।

ডিভিশন বেঞ্চের আদেশ শোকাহত মা রেহানা এবং আশাহীন বাবাকে বড় স্বস্তি দিয়েছে যে তারা শীঘ্রই ন্যায়বিচার পাবে।

How a ‘grieving’ mother fought against ‘mighty’ IIT Kharagpur

0

Kolkata: Since the dead body of Faizan Ahmed, a third-year student at the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, was recovered inside the hostel of the premier institute, IIT authorities steadfastly denied that the extraordinarily talented student had been murdered. They consistently maintained that the 23-year-old, the only child of Rehana and Salim Ahmed, residents of Tinsukia, Assam, had committed suicide. The authorities claimed that Faizan was depressed and had taken this drastic step. However, from the time of his death, his parents have maintained that their son was murdered.

When Kharagpur police and the initial postmortem failed to provide satisfactory answers to the grieving family, the parents moved the Calcutta High Court.

A Daunting Challenge Against State and IIT

In the High Court, the parents faced not only the formidable IIT but also the state government, which consistently claimed that the Kharagpur police investigation was fair. With the assistance of Salim’s friend, the family secured an excellent legal team, including Ranajit Chatterjee and Aniruddha Mitra.

During the High Court proceedings, the police again failed to ascertain the cause of death before Justice Rajasekhar Manta. The court ordered a second postmortem, which established that Faizan had been murdered. Justice Manta constituted a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to further investigate the case, replacing the police. During the hearing, Justice Manta verbally indicated to IIT lawyers that the court would not hand over the case to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The court also believed that, as a centrally funded organization, it was preferable to handle the case within the jurisdiction of the local police rather than transferring it to the CBI.

State and IIT Challenge Orders in Division Bench

Before the division bench comprising Chief Justice TS Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmai Bhattacharyya, the state government filed a petition against the SIT formation, while IIT Kharagpur sought to quash the entire case. The state was represented by the Additional Advocate General (ADG), and IIT presented its best legal counsel to attempt to halt the proceedings.

During the hearing, lawyers for the state and IIT employed various tactics to persuade the division bench in their favor. IIT lawyers, in their verbal submissions, not only repeatedly claimed that the case had been filed by the parents to extort money from IIT but also asserted that Faizan’s case was not one of ragging.

However, neither the state’s demand to replace the SIT nor the claim of IIT lawyers that it was a case of suicide, not homicide, was accepted. The only order the Division Bench issued was to remove two officers who were under the supervision of ADG K Jayaraman. The court stated that the ADG, who would lead the SIT, could select his own team.

Now, following the Division Bench’s order, regardless of the eventual outcome, the Calcutta High Court has established that Faizan’s case is of a ‘homicidal’ nature and not a suicide, as IIT authorities have claimed. This order may also expedite the resolution of the 10-month-old case, leading to a quicker conclusion and enabling the discovery not only of the culprits but also the motive behind the brutal murder of one of India’s most talented young students.

Battle for Justice Amidst Ruined Lives

In the similar case of the alleged ragging and murder of Swapnadip Kundu at Jadavpur University, several protests erupted across Bengal and Kolkata. People from Nadia district, Swapnadip’s native place, marched to Jadavpur University demanding justice. It was the pressure of these protests that transformed the initial suicide narrative into a murder investigation within two days, prompting swift action by Kolkata police.

However, Rehana and Salim Ahmed have been fighting a solitary battle for the past 10 months against the powerful forces of the state government and IIT.

During the second postmortem, Faizan’s mother, Rehana, stayed in Kolkata for 21 days with her son’s body.

“During the day, we go to court to meet lawyers or to the police mortuary, and at night, we pray for justice,” said Salim. “Rehana’s life has been completely shattered. She neither eats properly nor sleeps well. Sometimes she remains awake all night, convinced that our son will return at any moment.”

The order by the division bench has provided significant relief to the grieving mother, Rehana, and the despairing father, offering them a glimmer of hope that they will soon receive justice.

কলকাতা হাইকোর্ট ডিভিশন বেঞ্চ আইআইটি কেজিপি ছাত্র ফয়জান আহমেদ মামলায় একক বেঞ্চ দ্বারা এসআইটি এবং হত্যার আদেশ রেখেছে

কলকাতা: আজ কলকাতা হাইকোর্টের একটি গুরুত্বপূর্ণ আদেশে, প্রধান বিচারপতি টিএস শিবগ্নানাম এবং বিচারপতি হিরনমাই ভট্টাচার্যের ডিভিশন বেঞ্চ একটি একক বেঞ্চের আদেশ বহাল রেখেছে যা আইআইটি খড়গপুরের ছাত্র ফয়জান আহমেদের মৃত্যুকে ‘হত্যা’ বলে ঘোষণা করেছিল এবং অব্যাহত রেখেছে। বিচারপতি রাজশেখর মন্থার দ্বারা গঠিত বিশেষ তদন্তকারী দলের (SIT) সাথে।

আইআইটিতে র‌্যাগিং

যেখানে রাজ্য সরকার এবং আইআইটি খড়গপুর উভয়ই একক বেঞ্চের আদেশকে চ্যালেঞ্জ করেছিল। রাষ্ট্রপক্ষ যুক্তি দিয়েছিল যে SIT গঠনের প্রয়োজন নেই কারণ বিচারপতি মন্থা স্থানীয় পুলিশের তদন্তের বিষয়ে কোনও বিরূপ মন্তব্য করেননি। অন্যদিকে আইআইটি কেজিপি মামলাটি বাতিল করার আবেদন করেছিল, কারণ তাদের মতে, দ্বিতীয় পোস্টমর্টেমে অনেক ঘাটতি ছিল। মৌখিক দাখিলে আইনজীবীরা আরও অভিযোগ করেন যে চাঁদাবাজির জন্য মামলা করা হয়েছিল এবং ফাইজান র্যাগিংয়ের কারণে মারা যাননি।

ইন্ডিয়ান ইনস্টিটিউট অফ টেকনোলজি (আইআইটি) খড়গপুরের মেকানিক্যাল ইঞ্জিনিয়ারিং-এর তৃতীয় বর্ষের ছাত্র 23 বছর বয়সী ফয়জান আহমেদের আংশিক পচনশীল দেহটি 14 অক্টোবর, 2022 তারিখে আইআইটি খড়গপুর হোস্টেলের ভিতরে পাওয়া গিয়েছিল। প্রাথমিকভাবে খড়্গপুর পুলিশ এবং আইআইটি কর্তৃপক্ষ উভয়েই দাবি করেছিল যে ফয়জান আত্মহত্যা করেছে। তবে এটিকে হত্যা দাবি করে অভিভাবকরা হাইকোর্টে যান। যখন প্রথম পোস্টমর্টেম রিপোর্ট মৃত্যুর কারণ নিশ্চিত করতে পারেনি, তখন বিচারপতি মান্থা একজন ফরেনসিক বিশেষজ্ঞ ডঃ অজয় গুপ্তকে নিয়োগ করেছিলেন, যিনি প্রথম ময়নাতদন্তের রিপোর্টটি দেখার পর নতুন পোস্টমর্টেম করার অনুরোধ করেছিলেন। আর দ্বিতীয় পোস্টমর্টেমের পর কলকাতা হাইকোর্ট ফয়জানের মৃত্যুকে ‘হত্যা’ বলে ঘোষণা করে। বিচারপতি মন্থা পুলিশের অতিরিক্ত মহাপরিচালক (এডিজি) কে জয়রামনের নেতৃত্বে এসআইটিও গঠন করেন। আদালত সিআইডি, পশ্চিমবঙ্গের একজন কর্মকর্তা এবং অন্য একজনকে হোমিসাইড ডিপার্টমেন্ট থেকে নিয়োগ করেছিল।

প্রধান বিচারপতি শিবগ্নানাম এবং বিচারপতি ভট্টাচার্যের ডিভিশন বেঞ্চ এসআইটির বাকি দুই সদস্যকে আলাদা করে দিয়েছে এবং উল্লেখ করেছে যে আদালত দল নির্বাচন করতে পারে না, তবে শীর্ষস্থানীয় কর্মকর্তা তার নিজের দল বেছে নেবেন।

যাইহোক, আইআইটিতে র‌্যাগিং খড়্গপুরের ছাত্র ফাইজান আহমেদ হত্যা মামলার দুটি পিটিশন 45 মিনিটেরও বেশি সময় ধরে যুক্তি চলেছিল কারণ উভয়ই রাজ্য এবং আইআইটির পক্ষে যথাক্রমে অতিরিক্ত অ্যাডভোকেট জেনারেল সম্রাট সেন এবং আইনজীবী অনিন্দ্য মিত্র এসআইটি গঠন এবং পুরো মামলার বিষয়ে বেশ কয়েকটি পয়েন্ট করেছেন। . সেন ডিভিশন বেঞ্চের কাছে জোর দিয়েছিলেন যে পুলিশ একটি ন্যায্য কাজ করছে এবং একক বেঞ্চের মতো এটি অপসারণ করা উচিত নয়, মিত্র এমনকি দাবি করেছিলেন যে ফয়জান আহমেদের বাবা-মা আইআইটি থেকে ‘চাঁদাবাজি’ করার জন্য মামলা করেছিলেন। এক পর্যায়ে তিনি উল্লেখ করেন যে এটি র‌্যাগিংয়ের মামলাও নয়, যেটির বিরোধিতা করেন ফাইজানের আইনজীবী রণজিৎ চ্যাটার্জি এবং মনে করিয়ে দেন যে র‌্যাগিংয়ের বিষয়ে মৃত ব্যক্তির একটি চিঠি রয়েছে এবং আইআইটি কর্তৃপক্ষ তার অভিযোগের ভিত্তিতে ব্যবস্থা নিয়েছে।

এদিকে আইআইটিতে র‌্যাগিং এর আরও একটি মামলার খবর পাওয়া গেছে। এটি যাদবপুর বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়ের প্রথম বর্ষের ছাত্র স্বপ্নদীপ কুন্ডুকে হত্যা করেছে এবং রাজ্যের রাজধানীতে বেশ কয়েকটি বিক্ষোভ চলছে।

আদেশের সাথে, এটি মামলার অগ্রগতি প্রতিবেদন একক বেঞ্চে জমা দেওয়ার পথ পরিষ্কার করে যা জুলাই মাসেই পেশ করার কথা ছিল।

“প্রমাণে এটা পরিষ্কার যে আমার ছেলেকে খুন করা হয়েছে। আর পুলিশ ঠিকমতো তদন্ত করেনি তাই SIT দরকার ছিল। এখন আবার, হাইকোর্ট সম্মত হয়েছে যে এটি একটি হত্যা মামলা এবং SIT চলবে। আমি বিচার ব্যবস্থায় বিশ্বাস করেছিলাম এবং আমার বিশ্বাস পুনরুদ্ধার হয়েছিল। এখন আমি চাই রাষ্ট্রীয় পক্ষ এবং আইআইটি আমাদের পাশে দাঁড়াবে কারণ আমরাই আমাদের একমাত্র সন্তানকে হারিয়েছি,” ফয়জানের মা রেহানা আহমেদ আদেশের পর ই-নিউজরুমকে বলেন।

Calcutta HC Division Bench Upholds SIT and Homicide Order by Single Bench in IIT KGP Student Faizan Ahmed Case

Kolkata: In a significant order by the Calcutta High Court today, the division bench of Chief Justice TS Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmai Bhattacharyya upheld the order of a single bench which had declared the death of IIT Kharagpur student Faizan Ahmed, a ‘homicide’ and continued with the Special Investigation Team (SIT) formed by Justice Rajasekhar Mantha.

Whereas, both state government and IIT Kharagpur had challenged the orders of the single bench. State side argued that there was no need for the formation of SIT as Justice Mantha had not made any adverse comment on the investigation of local police. IIT KGP, on other hand had appealed to quash the case, as according to them, there were so many deficiencies in the second postmortem. In verbal submission the lawyers also alleged that the case was lodged for extortion and Faizan did not die because of ragging.

The third year Mechanical engineering student of Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur 23-year-old Faizan Ahmed’s partially decomposed body was found inside the IIT Kharagpur hostel on October 14, 2022. Initially, both Kharagpur police and IIT authorities had claimed that Faizan committed suicide. However, parents moved to the High Court, claiming it a murder. When the first postmortem report could not ascertain the cause of death, Justice Mantha appointed a forensic expert Dr Ajay Gupta, who after going through the first autopsy report requested a fresh postmortem. And after the second postmortem, Calcutta High Court declared that the death of Faizan was a ‘homicide’. Justice Mantha also constituted SIT led by Additional Director General (ADG) of Police K Jayaraman. The court had also appointed an officer from CID, West Bengal and another from homicide department.

The division bench of Chief Justice Sivagnanam and Justice Bhattacharyya set aside the rest two members of SIT, and mentioned that it is not the court which can select the team, but the leading officer will choose his own team.

However, the two petitions in IIT Kharagpur student Faizan Ahmed murder case went on for more than 45 minutes argument as both additional advocate general Samrat Sen and lawyer Anindya Mitra respectively for state and IIT made several points on the formation of SIT and the entire case itself. Sen insisted to the division bench that police was doing a fair job and it should not be removed as done by the single bench, Mitra even claimed that parents of Faizan Ahmed did the case to ‘extort’ money from IIT. At one point he mentioned that it is not even a case of ragging, which Faizan’s lawyer Ranajit Chatterjee opposed and reminded that there is a letter by the deceased about ragging and IIT authorities have taken action on his complaint.

Meanwhile, there is another case of ragging reported. It led to murder of Swapnadip Kundu, a first year student of Jadavpur University has taken place and several protests are taking place in the state capital.

With the order, it cleared the way to submit the progress report of the case before the single bench which was supposed to be tabled in July itself.

“The evidence had made it clear that my son was murdered. And police did not investigate properly so SIT was needed. Now again, the High Court has agreed that it is a case of homicide and SIT will continue. I had believed in the judiciary and my faith had been restored. Now I want the state side and IIT to stand with us as it is we who lost our only child,” Rehana Ahmed, mother of Faizan told eNewsroom after the order.

सचिन पायलट ने बीजेपी आईटी सेल हेड अमित मालवीय के झूठ की पोल खोल दी

0

काँग्रेस नेता सचिन पायलट ने 15 अगस्त के दिन, भारतीय जनता पार्टी के आईटी सेल के हेड अमित मालवीय के झूठ का करारा जवाब दिया। अमित मालवीय ने 13 अगस्त को ये ट्वीट किया कि सचिन के पिता राजेश पायलट और सुरेश कलमाड़ी ने 5 मार्च 1966 को मिज़ोरम की राजधानी आइजवाल पर बम गिराए थे, जिसके ईनाम के तौर पे दोनों को काँग्रेस में सांसद और मंत्री बनाया गया था। दो दिनों बाद, सचिन पायलट ने न सिर्फ ये बताया कि उनके पिता जिनका असल नाम राजेश्वर प्रसाद बिदुडी था को इंडियन एयरफोर्स में 29 अक्टूबर, 1966 को कमीशन हुए थे साथ ही उस समय का लेटर भी शेयर किया।

सचिन ने लिखा, “स्व. श्री राजेश पायलट जी दिनांक 29 अक्टूबर, 1966 को भारतीय वायु सेना में कमीशन हुए थे।
यह कहना कि उन्होंने 5 मार्च 1966 में मिज़ोरम में बमबारी करी थी – काल्पनिक है, तथ्यहीन है और पूर्ण तरह भ्रामक है।”

“हाँ, 80 के दशक में एक राजनेता के रूप में मिज़ोरम में युद्ध विराम करवाने और स्थाई शांति संधि स्थापित करवाने में उन्होंने महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका ज़रूर निभाई थी।”

“स्वतंत्रता दिवस की शुभकामनाएँ, जय हिन्द। ”

राजस्थान काँग्रेस के नेता ने अपना जवाब इंग्लिश और हिंदी दोनों में ट्वीट कर दिया। इंग्लिश में सचिन ने ये भी लिखा कि राजेश पायलट ने बम गिराया था पर ईस्ट पाकिस्तान में।

काँग्रेस सचिन पायलट बीजेपी आईटी सेल हैड अमित मालवीय

कहाँ से हुई मिज़ोरम पे एयर फोर्स के हमले की बात

प्रधानमंत्री नरेंद्र मोदी ने अपने संसद में अविश्वास प्रस्ताव में 10 अगस्त को दिये भाषण में ये बताने के लिए कि काँग्रेस उत्तर-पूर्व के राज्यों के समस्याओ का मूल कारण है, ये बोला था कि इन्दिरा गांधी ने 1966 में मिज़ोरम पे एयरफोर्स के जरिये बम गिरवाया था।

अभी राजनीतिक जानकार ये बोल ही रहे थे के प्रधानमंत्री को भारतीय सेना को अपने राजनीतिक भाषण में शामिल नहीं करना चाहिए था और उन परिस्थितियों का भी ज़िक्र कर रहे थे जिन वजहों से आइजवाल पे बम गिराया गया था, इस बीच अमित मालवीय, जो सैकड़ों बार झूठी खबरें शेयर करते पकड़े जा चुके हैं ने अपना ट्वीट राजेश पायलट को और काँग्रेस को निशाना करके कर दिया।

ट्विटर पर हो रही अमित मालवीय की गिरफ्तारी की माँग

सचिन पायलट के ट्वीट के बाद, ट्वीटर पे हजारों लोगों ने अमित मालवीय के झूठ के लिए उस पर केस कर गिरफ्तार करने के बारे में लिख रहे। कुछ लोग तो अमित मालवीय माफ़ी माँगो भी ट्वीटर पर ट्रेंड करा रहे हैं।