Home Blog Page 198

As agitating doctors protest intensifies in Bengal, Mamata Banerjee gets stuck in catch-22 situation

Kolkata: With every passing day, the government healthcare system has seen a complete breakdown in West Bengal since a patient party at Neel Ratan Sarkar (NRS) Hospital beaten doctors after the death of a patient on June 10. With Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee visiting another government hospital (SSKM) and asking the doctors to withdraw their protest, without condemning the assault has only aggravated the situation. Now, both the senior and junior white coat persons have not only suspended their work in government hospitals across the state, and around 300 medical practitioners have also resigned.

The Six demands

While the agitation is getting support from across India, the junior medical practitioners have now put forward six unconditional demands.

The first and the most important demand being, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, who is also the state health minister, should both condemn the act of patient party assaulting junior doctors at the NRS Hospital and visit the injured doctor at Neurosciences Institute Kolkata.

“Urgent intervention of the Honourable Chief Minister of Bengal into the matter including visiting Dr Paribaha Mukhopadhyay at INK and interacting with the agitated students at NRSCMC&H followed by a detailed press release from her office condemning the events that took place on 10.6.2019 and withdrawal of statement issued by her at the SSKM hospital on 13.6.2019,” stated the press note released by the agitating doctors.

The doctors have also demanded documentary evidence of action taken by the police against those involved in the incidence of violence against the doctors on June 10. They have also demanded the withdrawal of false cases imposed on the doctors and medical students.

Speaking to eNewsroom, Anupam Bhattacharjee, a junior doctor at R G Kar, without mincing words stated, “The way the CM spoke and ridiculed us instead of taking action against those involved in the attack at NRS Hospital. Her statement has further infuriated us.”

Apology first, treatment later

On being reminded about being under oath to treat the sick, he said, “The emergency is open so people can come in and avail treatment.” However, on being reminded that there were no doctors in the emergency, he quickly said, “We will resume work immediately, once she tenders an apology. Also, they have the CCTV footage, which can help them identify the culprits, which can be used as evidence to book the accused.” He further stressed that the doctors could be coerced to work. “A public apology from the CM is the only way to get us back to work,” he said.

How justified is the complete shutdown?

The complete shutdown of government healthcare infrastructure has lead to a medical emergency of a kind in the state, which has put the terminally ill and those in need of immediate medical help at stake.

While the junior doctors are claiming in a video that they have the support of the legal fraternity, eNewsroom spoke to advocate Shabnam Sultana to know what the law has to say about such strikes.

Sultana, who practices in the Calcutta High Court said, “Complete shutdown of hospitals across the state is definitely not justified legally. There are several Supreme Court rulings which don’t support such agitation.”

She further added, “Doctors are life savers and are bound to save life at any cost. Such agitation is putting the lives of so many patients at a risk. There are many ways of putting forward their demands. They can, of course, take the legal recourse to have guilty punished.

“Doctors’ going on strike is unconstitutional”

Meanwhile socio-legal researcher and activist, Biswanath Goswami, pained by the gross violation of ‘right to life’ of patients pleading to the doctors for medical help has filed public interest litigation (PIL) against the total breakdown of the healthcare system in the government hospitals and infringement of Fundamental and Legal Rights of emergency patients, injured and terminally ill patients and gross violation of the Article 21 of the constitution of India and Hon’ble Supreme Court judgments.

In his PIL, Goswami mentions, “Access to medical attention and treatment is a part of right to life and a Fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and basic human right conferred by the common law where such illegal Suspension of work/Cease-Work by the Doctors in the Govt. hospitals and other hospitals in the state of West Bengal and others is gross violation of the constitution of India.”

He further pointed out, “Medical service is not like any other services. They are missions for serving the society and nation and saving lives as they are under ‘Hippocratic Oath’, any strike, cease-work, work-suspension by doctors and medical professionals for any reason is professional misconduct and illegal. In case of any larger / local interest issues, doctors must be more responsible for registering their protest in a noble manner.”

Meanwhile, Indian Medical Association (IMA) has also announced for nationwide doctors strike on June 17, if the demands of the junior doctors in Bengal is not  fulfilled.

Political violence in West Bengal turning communal

0

The toll of post-poll political violence is rising alarmingly in West Bengal. At least 10 people have lost their lives and dozens have suffered grievous injuries in clashes between the resurgent BJP and ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC). True, the state is no stranger to gory political turf wars since independence. But the latest bout of mob violence is taking an ugliest turn to communal conflagrations.

The result shows that the Hindutva camp has succeeded in engineering communal polarization through approx. 40 sectarian clashes in pre-poll years, particularly in areas bordering Bangladesh and industrial suburbs with mixed population. TMC supremo and chief minister Mamata Banerjee’s opportunist courtship with Muslim orthodoxy has only created space and legitimized saffron upsurge. The post-poll sectarian overtone of political wrangling is fast becoming a new normal for the state, once known as the citadel of Left-liberal ethos and politics.

The saffron camp led by Narendra Modi-Amit Shah duo is smelling blood after wresting as many as 18 parliamentary seats out of total 42, a meteoric rise from two in 2014 in contrast to TMC’s reduced tally of 22 from 34. Gaining 40 per cent of the vote-share against TMC’s 43 per cent, an aggressive saffron brigade is now hellbent to dislodge ‘Didi’ from power, if possible, even before assembly polls in 2021.

On the other hand, the hegemons of Bengal politics for three decades, the CPM-led Left Front (LF) now stands decimated at the hustings as their candidates lost deposits except in one seat while country’s grand old party, Congress has managed to retain two out of four seats. The transfer of lion’s share of Left-Congress votes to BJP has now boiled down to a direct duel between Bengal’s big sis and her friend-turned bete noire.

The BJP game-plan  

Backed by Shah-led union home ministry, BJP’s multi-pronged strategy appears to be focused on further communalization of everyday conflicts of interests along with armed Hindutva mobilizations during religious festivals. The latest example of first kind is the reaction of the party stalwarts to the ongoing cease-work by doctors in hospitals following an attack on some junior doctors by a deceased patient’s family and neighbors who complained medical negligence at NRS Medical college and hospital in Kolkata. Though the patient party-doctors clashes point to deep-rooted maladies in healthcare system, Dilip Ghosh, the state BJP president and Mukul Roy, once Mamata’s number 2 and now BJP linchpin for breaking the ruling party ranks blamed Muslims and their ‘protector’ Mamata, simply on the ground of religious identity of the deceased’s family.

Another means for continued unrest is provocation to street-fights over its victory rallies in hitherto TMC strongholds and combative anti-government demonstrations. The consequent violence is making room for central intervention on the ground of the state’s failure to maintain law and order. Already, the possibility of President’s rule is being discussed as the pivot for political initiative on all-party peace meet has been moved to state governor Kesrinath Tripathi, a veteran RSS man and former UP speaker.

Mamata’s Response 

Ironically, life seems to have come to full circle for Mamata as she is now a victim of her own brand of politics in opposition and ruling avatars. Reneging on her big promise for ‘Paribartan’(change) to the Left legacy, she has neither allowed any electoral space to rivals nor she has tolerated independent civil society voices.

Since she has stepped into the CPM’s shoes by awarding government doles to party faithful and denying it to dissenters, a sizable section of disgruntled rural voters has switched to saffron camp this time, not necessarily out of ideological shift but to teach a lesson to highhanded and corrupt TMC satraps. Many a local toughs and other weathercocks too have changed their colors as their new masters have deeper pockets and more power berths to offer. Although, she has reprimanded her minions for their greed and factional feuds, no sincere self- introspection has come from her on her own policies and practices. Instead, she expressed her anguish over voter’s ingratitude to her despite availing the benefits of welfare schemes for tribals, poor and women as well as rural development projects.

Her impulsive outbursts and police action against BJP’s provocations like raising the battle-cry, ‘Jai Sri Ram’ in front of her and other TMC biggies were not expected from an astute politician. On the other hand, she publicly thanked Muslims for supporting her. Her comment – ‘it is better to suffer the kicks of the cows which give us milk’— a Freudian slip over betraying her attitude to the minorities would only help her challengers.

The boiling communal cauldron

Muslims comprise around 30 per cent of the state population and have sizable presence in approximately 100 assembly constituencies out of total 294. The community votes were divided between Congress and Lefts In earlier decades. After being a member of Vajpayee government in her initial post-Congress years, Mamata left the BJP bandwagon and joined hand with her parent party to unseat the LF.

Before and after assuming office, Mamata courted Muslim clergy and other conservatives to maximize her minority votes rather than nurturing the emerging educated Muslim middle class while endeavoring for jobs and education for the community youth. Her populist but opportunist personal identification with the community’s religious affairs have only helped the Sangh Parivar to foment the Hindu backlash. Sensing trouble, she tried to outsmart the Sangh by promoting Ganapati and Vajrangvali worships in addition to more extravaganza during annual Durga Puja festival at state expenses. But the election result has outwitted her.

The Parivar has been spreading its wings in Bengal since the Ram Janambhoomi movement but found political legitimacy after Mamata joined NDA in late nineties. Cross-border situation has also helped it greatly. Not only the victims of Partition riots and Pakistan era, waves of persecuted Bengali Hindus have taken shelter in west Bengal even from post-liberation Bangladesh. Aimed at tapping the latent anti-Muslim anger and hatred of Hindu refugees of different generations, the saffron camp raised a specter of ‘silent but steady’ demographic deluge by Islamists from Bangladesh while accusing rivals of vote-bank politics. The BJP has also harvested the dividend of Modi-Shah’s promise to make distinction between Hindu refugees and Muslim infiltrators and proposed changes in citizenship laws to welcome non-Muslims from neighboring countries.

Hindutva forces have succeeded in making huge dents in one of Mamata’s support base among one of Bengal’s Dalit communities, the Matuas. This influential sect which had begun as an anti-Brahminical socio-religious movement in undivided Bengal is popular among Nomo Shudras, largest scheduled caste group in south Bengal. Mamata courted the sect’s ruling clan and garnered support till BJP succeeded in dividing it and making hay with citizenship promises. Undivided Bengal had proponents of Dalit-Muslim unity against Brahminism and biggest of them, Jogendranath Mondol joined Jinnah government only to leave Pakistan during riots in 50s. Mamata’s Muslim-Matua joint base too has been fractured by Hindutva onslaught.

To be historically honest, the communal narrative is not at all alien to Bengal given the contest for power between peasants-dominated Muslim majority and Hindu Bhadroloks in undivided Bengal. Both Muslim League and Hindu Mahasabha flourished here before the Partition. It was also home to Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, Hindu Mahasabha and Jana Sangh leader and Nehru’s minister whose death in Kashmir made him the first martyr-hero of Hindutva pantheon after 1947. However, the post-independence mainstream politics here had remained largely secular for decades after suffering the Partition horrors including the Great Calcutta Killings. But the increasing communal tension is resurrecting the memories of Partition years to many a member of civil society and other saner minds.

 

Opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and not of eNewsroom. This is an open forum and we try
to give space to every school of thought.

 

Kolkata’s First NRC Victim to Walk Out ‘Stateless’ of Detention Camp in 2020

0

Kolkata/Guwahati: Fifty-year-old Asgar Ali, a carpenter by profession, will be reuniting with his family in 2020 after completing his three-year-detention in Goalpara detention centre, Assam. But this time when he will meet his family, he will be “stateless”.

Asgar, a Kolkata-born carpenter who was eking out a living in Assam, got listed in the D-Voters category when National Register of Citizens (NRC) was being implemented in the state. However, as luck would have it an anomaly in the name of his father, put his Indian Citizenship at stake.

All in the name

Speaking to eNewsroom, Arshad Ali, one of Asgar’s brother said, “Our father had a very peculiar name – Sk Morol. We were often ridiculed by our neighbours and friends for this. Hence, my father changed his name to Md Jarif. However, we failed to update the name in some of our father’s document. And that made it easier for my brother to be stripped off his nationality.”

Arshad claimed that he and his family have been residing at 9, Chamru Khansama Lane in Ghaasbagan area of Kolkata, for decades and that he and his family are nothing but Indian. He said, “We are not that educated and have little understanding for correct documentation and that has worked against us. We are from Kolkata and have no other place of origin. We definitely are not Bangladeshi.”

Documents termed invalid

Arshad and his younger brother work as tailors, while Asgar had travelled to Assam in hope of better work opportunity. It has been 30 years now since he had settled in Assam’s Islampur district with his family. Zeeshan Ali, his Assam-based nephew said, “We presented almost all the documents that we could before the court, but the judges didn’t find them valid. Following which he was arrested and sent to the Goalpara detention camp. We had even petitioned before the Supreme Court, but our petition had been dismissed.”

No clear roadmap for NRC detainees

Speaking to eNewsroom, lawyer Aman Wadud, who along with advocate Anas Tanwir had represented Asgar, before the Gauhati High Court and the Apex Court, respectively, said, “Asgar is about to finish his second year in the detention centre this year. On completion of his 3-year-term, he will be released. But following his release, he will be declared ‘stateless’ as in his case, his place of origin couldn’t be traced to Bangladesh, so he will not be deported. But given the fact that the court didn’t honour any of the documents submitted by him, he is no longer an Indian.”

On being asked, what would be his fate then, he replied, “He like the 200 other detainees, will be released, but no road map has been decided by the government to take care of such individuals, who have been stripped off their citizenship but haven’t been identified as Bangladeshis. So they will continue to work in India as a stateless person.”

Why documents were declared invalid?

Explaining the reasons for Asgar’s documents being termed invalid by the court, he said, “His family from Kolkata couldn’t provide sufficient documents and the ones they shared were termed invalid by the court.” He even shared the legal documents with eNewsroom to understand the case.

The copy of the judgment, states, “There is nothing on record to show that Md. Jarif and Sk Moral is one and the same person. That apart and as rightly pointed out by the Tribunal, certified copy of this exhibit i.e. extract of electoral roll of 1966 was issued by one Subodh Ch. Das, Assistant Director, Director of State Archives, Higher Education Department, Government of West Bengal. Director of State Archives cannot be the custodian of electoral roll of assembly constituencies in the State of West Bengal. It is the Electoral Registration Officer of the concerned assembly constituency who would be the custodian of the electoral rolls of the said constituency.

Therefore, the certified copy issued by the Assistant Director, Director of State Archives, Higher Education Department, Government of West Bengal cannot be said to be a legitimate certified copy of the electoral roll of 1966 of Ballygunge Assembly Constituency. This coupled with the surrounding material contradictions which are apparent from the other documents on record, makes this document wholly unreliable, besides putting a question mark over its genuineness.”

Adding to that, “In such circumstances, we do not find any good ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the Tribunal. Consequently, writ petition is dismissed. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.”

Following which his appeal was dismissed by the SC and Asgar was sent back to the Goalpara detention centre, where he will be completing his detention tenure of three years, to walk out free, stateless and stripped off his citizenship.

Jharkhand activist raided again in connection with Bhima-Koregaon incident, civil society furious

Ranchi: The residence of 83-year-old Stan Swamy, a well-known activist from Jharkhand, was once again raided by the Maharashtra police today morning in Ranchi.

The eight-member police team searched Stan Swamy’s belongings for about three-and-half hours. They took Stan’s hard disk and internet modem and forced him to share the passwords for his email and Facebook accounts. Thereafter, they changed the passwords and seized the accounts. Maharashtra police had raided the Jharkhand activist’s residence last year on August 28, 2018.

Stan works for the rights of Adivasis and other underprivileged groups in the state. Among other issues, he also works on displacement, corporate loot of resources, the condition of undertrials and PESA. Stan has been a vocal critic of the government’s attempts to amend land laws and the land acquisition act in Jharkhand. He is also a strong advocate for the Forest Rights Act, PESA and other related laws. He also happens to be an exceptionally gentle, honest and public-spirited person.

Stan on January 26, the Republic Day this year had written an open letter to the common man of India, seeking their support to question the authority about the declining Human Right situation in India.

Following the raids by the Maharashtra police, Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha (JJM), an umbrella body of progressive activists has strongly condemned the police action.

The Mahasabha, which claims of having the highest regard for Stan and his works, is shocked by the intimidation and arrests of activists and public intellectuals who are critical of the government and the ruling party at the Centre.

It, in a press communiqué, stated that last year, Surendra Gadling, Sudhir Dhawale, Mahesh Raut, Shoma Sen, and Rona Wilson were arrested on 6 June 2018, and they continue to be held imprisoned in the Yerwada Central Jail.

In 2018, the police arrested five more activists – Sudha Bharadwaj, Arun Ferreira, Vernon Gonsalves, Varavara Rao and Gautam Navlakha. They too are yet to be released.

“These imprisonments are nothing but an attempt by the government to strike terror among those who are fighting for the rights of the marginalized,” states the press note.

It further added that the central government and media houses close to the BJP claim that the human rights activists were part of a Maoist conspiracy related to the Bhima-Koregaon incident. This concocted story seems to be part of a larger propaganda, based on terms like “urban naxals”, aimed at stifling any criticism of the government.

The raids and arrests are part of the government’s growing attempts to stifle dissent and intimidate those who are fighting for justice.

“JJM demands an immediate end to the raids, dropping of all false charges against human rights activists across the country and release of those who are arrested. These harassments are politically motivated and wholly unjustified,” read the press note.

Public Protest Against Mob Lynching and Inaction of Jharkhand Police

Ranchi: Large number of tribals, activists and concerned citizen from several districts in Jharkhand protested against the lynching of a tribal over alleged cow slaughter by a mob at Dumri in Gumla district.

On April 10, 2019, one Prakash Lakda, a 50-year-old Adivasi of Jurmu village in Dumri block, was lynched to death by a mob from the neighbouring Jairagi village. Three other victims – Peter Kerketta, Belarius Minj and Janerius Minj – sustained severe injuries due to the assault by mob.

Along with Lakda, 11 other persons have been lynched so far in Jharkhand, of whom nine were Muslims and the remaining two were Adivasis.

On Friday, May 31, Kendriya Jan Sangharsh Samiti (KJSS) organised a protest against the violence, killing, and police inaction in Dumri block. The protest was attended by thousands of people from Gumla, Latehar and Ranchi districts. Several human rights activists of the state also participated in it.

KJSS’s Saroj Hembrom shared that a fact finding team of human rights found that the four victims, along with other men and children of their village, were skinning a dead ox on the bank of a river that flows near their village. Some people from Jurmu were told by the owner of the dead ox to carve it for its meat and its hide. While the Adivasis were doing so, they were attacked by a mob of about 35-40 persons from Jairagi village.

After being beaten for around three hours, the victims were dumped by the perpetrators in front of Dumri police station at midnight.

But instead of immediately rushing the victims to a hospital, the police made them wait outside in the cold for around four hours. By the time they were taken to the local health centre, Lakda had already succumbed to his injuries.

While the victims kept saying that they were carving an ox that had died, the police filed an FIR against them and 20-25 unnamed persons of their village on charges of cow slaughter.

Jerome Kujur of KJSS informed the gathering about police inaction in Prakash Lakda’s death. And a member of the fact finding team, James Herenj said that he was very saddened to learn about the false reporting on this matter by the local media. He read in the newspaper that the Adivasis began to fight among themselves while distributing cow meat, which led to Lakda’s death.

Jean Dreze, the renowned development economist and social activist who had met the SP on this matter, said on the occasion that the incident in Jurmu is a plain and simple case of murder which received the blessings of the local police and the state government.

Dreze added that in the past few years, at least 40 persons have died across the country in similar acts of violence.

KJSS unequivocally condemned Prakash Lakda’s death. The Samiti said that they want peace in the entire region. But the incident has created an atmosphere of fear.

At the end of the protest, the representatives met the local administration and submitted a memorandum addressed to the Governor of Jharkhand with the following demands:

  1. Withdrawal of false cases of cow slaughter filed against the Adivasis of Jurmu
  2. Arrest all the perpetrators involved in the mob violence and file charges against them under The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act
  3. Take action against the local police for its long delay in arranging medical treatment for the victims and filing of false case of cow slaughter
  4. Provide interim compensation of Rs 15 lakh to the deceased’s family and Rs. 10 lakhs each to the injured victims
  5. Compliance with the recent Supreme Court judgement on lynching

Godse comes alive to haunt BJP in its hour of glory

0

Nathuram Godse has come alive 70 years after being hanged for the murder of Mahatma Gandhi to haunt the BJP in its hour of glory. Not that BJP had ever had any aversion for Godse. Rather, the BJP leaders had always been admirers of Godse’s ‘courageous act’ though they had been exercising discretion in praising Godse publicly because of strong public sentiment against Godse’s dastardly act of killing a person who is universally revered and regarded as the ‘Father of the Nation’ in India.

Just as the country was readying for the seventh and last phase of polling in the Lok Sabha elections, BJP’s Bhopal candidate and Malegaon blasts accused Pragya Singh Thakur raked up the controversy on May 16 by glorifying Godse as a patriot. She got prompt support from two Karnataka BJP leaders. Though there were strong protests across the country, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP President Amit Shah did not react immediately. Apparently on receiving a feedback that Thakur’s remark might have an adverse effect on BJP’s prospects in the last phase of polling two days later, the two top BJP leaders reacted only next day. Shah referred the matter to the party’s disciplinary committee for ‘appropriate action’ against Pragya Singh Thakur, as well as the two Karnataka leaders Anant Hegde and Nalin Kateel. Both Shah and Modi said that what Pragya Singh Thakur had said was against the party’s ideology. Modi also said that he would never be able to forgive Pragya Singh for her remarks about Godse.

That was before the last phase of polling was held. The election process was completed on May 23 and the BJP romped home with a stunning majority. The deadline given to the disciplinary committee to take ‘appropriate action’ against Thakur and the two Karnataka leaders expired on May 27. Moreover, if the two felt that Pragya’s Godse remark was against BJP’s ideology, they would not have allowed it to be aired on channels and displayed on media for full 24 hours before reacting and sending the matter to the disciplinary committee.

While the disciplinary committee is still debating what action to suggest against Pragya Singh Thakur (now a Lok Sabha member) and others, BJP’s MLA from Mhow in Madhya Pradesh Usha Thakur has eulogised Godse and said Godse was a ‘nationalist’ and he always had the nation’s interest at heart. Pragya Singh Thakur’s Godse remark has found endorsement from a top Sangh Parivar ideologue, Vishnu Pandya, also. Participating in a debate on Gujarat Samachar TV (GSTV), Pandya was reported to have said that ‘Godse was a patriot, and so was Gandhi’. At present president of Gujarat Sahitya Akademy and a Padma-Shree awardee, Pandya was known to be close to Modi when the latter was Chief Minister of Gujarat.

BJP’s dilemma is how to proceed against Pragya Singh Thakur and others who have lauded Nathuram Godse. Inaction or mild action against them is likely to upset some of BJP’s NDA allies. Even though the BJP has a thumping majority in Lok Sabha on its own, upsetting the allies will mark a bad beginning for the second term of Modi government. More importantly, condonation of Pragya Singh’s Godse remark will create a feeling of resentment among the vast majority of the people in India which will not be conducive for smooth running of the government. Strict action against Thakur and others is likely to alienate BJP/RSS cadre who have all these years been fed on Godse’s patriotism.

Kolkata Boy Scores 78 percent in WBHSE despite rare lung disorder

Kolkata: Toppers are not always those who score the highest marks. Sometimes even those who score a little less than 80 per cent can take away the limelight from top scorer. Behala’s 18-year-old Sougata Bakshi is one such hero.

For Bakshi, unlike other teens, is wheelchair bound and needs the oxygen cylinder by his side 24×7 to survive. He gasps for air every time he completes a sentence, but that doesn’t seem to have taken away his zeal to excel in life.

Born in a Bengali middle-class family, that resides in Behala Sarsuna area of Kolkata, Bakshi was diagnosed with Familial Pulmonary fibrosis, a rare lung disorder, characterised by the formation of excessive scar tissues in the lung, in 2011. The very next year, his father Siddhartha Shankar Bakshi, succumbed to the same disorder, and from 2013 onwards, he had to discontinue regular classes.

“With my worsening lung condition, my body got weaker and was eventually advised by my doctor to not attend regular school as it could lead to me contracting infection. Since 2013 I have been studying at home, my school Nava Nalanda High School was very understanding and helped me in every possible way to complete my secondary examination. I gave my WB Secondary Examinations from the hospital and scored 68 per cent.”

Not content with his score, Bakshi was determined to his better his score in the WBHSE.  Despite his condition worsening, he devoted six hours a day to study. “Given my condition, attending school was impossible so the onus was on me to complete my syllabus and prepare well. Getting a good score is a must to get admission into a good college,” said Bakshi, with a laugh.

Bakshi who loves reading thrillers is a fan of Agatha Christie and Satyajit Ray. And also aspires to write some thrillers one. Needless, to say, he scored his highest in English other than Computer Science.

On being asked if he was happy with the score, he said, “Yes, of course. Now am looking forward to getting admitted to a decent college before, I head off for a lung transplant in Chennai.”

The ease with which he speaks about his surgery, reveals his desire to lead a healthy life in future. “I want to live a healthy life, complete my education and take care of my mother,” says the young lad, who is extremely optimistic about his transplant, which is going to cost around INR 60,00,000.

Coming from a middle-class family, which had already exhausted its resources in having his father treated, which was followed by his was not an easy task. His mother, Pratima Bakshi, a homemaker was already finding it difficult to collect money for his regular treatment when his doctor declared that it would be difficult for the lad to survive without an immediate lung transplant. The family is at present running a crowdfunding campaign on Milaap (https://milaap.org/fundraisers/support-sougata) to raise funds for the surgery.

On being asked what next plans he has post recovery, the little champ said, “You know what, I am a great fan of Shah Rukh Khan and Kolkata Knight Riders. But am yet watch any of its matches live from the Eden. God willing, I would love to watch my favourite team play at the Eden, at the IPL next year.”

50-year-old vulnerable tribal allegedly dies of hunger in Jharkhand

0

Ranchi: With the exit poll indicating a thumping victory for the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in the 2019 Lok Sabha Election, the Raghubar Das-led BJP Government in Jharkhand were in a mood of celebration. Along that time, on May 22, the eve of election result, Motka Majhi, a tribal belonging to the Maal Pahadia community breathed his last because of hunger.

Maal Pahadia is one of the 75 tribal groups which has been categorised as Particular Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG). The PVTG are the marginalised section of the scheduled tribes in India.

According to Dainik Jagran, a Hindi daily, 50-year-old Manjhi, a daily wage labour, residing in Uper Rengani village in the Jama block of Dumka, had not been getting work since the implementation of Election Model Code of Conduct (MCC). For a fortnight, Majhi had been surviving on Taadkun (Toddy Palm) fruit. Following his death on May 22, Manjhi’s wife Alawati Devi and son Sunil Manjhi performed his last rites. Majhi is survived by two other sons, who are also poor daily-wage labours.

According to villagers, when Majhi died, there was no ration in his house, made of mud, branches and leaves.

The family while talking to the reporters also claimed that they neither had the ration card nor Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)’s job card. They were yet to be sanctioned a home under Prime Minister’s Awas Yojna.

They added that Majhi used to work at a brick kiln, but had not been getting work since the implementation of MCC.

Village head Rajendra Yadav, immediately after Majhi’s death provided 15 Kg ration to the family.

When Block Development Officer (BDO) Sadhu Charan Deogam got information, he inquired into the case and sent 10 kg rice to the family. However, he claimed that the in-laws of deceased were in Ramgarh, another block in Dumka, where they had gone to cast their vote. They had a Pink card which entitles every member of the family to get 5 kg ration every month.

“There is no question of starvation death. It might have happened from some other reasons and after performing the last rites they (his family) are claiming that he (Manjhi) died from hunger,” the newspaper quoted the BDO.

However, this is not the first case of alleged starvation death in Jharkhand. At least 19 people before Majhi have died of hunger in Jharkhand in the last two years.

Mistakes that Mahagathbandhan made in Jharkhand

Ranchi: Mahagathbandhan leaders lost a golden opportunity to defeat the Bhartiya Janata Party in Jharkhand. And it was their overconfidence arising due to their ‘arithmetic on paper’ that made them make several mistakes to lose the election at a time when the common man was unhappy with CM Raghubar Das led BJP government in the state.

A little bit of probing into the Mahagathbandhan parties, one would realise that presently Congress, Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) and Jharkhand Vikash Morcha don’t have strong cadre base in Jharkhand. Jharkhand Mukhti Morcha (JMM) was the only gatbandhan party with a substantial cadre base (has 18 MLAs in the state), however, keeping assembly election in mind, JMM let Congress play the role of elder brother and when seat sharing took place, Congress got the maximum share — 7 out of 14 seats. But Congress had to struggle to field eligible candidates in the seven Lok Sabha seats. They even borrowed Kirti Azad from Darbhanga. And fielded Khunti and Hazaribagh candidates at the eleventh hour.

RJD which has been wiped off from Bihar, post results, had its doom scripted right from the beginning, even before polls in Jharkhand. RJD’s state chief Annapurna Devi left the party to become BJP’s candidate from Koderma. Despite Lalu Prasad Yadav’s party having no base in Jharkhand ever since the creation of Jharkhand, it too bargained for two seats in Mahagathbandhan. It got one from Palamu, but it fought on Chatra seat too, and lost both the seats.

JVM, formed in 2006 and led by Babulal Marandi, Jharkhand’s first Chief Minister, has been losing its MLA and leaders to BJP and when it became part of the gathbandhan, it has also remained close to its party base. But JVM got two seats to contest, and both the seats were of choice — Koderma and Godda. At both the seats, Mahagathbandhan ignored 2014’s runner ups — Rajkumar Yadav and Furqan Ansari and handed over the seats to JVM, which lost on both the seats.

“Since the formation of the alliance, the gathbandhan partners were making every strategy keeping forthcoming assembly polls in mind, and not the immediate challenge BJP had given them in the form of Lok Sabha election. Which ultimately cause them heavy loss,” said senior journalist Kamal Chaparia.

Another major mistake of the Mahagathbandhan was to exclude the Left in Jharkhand. At least on two seats – Koderma and Hazaribagh, communist parties were strong but were not considered for the alliance. Also, the candidates fielded by the Mahagathbandhan candidate were not strong enough to even give a fight to the BJP.

Jharkhand has two MLAs from the Left parties but was being denied any seats. However, despite JVM also having only two MLAs, managed to get two MP seats to contest from, but Left did not get a single one. RJD also despite having no MLA, got to fight from two seats as well. This alienated the Left party further.

The election result also indicated that Mahagathbandhan parties failed to consolidate the left voters. All they got were the minority and tribal votes in Jharkhand. They have no strategy to hold back even the schedule caste voters, nor do they have any penetration into backward caste votes, leave aside the upper caste Hindu votes. The outcome was dismal, even JMM chief Shibu Soren could not save his seat, from the tribal-dominated Dumka seat.

The winning margin of BJP candidates is also to ponder upon. Mahagathbandhan candidates got marginally higher votes in comparison to what they got in 2014 from their respective seats, but BJP got much higher votes, which means, that the gathbandhan parties have to work hard to dent into BJP votes.

With Jharkhand’s assembly polls being scheduled within the next six months, the opposition needs to put its act into place. Babulal Marandi, while speaking to eNewsroom on May 23 maintained that they will fight in the upcoming assembly together, but if alliances are made without taking the ground reality into account, the result will not get any better.

Every experiment pays off for BJP in Jharkhand, Mahagathbandhan’s arithmetic fails

Ranchi: When the Mahagathbandhan was being formed in Jharkhand, it looked strong. To stop it from snatching away its seats, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) did its best, right from taking some harsh decisions to poaching candidates from its opposition. And at the end, it seems like all the efforts made by the saffron party has yielded the desired result for it in the 2019 Lok Sabha Elections.

Right from not fielding its candidate from Giridih Lok Sabha seat, a traditional bastion for the party to fielding an outsider to denying ticket to its 5-time Member of Parliament Ravindra Pandey to leaving the seat for alliance partner All Jharkhand Student Union (AJSU), BJP tried all strategy to keep their votes consolidated.

AJSU fielded Raghubar Das’ Cabinet Minister Chandra Prakash Choudhary. Choudhary, a resident of Ramgarh, who was even dubbed as “outsider” won the seat comfortably for the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) with a margin of over 2.48 lakh. In 2014, BJP had won the seat, with a margin of only over 40,000 (approx) votes.

In Ranchi too, BJP removed its five-time MP Ramtahal Choudhary and fielded a new face from the party itself – Sanjay Seth, who also won the seat for the party with a margin of 2.83 lakh votes. Seth won the seat after defeating senior Congress leader Subodhkant Sahay.

The third major gamble that the BJP took was in Koderma, where it not only denied the ticket to incumbent MP Ravindra Rai, but also brought in former RJD state chief Annapurna Devi and fielded her for as the candidate for Koderma. Rai was state chief in 2014, but the party was unhappy with his performance and chose to deny him the ticket. Here too the gamble clicked and Annapurna Devi won by over 4.55 lakh votes.

In Khunti too, BJP denied the ticket to another five-time-MP, Karia Munda, and instead fielded former Chief Minister Arjun Munda. Here Munda had a tough fight from Congress candidate Kali Charan Munda. Arjun Munda was leading by a margin of a few thousand votes by the time this report was being filed.

Besides Giridih, Koderma, Ranchi and Khunti, where the party had not made any changes its candidates or left the seat for its alliance parties, BJP candidates performed really well. In Hazaribagh, Jayant Sinha is also won by a margin of over 4.79 lakh votes.

Significantly, Jharkhand Mukhti Morcha (JMM) Chief Shibu Soren lost to BJP candidate Sunil Soren, in Dumka. The JMM Supremo had won the seat eight times and would have created history by winning it for the ninth time, but Sunil defeated him by over 47 thousands votes.

The Lohardaga seat, where it was being believed that Congress would be faring better, BJP’s Sudarshan Baghat leading by over 9 thousand votes.

Former Director General of Police VD Ram, who had entered politics in 2014 and won on BJP’s ticket from Palamu seat is also leading with a margin of 4.77 lakhs this time.

Dhanbad and Chatra’s sitting MPs—PN Singh and Sunil Singh are also leading with a huge vote margin, while another sitting MP from Jamshedpur Bidyut Mahto won by over 3 lakhs votes

In Jharkhand, it was the personality and name of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, that played a crucial part in boosting the BJP vote share. Most BJP candidates in Jharkhand were seeking votes in his name and they got it. In fact, on all four Lok Sabha constituencies—Ranchi, Lohardagga, Koderma and Khunti where Narendra Modi had campaigned, BJP has won.

And except Khunti, the winning margin of all the BJP candidates has increased in comparison to their 2014 winning margin.

An excited Jharkhand Chief Minister Raghubar Das told media persons in Ranchi, “In Jharkhand where selfish people had formed a grand alliance has been rejected by the people, and expressed faith on BJP. It is a new beginning. We can also say that, people from Jharkhand as well as across India have liked development politics than caste and religious one.”

When eNewsroom asked Babulal Marandi, Mahagathbandhan’s Koderma candidate and Jharkhand Vikash Morcha Chief (JVM) chief, will the Lok Sabha election results impact the upcoming assembly polls in Jharkhand, scheduled in December, he reacted, “Lok Sabha and assembly elections are contested on different political issues. BJP had lost in three states in during the assembly polls in 2018, but they have won the Lok Sabha elections Rajasthan, MP and Chattisgarh. In 2014, BJP had won 12 seats but could not get a majority in the assembly election. So, we sit and introspect at a micro level to gauge where things have gone wrong so that we can put up a stronger fight against the BJP, together.”