Home Blog Page 143

मैं आज क्यों लिख रहा हूं, अर्णब की गिरफ्तारी के तुरंत बाद क्यों नहीं लिखा?

0

त्महत्या के लिए उकसाने का मामला संगीन है लेकिन सिर्फ नाम भर आ जाना काफी नहीं होता है। नाम आया है तो उसकी जांच होनी चाहिए और तय प्रक्रिया के अनुसार होनी चाहिए। एक पुराने केस में इस तरह से गिरफ्तारी संदेह पैदा करती है। महाराष्ट्र पुलिस को कोर्ट में या पब्लिक में स्पष्ट करना चाहिए कि क्या प्रमाण होने के बाद भी इस केस को बंद किया गया था? क्या राजनीतिक दबाव था? तब हम जान सकेंगे कि इस बार राजनीतिक दबाव में ही सही, किसी के साथ इंसाफ़ हो रहा है। अदालतों के कई आदेश हैं। आत्महत्या के लिए उकसाने के ऐसे मामलों में इस तरह से गिरफ्तारी नहीं होती है। कानून के जानकारों ने भी यह बात कही है। इसलिए महाराष्ट्र पुलिस पर संदेह के कई ठोस कारण बनते हैं। जिस कारण से पुलिस की कार्रवाई को महज़ न्याय दिलाने की कार्रवाई नहीं मानी जा सकती।

भारत की पुलिस पर आंख बंद कर भरोसा करना अपने गले में फांसी का फंदा डालने जैसा है। झूठे मामले में फंसाने से लेकर लॉक अप में किसी को मार मार कर मार देने, किसी ग़रीब दुकानदार से हफ्ता वसूल लेने और किसी को भी बर्बाद कर देने का इसका गौरवशाली इतिहास रहा है। पेशेवर जांच और काम में इसका नाम कम ही आता है। इसलिए किसी भी राज्य की पुलिस हो उसकी हर करतूत को संंदेह के साथ देखा जाना चाहिए। ताकि भारत की पुलिस ऐसे दुर्गुणों से मुक्त हो सके और वह राजनीतिक दबाव या अन्य लालच के दबाव में किसी निर्दोष को आतंकवाद से लेकर दंगों के आरोप में न फंसाए।

अर्णब गोस्वामी के केस में कहा जा रहा है कि महाराष्ट्र की पुलिस बदले की भावना से कार्रवाई कर रही है। ग़लत नहीं कहा जा रहा है। क्या दिल्ली पलिस और यूपी की पुलिस बदले की भावना से कार्रवाई नहीं करती है? अर्णब गोस्वामी ने कभी अपने जीवन में हमारी तरह ऐसा पोज़िशन नहीं लिया है। मुझे कुछ होगा तो अर्णब गोस्वामी एक लाइन नहीं बोलेंगे। अगर पुलिस किसी को दंगों के झूठे आरोप में फंसा दे तो अर्णब गोस्वामी पहले पत्रकार होंगे जो कहेंगे कि बिल्कुल ठीक है। पुलिस पर संदेह करने वाले ही ग़लत हैं। फिर भी एक नागरिक के तौर आप भी अर्णब के केस में पुलिस के बर्ताव का सख़्त परीक्षण कीजिए ताकि सिस्टम दबाव और दोष मुक्त बन सके। इसी में सबका भला है।

डॉ कफ़ील ख़ान पर अवैध रूप से राष्ट्रीय सुरक्षा क़ानून लगा कर छह महीने बंद रखा गया। इलाहाबाद हाई कोर्ट ने कहा था कि अवैध रूप से रासुका लगाई गई है। उक्त अधिकारी के ख़िलाफ़ कोई कार्रवाई नहीं हुई है। अर्णब गोस्वामी से लेकर गृह मंत्री अमित शाह से लेकर तमाम मंत्री और मुख्यमंत्री योगी आदित्यनाथ तक ने इस नाइंसाफी पर कुछ नहीं कहा। भारत में किनके राज में प्रेस की स्वतंत्रता अभी खत्म होकर मिट्टी में मिल चुकी है यह बताने की ज़रूरत नहीं है। आपको एक लाख बार बता चुका हूं। प्रेस की स्वतंत्रता की बात करने वाले मंत्रियों के प्रधानमंत्री ने आज तक एक प्रेस कांफ्रेंस नहीं की है।

बिल्कुल अन्वय नाइक और कुमुद नाइक की आत्महत्या के मामले में इंसाफ मिलना चाहिए। अन्वय नाइक की बेटी की कहानी बेहद मार्मिक है। इस बात की जांच आराम से हो सकती है कि अर्णब गोस्वामी ने अन्वय नाइक से स्टुडियो बनाकर पैसे क्यों नहीं दिए? 80 लाख से ऊपर का काम है तो कुछ न कुछ रसीदी सबूत भी होंगे। अन्वय नाइक की बेटी का कहना सही है कि कोई भी कानून से ऊपर नहीं होना चाहिए लेकिन कानून को भी मर्यादा से ऊपर नहीं होना चाहिए। जांच की निष्पक्षता की मर्यादा अहम है। तभी लगेगा कि पारदर्शिता के साथ न्याय हो रहा है। राजनीतिक दबाव में केस का खुलना और केस का बंद होना ठीक नहीं है।

जब एनडीटीवी पर छापे पड़ रहे थे और एक चैनल को डराया जा रहा था तब अर्णब का कैमरा बाहर लगा था और लिंचमैन की तरह कवर किया जा रहा था। उनके कवरेज में एक लाइन प्रेस की स्वतंत्रता पर नहीं थी। उनका रिपोर्टर डॉ रॉय के घर की दीवार फांदने का प्रयास कर रहा था। बीजेपी के मंत्री प्रवक्ता मेरा बहिष्कार करते हैं। एन डी टी वी की सोनिया वर्मा सिंह ने ट्विट कर अर्णब की गिरफ्तारी की निंदा की है। एनडीटीवी के अन्य सहयोगियों ने अर्णब की गिरफ्तारी की निंदा की है। ये फर्क है। जब 2016 में एन डी टी वी इंडिया को बैन किया जा रहा था तब प्रेस क्लब में पत्रकार जुटे थे। आप पूछ सकते हैं कि अर्णब और उनके बचाव में उतरे मंत्री लोग क्या कर रहे थे। जब विपक्ष के नेताओं पर छापे की आड़ में हमले होते हैं अर्णब हमेशा जांच एजेंसियों की साइड लेते हैं।

अर्णब ने मोदी सरकार पर क्या सवाल उठाए हैं, बेरोज़गारी से लेकर किसानों के मुद्दे कितने दिखाए गए हैं यह सब दर्शकों को पता है। उल्टा अर्णब गोस्वामी सरकार पर सवाल उठाने वालों को नक्सल से लेकर राष्ट्रविरोधी कहते हैं। भीड़ को उकसाते हैं। झूठी और अनर्गल बाते करते हैं। वे कहीं से पत्रकार नहीं हैं। उनका बचाव पत्रकारिता के संदर्भ में करना उनकी तमाम हिंसक और भ्रष्ट हरकतों को सही ठहराना हो जाएगा।

अर्णब की पत्रकारिता रेडियो रवांडा का उदाहरण है जिसके उद्घोषक ने भीड़ को उकसा दिया और लाखों लोग मारे गए थे। अर्णब ने कभी भीड़ की हिंसा में मारे गए लोगों का पक्ष नहीं लिया। पिछले चार महीने से अपने न्यूज़ चैनल में जो वो कर रहे हैं उस पर अदालतों की कई टिप्पणियां आ चुकी हैं। तब किसी मंत्री ने क्यों नहीं कहा कि कोर्ट अभिव्यक्ति की स्वतंत्रता पर हमला कर रहा है? जबकि मोदी राज में अभिव्यक्ति की स्वतंत्रता की सीमाओं को जिनती बार उभारा गया है उतना किसी सरकार के कार्यकाल में नहीं हुआ। हर बात में अभिव्यक्ति की स्वतंत्रता की सीमा बताई और दिखाई जाती है।

एक बार अर्णब हाथरस केस में योगी की पुलिस को ललकार कर देख लेते, मुख्यमंत्री योगी को ललकार कर देख लेते जिस तरह से वे मुख्यमंत्री उद्धव को ललकारते हैं तो आपको अंतर पता चल जाता कि कौन सी सरकार संविधान का पालन कर रही है। उद्धव ठाकरे ने प्रचुर संयम का परिचय दिया है और उनकी पार्टी के कार्यकर्ताओ ने भी जिनकी एक छवि मारपीट की भी रही है। कई हफ्तों से अर्णब बेलगाम पत्रकारिता की हत्या करते हुए हर संवैधानिक मर्यादा की धज्जियां उड़ा रहे थे। पत्रकार रोहिणी सिंह ने ट्विट किया है कि यूपी में पत्रकारों के खिलाफ 50 से अधिक मामले दर्ज हुए हैं। क्या अर्णब में साहस है कि वे अब भी योगी सरकार को ललकार दें इस मसले पर। जो आज अभिव्यक्ति की स्वतंत्रता की बात कर रहे हैं वो सीमा की बात करने लगेंगे और अर्णब पर रासुका लगा दी जाएगा डॉ कफील ख़ान की तरह। गौरी लंकेश की हत्या के मामले को अर्णब ने कैसे कवर किया था? या नहीं किया था?

द वायर के संस्थापक हैं सिद्धार्थ वरदराजन। अर्णब गोस्वामी सिद्धार्थ वरदराजन के बारे में क्या क्या कहते रहे हैं आप रिकार्ड निकाल कर देख सकते हैं मगर सिद्धार्थ वरदराजन ने उनकी गिरफ्तारी में पुलिस की भूमिका को लेकर सवाल उठाए हैं। निंदा की है। उसी तरह से कई ऐसे लोगों ने की है। अर्णब के पक्ष में उतरे बीजेपी की मंत्रियों और समर्थकों की लाचारी देखिए। वे सुना रहे हैं कि कहां गए संविधान की बात करने वाले। पत्रकार रोहिणी सिंह ने एक जवाब दिया है राकेश सिन्हा को। संविधान की बात करने वालों को आपने जेल भेज दिया है। कुछ को दंगों के आरोप में फंसा दिया है। इनकी समस्या ये है कि जिन्हें नक्सल कहते हैं, देशद्रोही कहते हैं उन्हीं को ऐसे वक्त में खोजते हैं। इस बात के अनेक प्रमाण हैं कि कई लोगों ने एक नागरिक के तौर पर अर्णब की गिरफ्तारी की प्रक्रिया को लेकर सवाल उठाए हैं। उन्होंने यह फर्क साफ रखा है कि अर्णब पत्रकार नहीं है और न ही यह अभिव्यक्ति की स्वतंत्रता का मामला है।

न्यूज़ ब्राडकास्टर्स एसोसिएशन ने भी निंदा की है जबकि अर्णब इसके सदस्य तक नहीं है। अर्णब ने हमेशा इस संस्था का मज़ाक उड़ाया है। क्या न्यूज़ ब्राडकास्टर्स एसोसिएशन किसी ऐसे छोटे चैनल के पत्रकार की गिरफ्तारी पर बोलेगा जो उसका सदस्य नहीं है? ज़ाहिर है केंद्र सरकार अर्णब के साथ खड़ी है। अर्णब केंद्र सरकार के हिस्सा हो चुके हैं। अर्णब पत्रकार नहीं हैं। इसे लेकर किसी प्रकार का संदेह नहीं होना चाहिए। पत्रकारिता के हर पैमाने को ध्वस्त किया है। जिस तरह से पुलिस कमिश्नर को ललकार रहे थे वो पत्रकारिता नहीं थी।

मैंने कल इस मामले पर कुछ नहीं लिखा क्योंकि प्राइम टाइम के अलावा कई काम करने पड़ते हैं। मैं लंबा लिखता हूं इसलिए भी टाइम चाहिए होता है। जब गिरफ्तारी की ख़बर आई तो मैं व्हाट्स एप पर था। फिर तुरंत कपड़े धोने चला गया। नील डालने के बाद भी बनियान में सफेदी नहीं आ रही थी। उससे जूझ रहा था तभी किसी का फोन आया कि चैनल खोलिए अर्णब गिरफ्तार हुए हैं। मैंने कहा कि उन्हीं जैसौं के कारण तो मेरे घर में न्यूज़ चैनल नहीं खुलता है। ख़ैर जब बनियान धोने के बाद पंखे की सफाई के लिए ड्राईंग रूम में आया तो चैनल खोल दिया। पंखे पर जमी धूल आंखों में गिर रही थी और मीडिया पर जमी धूल चैनल पर दिखने लगी। वैेसे कुछ दिन पहले फेसबुक पर रिपब्लिक चैनल के मामले में एडिटर्स गिल्ड की प्रतिक्रिया पोस्ट की थी कि किसी एक पर आरोप है तो आप पूरे गांव पर मुकदमा नहीं कर सकते।

लेकिन मैं अर्णब का घर देखकर हैरान रह गया। रोज़ 6000 शब्द टाइप करके मैं गाज़ियाबाद के उस फ्लैट में रहता हूं जिसमें कुर्सी लगाने भर के लिए बालकनी नहीं है। अर्णब का घर कितना शानदार है। ईर्ष्या से नहीं कह रहा। मुझे किसी का भी अच्छा घर अच्छा लगता है। एक रोज़ किसी अमीर प्रशंसक ने घर आने की ज़िद कर दी और आते ही बच्चों के सामने कह दिया कि बस यही घर है आपका। हम तो सोचे कि आलीशान फ्लैट होगा। एक मोहतरमा तो रोने लगीं कि मेरा घर ले लीजिए। कोरोना के कारण जब घर से एंकरिंग करने लगा तो मेरे घर में झांकने लगे। उन्हें लगा कि रवीश कुमार शाहरूख़ ख़ान है। जल्दी उन्हें मेरे घर की दीवारों से निरशा हो गई। मैं ठीक ठाक कमाता हूं और किसी चीज़ की कमी नहीं है। मुझे अपना घर बहुत अच्छा लगता है। मेरी तेरह साल पुरानी कार को देखकर कई बार लोगों को लगा कि किसे बुला लिया अपनी महफिल में। वैसे ईश्वर ने सब कुछ दिया है। लोगों ने इतना प्यार दे दिया कि सौ फ्लैट कम पड़ जाएं उसे रखने के लिए। मैं अर्णब के शानदार घर के विजुअल के सामने असंगठित क्षेत्र के एक मज़दूर की तरह सहमा खड़ा रह गया। मैं क्या बोलता, मेरे बोले का कोई मोल है भी या नहीं। एक अदना सा पत्रकार एक चैनल के मालिक के लिए बोले, यह मालिकों का अपमान है।

मैं तो बस अर्णब के घर की ख़ूबसूरती में समा गया। कल्पनाओं में खो गया। ड्राईंग रूम की लंबी चौड़ी शीशे की खिड़की के पार नीला समंदर बेहद सुंदर दिख रहा था। अरब सागर की हवाएं खिड़की को कितना थपथपाती होंगी। यहां तो क़ैदी भी कवि हो जाए। मुझे इस बात की खुशी हुई कि अर्णब के दिलो दिमाग़ में जितना भी ज़हर भरा हो घर कैसा हो, कहां हो, कैसे रहा जाए इसका टेस्ट काफी अच्छा है। उसमें सौंदर्य बोध है। बिल्कुल किसी नफ़ीस रईस की तरह जो अपने टी-पॉट की टिकोजी भी मिर्ज़ापुर के कारीगरों से बनवाता हो। मैं यकीन से कह सकता हूं कि अर्णब के अंदर सुंदरता की संभवानाएं बची हुई हैं। लेकिन सोचिए रोज़ समंदर के विशाल ह्रदय का दर्शन करने वाले एंकर का ह्रदय कितना संकुचित और नफ़रतों से भरा है।

अर्णब गोस्वामी जब भी जेल से आएं, अव्वल तो पुलिस उन्हें तुरंत रिहा करे, मैं यही कहूंगा कि कुछ दिनों की छुट्टी लेकर अपने इस सुंदर घर को निहारा करें। इस सुंदर घर का लुत्फ उठाएं। सातों दिन कई कई घंटे एंकरिंग करना श्रम की हर अवधारणा का अश्लील उदाहरण है। अगर इस घर का लुत्फ नहीं उठा सकते तो मुझे मेहमान के रूप में आमंत्रित करें। मैं कुछ दिन वहां रहूंगा। सुबह उनके घर की कॉफी पीऊंगा। वैसे अपने घर में चाय पीता हूं लेकिन जब आप अमीर के घर जाएं तो अपना टेस्ट बदल लें। कुछ दिन कॉफी पर शिफ्ट हो जाएं। और हां एक चीज़ और करना चाहता हूं। उनकी बालकनी में बैठकर अरब सागर से आती हवाओं को सलाम भेजना चाहता हूं और बॉर्डर फिल्म का गाना फुल वॉल्यूम में सुनना चाहता हूं। ऐ जाते हुए लम्हों, ज़रा ठहरो, ज़रा ठहरो….मैं भी चलता हूं… ज़रा उनसे मिलता हूं… जो इक बात दिल में है उनसे कहूं तो चलूं तो चलूं…. और हां पुलिस की हर नाइंसाफी के खिलाफ हूं। चाहें लिखू या न लिखूं।

Love jihad is a campaign to curb inter-faith marriages

0

Allahabad High Court in its recent judgment opposed the conversion to get married to the person of another faith. The logic is that in the Special Marriages act, interfaith marriages are totally acceptable. One Muslim woman had converted to Hinduism to get married to a Hindu man. Talking in this aftermath the UP Chief Minister launched a tirade against Muslim men. As per him many Muslim youth hide their religious identity, lure the Hindu girls and then convert them to Islam. They will be dealt with sternly and their own funeral processions (Ram Naam Satya Hai) will be taken out.

In a strict warning he said that such incidents will not be allowed, his Government will come out with a law against it. He also said that posters will be put up of those indulging in such activities. As if on the cue, Haryana Chief Minster Manohar Lal Khattar, another BJP ruled state came forward with the resolve of his Government to bring a law against such interfaith marriages, Muslim boy-Hindu girls, which are referred to by the derogatory ‘Love Jihad’, which by now has become a sort of provocation for violence., as witnessed in the case of Muzzafarnagar violence of UP in 2013.

In contrast to these hyperbole speeches by BJP leaders the number of cases of interfaith marriages is handful. There are both types of such marriages. One does recall the marriage of Trinmul Congress MP, Nusrat Jahan to a Hindu and the way she was trolled. Selectively case of Nikita Tomar, who was murdered by a Muslim man, in which case Tausif and Rehan have been arrested and hash tag #KshtriyaLivesMatter is making the rounds is also being projected as an attempted love jihad. Officially speaking  G.Kishan Reddy, Junior minister in Home Ministry had stated in Parliament that there is no such category as love jihad. He also pointed this out while replying to a question by a Kerala MP, about love Jihad cases in Kerala. As per him the cases were investigated and not found to be the one related to coercion etc.

Love Jihad had come to fore in a big way in case of Akhila. This Hindu girl had married a Muslim man; and had changed her name to Hadiya. After the long battle the Supreme Court upheld her right to her choice and overruling the Kerala High Court verdict and permitted her to stay with her husband. Again we witnessed the same in case of recently released and then withdrawn Tanishq advertisement. In this ad a Hindu bride, looking happy and cheerful is surprised that a Hindu ritual of God Bharai (Baby Shower) is being organized for her in her husband’s Muslim household. The communalists not only trolled this ad but also declared a boycott of Tanishq products. Under the threat of this the company buckled and withdrew the ad. The charge was same that such advertisements promote Love Jihad.

This time around apart from the types of steps being outlined by the UP and Haryana Chief Ministers, what is being dished out is a series of advices to the parents of Hindu girls to keep a watch on them, to whom they talk, their mobile phone messages and their movements. Clearly control mechanisms are being devised to keep a control on the lives of girls/women. Control over the lives of women is one of the agenda of the communal politics. Communal politics seems to be operating on the ground of ‘hate minorities’, Muslim and also partly Christians. Its other components are to push the caste equations to the pre-democratic times and also to intensify the patriarchal control, which has the danger of weakening in the democratic society. In the wake of rising education among girls in particular, the social interactions between opposite sex do go up.

As such this patriarchy is the integral part of the communal politics everywhere. It may be Muslim communalism or Christian fundamentalism, patriarchal control is the core of their agenda.

In case of Hindu Communalism, showing the threat of Hindu women being converted to Islam has part of communal propaganda. Hindutva ideologue Savarkar; in his writings chastises Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, a great icon for Hindu communalists, for leaving alone the daughter-in-law of Bassien’s Subhedar, a Muslim, who was brought to her as a gift by his soldiers. It is precisely for this reason that Savarkar, despite being admirer of Shivaji on other counts did not include Shivaji’s reign in his ‘Six Golden Pages of Indian History’, the major book by him.

As Hindu communalism (parallel and opposite to Muslim communalism) developed in north India, the communalists projected the threat of rising Muslim population in India, way back in 1920s. Charu Gupta in her ‘Myth of Love jihad’ makes an interesting observation “Pamphlets with provocative titles like “Hindu Auraton ki Loot”, which denounced Muslim propaganda for proselytizing female preys, and “Hindu Striyon ki Loot ke Karan”, an Arya Samajist tract showing how to save “our” ladies from becoming Muslim, appeared at this time. The love jihad campaign of today, too, is using similar tropes.”

Not to be left behind RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat reiterates that women should restricts themselves to household chores, while men should do the earning part.

In our large society multiple layers of life patterns are occurring at the same time. The interaction between people of different castes and religious communities is the natural phenomenon. It is this interaction which does bring people in close bandings, some of these leading to marital alliances. As such even inter caste marriage is not occurring in India in significant proportions. One of the prescriptions Babasaheb Ambedkar makes for ‘Annihilation of Caste’ is promotion of inter-caste marriages. We on the contrary are witnessing reverse phenomenon. In case of interfaith marriages the matters are worse. Here Hindu vigilantes and Muslim fanatics bay for the blood of those crossing the religious boundaries in matters of love and marriage.

Islamophobia Vs Regressive Islamists: how to get out of the vicious cycle of hatred and violence?

0

Recent terror killings in France and later in Canada in the wake of controversy over the cartoons on Islam’s Prophet Muhammad has once again foregrounded the so-called clash of civilizations between the Christian – secular West and the Islamic world in global media and political discourses. It has huge implications in Hindu and Buddhist-majority countries like India and Myanmar also where ethno-religious politics is already reigning at the top.The row has overshadowed the unprecedented global pandemic and its staggering tolls in terms of millions of human lives as well as massive economic devastation that has ruined livelihood of billions, mostly poor across the religio-ethnic divide in both the hemispheres.

Informed and civilised debates are most welcome. The theory and practice of secularism and multiculturalism in different parts of the world, freedom of speech and expression and its limits including right to criticise religions, blasphemy and atheism should be examined. Particularly, the reality check on the religio-cultural freedom and other rights of minorities vis-a -vis majoritarian ‘national cultures’ dominated by one or other religious creed must be done based on lived experiences. However, what we are witnessing now are fanatic violence, both physical and verbal, in the name of divine and secular faiths.

Hypocrites are ruling the roost as every side is playing up their victimhood in a vicious cycle of hate crimes blinded by deep-seated prejudices to people of other races and religions, cultures and colors while hiding the fact that blood of innocents is in their hands too. This hellfire is being fueled constantly by many state and non-state powers who are hellbent to impose supremacy of their beliefs and ruling systems on the multitude of masses.

Terror in Thy Name 

We have no qualm in condemning those killing in the name of Allah and Muhammad. These self-appointed avengers for Islam are no different from those who have massacred people for long or still running murderous campaigns in the name of Christ, Moses, Rama even Buddha. Tech-savvy Jihadists with medieval, misogynist mindset in Al Queda, ISIS and tribal Taliban as well as other non-state terror networks have ruled their proto-states as killings machines even for Muslim sects who differ with their version of Islam.

Like the fundamentalist Christians and Hindus, they refuse to understand and follow scriptural injunctions in their historical contexts and use human intellect and rational faculties to mitigate the current troubles. Instead, they want to bring back either the dawn of Islam in seventh-century Arabia or later-day global Islamic empires, at least pan-Islamic one in the 21st century world.

islamophobia islamic world france muslims prophet hate macron erdogan france turkey
A protest against Macron’s comments, considered insulting Muslims, in Indonesia. Courtesy: Reuters / Hendra Nurdiyansyah/rt.com

History is the witness to the fact that most of these modern avenging angels for Islam are the Frankensteins of the Western powers since the colonial times down to the anti-Soviet Afghan war in the eighties. Osama Bin Laden and other Jihadists had collaborated with the ‘greedy but god-fearing’ Capitalist West during its post-WW2 Cold War with ‘helpful but godless’ Communist bloc. Radical Islamists have replaced the hated commies as the first enemy of the US-led European nations, predominantly Christian, after 9/11. The lone wolves inspired by them are mostly underprivileged and alienated youth, ignorant about the rich and diverse history of the Islamic civilization and its huge contribution to humanity. Killing to avenge insults to the prophet undermines those contributions and exposes a lack of confidence and seized mentality of a weak mind.

But the other side of the coin is hardly different. West-dominated global media generally call Muslim attackers as Islamic terrorists. But it never identifies the bigots from other faiths with their creeds or probe into their association to organised terror. Even the most liberals often demonise fanatic Muslim youth as horrible monsters in human forms who bear the DNA of an alien and abnormal species. But they treat neo-Nazi killers as freak but fringe elements in a normal society. American White supremacists, anti-Muslim, anti-black and misogynists like Proud Boys who have stood by Donald Trump during the Black Lives Matter protests are considered mere aberrations. They never raise any Doomsday alarm about white Christian fundamentalism when lone wolves mowed down black Christian congregations or Muslim worshippers en masse in the US and Norway to New Zealand.

The Hypocrisy of the Politicians

Consider the roles of other wily politicians like young French president Emanuel Macron and his grey-haired Turkish counterpart Recep T Erdogan. Both the right wingers are deliberately playing with fire knowing well that it would open up the Pandora’s Box again. Our discerning readers may know how deeply entrenched is the current tirade in the grand narratives of historical rivalries between former Christian and Islamic empires since the days of Crusades and Jihads as well as ‘secular’ colonial and postcolonial history.

Macron’s defence of the cartoons on Prophet Muhammad and Erdogan et al’s reaction have underlined that both sides are resorting to age-old straightjacketing and stereotyping aimed at mutual demonization and vilification to gain in domestic electoral fortune  and larger geo-political influence.The renewed tirade on radical Islam Vs Islamophobia have provided both leaders the opportunity to mask their ongoing resource wars over natural gas and oil in eastern Mediterranean region from Cyprus to Libya as well as old power rivalries in Syria-Lebanon, even in latest Armenia-Azerbaijan war over disputed territory of Nogorno-Karabach.

The latest spate of Jihadi terror attacks had begun following the French president’s provocative TV deliberation on his ‘anti-seperatism’ bill on 2nd October. He went on denouncing ‘Muslim seperatism and Islamic radicalism, preached and practised by foreign-funded mosques and social- religious associations’ which prefer ‘home or community schooling’ to secular state-run public education etc. France retains an overwhelming white Catholic majority but it also hosts the largest black and brown Muslim population in Europe, a historical consequence of its colonial past.

islamophobia islamic world france muslims prophet hate macron erdogan france turkey
France, Islam, Qibab, Burka, anti Face Mask, political cartoon I Courtesy: huffpost.com

Macron knew well that the French society is already deeply divided over the cartoons and Hijab controversies that had led to terror attacks in churches and mosques as well as public places like Jewish market. But he brazenly rubbed the raw scars of earlier anti-government riots in dingy and crammed Paris suburbs.The suburbs witnessed intermittent violent protests by immigrant youth including those were born in France against poverty, unemployment, lack of civic amenities including sports facilities as well as  police brutalities and other institutional discrimination. The president sparsely admitted the scars left by the French colonial past on Algerian and other north African Arab and Barber immigrants. He fleetingly mentioned that the ‘government’s withdrawal’ or cut in state expenditure in poor suburbs had facilitated the alienation and separatism.

But his matra for Muslim integration was far from persuasive and inclusive healing touches capped with long-term economic moves to generate jobs for poor minorities as well as social security and social justice for them as their legitimate cultural space expected in a multi-ethnic, multi-cultural society. Instead, he feigned to be a savior of Laicite or French version of secularism and made public schooling mandatory for all children except those can’t attend schools on health grounds. He also thundered against foreign-funded mosques et al and promised to come down on them heavily through new laws. As it was not enough, he spoke of ‘Islam in crisis all over the world’ and virtually called for a global campaign against radical, revivalist Islam a la the ‘war on terror’ of junior Bush era.

Erdogan, on the other hand, complains about minority rights in France and lack of sanity in Macron’s mind. Only a few months back,he had reconverted the iconic Hagia Sophia in Istanbul, the historic symbol of the East-West meeting point, into a mosque. The medieval cathedral-turned mosque in Istanbul was transformed into a museum by post-Ottoman Turkey’s secular and modernist ruler Kamal Pasha, ‘the Ataturk’ in 1934-5 in a bid to reduce the centuries-old tensions between the Orthodox Christians and Muslims in Turkey and its neighborhood. Islamist Erdogan ignored all protests within and outside Turkey while undoing the Ataturk-era ‘injustice to the believers and virtually claimed himself as new defender of Islamic faith.

Increasingly dictatorial in his long rule, he is now playing Islamist-nationalist card more aggressively to fulfil his neo-Ottoman ambition to be the uncrowned Caliph of the Islamic world. He has no qualm in suppressing violently his friend-turned foes among the Turkish Islamists and the Kurds, the largest ethnic minority as well as opposition parties despite most of them are Muslims. His contests with Saudi’s Salman, Egypt’s Al Sisi or Iran’s Rohani over the control of Libyan and Caspean Sea oil and gas reserves as well as middle east politics are still hot. The Macron has only provided him a suitable route to claim his numero uno status in Islamic world by asking Muslim masses to boycott French products..

However, neither Macron is a new Napoleon spearheading an enlightened European modernist mission in Africa nor Erdogan is a new Fatih; Mehmet II, the Ottoman conqueror of the Byzantine Constantinople which was the centre of medieval Eastern Christianity. Despite their best efforts to don the cloaks of the new champions of Western and Islamic identities respectively, neither have managed to hide their domestic economic failures and outsmart their regional challengers. Both– Macron and Erdogan, the opportunist and ambitious politicians are busy in mainstreaming the discourse of their domestic far right racists and bigots with an eye to the upcoming presidential elections in their countries.

How soccer’s loss became Hollywood’s gain

0

For over a month, the 1965 film The Hill was on my watchlist. I kept pushing back, for a variety of reasons. Saturday evening, I played the film some minutes after its lead Sir Sean Connery’s death was announced. The “Greatest Scot Alive” was dead. The “sexiest man” of the 20th century had breathed his last. The death came just days before James Bond, the character he immortalized on screen, turns 100.

One of the reasons, behind being so keen on The Hill was that Sir Connery was much more than James Bond, a character he played for the first time and then returned twice to, before finally calling it quits and switching to supporting roles.

Born to a Catholic father and a Protestant mother in Edinburgh’s Fountainbridge area, Sir Thomas Sean Connery never completed formal education. Till he joined the Royal Navy, Sir Connery had worked as a bricklayer, polished coffins and delivered milk. After three years, invalided from the Royal Navy, Sir Connery returned home to an uncertain present and near absent future. Driving trucks, posing as model for art students and working as lifeguard to scrape a living, Sir Connery had gained quite a reputation as a “tough guy”.

He carried that toughness into playing Bond, a role that was still few years away from him. Sir Connery might also have a different career, a sporting one, had he accepted an offer from the English football club Manchester United. He thought otherwise and tried his luck on the stage. It was here that he started reading Ibsen and other playwrights, modern and past greats.

The ladies liked him in Blood Money. A year later he was rumoured to have been romancing Lana Turner, his leading lady in Another Place, Another Time. Turner’s gangster boyfriend, Johny Stompanato stormed into the set pointing a gun at Sir Connery, who had him easily overpowered and snatched the gun. Stompanato returned to Los Angeles the next morning.

Then came the offer to play the character that would turn him into a global fan-favourite, the British secret service agent 007, James Bond, fond of golf, gambling and women, that passed off well in the 60s but in the post-Cold War world has been frowned upon. That did not affect the popularity of either Sir Connery or Bond, James Bond. Incidentally, Fleming was unhappy with the producers favouring Sir Connery to play Bond in Dr No and came around only after seeing the film. (Fleming had described Sir Connery as an “overgrown stuntman”. Well, too err is human). Fellow Scotsman Sir Richard Burton, Cary Grant and Rex Harrison were the first choices to play Bond.

Sir Connery returned twice to play James Bond, in the 1971 film Diamonds Are Forever and Never Say, Never Again (1983).

Sir Connery’s impact was such that Bond creator Ian Fleming had to provide the character with a Scottish family background like Sir Connery, a proud Scotsman, who never gave the Scottish way of speaking which meant, the Ss were Shs, the Ohs turning Ors and more. The same actor playing an Irish beat cop in an American city with a strong Scottish accent won his only Academy Award for best supporting actor in the now-considered classic The Untouchables. 

Sir Connery would play a Soviet submarine captain Marko Ramius who defects to the US at the end of the Hunt for the Red October.

The Hill was among the non-Bond films that Sir Connery did in the 60s. He hated Bond and had told his close friend and actor Sir Michael Caine that he would kill Bond. In The Hill he played a former squadron sergeant major charged with assaulting his senior officers, now imprisoned in a British military prison in the Libyan desert.

The character required raw physicality as he was subjected to severe punishment in the form of routine drills by a sadistic and brutal staff sergeant Williams (Ian Hendry).  And, Sir Connery’s on-screen raw sexuality was a major pull for his fans.

Tired of Bond, Sir Connery appeared in Alfred Hitchcock’s Marnie, played Robin Hood opposite Audrey Hepburn in Robin and Marian, in John Huston’s Man Who Would Be King with Sir Caine and the late Saaed Jaffrey, Murder in the Orient Express, The Name of the Rose (for which he won a Bafta award), Highlander, Steven Spielberg’s Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, The Russia House, Entrapment, The Rock (both box office successes) and Finding Forrester. Others like The First Knight and The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (Naseeruddin Shah played Captain Nemo in the film) tanked. Never comfortable in the glitzy life of Hollywood and keen to avoid the “idiots now making films in Hollywood”, he turned down an offer to play Gandalf in the Lord of the Rings.

A member of the Scottish National Party (Left-oriented), Sir Connery was key votary for Scottish independence (a stand that almost cost him the Knighthood, not that he cared).

Several times he had turned down Apple founder Steve Jobs’ offer to endorse the company products.

He preferred exile over Hollywood, moving from the houses he owned in the Bahamas (where he died in sleep), Spain and Portugal as retirement was “too much fun.”

Diversity in Nation Building: Contributes or Hinders?

0

There is news that in UK, Chancellor Rishi Sunak has unveiled (17/10/2020) 50 Pence ‘Diversity coin’ to celebrate Britain’s diverse history and recognise the profound contribution minority communities have made to the shared history of the country. The coin carries the message “Diversity Built Britain”. This is in the backdrop of the campaign led by ‘We too built Britain’ group. The release of the coin is the beginning of the series which will honour the country’s ethnic minorities. There can be a detailed elaboration as to how different ethnic minorities have lived and made Britain their home. A significant number of these are from South Asia, including India.

The real import of this is the backdrop of the thesis of ‘Clash of civilizations’ by Samuel Huntington, as per which the present era is the one where after the collapse of socialist Soviet union, the clash is along the lines of civilizations. Different religions will be in conflict as per this thesis. “It is my hypothesis that the fundamental source of conflict in this new World will not be primarily ideological or primarily economic. The great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of conflict, will be that the cultural. Nation states will remain the most powerful actors in world Affairs, but the principal conflicts of global politics will occur between Nations and groups of different civilizations. The clash of civilizations will dominate global politics. The fault lines between civilizations will be the battle lines of the future.”

This theory dominated the global scene particularly in the aftermath of 9/11 attack on World Trade Centre. Osama bin Laden called 9/11 jihad and George Bush launching the attack on Afghanistan used the word Crusade, while Tony Blair, the then UK PM, attributed ‘divine reasons’ for the attacks on the countries of West Asia.

This theory did provide an ideological cover for the attacks on different countries by US and allies. It was primarily driven by lust for control over oil resources. The ‘Clash theory’ provided cover for the violations done by American axis always out to control global resources, earlier in form of direct colonization and now as imperialist forces, influencing global economy with an eye on oil resources. At ideological level the best response to this thesis came from the then President of India, Dr K.R. Narayanan, who stated that ‘civilizations don’t clash, it is barbarisms which clash’.

The United Nation at that time was led by Kofi Annan, who was the General Secretary. He went on to appoint a high level international committee, cutting across different religions and nations to come up with an understanding of the world today and to recommend the measures to restore the amity of civilizations, cultures and people of the of the World. The report (Mid Nov2006) (http://www.unaoc.org/repository/report.htm) is a landmark in more ways than one.This committee came out with a brilliant document, ‘Alliance of Civilizations’.

There is not much awareness about this global study, which aptly describes the role of migrations, building of nations by diverse communities through alliances at multiple levels.

Talking of India, diversity has been the hall mark of this society from long. Christianity entered India, right in first century. Already different religious traditions, Jainism Buddhism were present here. Islam came in 7-8 Century from Malabar Coast through Arab traders and later many of those who were victims of Varna-Caste system embraced Islam through Sufi saints. The Muslim invaders coming from North West were more for reasons related to power and wealth. Buddhism had spread in various South East Asian countries. Indians also migrated to different parts of the World mostly for economic purpose, employment or greener pastures. UK has abundant number of them, Similarly America and Canada, now Australia has lot of migrants from India. Earlier many Indians did migrate to Caribbean’s, Mauritius, and Ceylon among other places.

The migrating communities have no monolithic approach in the countries of their migration. Most of them do maintain their nostalgia for the country of their origin, while relating to the societies of their migration in different ways. Today you will see a large numbers of Indians in West Asia, particularly in Gulf region. Here in India the sectarian elements uphold the Non Resident Indian’s nostalgia for India, they also look down upon minorities (Muslims and Christians) as foreigners. There is an infinite diversity within the Hindu fold itself. Indian culture has been a total mix of diverse sections of society, each contributing in their unique ways. All our Literature, Art, Architecture is a mix of contributions from multiple streams.

India’s diversity has been multi-factorial and at different layers. Different communities have been living and celebrating this diversity. Religious festivals have been one of the strong platforms for community interactions. In the area of religions Bhakti and Sufi traditions have upheld the diversity. While ‘melting pot model’ of cultural integration does apply partly, the main expression of diversity has been a ‘salad bowl’ model where different components are visible and still are thick part of the whole. Our literature for example not only mirrors the reality of society, it also tells us the diversity which has been prevailing here. We can learn this from so many literary giants and see this diversity of our culture. The same diversity formed the base of freedom movement of India, which gave space to each of these components of diversity.

In contrast to those who were part of national movement, the communal streams went for monolithic concepts, like ‘Urdu-Muslim-Pakistan’ and matching ‘Hindi-Hindu-Hindustan’. The leasers of freedom movement went on to uphold this diversity as a strength to coin phrases like ‘Unity in Diversity’. One of the paramount leaders of freedom Movement, Jawaharlal Nehru, went on to express the same as a celebration in his magnum opus, ‘Discovery of India’.

Today we do need to learn from the UK example where role of minorities is recognised, appreciated and upheld. One needs to give the similar acceptance for diversity, to pave the path of peace and progress.

Politics over pandemic in Bengal

0

It is a pity that after managing to control the rates of infection, recovery and mortality from the coronavirus reasonably better than five other comparable metropolises, Calcutta now appears determined to tease its fate during Durga Puja. When the coronavirus appeared in tiny numbers, knee-jerk, unplanned, nationwide lockdowns were clamped down with a lot of drama, with politics and image-building taking precedence. The social media was inundated with hate-filled messages targeting West Bengal’s special incompetence in combating the pandemic, ignoring the fact that most other states were floundering as well. There were whispers that deaths were being hushed up here. To prove this, morbid visuals of the corpses of ‘corona victims’ being flung around insensitively were pumped into our mobiles. It was obvious that a professional, well-financed campaign was underway to seize power next summer. Instead of rushing much-needed testing kits and protective equipment, the Centre sent inspection teams led by an about-to-be-promoted bureaucrat who, unfortunately, joined the chorus to savage Bengal’s initial efforts. The state’s containment strategy was not faultless but the data published by the Centre could not substantiate the charge that Bengal was India’s worst performing state in the war against Covid-19.

Many, therefore, simply fail to comprehend why West Bengal is suddenly going lax on large gatherings and social mixing during the Pujas, thereby inviting disaster. The chief minister has also ramped up her ‘assistance’ to 36,946 Puja organizers to Rs 50,000, up from last year’s sum of Rs 10,000. This may cost a staggering 185 crore of taxpayers’ money so that grander pandals attract several thousands more — knowing well that this vicious virus thrives on crowds. The usual homilies about wearing masks and maintaining ‘social distancing’ have been dished out, but massive crowds of Puja shoppers sans masks surely indicate what lies ahead. The Calcutta High Court has, however, intervened and has mercifully ordered strict control over numbers of visitors at the pandals but large crowds roaming everywhere else would be equally vulnerable. It has also directed that 75 per cent of grants must be spent by Puja organizers on masks, sanitizers and protective equipment. There is concern regarding their distribution at the pandals as freebies invariably trigger genetically-driven scrambles.

A couple of years ago, there were accounting issues regarding an estimated Rs 700 crore that the state government had given to ‘sports clubs’ over five years or so. Besides, government grants given to any one religion militate against secularism — the old haj subsidy being a case in point. We may also recall that the Indian Muslim community has, by and large, accepted the rigorous post-corona stipulations. During Ramazan this year, it did not insist on the usual bustling evening food markets. This faith was reconciled to the ban on massive congregations for namaz on Eid, even refraining from fraternal hugs, community meals and Muharram processions. Maharashtra, Goa and Karnataka, ruled by pro-Hindu parties, imposed stringent prohibitions on crowds during the Ganapati festival. Kerala, too, attempted to tone down Onam celebrations. It appears that Bengal could be a spoilsport and may be accused, with or without evidence, of giving fresh life to the pandemic.

Politics has, however, its own bizarre compulsions. The prime minister, who had imposed a draconian lockdown and has reminded us again to avoid crowds during Covid 19, is now hell-bent on addressing public meetings in poll-bound Bihar. His election rallies will surely draw enormous gatherings and all his sage counsel on social distancing delivered theatrically on television is likely to be ignored. His teflon may succeed in deflecting the blame for spreading Covid-19 on someone else, but Mamata Banerjee may not be that lucky if hospitals here cannot handle the unprecedented rush in patients. Her compulsions are, however, different. To understand them, we have to go back to the 34 years when the Left Front ruled Bengal without any serious challenge. The Communist Party of India (Marxist)’s ‘local committees’ exercised a complete grip on localities. Their skilful sub-allocation of specific tasks to cells meant that every voter on the electoral roll was tracked. During elections, these local committees mustered not only supporters but also ensured that dead or absent electors ‘voted’ through proxies.

Mamata Banerjee could dislodge the regime because she developed an alternative ‘grassroots’ — trinamool — response. She came up with a network of dedicated local-level field units, consisting of Puja-organizing clubs. These had been ignored by most Left parties that stayed away from religion — leaving, thereby, the only gap in their impregnable fortress. This vacuum was filled by Banerjee’s ‘clubs’ that took on the local committees and started responding actively to her calls for street-agitations and road blockades against the Left Front regime. Her model of agitational politics finally found its feet with the help of these local clubs, which provided her with a solidarity with local voters. She and her supporters also bonded through subaltern community feasts and soon enough many other deities were added to the calendar of celebrations. With an assured following, she could finally knock the Marxists off their perch.

With another election round the corner, Banerjee has to recharge her support base during the festive season. For Modi, Didi and their flocks, it is now ‘payback time’ — corona be damned.

 

The piece was first published in The Telegraph

CBI, country’s premier crime investigation agency, losing trust of the people

0

Maharashtra’s is the latest non-BJP government to withdraw general consent to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for taking up investigation of a crime in the State on its own. Rajasthan, West Bengal, Chhattisgarh and Punjab have already done that. This shows the growing distrust of the people in the CBI. Under the relevant law, the CBI has, unless directed by a competent court, to get approval of the State government concerned to investigate a crime within the State. Having faith in the integrity of the CBI officers, the States had given blanket consent to the agency which some of the States have withdrawn now.

CBI is very competent when it is investigating an ‘ordinary’ crime. But when investigating a politically sensitive crime, it behaves like a pet dog of the party in power, biting or barking or whining on the command of its master, little caring for law and propriety or even for its own reputation. Little wonder that an officer, who was accused of messing up with the evidence in a politically sensitive murder case, was picked up by Prime Minister Narendra Modi to head it. Here are a few politically sensitive cases botched up by the CBI.

Malik Makbooja case: Some politicians, with the help of senior bureaucrats, plundered the forest wealth of Bastar for decades. On a direction of the Supreme Court, the Lokayukta constituted a committee to look into the matter. The committee prepared a comprehensive two-volume report giving precise details of over 800 cases. The Congress government of Madhya Pradesh (Bastar then being part of Madhya Pradesh) headed by Digvijaya Singh flatly — and shamelessly – refused to ask its police to further investigate and prosecute the culprits. The Supreme Court then entrusted the case to the CBI. No one was prosecuted.

Arms Smuggling: A team of Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) of Gujarat police quietly swooped on Ujjain district (MP) in the night and recovered 24 AK-56 rifles, 27 hand grenades, 81 magazines and 5250 cartridges of AK-56 rifles from a disused well near Jhirniya village. An MP police team, led by then DIG (CID) Rajiv Mathur, was later sent to Ahmadabad where it was told by Latif and Sohrab (then in police custody) that Dawood Ibrahim had sent 47 AK-56 rifles to India around January 1993. Of these 32 were transported to Madhya Pradesh in July 1994. Following pressure from the BJP and bad publicity in the national press (Digvijaya Singh is a very publicity-conscious leader), the matter was entrusted to the CBI for investigation. And the officers of this fine investigating agency probably succumbed to Digvijaya Singh’s charm and nothing came out of it.

Som Distilleries:  Jagdish Arora, a small-time liquor vendor, first came to limelight during the BJP regime when he befriended then Chief Minister Sunderlal Patwa and set up his Som Group of Industries, with the ambition of putting the House of Kedias out of business. The Kedias had for long had a near-monopoly of the liquor business in Madhya Pradesh. Arora started with a beer factory and received ample cooperation from Patwa and the bureaucracy to give a concrete shape to his dreams.

When the Congress formed its government, Arora drew closer to Digvijaya Singh, considered as cash hungry as Patwa. Arora was virtually dictating the terms to the government on the excise policy.  Arora’s business escalated from beer to whiskeys and rums; he became the benami owner of all liquor shops in Bhopal and these shops sold nothing but the Som products. When there was a public outcry, the shops did start selling some other brands also, but only grudgingly and sparingly. Arora and his group of industries submitted a fake draft for Rs 3 crore as deposit for the auction of liquor shops in Raipur (then part of Madhya Pradesh). The case was handed over to the CBI for investigation. Only some of his minions were arrested and eventually the matter was closed.

Shehla Masood Murder: Activist Shehla Masood, who had filed over a hundred applications under RTI seeking information on dubious activities of BJP Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh Shivraj Singh Chouhan and his relatives, was shot dead in front of her house as she was about to start her car to go to join an anti-corruption dharna. Then Director General of Police S K Raut and Additional Director General of Police (Intelligence) R K Shukla reached the spot promptly. The case was later handed over to the CBI which, after feeding to the media many cock and bull stories, submitted the charge-sheet in the special court of B K Paloda. Later the CBI changed its fiction and requested the judge to make the ‘real killer’ (as recorded in the charge-sheet) a State approver and the judge, shockingly, did that, even though it is not permitted by the Cr.P.C. The CBI got whatever judgement it wanted from the obliging judge.

Before the case was handed over to the CBI, a sting operation was conducted by Headlines Today. When D S Tomar, Inspector-in charge of the police station of the area, was asked about the ‘shoddy investigation’ by his team, his reply was, inter alia: ‘Within half an hour, the DGP, IG, SSP, SP, Additional SP, almost everyone was there. We started following their instructions and took only those things which they asked us to and left the rest’. Would DGP and Additional DGP (Intelligence) have dared remove the murder evidence unless assured by Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan himself that nothing would happen to them? DGP Raut has retired gracefully and Additional DGP R K Shukla is now Director of CBI.

As Bengal election nears, BJP to organize Durga Puja in Kolkata

0

Kolkata: Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) is eyeing to cash on the biggest festival of West Bengal, Durga Puja.

Bengal BJP has decided to organise a Durga Puja in Kolkata.

Last year, Union Home Minister Amit Shah had inaugurated a puja in Kolkata’s Salt Lake amid controversies. This time, with assembly elections just months away, the BJP is itself organizing a puja. And even utilising Prime Minister Narendra Modi to inaugurate several Durga puja pandals virtually this year starting with their own puja at Eastern Zonal Cultural Centre (EZCC) on October 22.

The women’s wing of the saffron brigade will be organising Durga puja in the state.

According to sources, Sourav Ganguly and his wife Dona Ganguly is also invited during the inauguration and reportedly Dona Ganguly is also requested to perform during the inauguration.

State BJP leadership said that the EZCC, an auditorium owned by the Ministry of Culture was chosen as the venue for the puja to avoid any potential obstruction by the Trinamool Congress (TMC) government.

“Consider this as BJP’s family puja. We are all looking forward to welcoming the Holy mother,” said BJP Hooghly MP and state general secretary Locket Chatterjee.

State BJP general secretary Sayantan Basu said that over the last few years narrow-minded politics over Durga Puja was going on in Bengal and also that several BJP leaders were excluded from big-ticket puja committees.

“So this year we will do our own Durga Puja. It will be conducted in accordance with Bengali culture and tradition and also by abiding all the covid protocols. We have also planned for several cultural programmes during the festivity. It will be conducted by the cultural wing of the party,” mentioned Basu.

It is pertinent to mention that the TMC dispensation has already announced a slew of doles for over 37,000 organisers of community pujas, shrugging off criticism by certain sections of the society that questioned the government’s move, amid the Covid-19 crisis.

The saffron camp, however, is taking a different route to challenge the decade-long hegemony of the TMC. It has decided to set up medical camps, and stalls to display books on its ideologies and educate masses on the contentious issues of Citizenship (Amendment) Act and farm laws, as part of the efforts to connect with people.

Sources also said that the party has set a target to reach out to 14,000 of the 37,000 puja committees in the state. Last year, it had managed to erect only 4,000 stalls across the state.

The BJP, which had been trying to take reins of the puja committees over the last two years, is facing stiff resistance from the TMC, which continues to have an iron fist control over these puja committees.

According to political experts, festivals are gradually becoming more important for the political parties as they can utilize the platform for mass connect especially before the elections.

Many political experts claimed that the five-day fest is no longer just about traditions, culture and celebrations, as parties strive to stake claim over the committees most of which are controlled by influential locals.

State education minister and TMC secretary general, Partha Chatterjee, alleged that the BJP, with its ‘anti-Bengali mindset’, has cancelled Durga puja celebrations in states where it is in power.

“In Bengal, as they can’t do much, they are trying to politicise the festival. It is not the job of a political party to officially organise a puja. Individuals (from the party) can only be part of it,” mentioned Chatterjee.

Durga to be worshipped as a migrant worker in many pujas in Bengal

Kolkata: In West Bengal, it’s been a tradition for puja pandals in and around Kolkata to always resonate the present social issues through their themes.

Despite the pandemic, this year too puja committees has several surprises for the pandal hoppers as even this several themes have been developed based on socio-economic problem to the Indian Premier League (IPL) to cyclone Amphan.

The heart-wrenching visuals of migrant workers walking miles barefoot with their children on their laps or on shoulders with empty stomachs to reach their villages and hometowns have inspired artisans to pay tribute to them.

Barisha Club of Behala has installed the idol of a migrant worker with her children in place of Goddess Durga. This step has been taken to highlight the plight of the migrant workers who had been forced to leave cities during the lockdown.

Thousands of them were seen walking by foot to their places due to lack of jobs money and jobs to sustain themselves in the cities. The statue, installed by the Barisha Club Durga Puja committee, shows a saree-clad mother with a child in her arms.

durga puja migrant workers bengal kolkata
Another idol of migrant worker, which replicates of a woman who carries her child on trolley during lockdown

Not just Goddess Durga even but other deities like Saraswati and Lakshmi have also been replaced with women migrant idols. One of the migrant worker’s daughters will be seen with an owl representing Laxmi and the other with a duck, signifying Saraswati. The four are accompanied by a little kid with an elephant’s head, signifying Ganesha.

Together, the mother and her children will be seen walking towards the image of Goddess Durga – a halo with 10 hands.

“The pandal is based on the theme of the life of migrant workers and what they have faced during coronavirus lockdown,” said Sudip, President of the puja committee.

Another committee member, Dumpy said, “Goddess Durga epitomises strength and determination. Our budget has completely gone down due to the Covid-19 pandemic and Barisha Club is known for its theme; so nothing could be better than portraying the hardships of these migrant workers.”

Talking about the theme ‘Tran’, which means relief, artist Rintu Das said, “The family represents Goddess Durga and her children, including Ganesha and Kartikeya. The goddess is the woman who braved the scorching sun and hunger and penury along with her children. The woman is a migrant worker and a mother who is searching for food and water for her children.”

Rintu Das also added that depicting realistic theme is always a challenge but this year the challenge of the migrant workers is nothing in comparison of just depicting it.

Tapabrata Singh Roy, a resident of Behala was seen weeping while watching the final touches given to the idol.

“Not just migrant workers many lost jobs and now are hardly managing to make both ends meet. Seeing this I am reminded of several friends who have committed suicide after losing their jobs as they knew they cannot run their families. Along with retrenchment salary cuts is also an issue. Don’t know what the mother has in store for us. Though we are gearing up for celebrations there are so many people who don’t even know whether they can get their meals,” mentioned Singh Roy, a retired school teacher.

In September, the government of India said that of the four crore migrant workers in the country, over 25 per cent or 1.05 crore have returned to their respective states due to coronavirus pandemic and ensuing lockdown. Uttar Pradesh topped the list with 32.50 lakh labourers having returned to their homes, followed by Bihar where the number is 15 lakh.

The stress has been even more on women who have not only lost incomes but have also been forced to stay confined inside four walls with their families.

Secret of NEET Perfect Scorer: 14 hours study, motivation from mother and proper use of lockdown period

0

Kolkata/Kota: It has been quite hectic for 18-year-old Shoyeb Aftab ever since the result for National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test (NEET) 2020 was declared. Shoyeb, the national topper from Rourkela, Odisha created history by securing the perfect score of 720/720 in the exam.

The second rank holder Akansha Singh, has also scored the perfect 720 score in NEET 2020, the only second person after Shoyeb in history to get perfect score.

eNewsroom caught up with Shoyeb, while he was travelling back from Ajmer to Kota, to engage in candid chat, about his aspirations, role models, challenges and more. Following are excerpts of the interview:

eNewsroom: What has it been like for you, ever since the NEET results were declared?

Shoyeb: It has been both encouraging and hectic for me. We were in a press conference organised by my institute – Allen, when the result was declared. Since then I have traveled to Jaipur and then Ajmer Darga and now am on my way back to Kota. All the travel and meetings have been organised by my institute.

eNewsroom: What made you travel to Kota from Rourkela?

Shoyeb: I dreamt of being a doctor. When I cleared my ICSE in 2018, we decided to move out of Rourkela to Kota, as I was very much determined to prepare for the entrance examination in the best possible way. So we decided to get enrolled with Allen in Kota, as the city has the reputation of providing the best preparation for medical entrance examinations.

eNewsroom: What was it like.. the preparation? How difficult was it for you in Kota?

Shoyeb: Initially it was a bit unsettling. You know the entire process of relocating to a new city in hope of fulfilling your dreams. Initially, it was difficult for me to get accustomed to my new life in Kota. But, thanks to my parents, things were easier for me. When I took the decision to relocate to Kota, in order to prepare for NEET 2020, my mother decided to relocate with me to Kota. Along with her, my sister, a standard five student, also had to relocate to Kota. My mother and sister have sacrificed a lot for me.

eNewsroom: Would you share the details of one day in the life of Shoyeb, while preparing for NEET in Kota?

Shoyeb: Life changed for me the moment I came to Kota and got myself enrolled with the classroom programme for Allen Institute. I also got myself enrolled with a local school here, where I prepared for my plus two examination. But my main focus was on NEET preparation. My schedule was hectic – I used to wake up at six in the morning to make it to my school by 7:00 am. After attending my classes in school, till two in the afternoon, I would rush to the Institute for classroom coaching. Exhausted, I would reach home around six in the evening. After taking some rest, I would start studying again.

eNewsroom: Well, quite hectic, isn’t it. How did you relax during these two years?

Shoyeb: Well, it definitely was hectic for me, but studies was never a burden for me. I enjoyed the effort that I was putting into my studies. When I would feel exhausted, I used to play with my sister or watch something on YouTube or play my favourite android game. But the routine changed a lot for me during the lockdown period. I think that was the turning point for my preparation.

eNewsroom: Speaking about the lockdown, it was a period of uncertainty and a lot of people were saying that it was affecting them mentally. How did you convert it into the most productive period for yourself?

Shoyeb: I knew that a lot was on stake. My parents had sacrificed a lot for me. So, I wanted to put in my best effort. The lockdown gave me ample time to study at home, and I used this period to better my preparation. The lockdown in a way made me realise that all of a sudden all the NEET aspirants had a lot of time to prepare. I dreamt of making it to the top 50 candidates. So, I knew that competition would be immense, hence i started to put in around 13 to 14 hours in the preparation.

eNewsroom: Are you saying that you never dreamt of topping NEET?

Shoyeb: Well, to be honest, I never thought of scoring the perfect score. But yes, I put in a lot of effort. My mother always motivated me during the lockdown. Also, the fear of my fellow classmates efficiently utilising the lockdown period for better preparation pushed me to put my best leg forward. Am glad that I put in such a lot of effort.

eNewsroom: Well, six institutes have been claiming to have prepared you for NEET. Are these claims true?

Shoyeb: Well, as I have told you, I had enrolled myself with Allen’s classroom coaching for NEET preparation. But then, during the lockdown, when the classroom coaching came to a stall, I enrolled myself for several distance learning programmes, which also helped me better my preparation. So, they are not wrong.

eNewsroom: Speaking of lockdown and the pandemic, given the effort that you had been putting in, did the possibility of the exam being called off scare you?

Shoyeb: Well, we all had thought about the possibility of the exam being called off. But that didn’t stop me from preparing. I thought, even if the exam was called off, the effort that I would be putting in would definitely help me later to crack this exam.

eNewsroom: Have you watched Kota Factory? How true is it?

Shoyeb:  (laughs) Yes, I did. I could very much identify with many things that they showed in the web-series. Kota has its own life and yes, there is life beyond Kota. The institutes, have really good faculty members who not just motivate us to study but also help us in every possible way.

eNewsroom: Now that you have topped, what’s the next thing to do on your wishlist?

Shoyeb: I want to specialise in Cardiology and take up research work at AIIMS, New Delhi.

eNewsroom: Before we wind up, can you share something about your Bengal connect?

Shoyeb: We are originally from West Bengal. My father who has a construction business chose to settle in Rourkela. But my mother’s family still stays in Tarakeshwar. I still visit my grandparents during my summer breaks. I always look forward to spending time out there.

eNewsroom: Who is your role model?

Shoyeb: My mother. She is the only person who inspires me, motivates me. Also, my teachers in Allen Institute can be considered as a role model for me.