Home Blog Page 10

The Right to Be Heard: Protests, Power, and the People

0

[dropcap]I[/dropcap]n Part 1, we talked about strikes—just one form of protest. But that brings us to a broader question: What really is a protest?

A protest is one of the oldest and most powerful ways people express themselves publicly. When people feel unheard, sidelined, or wronged—when every door seems shut—they take to the streets with placards, slogans, and a flicker of hope. Protest isn’t just about saying no to something; it’s also about saying yes to something better.

Protest vs. Strike

A strike usually involves stopping work to demand justice—often by workers, professionals, or students. A protest, on the other hand, is broader. It can be a march, a dharna, a candlelight vigil, a signature campaign, or even a digital campaign on social media. The goal remains the same: to be heard.

Bengal and the Culture of Protest

Bengal has always had a deep culture of political engagement. From colonial times to the present day, Kolkata has echoed with slogans for justice. Moula Ali, College Street, Jadavpur, Park Circus, the Metro Channel, and of course, the Brigade Parade Ground—these names are more than just locations. For decades, they’ve served as stages of resistance.

At my age, I’ve seen countless bandhs, dharnas, michhils, fiery sloganeering—you name it. One chant—almost a war cry—has always stayed with me: “Lorai, lorai, lorai chai, Lorai kore baachte chai”, a cry that emphasizes the fight for survival.

Protests here are often creative, filled with poetry, songs, street plays, graffiti, and, yes, high-pitched and often fiery speeches full of emotion. They are about rights, identity, and dignity.

Protest on the National Level

Protests played a vital role in India’s independence—be it Satyagraha, the Non-Cooperation Movement, the Salt March, or the Quit India Movement, all were powerful acts of resistance. Most of us weren’t there, but even imagining those moments stirs something deeply patriotic in us. These weren’t mere outbursts—they were organized, principled, and full of purpose.

And even after Independence, protests have continued to shape history:

  1. The JP Movement in the 1970s brought lakhs to the streets, demanding clean politics.
  2. The Narmada Bachao Andolan raised awareness about displacement and environmental justice.
  3. The anti-corruption movement in 2011 led to the creation of the Lokpal and shook the political establishment.
  4. The CAA-NRC protests saw people reading the Constitution in parks and on streets, waving the national flag.
  5. The Farmers’ Protest ultimately led to the repeal of three controversial laws, though at a tragic human cost.

These were not mere complaints. Nor were they anti-national, even though those in power often rush to label dissent that way.

Why Do People Protest?

Why do people leave behind their families, sacrifice days and months of comfort, live in harsh conditions without hygiene, fall sick, and sometimes even risk their lives?

Because silence rarely helps. Waiting endlessly for justice often leads nowhere. So they come out—to create awareness, to demand accountability, to show solidarity, to pressure the powers that be, and above all, to stop injustice.

Most protests aren’t about causing inconvenience. But when systems stop listening, sometimes disruption becomes the only way to be noticed.

Protest Is a Constitutional Right

As mentioned in Part 1, the Constitution gives every citizen the right to peaceful protest. These aren’t favours or permissions—they are rights, core to being Indian.

Still, peaceful protests are often labelled “disturbances” or “security threats,” even when they follow all rules. But the test of democracy is not in how we treat the silent, but in how we treat the loud—yet peaceful.

As long as a protest is non-violent and disciplined, it deserves respect—not demonisation.

Recent Protests in Bengal

Bengal continues to witness strong, mostly peaceful protests that reflect real anger and real hope. The SSC recruitment protest has seen job aspirants and teachers camping on the streets for over two years—through rain, winter, and police pressure. The Park Circus sit-in during the anti-CAA movement saw mothers, students, and ordinary citizens come together in a peaceful, round-the-clock vigil.

Even today, walk through Esplanade or Dharmatala and you’ll find people in peaceful protest—teachers, job-seekers, activists. They’re not just “blocking roads”; they’re demanding their democratic rights. Living under makeshift tents, with barely any hygiene facilities, surviving on modest meals and endless cups of tea served in bhad (earthen cups), shouting themselves hoarse—these people also have families and jobs to return to.

These are not publicity stunts. These are real people, with real fears, holding on to real hope.

When the Streets Fall Silent: What Strikes Say About a Nation’s Soul

0

[dropcap]W[/dropcap]hen I was growing up in Kolkata during the Left Front days, hearing the words “Kaalke bandh aache” (“Tomorrow, there’s a bandh”) was a regular part of life. And those three words would change everything around us. It was like a switch: schools would shut, buses would vanish, shops would pull down shutters, and the usually busy roads would fall silent. Only slogans or a distant police siren would break that silence.

The political party calling the bandh would be out on the streets enforcing it. Those opposing it would also be visible, sometimes leading to arguments or even clashes. But for us children, it usually meant an unexpected holiday — a chance to play on empty roads.

That was the environment many of us in Bengal grew up with: the culture of hartal, or strike.

What really is a strike?

A strike isn’t about causing a disturbance, nor is it simply about skipping work. A strike is a collective decision — a way for people to stop routine work and raise their voices when something feels deeply wrong or unfair. It is recognised under the Industrial Disputes Act when related to labour or industrial issues, but in the broader social context, it’s a form of public expression. It is a peaceful way of saying: we can’t carry on like this anymore.

Bengal’s History with Strikes

Bengal has seen many kinds of strikes over the decades — led by factory workers, teachers, junior doctors, and political groups. Some were successful, others were symbolic. But behind most of them was the need to be heard.

In recent years:

  • In 2019, junior doctors across Kolkata went on strike after one of their colleagues was brutally attacked. The strike later spread nationwide, raising the issue of safety for medical professionals.
  • In 2023–24, over 42 days of strike were observed by junior doctors across Bengal following the rape and murder of a female trainee doctor in a government hospital.
  • Teachers and job aspirants have been protesting for over two years at Dharmatala against irregularities in SSC recruitment. Hunger strikes, sit-ins, and peaceful protests continue.

These were not disruptions for disruption’s sake. They were expressions of pain, unity, and a demand for justice.

A Look Back at Key Strikes in India

India has seen many important strikes that helped shape our democracy:

  • 1974 Railway Strike – Led by George Fernandes, over 17 lakh railway workers demanded better pay and conditions. It became one of the world’s largest industrial strikes, lasting 20 days.
  • 1982 Bombay Textile Strike – Led by Datta Samant, over 2.5 lakh workers protested for the right to form independent unions.
  • 2001 All-India Bank Strike – About 9 lakh banking sector employees opposed privatization and reforms.
  • 2011 Anna Hazare’s Hunger Strike – His fast in Delhi pushed Parliament to act on the Lokpal Bill.
  • 2020–21 Farmers’ Protest – A peaceful, year-long protest that led to the repeal of the three farm laws.

Each of these moments was about ordinary people standing up for justice and equality.

While Bengal and India have a rich history of strikes, they are not unique to this region. Globally, strikes have been pivotal in securing workers’ rights and social change.

Effect of Strikes on Businesses

Strikes inevitably disrupt productivity, planning, and the broader economy. When there’s a bandh or hartal, shops shut down, transport halts, business losses mount, and financial records reflect the dent. There have even been instances where companies had to shut operations permanently due to prolonged or repeated strikes.

But ignoring injustice comes at a cost too — often a deeper one. When trust breaks down and voices remain unheard, the economy might continue to function, but life becomes mechanical. People lose joy in their work, their eagerness to do better fades, and loyalty and dedication begin to erode.

Although not all strikes succeed in their objectives, they represent society’s way of trying to correct the imbalances in the nation’s balance sheet — not just economically, but morally and emotionally too.

Strikes Are a Part of Democracy

Many people assume a strike is a nuisance or an attack on the system. But actually, a strike is a tool within democracy. It is one of the ways through which ordinary people express disagreement, frustration, or demand accountability.

As Mahatma Gandhi said: “Strikes are an inherent right of the working people to secure justice.”

Yes, strikes disturb normal life. But sometimes, normal life hides deep injustices. And a strike is a way of bringing those hidden issues to light. When normal life gets disrupted during a protest, it’s not always the protesters who must be blamed — the administration has a responsibility too. So even if we don’t fully agree with a strike, we should at least try to understand it, because it’s rarely the first option, and more often the last one left. It is often the final cry of those who have been ignored for far too long.

Strikes and the Constitution

Protests are a democratic right protected by the Constitution of India. The Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression, the Right to Assemble Peacefully, and the Right to Life empower citizens to raise their voices through non-violent means like strikes, dharnas, or marches — as enshrined in Articles 19 and 21.

‘नफरत बेचती है गोदी मीडिया’: चंद्रशेखर आज़ाद ने भाजपा की बांटो-राज करो नीति को दी सीधी चुनौती

कोलकाता: “एक साल में आप देखेंगे कि हम भारत में नफरत भरे भाषणों और नफरत से जुड़े अपराधों का जवाब देने लगे हैं। अभी भी हम दलित (अनुसूचित जातियों) भाइयों को मुसलमानों के खिलाफ दंगों में शामिल होने से रोकने की कोशिश कर रहे हैं। रिपोर्टें बताती हैं कि ऐसे दंगे किसी खास राजनीतिक पार्टी के फायदे के लिए कराए जाते हैं। हमारे कई दलित भाई, जानबूझकर या अनजाने में, इन घटनाओं में शामिल हो जाते हैं, और हम उन्हें इससे अलग करने की कोशिश कर रहे हैं,” ऐसा कहा सांसद और आज़ाद समाज पार्टी के राष्ट्रीय अध्यक्ष चंद्रशेखर आज़ाद ने।

नगीना से सांसद आज़ाद भीम आर्मी के संस्थापक भी हैं, जो एक सामाजिक संगठन है। इस युवा सांसद ने बताया कि वे अपने संगठन का विस्तार करना चाहते हैं और वैचारिक रूप से प्रतिबद्ध लोगों को उसमें जोड़ना चाहते हैं।

उन्होंने कहा, “सबसे पहले हमें समझना होगा कि आम लोगों के बीच समाजिक स्तर पर इतनी नफरत नहीं है। यह नफरत ‘गोदी मीडिया’ ने फैलाई है, ताकि एक खास राजनीतिक पार्टी को फायदा हो। हम जानते हैं कि एक पार्टी हिंदू-मुस्लिम में बांटकर राजनीति करती है।”

उन्होंने आगे कहा, “पहल्गाम हमले के बाद, जब देश आतंकियों से लड़ने की तैयारी कर रहा था, तब कौन था जो देश के लोगों के बीच नफरत फैला रहा था? इसलिए हमें ‘गोदी मीडिया’ और आईटी सेल का मुकाबला करना होगा, और हम इस पर पहले से ही काम कर रहे हैं। ‘ऑपरेशन सिंदूर’ के दौरान कुछ मीडिया चैनल इस्लामाबाद और कराची तक चले गए थे—मैं उन्हें वापस टीवी स्टूडियो ले आया,” आज़ाद ने मुस्कराते हुए कहा।

यह बात उन्होंने शनिवार शाम एसआर फाउंडेशन द्वारा आयोजित एक बैठक में ईन्यूज़रूम के सवाल के जवाब में कही, जब उनसे पार्टी और संगठन की रणनीति को लेकर पूछा गया कि वे नफरत फैलाने वाले भाषणों और अपराधों का बौद्धिक रूप से कैसे जवाब देंगे।

आज़ाद समाज पार्टी चंद्रशेखर आज़ाद गोदी मीडिया कोलकाता भीम आर्मी Bhim Army Chandrashekhar Azad
सांसद चंद्रशेखर आज़ाद कोलकाता में इंटेलेक्चुअल मीट को संबोधित करते हुए | ईन्यूज़रूम

इससे पहले दिन में, आज़ाद ने कोलकाता में आज़ाद समाज पार्टी द्वारा आयोजित ‘भाईचारा’ सम्मेलन में भी हिस्सा लिया।

उन्होंने भारतीय जनता पार्टी की ‘तिरंगा यात्रा’ पर भी सवाल उठाया। “मैंने संसद में पूछा है कि तिरंगा यात्रा का मकसद क्या है, और ‘ऑपरेशन सिंदूर’ का जश्न क्यों मनाया जा रहा है,” उन्होंने कहा।

आज़ाद ने साफ़ किया कि आज़ाद समाज पार्टी अगले साल होने वाले पश्चिम बंगाल विधानसभा चुनाव में हिस्सा लेगी।

मुस्लिम समाज को भी उन्होंने एक सलाह दी, जो उनके अनुसार राजनीतिक पार्टियों से बराबरी नहीं पा सका। “मैंने हज़रत उमर, हज़रत अली और इस्लाम के बारे में बहुत सी किताबें पढ़ी हैं, और पाया कि आज के मुसलमान भी उनकी सीखों को सही से नहीं मानते। इस्लाम बराबरी की बात करता है, लेकिन हम आज़ के दौर में अपने से नीचे तबके को कुचल कर आगे बढ़ना चाहते हैं।”

आखिर में उन्होंने अपने संघर्ष और सफर के बारे में कहा, “इन कठिन हालातों ने हमें बहुत कुछ सिखाया है। इन्हीं हालातों ने मुझे चंद्रशेखर आज़ाद बनाया है। अगर मैं जिंदा रहा, तो दस साल बाद लोग पहले अपने भगवान को याद करेंगे और फिर मेरी सलामती की दुआ करेंगे। ये तो बस शुरुआत है। अभी तो मैं सिर्फ एक सांसद हूं। असली काम तो अब शुरू होगा।”

अधिवक्ता आज़ाद एक किसान परिवार से आते हैं और उनका कोई राजनीतिक परिवारिक बैकग्राउंड नहीं है। “मेरे दादा किसान थे और मेरे पिता शिक्षक,” उन्होंने कहा।

“मुझे राजनीति में आने का इरादा नहीं था। लेकिन मेरे सामाजिक कार्यों के दौरान जो अत्याचार झेलना पड़ा, उसके बाद मुझे चुनाव लड़ना पड़ा,” उन्होंने जोड़ा।

Godi Media Spreads Hate, Not the People: Chandrashekhar Azad Vows to Counter BJP’s Divide-and-Rule

0

Kolkata: “In a year, you will see that we will be countering all the hate speeches and hate crimes in India. Even now, we are working to prevent Dalits (Scheduled Castes) from participating in riots against Muslims. Reports suggest that such riots are manufactured to benefit a particular political party. Many Dalit brothers, knowingly or unknowingly, get involved in these incidents, and we are working to disengage them from such activities,” said Chandrashekhar Azad, Member of Parliament and National President of the Azad Samaj Party.

Nagina MP is also the founder of the Bhim Army, a social organization. The young MP mentioned his intention to expand his organization by including ideologically committed individuals.

“First of all, we should understand that there is not much hatred among common people at the social level. This hatred has been largely propagated by ‘Godi Media’ to benefit a particular political party. We know that one party thrives on creating division between Hindus and Muslims,” he said.

“After the Pahalgam attack, when the country was preparing to fight terrorists, who was it that was inciting hatred among the people of this country? That’s why we have to counter ‘Godi Media’ and the IT Cell, and we are already working on that. During Operation Sindoor, some media houses even went inside Islamabad and Karachi—I brought them back to the TV studio,” Azad added with a smile.

He was responding to a question from eNewsroom about his party and organization’s strategy to intellectually counter the ongoing hate speeches and crimes in the country, during a meeting organized by the SR Foundation on Saturday evening.

mp chandrashekhar aazad samaj party bhim army hate Pahalgam attack
Chandrashekhar Aazad being getting a momento by the officials of Bengal chapter of Aazad Samaj Party | Courtesy: X/ Chandra Shekhar Aazad

Earlier in the day, Azad attended a Bhai-Chara (brotherhood) meeting organized by the Azad Samaj Party in Kolkata.

He also questioned the Bharatiya Janata Party’s Tiranga Yatra. “I have already asked in Parliament what the purpose of the Tiranga Yatra is, and why there is a celebration of Operation Sindoor,” he said.

Azad made it clear that the Azad Samaj Party will contest the upcoming West Bengal Assembly elections scheduled for next year.

He has a piece of advice for Muslim community as well, which did not get adequate share by political parties. “I have read Hazrat Umar and Hazrat Ali and several other books, and I find that even many Muslims today do not follow their teachings correctly. Islam promotes equality, but we are trying to crush the lower strata of society to get ahead in life.”

He concluded by reflecting on his personal journey: “These tough times have taught us many things. These times have made me who I am—Chandrashekhar Azad. If I remain alive, after ten years, people will remember their gods and after that pray for my well-being. This is just the beginning. Right now, I am just an MP. The real work of our organization is yet to come.”

Advocate Azad, who hails from a farming family, has no political lineage. “My grandfather was a farmer, and my father was a teacher,” he said.

“I never intended to enter politics. But after facing so much torture during my activism, I had no choice but to contest elections,” he added.

The Last Rebel in the Newsroom: Biswajit Roy and His Lifelong Fight for Uncompromising Journalism

Kolkata: Back in 2021, when the West Bengal Assembly election campaign was at its peak, Biswajit Roy and I had planned to leave early one morning for Nandigram to gauge the mood in the constituency where Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee was contesting. Around 4 a.m., the driver—whom we had arranged privately at a lower fare than a regular cab—called to cancel. I couldn’t find another ride at such an early hour, and the trip to Nandigram had to be shelved.

That day, I learned something lasting about Biswajit Da: how deeply committed he was to ground reporting. He was 61 at the time and not in the best of health, yet he was determined to be where the story was unfolding. After I began working closely with him, I often regretted not having enough resources to support his passion for fieldwork. Earlier in the same election season, we had travelled to Singur and Asansol to report from the ground. We also jointly covered many rallies and protests. He understood our shoestring setup and never complained.

Biswajit Roy had worked with The Telegraph, The Times of India, The Statesman, and Doordarshan. Over time, he also came to appreciate the importance of independent media. Not only did he help build a small network of online news outlets in Bengal, but he personally supported eNewsroom India financially on two occasions.

He seemed to value how independent platforms allowed him to write with depth, without the constraints of word counts or commercial agendas. His analytical reports during the Galwan Valley clash between Indian and Chinese soldiers were widely read and praised for their insight. He was always ahead of the curve, offering perspective rather than just the news.

Over the last four years, Roy had been living in Shantiniketan. There, he continued writing—on politics, culture, and international affairs. He explored Rabindranath Tagore’s views on Palestine, including the profound exchange between Tagore and Albert Einstein on the matter. Earlier this year, he published a book on Gaza in Bangla, launched at the Kolkata Book Fair. At the time of his passing, he was working on another book, focusing on how Indian leaders such as Tagore, Gandhi, and Nehru viewed the Palestine question.

Bengal has long served as a sanctuary for journalists. The state’s intellectual ecosystem has nurtured many who made their mark nationally and globally. But few remained as uncompromising—or as rebellious—as Biswajit Roy. The 65-year-old journalist breathed his last on the morning of May 15 at his Ballygunge residence.

He wrote fluently in both Bangla and English, and even turned to poetry on occasion. “Probably the last rebel in any newsroom in Bengal,” said Supratim Pal, a former colleague from The Telegraph. Fondly known as Madhu Da among his peers, Roy had a journalistic career spanning over four decades. Throughout it, he remained a practitioner of meaningful journalism.

“He was a born revolutionary, always passionate in his beliefs and work,” recalled Deepak Mishra, a senior journalist based in Patna. One of the books he edited, War and Peace in Junglemahal, stirred controversy when a Bombay High Court judge, during the bail plea of human rights defender Vernon Gonsalves, questioned why someone would possess War and Peace. The reference mistakenly associated the title with Roy’s edited volume, sparking outrage on social media over the judge’s ignorance—and the deeper fear of dissenting voices.

I had often heard tales of how Roy raised sharp and uncomfortable questions within newsrooms. I also read his powerful and fearless piece written after being retrenched by The Telegraph. Despite his strong views, he was known for his kindness and humility. “But for juniors, he was very kind and considerate,” recalled Sucheta Chakraborty, who had worked with him at both The Telegraph and eNewsroom.

Dipankar Bhattacharya, General Secretary of CPIML, said, “We lost an uncompromising activist-writer and journalist who always stood for the people and fought for a free press and civil liberties.”

“We worked together many times in fact-finding teams. Such tedious work can only be done by journalists who not only understand their journalistic responsibilities but also have deep social concerns,” said Samirul Islam, the activist-turned-TMC MP. Speaking to eNewsroom, his voice grew heavy as he recalled his bond with the veteran journalist.

Roy is survived by his two sons, Kabir and Kanishk, and his ailing mother. His wife, Debjani—also a journalist—had passed away just 16 months ago.

“Forever a restless mind,” is how senior journalist Sujan Dutta remembered him. Biswajit Da, you dedicated your life to building a better society through journalism. You raised the bar for what journalism could and should be. May your ideals be realised sooner rather than later.

Nobel Dreams and Bayraktar Beams: What the Indo-Pak War Really Sold Us

1

[dropcap]T[/dropcap]he India-Pakistan war after the Pahalgam attack wasn’t just another conflict. It was a laboratory experiment.

South Asia became the guinea pig—a testing ground where global powers trialed their weapons, alliances, and strategies, while ordinary people paid the price with their lives.

Pakistan, reeling from economic collapse, walked away with a $7 billion IMF bailout. Not bad for a nation on the brink—but the war became its bargaining chip.

China didn’t fire a single shot, nor did it need to. Its J-10C “Vigorous Dragon” jets, deployed by Pakistan, made their combat debut. The PL-15 missiles followed—not for defense, but for display. No Chinese soldier moved, no border was touched. But Beijing’s arms catalog got an upgrade, sending a shockwave through many weapon manufacturers. China’s defense exports are now poised to rise.

Turkey’s Bayraktar TB2 drones, flown remotely, were not just war machines—they were live demonstrations. Every strike became an advertisement. The battlefield became an open-air defense expo.

Trump, after failing in Gaza and Ukraine, played peacemaker—pushing for a ceasefire not out of compassion, but to polish his brand and whisper “Nobel” into the global echo chamber. Nobel Peace Prize? Let’s see…

France watched its Rafale jets enter headlines—some glorified, some reportedly downed. But even wreckage tells a story. For the arms lobby, failure is feedback. Damage becomes data. New contracts are born from old smoke.

India responded with Operation Sindoor—a carefully timed military display showcasing layered air defense and retaliation. But the mission didn’t stop in the skies. On the ground, the Tiranga Yatras will begin in days to come. Nationalism will be repackaged, election-ready. In a land where emotions vote, military glory translates into ballot power.

And how can we forget the media? They too reaped the benefits of TRPs, with many advertisers bidding high for prime time slots.

But in all this… who are the real guinea pigs?

The stupid common men, whose blood always spills first, and who, like lab rats, are tested again and again.

Born Here, Thrown Out: Bengali Muslim Families Face Forced Evictions in Kolkata’s Rajabazar

0

Kolkata: Tensions are escalating in Kolkata’s Rajabazar after police-led evictions left dozens of families, including many school-going children, homeless and exposed to the elements. Students like Muhammad Farhan, Rosy Khatun, and Ayesha Khatun—who study at Mitra Institution—now struggle to attend classes while living under makeshift roofs, their books and uniforms buried under rubble. Their homes, small huts built along the roadside near 299 Acharya Prafulla Chandra Road, were demolished by Amherst Street Police on May 9, leaving their families without shelter or support.

“This is no way to treat children,” said Shehzadi Bibi, one of the evicted residents. “We are poor, but we tried to educate our kids. Now they are studying on pavements.” Her voice trembled as she pointed to the shattered remains of her home. “This shack was everything. We have nowhere else to go.”

The affected families, all Bengali Muslims, say they have been living in the area for over 50 to 60 years. They allege that the police arrived without notice or legal paperwork, demolished three huts, and warned of legal action if they did not vacate. “These are not illegal encroachments by outsiders,” said Sheikh Rahim, another resident. “We were born here. We have voter cards going back decades. Yet they treat us like we don’t exist.”

The residents include cart-pullers, shoe shop workers, and daily wage earners—people whose incomes barely cover food and education, let alone alternative housing. Despite their hardships, many have enrolled their children in local schools. Now, with their homes razed, even basic schooling hangs in the balance.

Repeated attempts to contact police officials for comment have gone unanswered. Residents also say that their appeals to the local councillor and the MLA of Ward 36 have fallen on deaf ears. “No one has come to speak with us. Not a single official,” said Rahim.

In response, a formal complaint has been submitted to the West Bengal State Minorities Commission. “Save the people of the Bengali Muslim community from persecution and eviction,” the letter pleads. Civic rights group Bhumi (Bhumiputra Unnayan Morcha of India) has condemned the evictions. “These are Indian citizens who’ve lived here for generations,” said Imraz Sheikh, a representative of the group. “If eviction is necessary, where is the rehabilitation plan? Why this cruelty?”

They also informed BHUMI that “women were subjected to lewd stares when they returned after bathing, along with threats of false legal cases being filed in their husbands’ names. Meanwhile, liquor and drug dens were set up near the slum area.”

Some have alleged that outsiders—specifically non-Bengali goons—have established these drug and liquor dens.

However, when residents complained to the police, instead of taking action, the police began evicting them from their decades-old homes.

Ahmed Hasan Imran, Chairman of the West Bengal State Minorities Commission, confirmed receipt of the complaint. “I shall be forwarding the same to the concerned authorities and Nabanna so that they get State intervention in their plight on humanitarian grounds,” he said. He added that Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee is known for her humane approach, and he hopes suitable alternatives will be arranged.

The episode has reignited a larger debate about the rights of long-established slum communities in rapidly urbanising cities like Kolkata. Critics argue that unchecked eviction drives in the name of development are displacing vulnerable populations without due process or rehabilitation. For the families of Rajabazar, the issue is not just legal—it’s existential.

“Where do we go now?” asked Shehzadi Bibi. “We didn’t ask for palaces. We just want our children to be safe, to study, and to live with dignity.”

The Real Soldiers Want Peace—Only Cowards Turn Grief Into Communal Fire

[dropcap]I[/dropcap]t is sad to see persistent attempts being made to create communal frenzy across the country under various pretexts. In the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack, we saw a united India condemn the violence unequivocally. That unity is India’s greatest strength. While the public responded with sensitivity and reason, the prime-time mercenaries did everything they could to disrupt peace and stoke polarisation.

They were expecting the Prime Minister to order the complete annihilation of Pakistan—but that hasn’t happened. Instead, what came was the caste census, which they despise. It felt like egg on their face. Is this a Mandal 2.0, as many are suggesting?

To me, it seems more like headline management. But even if that’s the case, let’s hope the government genuinely follows through on conducting the caste census seriously. The only difference is that when VP Singh launched the original Mandal Commission process in 1990, there was complete honesty in that government’s intent. Today, we simply don’t know what will happen. I fear we’re heading toward more polarisation.

Anyway, let’s see how things evolve. I’ve stopped being either too excited or too cynical. Let things unfold. All political parties will make their calculations. The real crisis in India is the absence of true intellectuals. Those who claim to be intellectuals often end up as mere tailors stitching narratives to suit their jaati (caste) leaders or caste interests. While various castes have been clubbed into categories, today’s political leaders are experts at engineering new caste realignments—and that is exactly what we will see.

The government seems to be working on all fronts. On international affairs, there’s wide consensus, so there isn’t much space for the government to manipulate things. The people have punctured their plans to politicise national security. Unlike the Pulwama incident, which gave rise to many conspiracy theories, the Pahalgam attack has offered valuable lessons. The entire nation stood with the government. Still, the Hindutva loudspeakers kept trying to provoke by portraying others as anti-national or by putting words into people’s mouths to create tensions.

The incident in Muzaffarnagar is a prime example. Rakesh Tikait was publicly humiliated, but the move backfired. The truth is that farmers and soldiers have shown far more maturity and reason than our politicians. There’s no point playing games with national security. It takes time. Military leadership knows what to do. There’s significant international pressure as well—neither the Americans nor the Russians want war between India and Pakistan. That’s the geopolitical reality.

So let the bhakts shout, but the military will act according to strategy—not based on the chest-thumping of street-level politicians. Frankly, I’ve found our serving military personnel (not the retired rabble-rousers on prime-time debates) to have a deep understanding of the situation. Remember, a man in uniform is ready to sacrifice his life for the country, but he too knows that war is never the ultimate solution. Those living in border areas understand this better than anyone—they want peace and stability more than anyone else.

Look at the dignified response of Himanshi Narwal, wife of martyred Navy officer Vinay Narwal. Despite losing the most precious person in her life, she spoke out against spreading hatred towards Muslims. It takes immense courage to speak from the heart at such a moment. Salute to Himanshi for her strength and conviction.

Now is the time to rise and speak out against criminals and terrorists—without prejudice. In Uttarakhand, Sangeeta Negi bravely condemned the communal violence in Nainital. She stood firm against punishing an entire community for the act of an individual. And yet today, she receives rape threats from the same communal bigots who stayed silent when Ankita Bhandari was murdered—the accused being the son of a top BJP leader from the state.

We all remember how the narrative around the Nirbhaya case was crafted, but ask yourself: what has changed since 2013? The mindset remains deeply rooted in Brahmanical patriarchy. The outrage resurfaces only when their caste hierarchy is challenged—like when a film on Jyotiba Phule is shown that critiques Brahmanism.

As a nation, India will become truly powerful only when we collectively stand against all forms of violence, intimidation, terror, and goondaism—regardless of caste, gender, or religion. We cannot address today’s crises by selectively using problems for narrow political gains. Let the armed forces do their job based on their expertise and understanding. Let’s not speculate irresponsibly. Politicians chase electoral goals, but it is the brave men and women of our armed forces who guard our borders and defend our lives.

Let us stay united in this difficult hour, and not allow criminal incidents to be used as tools to spread rumour and hate.

राशन पर ओटीपी की मुहर: झारखंड की हाशिए की आबादी भूख और अपमान के बीच फंसी

[dropcap]39[/dropcap] वर्षीय हमीदा लातेहार जिले के मनिका प्रखंड की रहने वाली हैं, जुलाई 2024 में हमीदा अपने दो बेटों का राशन कार्ड में नाम जुडवाने के लिए स्थानीय जन सेवा केंद्र गयीं. इनके दोनों बेटो की उम्र 15 वर्ष से कम है, राशन कार्ड में नाम जुड़ने के पश्चात अतिरिक्त राशन का अधिकार व अन्य कल्याणकारी योजनाओं का लाभ मिल सकती है।

जन सेवा केंद्र के ऑपरेटर ने हमीदा को बताया कि राज्य के राशन कार्ड प्रबंधन प्रणाली पोर्टल पर आवेदन को आगे बढ़ाने के लिए वन टाइम पासवर्ड या ओटीपी (OTP) की आवश्यकता थी।  हमीदा ने कई बार अपना फोन चेक किया लेकिन कोई ओटीपी नहीं आया। फिर ऑपरेटर ने स्क्रीन पर संदेश पढ़ा जिसमें कहा गया था कि उसका फोन नंबर उसके आधार से लिंक होना चाहिए। हमीदा उलझन में थी। कुछ महीने पहले दिसंबर 2023 में, उसने बिना ओटीपी दर्ज किए अपने सबसे बड़े बेटे का नाम राशन कार्ड में जोड़ने के लिए एक आवेदन जमा किया था।

अब क्या बदल गया?

लगभग एक साल पहले जन वितरण प्रणाली अध्ययन के लिए क्षेत्र भ्रमण के दौरान, हमने पाया की लोगो राशन कार्ड विवरण बदलने में परेशानी का सामना करना पड़ रहा।

इससे पहले झारखंड राशन कार्ड प्रबंधन प्रणाली पोर्टल में राशन कार्ड विवरण में बदलाव के लिए  केवल राशन कार्ड नंबर और परिवार के मुखिया का आधार नंबर की आवश्यकता थी। अब, नाम जोड़ने, हटाने, सुधार या अपडेट को लेकर आवेदन के लिए परिवार के मुखिया के आधार से जुड़े मोबाइल नंबर पर भेजे गए ओटीपी को भी दर्ज करने की जरूरत पड़ती है।

हमीदा की तरह, लातेहार जिले के कई अन्य लोग ओटीपी की आवश्यकता से अनजान थे। बिना किसी उचित जानकारी के इस अचानक बदलाव से भ्रम की स्थिति पैदा हो गई है, परिवार के मुखिया के लिए मोबाइल नंबर को आधार से लिंक कराने का अतिरिक्त बोझ बढ़ गया है और आवेदन में देरी होगी।

सीमित डिजिटल साक्षरता और तकनीक तक पहुंच वाले लोगो के लिए, यह पहले से ही एक बड़ी बाधा है। यह विशेष रूप से हमीदा जैसी महिलाओं को प्रभावित करता है जो सीमित संसाधनों के साथ अपने घर का प्रबंधन करती हैं और भोजन के राशन पर निर्भर हैं।

राष्ट्रीय खाद्य सुरक्षा अधिनियम में राशन कार्ड के प्रयोजनों के लिए घर की सबसे बड़ी महिला को घर की मुखिया के रूप में नामित करने का प्रगतिशील आदेश शामिल है। यह प्रावधान खाद्य सुरक्षा में महिलाओं की केंद्रीय भूमिका को मान्यता देता है और उन्हें आवश्यक अधिकारों पर अधिक नियंत्रण प्रदान करके उन्हें सशक्त बनाने का लक्ष्य रखता है। आधार-आधारित ओटीपी प्रमाणीकरण की शुरूआत ने संरचनात्मक और प्रणालीगत बाधाओं को पैदा करके अनजाने में इस उद्देश्य को कमजोर कर दिया है जो महिलाओं को असमान रूप से प्रभावित करते हैं।

इस लेख में, हमने जानबूझकर “हक़दार” शब्द का इस्तेमाल इस बात पर जोर देने के लिए किया है कि राष्ट्रीय खाद्य सुरक्षा अधिनियम के तहत खाद्य अधिकारों तक पहुँच राज्य द्वारा कोई उपकार या परोपकार का कार्य नहीं है, बल्कि एक कानूनी अधिकार है। व्यक्तियों को हक़दार के रूप में मान्यता देने से राज्य की जिम्मेदारी पर ध्यान केंद्रित होता है ताकि न्यायसंगत और सुलभ सेवा वितरण सुनिश्चित किया जा सके। आधार-आधारित ओटीपी प्रमाणीकरण हक़दारों को पहचानने में यह विफलता को बढ़ाती है, खासकर महिलाओं और आर्थिक रूप से कमजोर समूहों के लिए।

डिजिटल भूलभुलैया

आधार, भारत के निवासियों के लिए एक विशिष्ट पहचान है। पिछले कुछ वर्षों में आधार अधिकांश सामाजिक सुरक्षा कार्यक्रमों, विशेष रूप से जन वितरण प्रणाली का हक़ प्राप्त करने में अनिवार्य हो गया है। भारत में, अनुमानित 81 करोड़ लोग सब्सिडी वाले खाद्यान्न के लिए राशन की दुकानों पर निर्भर हैं। झारखंड में, लगभग 2.86 करोड़ लोग राशन की दुकानों पर निर्भर हैं।

केंद्र सरकार का दावा है कि आधार को जन वितरण प्रणाली से जोड़ने से लक्ष्य निर्धारण में सुधार होगा, लीकेज और भ्रष्टाचार कम होगा, जिससे कार्यक्रम की दक्षता में सुधार होगा। 2015 से, आधार को योजनाओं के एंड-टू-एंड कम्प्यूटरीकरण, विभिन्न प्रक्रियाओं के स्वचालन और राशन कार्डों के ऑनलाइन डेटाबेस को बनाए रखने के साथ जन वितरण प्रणाली के साथ एकीकृत किया गया है।

अक्टूबर 2024 में प्रकाशित झारखंड के पीडीएस नियंत्रण आदेश में राशन कार्ड में बदलाव करने के लिए आधार से जुड़े ओटीपी को दर्ज करने के अतिरिक्त चरण का उल्लेख है, लेकिन यह नहीं बताया गया है कि इसकी आवश्यकता क्यों है।

जन सेवा केंद्र (सीएससी) संचालकों और कुछ प्रखंड अधिकारियों सहित हितधारकों के साथ चर्चा में पाया गया कि अधिकांश लोग इस बदलाव से अनजान थे. एक राज्य के अधिकारी ने आधार आधारित ओटिपी को सुरक्षा बढ़ाने के रूप में बताया ताकि यह सुनिश्चित हो सके कि राशन कार्ड में बदलाव या विलोपन करने के लिए वास्तविक आवेदन हैं।

राशन कार्ड में बदलाव करना महत्वपूर्ण है और समय-समय पर इसकी आवश्यकता होती है क्योंकि परिवार में जन्म, शादी और मृत्यु के साथ नाम जोड़ना या हटाना पड़ता है। ऐसी प्रक्रियाएं सरल और पारदर्शी होनी चाहिए, जिसमें लोगो की बेहतर पहुंच और निश्चित समय में अपडेट की सुविधा हो.

लातेहार जिले के सरयू ब्लॉक के चोरहा पंचायत की एक महिला ने बताया कि वह अपनी सास की मौत के बाद घर के मुखिया के तौर पर अपना नाम अपडेट करवाने के लिए पिछले कुछ महीनों से कोशिश कर रही थी।

उन्होंने ने कहा “मैं ब्लॉक ऑफिस, यहां तक ​​कि जिला और वहां के एक केंद्र में कई बार जा चुकी हूं, लेकिन मेरा काम नहीं हो पा रहा है।” “मैंने अब तो हार मान ली है।”

यदि आधार पूर्व से मोबाइल नंबर से लिंक नहीं है तो समस्याओं का समाधान मुश्किल हो जाता है। हमें कई ऐसे मामले भी मिले जहां ग्रामीण क्षेत्रों में आधार मोबाइल नंबर से लिंक नहीं था। ये बाधाएं उन लोगों के आर्थिक बोझ को और बढ़ा देती हैं जो पहले से ही अनिश्चित जीवन जी रहे हैं।

कार्ड धारकों को अक्सर प्रखंड या जिला मुख्यालय की यात्रा करनी पड़ती है, क्योंकि आस-पास गाँव या पंचायतों में आधार केंद्र उपलब्ध नहीं हैं, जिससे परिवहन व्यय के साथ-साथ उस दिन की मजदूरी का नुकसान भी होता है।

यदि आधार केंद्र हो या केंद्र में बहुत भीड़ होने की वजह से, कई हकदार बिचौलियों की मदद लेने के लिए मजबूर होना पड़ता है जो आधार को मोबाइल नंबर से लिंक करने या राशन कार्ड विवरण अपडेट करने जैसे सरल कार्यों को पूरा करने के लिए अत्यधिक शुल्क लेते हैं। उदाहरण के लिए, बरहेट के एक गाँव में कई लोगों  ने उन सेवाओं के लिए 500 रुपये से लेकर 1,600 रुपये तक दिए , जो हकदारों को आम तौर पर मुफ़्त या न्यूनतम मूल्य पर होने थे ।

महिलाओं की निजी मोबाइल फोन तक सीमित पहुँच है, जो एक बड़ी चुनौती है, खासकर ग्रामीण इलाकों में। राष्ट्रीय परिवार स्वास्थ्य सर्वे-5 (2019-21) के अनुसार, भारत में 8.5% और झारखंड में 10% घरों में मोबाइल फोन नहीं है। एक बड़ा लैंगिक अंतर भी है: राष्ट्रीय नमूना सर्वेक्षण कार्यालय द्वारा 2023 व्यापक वार्षिक मॉड्यूलर सर्वेक्षण के अनुसार, 10 में से सात गैर-मोबाइल उपयोगकर्ता महिलाएं हैं, यह सर्वे मोबाइल फोन और इंटरनेट उपयोग की व्यक्तिगत और घरेलू विशेषताओं को एकत्रित करता है। यह अंतर शिक्षा और उम्र और अन्य कारकों जैसे स्मार्टफोन का स्वामित्व होना और इंटरनेट का उपयोग करने के साथ बढ़ता है।

सांस्कृतिक मानदंड और आर्थिक बाधाएं पुरुषों के पास मोबाइल रखने की प्राथमिकता देती हैं, जिससे महिलाएं पुरुष परिवार के सदस्यों पर निर्भर रहती हैं। और यदि  महिलाओं के पास फोन तक पहुंच होती है, तो उनका उपयोग सीमित होता है। कई महिलाएं जो घर की मुखिया हैं, उनके आधार से या तो निष्क्रिय मोबाइल नंबर जुड़े हुए हैं या पुरुष रिश्तेदारों के मोबाइल नंबर जुड़े हुए हैं या कोई मोबाइल नंबर ही नहीं जुड़ा है।

मोबाइल फोन रखने वालों में भी, एक सक्रिय कनेक्शन को बनाए रखने की लागत, जो पिछले वर्ष लगभग 15% बढ़ गई. हमें कई आर्थिक रूप से वंचित परिवार मिले, जिनके मोबाइल नंबर अफोर्डेबल टैरिफ के कारण निष्क्रिय या बंद पड़े हैं। इससे वे सिस्टम से बाहर हो जाते हैं, क्योंकि राशन कार्ड मैनेजमेंट सिस्टम पोर्टल पर बदलाव करने के लिए एक चालू मोबाइल फोन कनेक्शन होना अब एक अनिवार्य शर्त है।

महिलाओं के पास पुरुष या अन्य लोगो पर निर्भर रहने के अलावा कोई विकल्प नहीं है, जिससे राष्ट्रीय खाद्य सुरक्षा अधिनियम द्वारा बढ़ावा दिए जाने वाले स्वायत्तता को नुकसान पहुँच रहा है। कुछ मामलों में, महिलाओं ने बताया कि उन्हें साधारण अपडेट के लिए बिचौलियों को बहुत ज़्यादा शुल्क देना पड़ता है।

ये अनुभव इस बात पर प्रकाश डालते हैं कि महिलाओं को सशक्त बनाने के लिए बनाई गई नीति ने खाद्य अधिकारों तक पहुँच में लैंगिक अंतर को कैसे बढ़ाया है। महिलाओं की डिजिटल पहुँच और स्वायत्तता को सीमित करने वाली संरचनात्मक असमानताओं को अनदेखा करके, अनुपालन का बोझ अनजाने में उन लोगों पर डाल दिया गया है, जिन्हें इससे लाभ मिलना चाहिए था। महिलाओं की पात्रता तक पहुँच सुनिश्चित करने के लिए आधार एकीकरण द्वारा पेश किए गए तकनीकी सुधारों से परे, इन बाधाओं को समग्र रूप से संबोधित करने की आवश्यकता है।

समाधान की दिशा में सुझाव

भारत की जन वितरण प्रणाली के डिजिटलीकरण की कल्पना पारदर्शीता और जवाबदेही की दिशा में कदम बढ़ाने के रूप में की गई थी, लेकिन ज़मीनी हकीकत एक जटिल कहानी बयां करती है।

हालाँकि आधार-आधारित बायोमेट्रिक प्रमाणीकरण और ओटीपी सत्यापन जैसी तकनीकों का उद्देश्य धोखाधड़ी और चोरी को रोकना है, लेकिन वे कमज़ोर समुदाय के लिए चुनौतियों को और बढ़ा देते हैं, जिनके पास डिजिटल साक्षरता की कमी है और मोबाइल फ़ोन या इन प्रणालियों को चलाने की कनेक्टिविटी की पहुँच सिमित है।

केवल तकनीकी पहुँच की समस्याएँ ही नहीं हैं, बल्कि डिजिटल और सामाजिक समावेशन की व्यापक चिंताएँ हैं, हकदार इन प्रक्रियाओं को कैसे समझते हैं और क्या उनके पास बनाई गई प्रणाली को चलाने का कौशल है। एक बुनियादी सवाल सामने आता है: क्या राज्य इन हकदारों को पहचानता भी है और वह उनकी मदद कैसे कर रहा है?

डिजिटलीकरण के लाभों को सभी हक़दार तक पहुँचाने के लिए एक लचीला और समावेशी दृष्टिकोण आवश्यक है। डिजिटलीकरण के प्रयासों में विभिन्न हितधारकों के साथ परामर्श शामिल होना चाहिए और अधिकार धारकों को परिवर्तनों के बारे में यथासंभव स्पष्ट रूप से जानकारी दिए जाने के बाद इसे लागू किया जाना चाहिए।

साथ ही, झारखंड के खाद्य और जन वितरण विभाग को यह सुनिश्चित करने के लिए आवश्यक सहायता प्रदान करनी चाहिए कि राशन कार्ड धारक संघर्ष या कठिनाइयों का सामना किए बिना आसानी से परिवर्तनों को कर सकें। इस मामले में कई विकल्प होने चाहिए, जैसे कि ओटीपी प्राप्त करने के लिए राशन कार्ड से जुड़े मोबाइल नंबर। अगर राशन कार्ड से कोई मोबाइल नंबर लिंक नहीं है या फिर कोई मोबाइल नंबर ही नहीं है, तो एक ऑफलाइन सिस्टम होना चाहिए जो आधार-आधारित ओटीपी की मांग नहीं करता हो। मोबाइल फोन नंबर और आधार विवरण अपडेट करने की प्रक्रिया को भी सरल बनाया जाना चाहिए।

तकनिकी लाभों को देखते हुए डिजिटलीकरण का संतुलित उपयोग कर हाशिए पर पड़े समूहों की वास्तविकताओं के प्रति संवेदनशीलता के साथ जोड़ा जाना चाहिए, ताकि यह सुनिश्चित किया जा सके कि अधिक सुरक्षित और पारदर्शी जन वितरण प्रणाली की खोज में कोई भी पीछे न छूट जाए।

 

लेख में व्यक्त विचार व्यक्तिगत हैं।

‘Himachal CM Should Quit’—A Sarcastic Quip That Unmasked Political Hypocrisy

0

Ranchi: “Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit—but the highest form of intelligence.”
— Oscar Wilde

Jharkhand’s politicians have rarely been known for their wit and sarcasm. So when Sudivya Kumar Sonu, a minister in the Hemant Soren cabinet, stated sarcastically after the Pahalgam terror attack that Himachal Pradesh’s Chief Minister should resign, not only did several netizens fail to understand it, but the president of the Bharatiya Janata Party, which is in opposition in the state, called it a vulgar statement.

On April 22, in the Pahalgam district of Jammu and Kashmir, 27 tourists and a local Kashmiri were killed in a terror attack. Despite such a large-scale assault—where several innocent lives were lost or injured—it was found that there were no police or army personnel deployed in the area, even though Jammu and Kashmir is considered to have the highest concentration of military presence in the world. The region is directly governed by the Union Government and falls under the jurisdiction of the Home Ministry. But even after 24 hours, with no questions raised about accountability, Minister Sudivya Kumar made a statement while briefing the media.

“For the incident in Pahalgam, Himachal Pradesh’s CM Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu should resign, as he could not save his citizens. It is an unfortunate incident, and I believe Himachal’s Chief Minister should resign,” said the minister.

As Kumar repeated that the Himachal CM should resign, he raised his finger in a manner that made the sarcastic tone of his remark apparent.

Still, on social media, several users—especially those unfamiliar with the minister or aligned with the BJP—mocked him, saying that he should have blamed the (non-existent) Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir, not Himachal’s.

Later, BJP’s Jharkhand president Babulal Marandi described Kumar’s remark as fuhad (vulgar), in the wake of a national tragedy. This gave Kumar an opportunity to call a press conference and clarify that his remark was, in fact, sarcasm.

He said today,

“BJP and its leaders should remember that our leaders have set high moral standards in public life. In 1956, Lal Bahadur Shastri resigned after a train accident. In 1999, Nitish Kumar did the same. In 2008, after the Mumbai terror attack, Home Minister Shivraj Patil resigned. But now, despite multiple terror attacks including Pathankot, Pulwama and the one in Pahalgam in 28 people killed, the media doesn’t even question the accountability of any person. In such silence, a minister like me is forced to step in and remind the nation. I also question that why national mourning was not announced.”

Who is Sudivya Kumar Sonu?

The Minister for Tourism, Higher Education, and Urban Development, Kumar is a two-time MLA from Giridih. A long-time member of the JMM, he calls himself a disciple of party founder Shibu Soren. Kumar is also considered part of the ruling government’s think tank in Jharkhand.

JMM Hits Streets Demanding Resignation of HM and Defense Minister

After the Pahalgam terror attack, very few opposition leaders at the national level demanded the resignation of the Prime Minister or the Home Minister. No party had taken to the streets. This is in contrast to the pre-2014 era when BJP leaders regularly took to the streets demanding accountability after every such incident.

However, following the minister’s press conference in Ranchi, JMM leaders in Giridih—Kumar’s home constituency—not only demanded resignations over the failure to prevent the terror attack, but also burned effigies of HM Shah and Defense Minister Rajnath Singh. They also shouted Pakistan Murdabad slogans.