Even BJP’s Swamy is against Vasundhara giving immunity to babus

The senior BJP leader tweeted: The draft Rajasthan law to dilute PCA etc for bureaucrats violates the SC's 2015 Constitutional Bench judgment in Subramanian Swamy vs CBI

Date:

Share post:

Jaipur/Kolkata: Vasundhara Raje led Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) government has been at the receiving end ever since she has issued an ordinance which makes it impossible for people to lodge FIRs against judges and bureaucrats, without seeking permission from the government. The ordinance, also bars media from covering such complaints till then it get cleared by the government. The ordinance is being sharply criticized by journalists, media organizations, activists and opposition parties.

However, amid all crying foul, criticism came from unexpected quarter– from lawyer cum politician Subramanian Swamy, the BJP leader, tweeted on Sunday, stating that the ordinance tabled by Raje is against Article 4 of the Indian Constitution, and that P Chidambaram had tried to bring such ordinance in favour of bankers, but Supreme Court had struck down the step on his plea.

The Article 4 of the Indian Constitution stresses on Right to Equality. Equality, before law.

The senior BJP leader tweeted: The draft Rajasthan law to dilute PCA etc for bureaucrats violates the SC’s 2015 Constitutional Bench judgment in Subramanian Swamy vs CBI.

The leader got more than 2600 likes and over 1100 retweets for this particular tweet.

Earlier, The Editors Guild of India, had issued a communiqué opposing Raje’s attempt to gag media and said that it will stop journalist in doing public interest stories.

Partika Group Chairman, Gulab Kothari has also vehementaly criticized the step and wrote a front page editorial on it.

The President of Press Club, Jaipur LL Sharma has called upon journalists to stand up against the draconian law. “Think again before having such a draconian law implemented. This law aims at suppressing freedom of press. It will not be tolerated,” he warned Raje.

Organizations working for Human Rights, Public Union for Civil Liberties, PUCL has also condemned the government’s decision to shield judges and babus by putting a gag on media.

Congress’ state president Sachin Pilot made it a point to mention before the journalists that this was an attempt by Vasundhara Raje to protect her corrupt officials.

However, some senior journalist based at Jaipur, questioned the opposition parties for their lack of knowledge on this law being in the anvil. Narayan Bareth said, “It is not surprising that the opposition came to know about the ordinance only after some media organization reported about it. This ordinance was tabled on September 7 itself. This happens when opposition parties follow calendars to assess when they are coming into power.”

Related articles

Cyclone Arnab Explained: How Ocean Linguistics Meet Climate Chaos

Why is a cyclone named Arnab, and who chooses these storm names? Discover how 13 countries contribute culturally rooted names to the North Indian Ocean’s cyclone naming system and why naming storms matters for communication, public awareness and disaster preparedness.

15-Person Family, 12 Names Deleted: Trilokpuri Door-to-Door Audit Flags 416 Wrongful Voter Exclusions

A public hearing in Delhi’s Trilokpuri heard testimonies from voters deleted during SIR, as an MKSS-led audit flagged 416 alleged wrongful deletions. Rahul Gandhi, Dipankar Bhattacharya, Prashant Bhushan and Yogendra Yadav attended the hearing, where residents raised concerns over voter exclusion and demolitions.

SIR Fallout Reaches Bengal’s Civic Polls as Opposition Demands January 2027 Deadline

Nearly 1.6 lakh voter appeals remain pending in Kolkata and Howrah following SIR deletions. A broad coalition of opposition parties, civil rights groups and public figures has urged the West Bengal State Election Commission to delay municipal polls until January 2027 and include voters whose appeals are awaiting tribunal decisions.

Lula, Gen Z and the Algorithm: Who Owns the Battle for Democracy?

From Lula’s victory in Brazil to Neha Bora’s emergence in India’s student protests, this opinion examines how social media algorithms, corporate interests and media sensationalism shape Gen Z activism, political narratives and the struggle for democracy.