Mamata Vs Centre face off over Bengal cadre IPS officers

MHA adamant on Central deputation of three IPS officers from Bengal

Date:

Share post:

Kolkata: On yet another issue, Mamata Banerjee led Bengal government and centre have locked horns. The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) on Thursday sent a fresh letter to Mamata Banerjee government asking immediate release of three Indian Police Service (IPS) officers for central deputation.

In the letter, the MHA has quoted section 6 (1) of the All India Service officers rule, which says that “in case of any disagreement, the Centre government’s decision shall prevail”.

Taking a potshot at the centre, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee took to twitter and wrote, “A colourable exercise of power and blatant misuse of emergency provision of IPS Cadre Rule 1954”.

“We will not allow this brazen attempt by the Centre to control the State machinery by proxy! West Bengal is not going to cow-down in front of expansionist & undemocratic forces,” the Trinamool Congress (TMC) supremo wrote in another tweet.

Notably, the three officers namely Bholanath Pandey, SP, Diamond Harbour, Praveen Tripathi, DIG, Presidency Range and Rajeev Mishra, ADG, South Bengal were responsible for BJP national president JP Nadda’s security during his visit to Bengal last week.

Due to their alleged ‘failure’ to give security to the BJP national president as his convoy was attacked at Sirakol, the central government has assigned new responsibilities to these three IPS officers.

Bholanath Pandey has been deputed as SP, Bureau of Police Research and Development (BPRD), Praveen Tripathi as DIG, Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB) and Rajeev Mishra as IG, Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP).

Significantly, soon after the alleged attack, a letter was issued by MHA on the same issue, the TMC government refused to release the IPS officers.

Slamming the series of tweets done by the chief minister, BJP general Secretary Sayantan Basu said that if the TMC government has any problem with the orders issued by the Union Home Ministry then the TMC government can move the court.

“This is not the first time such a decision has been taken by the central government. The same was done during the Congress regime. Even Rajiv Gandhi had done the same during 1984-85. If they have any problem they are free to move the court. But due to the negligence of the TMC government the IPS officer should not face a break in their services,” mentioned Basu.

TMC MP Mahua Moitra tweeted and attack BJP on the issue, @BJP spokesperson says, ‘exemplary punitive action’ taken against WB IPS offices for dereliction of duty (sic)”

“Then why entrust them with job of guarding borders & soldiers’ lives with SSB and ITBP Posting? (sic)” she questioned.

Related articles

Cyclone Arnab Explained: How Ocean Linguistics Meet Climate Chaos

Why is a cyclone named Arnab, and who chooses these storm names? Discover how 13 countries contribute culturally rooted names to the North Indian Ocean’s cyclone naming system and why naming storms matters for communication, public awareness and disaster preparedness.

15-Person Family, 12 Names Deleted: Trilokpuri Door-to-Door Audit Flags 416 Wrongful Voter Exclusions

A public hearing in Delhi’s Trilokpuri heard testimonies from voters deleted during SIR, as an MKSS-led audit flagged 416 alleged wrongful deletions. Rahul Gandhi, Dipankar Bhattacharya, Prashant Bhushan and Yogendra Yadav attended the hearing, where residents raised concerns over voter exclusion and demolitions.

SIR Fallout Reaches Bengal’s Civic Polls as Opposition Demands January 2027 Deadline

Nearly 1.6 lakh voter appeals remain pending in Kolkata and Howrah following SIR deletions. A broad coalition of opposition parties, civil rights groups and public figures has urged the West Bengal State Election Commission to delay municipal polls until January 2027 and include voters whose appeals are awaiting tribunal decisions.

Lula, Gen Z and the Algorithm: Who Owns the Battle for Democracy?

From Lula’s victory in Brazil to Neha Bora’s emergence in India’s student protests, this opinion examines how social media algorithms, corporate interests and media sensationalism shape Gen Z activism, political narratives and the struggle for democracy.