Home Blog Page 87

Safeguarding the natural habitat of Giant Leatherback turtles

0

Recently trafficking of turtles has been crucially increased and this matter seeks our grave concern regarding their protection. A report published by the Non-government organization TRAFFIC India indicates that at least 1,11,310 tortoises and freshwater turtles were smuggled from September 2009 to September 2019 for their tasty meat, ornamental value, and good luck charms. Along with this Environmental Pollution causes massive damage to their natural habitats.

Now the lives of Giant Leatherback Turtles are in great distress because their three natural nesting sites on the beaches in Andaman and Nicobar Islands are under threat due to the mega-development projects to be completed soon. There are 360 living species in the world and India has only 29 of them. The Giant Leatherback Turtle is the largest of the seven species of sea turtles, found in all oceans except the Arctic and the Antarctic. Other species are, Loggerhead, Green, Hawksbill, Kemp’s Ridley, Flatback and Olive Ridley turtles.

The Leatherback, is the largest of all living turtles, they are almost 8.9 feet tall and weigh almost 500 kilograms. This hidden-necked turtle primarily lives in the open ocean with its dark grey or black-coloured body having oily flesh and flexible leather-like skin.

This animal belongs to the Animalia kingdom, Reptilia Class and Dermochelyidae family described by Italian naturalist Domenico Agostino Vandelli in 1761. In 1816, French herpetologist Henry Marie Ducrotay de Blainville gave its scientific name Dermochelys Coriacea. They eat jellyfish, hydrozoa, squid, octopus, cuttlefish, snails, sea urchins, and fish. They live up to 30-100 years and the females lay eggs on the beaches and create 26000-43000 nests globally every year.

In the Indian Ocean, Leatherback’s population generally remains unassessed and unevaluated. But India’s National Marine Turtle Action Plan released in February 2021 implies that the Galathea Bay area of Andaman and Nicobar Islands is an “Important Marine Turtle Habitat in India.”

giant leatherback turtle turtles environmental pollution
Eggs of Giant Leatherback turtles, Kalipur beach | Credit: Dr B K Mahapatra

Within the Indian Ocean, these Turtles nest only in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, and Andaman & Nicobar islands of India. Now, development projects for building international airports, transhipment ports, Greenfield townships, and power plants at the Galathea, Campbell bay under the Holistic Development project of Andaman & Nicobar island seed threats to the biodiversity of that region.

Firstly, the standing committee of the National Board of Wildlife and the Wildlife Institute of India objected to the Environmental Impact Assessment reports and later, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate change eased the norms last November to approve the project. Experts believe that it is going to crevasse the marine ecosystem and leatherback is the main victim.

Leatherbacks are migratory animals and the beach area on little Andaman and great Nicobar island is a hotbed for their natural nesting. Due to these infrastructure projects the air, the soil, and the water will get polluted and these turtles will often feed on plastic flakes in the water that look like jellyfish. As they eat plastic and other riverine debris, their digestive system weakens, and nutrition gain slows down. In polluted water, female turtles can’t signal their pheromones to the males for mating. Eggs have been prayed for by Ghost crabs, monitor lizards, raccoons, coatis, dogs, coyotes, genets, mongoose and shore birds. There are problems due to malabsorption and chemical pollution. Streetlights, lights from buildings, offices, and lights from other sources are major threats to hatching as the Hatchlings become disoriented toward the light. Thus their lives and livelihoods are in crisis!

giant leatherback turtle turtles maps andaman

A study of Sea turtles in the southern Nicobar Islands by Manjula Tiwari under NOAA-National Marine Fisheries Services’ Marine Turtle Ecology and Assessment program shows that the collection of beach sand for construction purposes is a great ground to detriment their nesting. Scientist Dr Pankaj Sekhsaria claims in his article published in the Frontline magazine that he believes, “This whole development project put the pristine island, its priceless biodiversity and indigenous populations as well as the huge investment in danger”. There are two national parks, one biosphere reserve, and two tribes namely Nicobares and Shopian in the Great Nicobar Islands are facing fears of extinction. Visualizing the environmental vulnerability, Dr Sekhsaria describes it as a “Nicobar Nightmare.”

To control the unnecessary destruction of nests, collection of corals and beach sand. To educate the commoners and engage the tribals in the conservation of turtles. Also to enforce the law protecting their natural habitats, lots of efforts have been taken by various organizations, persons and researchers.

NGOs like Dakshin Foundation put efforts through their Dakshin Endeavour under the leadership of Adhith Swaminathan to save these natural nesting. Regarding the conservation of sea turtles, Dr BK Mahapatra, Principal Scientist and Scientist-in-Charge (retd), ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Kolkata, Ministry of Agriculture, GOI, notifies this Leatherback Turtle as a “keystone species”.

Dr Mahapatra mentions that they have also found in the Kalipur beach of Diglipur Forest Division. He says, “Training and awareness programs of different stakeholders for protecting and monitoring Leatherback turtles in the marine environment and on nesting beaches is an urgent need.”

Since 1980 there has been a dramatic decline in their population and Asian exploitation of turtle nests has been cited as the most significant factor for the species’ global population. The IUCN status of this species is vulnerable and also listed in Schedule I of India’s Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. So We’ve to think about it seriously.

Indian Women Have Strength to Upset Aussie Juggernaut in T20 World Cup Semi-Final

0

Mumbai: India-Australia clashes are the dominant flavour of the cricket season nowadays. Like their male counterparts battling with the Aussies at home, Harmanpreet Kaur and Co too will lock horns with the Australian Women in the semi-finals of the ICC Women’s T20 Cricket World Cup 2023 in South Africa. The blockbuster match on Thursday will be a repeat of the 2020 T20 World Cup final – while defending champions Australia would be aiming for a hat-trick of Women’s T20 World Cup trophy, Indian eves would be bidding for their first-ever ICC title.

The key question ahead of the mouth-watering battle is – Can the Women in Blue upset Meg Lannings’ top-ranked champion side?

The head-to-head record between the two teams puts Aussies as firm favourites for the match as Indian women have won only 7 of the 30 T20is played between the two sides; Australia grabbing 22 wins while one match ended without a result. Even in their respective journeys in the present World Cup, Aussies have been more assertive, winning all their four games easily in the group stage. But in contrast, the Indian women dropped their vital game against England even though they won the other three group matches quite convincingly.

Nevertheless, with a great blend of youth, talent and experience, the Indians have the potential to grab the World Cup glory. In Harmanpreet Kaur and Smriti Mandhana, India has two of the finest stroke makers in the game today though the skipper has been hardly at her best in the tournament until this moment. Scoring big, Mandhana, Jemimah Rodrigues and Richa Ghosh have been central to the batting fluency in almost all matches and if Captain Kaur and opener Shaifali Verma can come good, there’s no reason why India can’t set up a winning target or chase down a challenging total. If the top order lives up to its potential and fires, India’s chances of winning will get a big boost. 

While the Aussies have functioned like a well-oiled machine through the group stage, Indian bowling has been severely tested in this post-Jhulan Goswami era. Despite Renuka Singh’s dream spell against England, the Indian attack lacked firepower but Team India would be hoping that pace veteran Shikha Pandey and all-rounder Deepti Sharma continue their fine form and restrict Aussie batters with a disciplined display.

Apart from bowling limitations, a major area of concern for Women in Blue is the long-standing dot-ball issue. Kaur has admitted India’s inability to rotate the strike is a big worry especially as Indians struggled with strike rotation even in the series against Australia last December and the Tri-series earlier this month. The problem persists in the World Cup as India had 51 and 41 dot balls in the Group games against England and Ireland respectively.

Obviously, improving strike rotation alone will help achieve greater aggression and a positive mind is a must in crunch games. Grafting for runs has brought about downfall at crucial junctures since the pressure induces going for improbable big shots, leading to the disastrous dismissal of key batters. Harmanpreet and Shaifali have been guilty of throwing their wickets with diabolical slogs and this mindset needs to be curbed in the knock-out games.

Despite past records and the odds being stacked in favour of Australia, Team India does have a few things going in their favour. The semi-final is at Newlands in Cape Town where India has played two of their four matches while it will be Australia’s first game on that surface. Familiarity with local conditions, especially the slow-paced wicket, could be a big plus for India. In addition, massive support for India at Newlands could give India a slight psychological advantage over Australia – a key factor as the result in crunch games often depends on which team handles the pressure better.

Moreover, in recent weeks, Indian women’s cricket has been in the news for a number of positive reasons – from the historic victory in the Women’s Under-19 World Cup to the auctions for the Women’s Indian Premier League (WPL). The morale in the Indian camp has been sky-high after all the leading players fetched big bucks in WPL. Hence, if there is one team that has come close to beating the mighty Australians in recent times, it is India as it was the last team to defeat the Aussies. Why even in the Commonwealth Games Final last year, India lost narrowly by just 9 runs!

If the glorious victory by Indian girls in the U-19 T20 World Cup last month and the emphatic wins by Rohit Sharma and Co over the Aussies in the first two tests are any inspiration, the ‘Women in Blue’ can surely surprise the defending champions. With both sides packed with top-quality batters and balanced bowling attacks, it could be a cracker of a contest. For Captain Kaur and her Blue Brigade, the World Cup semis is a tough but not impossible assignment. After all, sports history is full of stirring episodes of David beating Goliath!!

India’s ICOMM Signs Agreement with CARACAL of UAE for Transfer of Technology In Small Arms

0

Abu Dhabi (UAE): In India’s defence manufacturing growth story ICOMM, a group company of Megha Engineering & Infrastructures Ltd (MEIL), has taken centre stage. On February 21, 2023, ICOMM signed a partnership, and licensing agreement, with UAE-based EDGE entity CARACAL for the first-ever Transfer of Technology (ToT) in defence articles. As per the agreement, ICOMM will locally manufacture CARACAL’s complete line of small arms for the Indian market under the ‘Make in India’ and Aatmanirbhar Bharat initiatives. 

The signing took place at the ongoing IDEX 2023 in Abu Dhabi, UAE, one of the largest tri-service defence exhibitions in the world. 

ICOMM will manufacture the full range of CARACAL small arms, including the versatile CARACAL EF pistol, modern CMP 9 submachine gun, CAR 814, CAR 816 and CAR 817 tactical rifles, CAR 817 DMR tactical sniper rifle, CSR 50 anti-material sniper rifle, CSR 338 and CSR 308 bolt action sniper rifles and the CSA 338 semi-automatic sniper rifle.

Sumanth P, Chief of ICOMM, said, “India’s Defence industry is on a strong path to develop its sovereign manufacturing capabilities. This agreement exemplifies the commitment shown by CARACAL to aid India’s ambitions towards making the defence sector self-sufficient.” 

The Indian Government seriously took up the indigenisation of Defence manufacturing, allowing the private sector to manufacture weapons, breaking the age-old view to ensure no disruptions in the supply chain. Sumanth added, “Our entry into small arms production is a proud moment for us.” 

CARACAL’s complete line of small arms will be produced in ICOMM’s world-class design, development and manufacturing centre in Hyderabad. ICOMM is one of the largest companies manufacturing missiles & sub-systems, communications & EW systems, radars, electro-optics, composites, loitering munitions, shelters, drone & counter-drone systems. 

Hamad Al Ameri, CEO of CARACAL, said, “This strategically important signing with ICOMM for collaboration in the Indian market is a key objective for CARACAL. As India continues to realise its sovereign defence ambitions, we look forward to partnering with ICOMM, whose capabilities in providing end-to-end solutions across multiple sectors, including engineering and defence, complement CARACAL’s portfolio of advanced small arms. 

About the companies, striking the deal

ICOMM is a group company of Megha Engineering & Infrastructures Ltd (MEIL), which is one of the largest infrastructure companies in India, with Annual Sales of over USD 4.0 Bn with over 40,000 employees and working on various projects, spread across 18 offices across the Globe.

Whereas Megha Engineering and Infrastructures Ltd. (MEIL) established in 1989, is one of the fastest-growing infra companies in India. Globally the company has its footprint in over 20 countries. 

Established in 2007, CARACAL is a regional and international leader in high-performance small arms. The company designs, engineers, innovates and manufactures mission-proven firearms for law enforcement, security and military forces, with a production legacy spanning more than 15 years. CARACAL is part of the Missiles & Weapons cluster of EDGE Group, an advanced technology group that ranks among the top 25 military suppliers in the world. 

Launched in November 2019, the UAE’s EDGE is one of the world’s leading advanced technology groups, established to develop agile, bold and disruptive solutions for defence and beyond, and to be a catalyst for change and transformation. Headquartered in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the UAE, EDGE consolidates more than 20 entities into four core clusters: Platforms & Systems, Missiles & Weapons, Electronic Warfare & Cyber Technologies, and Trading & Mission Support.

What Do You Know About The Investments of George Soros, The Latest Critic Of PM Modi

0

DelhiThe Hungary-born US-based billionaire has left his footprints in India through his Open Society Foundation. This trust has been working in India since 1999 after George Soros hit the world by weakening a few currencies and minting money. 

In India, the Open Society Foundation has helped more than 40,000 Micro Small and Middle Enterprises and more than 37 lakh poor people. It gives more than six hundred scholarships every year as well. 

According to the OSF official website, “OSF organises a career recognition program for students in Senior school and Junior colleges to give them a pathway to choose collegiate programs” through Operation Sahay Foundation. 

Its official website claims, “OSF provides resources for basic schooling – a good bag, lunch box, water bottle, notebooks and stationery items. We identify such schools where this is a necessity. This will stimulate their desire to attend school regularly. Parents from a poor economic background are also much relieved by this provision.”

Operation Sahay Foundation is not a clandestine organisation. It is based in Bangalore, works openly and boasts of “running the programme designed to benefit the deprived in Education & Training, Healthcare and Social Upliftment.” 

Operation Sahay Foundation also runs Sahay Arogya Yojana. Its official website writes,

“Projects under Sahay Aarogya Yojana of OSF include AMP (Aarogya Medical Points that works for the betterment of basic medical access in remote locations. Providing Oxygen Concentrator and consumables for non-commercial Covid19 care providers (hospitals). Making available Oxygen Concentrators for Covid patients who are prescribed to use them for a temporary duration.”

OSF also runs Sahay Krishi Yojana. 

Why has the nationalist government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi not taken stern actions against the Open Society Foundation, which, in Union Minister Smriti Irani’s words, ‘has mounted a war against India’ by criticising the prime minister?

Oswal Group of companies set up a fertiliser plant in Punjab’s Sangrur in 2013 and the Soros Fund invested a whopping Rs. 1,530 crores in the project. 

George Soros Fund has invested in other projects as well. 

Besides, George Soros has invested thousands of crores of rupees in the Indian stock market through Foreign Institutional Investors. Again, it can not be a clandestine operation and must be under the watch of the stock market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India.

Soros Fund has invested in companies dealing with food processing, vegetable oil, pharmaceuticals, fertilisers and other businesses. 

In Tamil Nadu, Soros Fund also runs Be Well Hospitals that claims to have ‘benefitted 5,00,000 patients, 10,000 health checkups, performing 30,000 surgeries’

According to its website, “The hospital hopes to see more people in India and around the world getting non-compromised, evidence-based healthcare. Working towards this end, Be Well has been setting up hospitals with world-class infrastructure in locations that currently have limited access to healthcare.”

It aims to ‘establish secondary care hospitals (50 to 75 beds) in all semi-urban & district headquarters towns across India and create a bigger network delivering big promises. Be Well will become the first organised private player in this “secondary plus healthcare model”, an integrator between primary and tertiary care hospitals.’

Open Society Foundation also funds the French NGO Sherpa. According to its official website, this organisation claims to ‘fight new forms of impunity linked to globalisation, work for human rights and environmental protection in value chains, and tackle illicit financial flows.’ 

French organisation Sherpa moved the Supreme Court against the Rafale Deal in 2018, it might have unnerved the ruling party and the government. 

The OSF also helps the Human Rights Law Network, Coordination of Democratic Rights Organisation, Right to Food Campaign, Centre for Policy Research, Association of Democratic Research, and Namati of Nobel Laureate economist Amartya Sen.

When the government put 18 NGOs under its watch list in 2016, it included Soros Fund Management. 

But the pertinent question remains, why has the government under Modi not taken action against these operations?

Attacking Soros, Union Minister Smriti Irani said, “The man who broke the Bank of England. A man who is known and designated as an economic war criminal by a nation has now pronounced his desire to break Indian democracy.” 

Foreign Minister S Jaishankar called George Soros ‘old, rich, opinionated and dangerous’.

Attending the Raisina Conference in the Australian city of Sydney, he said, “But he is old, rich, opinionated and dangerous because what happens is when such people, such views and such organisations – they actually invest resources in shaping narratives.”

The knee-jerk reaction of the government raises another question. Is the Indian government following the Chinese model of Wolf Warrior diplomacy?

‘Wolf Warrior diplomacy’ is the belligerent language used by Chinese diplomats since Xi Jinping came to power. Instead of introspecting, the government spokespersons come out with strong words and point out the history of western hypocrisy and imperialism. 

The Wolf Warrior spokespersons of the Chinese government paint anything critical as an interference in its internal affairs. 

They also call any criticism of the regime an attack on its civilisation, history, and values and a plot by foreign powers unable to stomach the rise of a rival in Asia.

Are we following the Chinese?

After Hindenburg, Forbes Reveals About Mysterious Offshore Companies Of Adani’s Brother

0

Delhi: A report prepared by the New York-based short-selling firm Hindenburg Research created ripples in the Indian corporate world and rocked its stock markets like never before.

Adani group of companies and its owner Gautam Adani were at the centre of the storm that shook the political establishment too. But the information unearthed by the US firm seems to be the tip of the iceberg.

If a recent report by US media giant Forbes is to be believed, the Adani group controlled several shell companies, siphoned off billions of dollars, pumped money into its Indian entities illegally and held information from the regulators. Gautam Adani’s brother Vinod was at the vortex of these operations.

Vinod Adani is a man who keeps himself away from the media glare and limelight, prefers to remain in the shadow of his brother and works silently. He holds a Cypriot passport, has his residence in Singapore and has spent a large part of his life abroad.

But he also holds many offshore firms in tax havens like Mauritius, the Cayman Islands, the Bahamas, the Virgin Islands, and the United Arab Emirates. He has used these bases for investing money into Indian companies, avoiding taxes, and withholding information from the Securities and Exchange Board of India and other government agencies, that too preferred to look the other way.

The report published by Hindenburg Research says that Vinod Adani, “Manages a vast labyrinth of offshore shell entities,” that have, “Collectively moved billions of dollars into Indian Adani’s publicly listed and private entities, often without required disclosure of the related party nature of the deals.”

By doing this, Vinod Adani has helped the Adani Group evade Indian laws that require at least 25% of a company’s publicly traded stock to be owned by non-insiders.

The Adani Group hit the headlines in 2022 when it bought the Swiss company Holcim’s stakes in its Indian cement giants Ambuja Cements Ltd and ACC Ltd for USD 10.5 billion. With this takeover, the Adani Group became the second-largest cement company in the country.

It is interesting to note that Vinod Adani’s company Endeavour Trade and Investment Ltd served as the acquisition vehicle for this takeover.

But other dealings and investments of Vinod Adani are not this much transparent.

According to the Forbes report, Vinod Adani’s company Singapore-based Pinnacle Trade and Investment Pte. Lte., took a loan of USD 263 million from Russia’s government-controlled VTB Bank. But out of the borrowing, Pinnacle gave away USD 258 million to an unnamed firm.

Pinnacle pledged two investment companies-Afro Asian Trade and Investment Ltd and Worldwide Emerging Market Holdings Ltd as guarantors for the same loan.

It is interesting to know that Vinod Adani owns Mauritius-based Acropolis Trade and Investments Limited, which holds 100% stakes in Worldwide Emerging Market Holdings Ltd.

These two companies, Afro Asian Trade and Investment Ltd and Worldwide Emerging Market Holdings Ltd, are large Adani Group shareholders. They hold about USD 4 billion worth of shares in Adani Enterprises, Adani Power, Adani Ports and Adani Transmission. These two companies are also the promoter entities of these firms.

These offshore companies were pledged by Pinnacle for the VTB Bank loan.

But, neither Afro Asian Trade and Investment Ltd nor Worldwide Emerging Market Holdings disclosed the share pledge for the four Adani Group companies.

Actually, Pinnacle pledged these offshore funds instead of the Adani Group shares to secure the Russian loan so that they might enjoy the exemption of the obligation of disclosing the pledged share.

The SEBI was in complete oblivion of these pieces of information and developments till recently. The regulator came out of its slumber after the Hindenburg Report and the subsequent hullabaloo.

The regulator told the Supreme Court last Monday that it was “enquiring into both the allegations made in the Hindenburg report as well as the market activity immediately preceding and post the publication of the report.”

Indeed, but only after the opposition rocked the Parliament for several days on this issue.

Vakodar Investment, a Cyprus-based company owned by Vinod Adani received a loan of USD 230 million from Vinod and an offshore firm in Dubai. But immediately after that, it purchased the convertible debentures of Adani Estates and Adani Land Developers.

Convertible debentures are loan instruments that pay interest at a fixed rate for a fixed period and get converted into equity of the company at a fixed date.

The two firms are subsidiaries of another group company Adani Infrastructure and Developers.

Adani Infrastructure and Developers was a subsidiary of Adani Enterprises, the publicly-traded and flagship company of the group. But Adani Enterprises revealed in its 2013 annual report that it had sold the company in June 2012 with a profit of USD 8.15 million.

It may appear bizarre, but Adani Enterprises in its annual report of 2017 mentioned Adani Infrastructure and Developers as its ‘related enterprise.’ In other words, the company became a ‘related enterprise’ of Adani Enterprises four years after it was sold.

It raises the question if the reported profit from the sale of the company was genuine or whether it was window dressing.

If the Forbes report is to be believed, the Adani family controlled Adani Infrastructure and Developers in 2017 through another group company Adani Properties.

The SB Adani Family Trust, Gautam Adani’s son Karan Adani and Adani Commodities own Adani Properties. Adani Commodities is a subsidiary of Adani Enterprises. So, Adani Enterprises owns, at least partially, the company it sold in 2012.

Will CPIML’s Party Congress work as a catalyst for opposition unity before 2024 Lok Sabha polls?

0

Patna: Call for the opposition unity against Bharatiya Janata Party given at the Party Congress of CPIML seems to have hit the right chord, as several leaders across the parties and country attended the convention in Patna and pledged to form an anti-fascist alliance.

CPIML is also an ally of the ruling Mahagathbandhan in Bihar. 

Themed as ‘Save Constitution, Save Democracy, Save India’ convention had the participants not only the gathbandhan leaders including Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar, deputy CM Tejashwi Yadav, senior Congress leader Salman Khurshid but also Left leaders like Md Salim and critical thinkers like Arundhati Roy in attendance. The meet stressed on the need of a strong opposition unity against the BJP, which they termed as Anti-Fascist resistance alliance.

Speaking on the third day of the convention, chief minister Nitish Kumar said, “The decision we have taken towards the Mahagathbandhan has gone well with the people, so we will continue to work like this together. But we have a responsibility beyond Bihar, and in light of the 2024 election, we must fight together and get rid of the current regime.” He reiterated that he has no wish for any post now but he wants to dislodge BJP from the center. 

Deputy chief minister Tejashwi Yadav mentioned, “We do not have Ambani-Adani to bankroll us. We also don’t misuse the government institutions to crack down on opposition, yet despite the attacks on us, we came together in Bihar to teach BJP a lesson and establish a unity based on the country’s interest”. He added, “We have said it time and again that in places where regional parties are strong, they should be given the driving seat and where there is a bipolar contest between the Congress and BJP, we will support Congress.”

Salman Khurshid, former cabinet minister pointed out, “What we face today are fascist powers. But they are cowards. Our unity will scare them to retreat.” He said that oppositional unity will show the way forward to counter hatred mongered by the BJP. He assured that he will take forward the message of unity in the Congress party, which is also ready to build oppositional unity.

Earlier, CPIML General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya had said, “The agenda of this convention is very clear – if the Constitution and democracy are in danger, there is a need for a decisive struggle to save them from the fascist forces and we need a grand unity for that.” He added that time and again, Bihar has shown how opposition is built both on the streets and electorally. The General Secretary added that the convention being called as part of the 11th Party Congress is a clarion call for resistance and opposition to the emergency-like situation in the country.

cpiml party congress opposition unity anti-fascist alliance
Arundhati Roy | Courtesy: Facebook/CPIML Liberation, Bihar

It was also attended by Member of Parliament from Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi, Tamil Nadu, Thol. Thirumavalavan, who said “We must oppose bigotry uncompromisingly. Fascism is hitting Indian democracy like a tsunami. It wants to make sure that a majority government will function as a majoritarian government.”

A day ahead of the convention, eminent writer Arundhati Roy called upon social groups and political parties to unite to fight against fascist forces in the country. Roy said on the second day of the convention, “The Social groups and the parties engaged in anti-caste and anti-capitalist struggles in the country have to come together.” Roy had earlier also attended CPIML’s Party Congress but this time, her presence and appeal for the opposition parties as well as civil society to unite has more significance ahead of 2024 Lok Sabha polls.

The same day, CPIML delegates adopted two resolutions. The first one, to recognize fascism as the main threat to people and democracy and the second to identify the nature of Indian fascism at the present juncture—as the manifestation of the corporate-communal nexus. 

Several dignitaries of fraternal organizations from Australia, Venezuela, Ukraine, Bangladesh, Nepal and Palestine were present in the convention. Communist groups from Cuba, Laos, Philippines, Cyprus, Germany, Argentina, Iran, Namibia and Afghanistan sent their solidarity messages to the Congress. 

Before the convention, CPIML had a major rally at Gandhi Maidan, Patna on February 15, which political observers believed that it reflected the increasing mass presence of the party.

देश के शहरों की संस्कृति पर आधारित दो दिवसीय ‘शहरनामा’ रविवार से

जयपुर: प्रभा खेतान फाउण्डेशन की ओर से 19 और 20 फरवरी को आईटीसी राजपूताना होटल, जयपुर में दो दिवसीय साहित्योत्सव ‘शहरनामा कहानी-अपने शहरों’ ऐ बुटीक लिट्रेचर फैस्टिवल का आयोजन किया जाएगा। शहरनामा फेस्टिवल की डायरेक्टर नीलिमा डालमिया और अपरा कुच्छल ने बताया कि शहरनामा जैसे कार्यक्रमों के जरिए यह प्रयास है कि देश के सभी दूसरे शहरों के इतिहास सहित स्थानीय परम्पराओं, लोकोक्तियों और ऐतिहासिक स्थलों के बारे में जानकारी लोगों को शेयर की जाए। ‘शहरनामा कहानी अपने-अपने शहरों की’ फैस्टिवल के आयोजन की पहली बार जयपुर शहर से शुरु हो रही है।

पर्यटन विभाग एवं श्रीं सीमेंट के सहयोग से आयोजित होने वाले इस कार्यक्रम में उन लेखकों से चर्चा होगी जिन्होंने देश के ख्यातनाम शहरों पर किताबें लिखी हैं। जयपुर, जोधपुर व पुष्कर, दिल्ली भोपाल व लखनऊ सहित देश में कई ऐसे कई शहर हैं जो अपने आप में एक इतिहास समेटे हुए हैं। इन शहरों पर किताब लिखने वाले लेखक अपने-अपने शहरों से जुड़ी यादें, किस्से, कला-संस्कृति, खानपान, पुरामहत्व व प्राचीन इमारतों के बारे में बात करेंगे और अपने अपने अनुभवों के बारे में बताएंगे। शहरनामा में दो दिन में 18 सैशन्स आयोजित किए जाएंगे।

19 फरवरी को सुबह 9.45 पर कव्वालियों से होगी शुरूआत

दो दिवसीय इस उत्सव की शुरूआत 19 फरवरी को होटल आईटीसी राजपूताना में सुबह 9.45 बजे आफाताब कादरी और तारीक फैज़ के सूफी कव्वाली गायन से होगी। 10.45 से 11.15 बजे तक उद्घाटन सत्र आयोजित किया जाएगा इसके बाद 11.25 शाम 5.45 बजे तक विभिन्न सत्र आयोजित किए जाएंगे जिनमें शिरकत करने वाले लेखक अपने अपने अंदाज़ में देश के विभिन्न शहरों की संस्कृति से संबंधित विचार व्यक्त करेंगे।

20 फरवरी के कार्यक्रम

इसी तरह 20 फरवरी को समारोह की शुरूआत  सुबह 9.45 बजे पद्मश्री गुलाबो और शकंुतला सरूपुरिया की प्रस्तुतियों से होगी। इसके बाद सुबह 10.30 बजे से दोपहर 1.40 बजे तक विभिन्न सत्र आयोजित किए जाएंगे जिनमें शिरकत करने वाले लेखक अपने अपने अंदाज़ में देश के विभिन्न शहरों की संस्कृति से संबंधित विचार व्यक्त करेंगे।

देश के ये नामी लेखक करेंगे शिरकत

फैजल अलकाजी, डॉ.संदीप पुरोहित, अभय के, अनूठी विशाल, मेहरू जफर, मिहिर वत्स, अदिति दुग्गड, मनीष मल्होत्रा, महक माहेश्वरी, वर्तुल सिंह, हिमांशु बाजपेई, सलमान चिश्ती, अनंत विजय, आलोक श्रीवास्तव, रशीद किदवई, अनीसुर रहमान, सुधा सदानंद, तृप्ति पांडे, यतींद्र मिश्रा, सुतापा मुखर्जी, जितेंद्र दीक्षित, अधिरजा रायचौधरी, अमनदीप संधु, स्वप्ना लिंडले, आशुतोष जी पोद्दार, संदेश भंडारी, स्मिता भारद्वाज,मोजेज सिंह, लक्ष्मीप्रसाद पंत,प्रो. विनोद शास्त्री व जितेंद्र सिंह शेखावत।

Kolkata Slum Kids Shine As New Kickboxing National Champions Of India

0

Kolkata: Mohammad Rahul Haldar, a 15-year-old boy from Kolkata, won a gold medal in the 42-kilogram weight category at the Kickboxing National Championship in Delhi, along with four other students from the Umeed Academy. The students’ achievements are particularly significant, as they come from underprivileged background and live in slums.

Shahnaz Perween won silver in the 42-weight category, Afifa Perween won silver in the 32-weight category, Md Husnain Ali won bronze in the 40-weight category, and Raunak Khatoon won bronze in the below 10-year category.

Umeed Academy, which is home to 230 students from impoverished families, provides not just free education but a holistic approach to the overall development of its children. The academy sent six children to the championship, and five of them won medals.

Haldar’s father is a mason, while Afifa’s father is a barber. Husnain’s father operates an eatery, and Raunak’s mother works in a slipper factory, while her father has gone missing. Their achievement is significant as it demonstrates the potential of the underprivileged youth, who are often overlooked in sports.

The kickboxing participants were daily trained for two and a half hours by professional coach Sahil Akram, who is a state-level kickboxing player himself. Akram works with Toponomics, a center of training for Kickboxing.

Coach Akram has all praise for the champions. “The kids used to do cage fights in the academy under the guidance of Nuur Bhutia sir. In the last two months, they have undergone rigorous training. They had a lot of injuries too. They played in nationals without sparing. But they are born fighters, and it is in their genes to stand up to overcoming the injuries. The academy had hired a nutritionist for them, so their diet was good too,” he told eNewsroom over phone from Delhi.

“We need to work hard for future events, but I am optimistic about it as they are very talented kids,” Akram added.

Umeed Academy, the brainchild of social activist Wali Rahmani, has a twelve-hour curriculum for its pupils, which includes education, three meals, books, uniforms, and sports activities. He informed that annually, Rs 35000 expenses occurred on every child. The academy has been running for the last four years. It use to train its students in a variety of sports categories.

Rahmani claims that at least thirty students can be sent for championships under the mixed martial arts category but lack of funds has been preventing the academy from doing so.

The academy has had to bear a cost of around one lakh rupees to make it possible for six of its children to participate in the championship hosted at the national capital.

Rahmani during foundation stone laying ceremony of Umeed’s new building had highlighted on the need for funds to expand the academy’s operations.

He also has special thanks for Partha Sarkar and Supriyo Samanta, Heads of the Kickboxing Federation of West Bengal. They have acted as a catalyst for Umeed children otherwise, it would not have been possible, Rahmani mentioned.

The five medalists will now be participating in the next Asian Games in their respective categories.

Raids on BBC: Intimidating Indian Democracy!

0

New Delhi: When the news of the Income Tax raids on New Delhi and Mumbai offices on the BBC was broken on the television channels, many people were surprised, some of them were utterly shocked.

It came suddenly. But it is just a continuation of the government’s intimidation process, where media outlets critical of the government and the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, are being threatened, silenced, or bought.

The raids came weeks after the BBC screened its documentary ‘India: The Modi Question’. The two-part documentary traces the rise of Narendra Modi and analyses his politics after the 2002 anti-Muslim riots in Gujarat when he was the chief minister of the state.

More than 1,000 people, mostly Muslims, were killed in the riots.

The riots erupted after a compartment of Sabarmati Express was set on fire, killing dozens of Hindu pilgrims.

The documentary was aired in the UK, not in India. The government called it a ‘bundle of lies’, and ‘propaganda’ and rejected it as a ‘colonial mindset’.

It also ordered Youtube and Twitter to block the links to the documentary.

The police swung into action and thrashed the students gathered to watch the documentary in the central university of Jamia Millia Islamia and other places. The screening was banned at iconic Jawaharlal Nehru University and many other universities. Nevertheless, the documentary was screened in many places.

Earlier too, the government raided many media outlets, though nothing much came out afterwards.

Raghav Behl’s Quint was raided, and Behal himself was questioned for hours by the Enforcement Directorate sleuths in Mumbai.

Later, he sold the Quint.

NDTV head Pranoy Roy, considered by many the father of television journalism in India, was also grilled. He was accused of bank fraud and money laundering. All charges were dropped later as the agencies failed to prove these in court.

Gautam Adani, considered close to Modi, bought NDTV recently.

Premises of the Hindi daily Bhaskar were raided in Madhya Pradesh.

Before the raids, Bhaskar had published stories on the floating corpses on the Ganges and the makeshift graves on its banks in the wake of Corona. Its Editor also wrote an opinion piece in the New York Times, titled ‘The Ganges is returning the dead, it does not lie’.

Bharat Samachar, a small television channel in Uttar Pradesh was not spared either. It said that it was punished for its coverage of bodies on the holy river.

Exactly two years ago, NewsClick, an independent digital-only media organization was raided too.

Whereas, most of the media houses in India, now are completely biased and carry out propaganda on behalf of the government and the ruling party. Many of these media outlets also indulge in Islamophobia and air stories and programmes demonizing Muslims and Islam.

The raids on the BBC have sent a strong signal to the media to fall in line or face government wrath.

But many people believe that the government has exposed itself to these raids. It has made it clear that none will be spared if it goes against the government, ruling party and the Hindutva brigade.

Press bodies, Editors Guild of India, Press Council of India, DigiPub News India Foundation and Press Club of Bangalore have issued statements and condemned the IT Survey on BBC in the strongest terms. They all mentioned that it is an attempt to stifle the media.

Shivkant, a retired Editor of BBC Hindi writes on his Facebook page, “The Modi government has proved the proverb a guilty conscience accuses itself right as the Income Tax department has raided the offices of the BBC. Questioning the bias of the BBC and losing its balance is a strategy difficult to comprehend. The raids have provided firm background to the questions raised by the BBC documentary and the Adani controversy that has enraged the government.”

The BBC is not a local newspaper or a regional television channel with a limited impact. It is the most reputed and trustworthy media outlet, with tremendous impact and far-reaching consequences. The BBC is watched and listened to in almost all countries in the world with its operations in about 150 countries and 42 languages.

One can recall the BBC story exposing the false claims of the British government on the Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq.

People still remember the Princess Diana interview taken by Martin Basheer of the BBC. Diana accused then-Prince Charles of adultery and also accepted her relationship with Hasnat Khan, a Pakistani-origin doctor. It shook the monarchy and the two soon separated.

And the Modi government has raided this media behemoth!

The image of India is already in tatters for its Islamophobia and treatment of Muslims.  It will be further damaged. The MEA mandarins will find it more difficult to justify this kind of high-handedness.

But the raids are not about the BBC. It is about the freedom of expression, democracy in the country, and the Fascism it is moving towards.

Is Membership Of A Banned Organisation Enough To Be Punished Under UAPA?

0

Is only membership of a banned organisation or ‘unlawful association’ sufficient enough to be punished under the UAPA? Or some overt actions over and above the membership is necessary to attract the penal provisions of the act?

A Supreme Court bench of Justices MR Shah, CT Ravikumar and Sanjay Karol has begun hearing the judgment of a two-judge bench of Justices Dipak Misra and AM Sapre. This case is related to Arup Bhuyan, Sri Indra Das and Raneef and the judgment was announced in 2014.

In the case related to Raneef, the two-member bench of the apex court in its judgment upheld that mere membership of a banned outfit will not incriminate a person until he resorts to violence or incites people to commit violence or does an act intended to create a disturbance of public peace by resorting to violence.

In the Arup Bhuyan case, the same two-member bench of the Supreme Court reiterated this view in the context of Section 3(5) of TADA.

In Indra Das’ case, the bench upheld this view once again.

Representing the view of the Union of India, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said that if an organisation is banned under Section 3, its members will be liable to punishment up to two years and a fine may be slapped beside it. Under Section 10 (b) if a man does something more besides being a member of the banned organisation, his offence will be graver. So his punishment will be more.

Section 10 (b) (i) says that if a man continues to be a member of a banned organisation and does an act that aids and abates the offence in any way or has fire-arms or weapons or explosives that cause mass destruction and death or injuries that might lead to death, he will be liable for death punishment or life imprisonment.

The solicitor general said that if a man is a member of Lashkar-e-Taiba, which is a banned organisation, he can not say that he is only a member. He added further that if a man invites the leader of a banned outfit, he can not say that he just invited the leader for a dinner and that he did not intend to collect money or weapons or he did not conspire.

Justice Shah said that if an organisation is banned, and a person is found to be associated with the outfit or a member of the organisation, he should know that this organisation is banned. He said further that the Parliament had made being a member of the banned organisation itself an offence.

Justice Shah said further that if a person becomes a member of a banned organisation, he should be wiser, he should know that the outfit is unlawful.

This matter is significant because, in the Kedarnath Singh vs State of Bihar case of 1962, a five-judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India was tasked with deciding on the constitutionality of the provision, which, over the years, has been used as a tool to curb dissent against the powers that be.

The Bench of then Chief Justice of BP Sinha and Justices SK Das, AK Sarkar, RN Ayyangar and JR Mudholkar tried to balance the offence of Sedition against the right to free speech and expression.

The Bench was to decide multiple appeals and petitions filed before it. One of these was an appeal filed by Kedar Nath Singh against a judgment of the Patna High Court which upheld his conviction under Section 124A of the IPC.

The Court upheld that any spoken or written words which have “implicit in them the idea of subverting government by violent means” will fall under the definition of Sedition.

However, the Court clarified that any strong statements expressing disapprobation of the measures of the government or any action taken by the government will not fall within the ambit of Sedition.

The Apex Court is yet to come out with its judgment that may be considered the final word on the subject.