Home Blog Page 189

Students pull hair, tears clothes of minister, he hurls abuse, elbows a student in Jadavpur University

0

Kolkata: It seems, like the confrontation of Student Unions of Jadavpur University (JU) with Union Minister Babul Supriyo is not going to melt down easily as the Student Federation of India (JU Chapter) and all other Left affiliated student unions across the city assembled together to lodge a formal complain against Supriyo and Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parisad (ABVP) members who ransacked the SFI Union rooms within the JU campus.

Meanwhile, newly entrant to BJP, West Bengal, Agnimitra Paul, a fashion designer-turned-politician too lodged a counter-complaint against the SFI and Left affiliated unions of JU.

The clash between ABVP and Left might not be a new thing for Delhi, but such clashes are now becoming frequent in Kolkata too, especially JU. Last time that hooliganism of this stature took place in Kolkata was when Vidyasagar’s bust was ransacked at Vidyasagar College. This took place when the present Home Minister Amit Shah’s convoy was passing College Street area and a scuffle broke out when TMC Student Union leaders chanted “Amit Shah Go Back” from the college campus.

Supriyo while speaking to media persons said, “I am saddened by the way some students heckled me. They pulled my hair and even pushed me. The incident is deplorable.”

A similar slogan coined by JU student union leaders – “Babul Go Back” greeted the Union Minister when he entered the university campus on Thursday to attend a Freshers’ event organised by JU’s ABVP chapter. The unperturbed minister attended the event. The scuffle or clash took place when the event got over and Supriyo was on his way back and was again greeted by the same sloganeering inside the campus.

SFI leader, Debraj Debnath reacted, “We were back then also holding a peaceful demonstration. It was only after Babul Supriyo became aggressive with us, that the scuffle broke within the campus. And following this, the way ABVP goons ransacked the university in the presence of the Union Minister and the Governor speaks volume.

Following which Supriyo while speaking to media persons said, “I am saddened by the way some students heckled me. They pulled my hair and even pushed me. The incident is deplorable.” He even in an interaction hinted the Vice-Chancellor of being a Leftist and hence not allowing police to enter the university campus. Meanwhile, his PR team (@TeamBabul) tweeted, “@SuPriyoBabul Heckled at #JadavpurUniversity by Pro-Naxal Students, Barred From Participating in Freshers’ Event”.

But SFI leader, Debraj Debnath reacted, “We were back then also holding a peaceful demonstration. It was only after Babul Supriyo became aggressive with us, that the scuffle broke within the campus. And following this, the way ABVP goons ransacked the university in the presence of the Union Minister and the Governor speaks volume. Today again we shall be holding a peaceful rally at JU to condemn what ABVP goons have done to our union rooms and university. They had come armed with acid bombs and other inflammable substances.”

Adding to that another JU student, Saranya Basu, said, “I was present when the clash broke out. Believe me we had no intention of manhandling the Union Minister. In fact we had only wanted to black flag him. We had even created a barricade to help him attend the Fresher’s event organised by ABVP. However, when the event got over he began demanding an apology and went and sat atop the bonnet of the car that belonged to the Press. We agree that there was heated debate between us and him but the violence broke out only when he roughed up with the students. He even assaulted a female student. It was following this that things got violent. And we know all know how ABVP, Durga Vahini and others ransacked the college.”

SFI ABVP Students Unions Left Jadavpur university babul supriyo
Union Minister Babul Supriyo pulls t-shirt of a protester at Jadavpur University

Speaking to the incident that took place at JU, Prof Nandini Chatterjee, who is associated with JU’s Computer Science and Engineering Department and is also the Vice-President of Jadavpur University Teachers Associations (JUTA) told eNewsroom said, “I wasn’t present there when this incident took place. Whatever happened is condemnable. However, I believe had the Union Minister talked to the agitated students in a polite manner, the result would have been different.” She further added, “I have come to know from sources that many outsiders were seen alongside ABVP goons who ransacked the SFI union room and set ablaze some benches etc in front of the university gate. We have never witnessed such an attack on JU. However, I believe that no JU student is capable of doing such a thing, even if they are with ABVP. The violence the ensued is definitely by outsiders seeking to politically benefit a certain party.”

She added, “The situation is comparable to any university in Delhi where the Left has a significant presence. The ABVP goons always create such unpleasant situations in Universities and Colleges that have SFI or Leftist at the helm of the college or university union. Today’s incident is a clear indication of them trying the same here.”

Meanwhile, BJP has also alleged that the JU episode was pre-planned. However, amid all, pictures of Union Minister pulling the T-Shirt of the agitators have also emerged along with videos of ABVP members wreaking havoc within the University premise.

Repeated attempts to contact Suranjan Das, VC of JU, by eNewsroom remained unsuccessful.

समलैंगिक सम्बन्ध में नहीं थी पेड़ से लटकी पायी गयी आदिवासी खिलाड़ी लड़कियां- पीड़ित परिवार

रांची: 11 अगस्त को दो आदिवासी लड़कियों का शव सिमडेगा के अरानी पंचायत में पेड़ से शव को लटकते पाया गया था। ये दोनों श्रधा (सिमडेगा) और सुनंदिनी (राउरकेला) हॉकी खिलाडी थी एवं कई अन्य खेलो के टूर्नामेंट में भी भाग ली थी। दोनों लड़कियां हमीरपुर, राउरकेला में मैरी पूर्ति के यहाँ रहकर इन्ही की दिशा निर्देश में हॉकी सिख रही थी। मैरी पूर्ति विभिन्न क्षेत्रो से महिला खिलाडियों को प्रशिक्षण एवं आगे की पढाई में मदद करने के नाम पर उन्हें राउरकेला बुलाती थी।

वही सिमडेगा पुलिस इस घटना को दोनों के बिच में प्रेम प्रसंग और समलैंगिक सम्बन्ध होने की वजह से आत्मत्या मान रही है।

17 अगस्त से 22 अगस्त तक सामाजिक कार्यकर्ता, वकील एवं अन्य संगठन से जुड़े लोग इस घटना से सम्बंधित तथ्यों को जानने के लिए झारखण्ड के सिमडेगा, अरानी,बीरू, भुकुमुंडा पतराटोली, बांसजोर एवं ओड़िशा के लचड़ा, गुरुनंदिया, हमीरपुर (राउरकेला) का दौरा किया। दल ने मृतक लडकियों के परिवार, ग्रामीण, कोच और पुलिस से मुलाकात की।

तथ्यान्वेषण के दौरान दल ने पाया की इन लड़कियों के दोनों परिवारों एवं ग्रामीणों ने इस घटना को हत्या बताया है पर पुलिस ने श्रधा और सुनंदिनी के परिवार वालों के पक्ष को नही सुना और आगे की कारवाई से इंकार कर दिया। साथ ही पुलिस ने श्रधा के पिता को ही फ़साने की धमकी भी दी। इस घटना में गवाह पुष्पा लोहार के अनुसार श्रधा और सुनंदिनी के बिच समलैंगिक सम्बन्ध थे, श्रधा नशे की आदि थी, श्रधा की पिता की तीन शादियाँ हुई है।  लेकिन दल ने श्रधा के परिवार और गाँव के लोगो से बातचीत से पाया की पुष्पा के ये सारे बयान गलत है, श्रधा के पिता राजेश सोरेंग की एक ही शादी हुई है और वो किसी प्रकार का नशा नही करती थी और छोटी उम्र से ही तैराकी करती थी।

पुलिस ने इस घटना से सम्बंधित विभिन्न पहलु– अंतिम बार सुनंदिनी के फोन से सोनम पूर्ती के फ़ोन पर मैसेज किया था, सोनम पूर्ति ने मृत्यु के घटना के एक दिन पहले ही सुनंदिनी के सारे सामान राउरकेला से लगभग 80 से 90 किलोमीटर दूर सुनंदिनी के गाँव लचडा पहुंचा दिया, मैरी पूर्ति के लडकियों को पढाने के नाम पर ओड़ीसा लाने के बावजूद कहीं भी नामांकन कराने को लेकर जाँच पड़ताल नही की। सुनंदिनी के कोच मैरी पूर्ति के परिवार के सदस्यों से पूछताछ एवं अन्य जाँच नही की गयी।

इस पुरे घटना में पुलिस और गवाह के बयान के अनुसार समलैंगिकता को एक आरोप की तरह इस्तेमाल किया गया और मामले को दबाने की कोशिश की गयी।

गत वर्ष सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने 377 हटाकर समलैंगिकता को अपराधमुक्त किया है एवं एक समान समलैंगिक व्यक्ति को जीने का अधिकार है।

फैक्ट फाइंडिंग टीम ने मांग किया है, 1- इस घटना को पुनः निष्पक्ष झारखण्ड एवं ओड़िशा पुलिस जाँच करे, 2- पुलिस के द्वारा समलैंगिकता को नकारात्मक एवं अपराध की दिशा में बयान देने को लेकर इस घटना की जाँच से सम्बंधित पुलिसों पर करवाई की जाए, 3- आखिरी बार सुनंदिनी के फोन के अनुसार सोनम पूर्ती को मैसेज किया था, इस मैसेज के आधार पर धारा 306 के तहत सोनम पूर्ती से पूछ-ताछ और प्राथमिकी दर्ज की जाए, 4- झारखण्ड सरकार यह सुनश्चित करे की इस घटना से सम्बंधित जाँच के दौरान श्रधा और सुनंदिनी के परिवार पर दबाव न बनाया जाए एवं पूर्ण सरकारी सहयोग मिले।

दल में शामिल व्यक्ति– तारामणि साहू (सामाजिक कार्यकर्ता), पल्लवी प्रतिभा (सामाजिक कार्यकर्ता), आरिफ राजा (NHRO),  धर्मेन्द्र (NHRO), अनूपा, इस्लोस्टीका, निर्मला खलको और रेगिना (सभी आदिवासी वोमेंस नेटवर्क) और विवेक कुमार (भोजन का अधिकार अभियान झारखण्ड)।

झारखंड के स्वाभिमानी पाठक अपने घरों से अखबार फेंक दें, चैनल बंद कर दें– रविश कुमार

[dropcap]झा[/dropcap]रखंड के नौजवानों और पाठकों ने क्या फ़ैसला किया है? आपने देखा कि राज्य सरकार ने विज्ञापन निकाला है कि अख़बारों में काम करने वाले पत्रकार सरकारी योजनाओं की तारीफ़ में लिखने के लिए आवेदन करें। उन्हें एक लेख के 15000 दिए जाएंगे। इसके अलावा 5 हज़ार की प्रोत्साहन राशि भी। ऐसे 30 लेख छपेंगे। सरकार के डर से वहां के अख़बार वैसे ही ख़त्म हो चुके हैं। अख़बार पर दबाव भी होगा कि पत्रकार का लेख छापें। बाद में उन लेखों का संग्रह छापा जाएगा और अख़बार और पत्रकार का नाम दिखाकर दावा होगा कि हमारी योजनाएं ज़मीन पर अच्छा काम कर रही हैं। वैसे भी आप देख रहे होंगे कि अख़बारों में सरकार की योजनाओं की कम ही कठोर समीक्षा छपती है। एक दो रूटीन टाइन की जनसमस्या छाप कर पत्रकारिता का धर्म पूरा कर लिया जाता है।

अब अगर इसके बाद भी आप उन अख़बारों को ख़रीद रहे हैं तो फिर कुछ नहीं किया जा सकता है। यह दर्ज किया जाना चाहिए कि लोग बुरी पत्रकारिता को भी पैसे दे सकते हैं। चाटुकारिता का भी मोल है। बेहतर होता कि आप अख़बार और चैनलों के पैसे को प्रधानमंत्री राहत कोष में भेज देते और अपने बचे हुए समय में टहलते या किताबें पढ़तें। ख़ुद को अंधेरे में रखने के लिए आप मेहनत की कमाई का पांच सौ से लेकर आठ सौ रुपया ख़र्च कर रहे हैं। जब तक आप इन अख़बारों और चैनलों को बंद नहीं करेंगे तब तक पत्रकारिता में बदलाव नहीं आएगा। मतलब जो अख़बार या चैनल आपकी बौद्धिकता का अपमान करते हों, खुलेआम, उसे आप पैसे कैसे दे सकते हैं? कायदे से चुनाव तक के लिए आपको अख़बार बंद कर देने चाहिए। वैसे भी उसमें कुछ छपने वाला नहीं है। मुझे झारखंड के नौजवानों से कोई उम्मीद नहीं है। सरकार उन्हें बीस साल नौकरी नहीं देगी तो भी वे खुश रहेंगे।

चुनाव आते ही चैनलों पर पंचायत टाइप के कार्यक्रम शुरू हो जाते हैं। भव्य मंच बन जाता है। मंत्री जी आते हैं और माइक लेकर जो मन में आता है, बोलते चले जाते हैं। उन कार्यक्रमों के सवाल जवाब में विपक्ष के आरोपों के बहाने पूछने का धर्म जनता के सामने निभा दिया जाता है। पत्रकार अपनी तरफ से किसी योजना को लेकर रिसर्च नहीं करता और मंत्री को नहीं घेरता है। संतुलन के लिए विपक्ष के दो चार नेता भी होते हैं। मगर पूरा कार्यक्रम विज्ञापनदाता सरकार के पक्ष में झुका होता है। ऐसे कार्यक्रम आचार संहिता के ठीक पहले शुरू किए जाते हैं। चुनाव के समय पहले रिपोर्टर हर दिशा में जाते थे। तरह तरह की ख़बरें लेकर आते थे। उसकी जगह अंचायत-पंचायत टाइप के मॉडल खड़े किए गए हैं ताकि स्क्रीन को भरा जा सके। इसके बहाने ज़मीन की सच्चाई को आने से रोका जा सके। आप ऐसे कार्यक्रम पत्रकारिता समझ कर देखते हैं और ख़ुशी ख़ुशी उल्लू बनते हैं।

मैं यह समझता हूं कि न्यूज़ चैनल चलाना काफी महंगा है। इसलिए चैनल वाले तरह तरह के रेवेन्यू मॉडल खड़ा करते हैं। हम सभी करते हैं लेकिन जब चुनाव के समय ऐसे कार्यक्रम हो तो थोड़ी सतर्कता से देखिए। जो चैनल सरकार की खुशामद नहीं करता है, उसे चुनावी राज्य वाली सरकार विज्ञापन नहीं देती है। लिहाज़ा आप उसके स्क्रीन पर पंचयात टाइप के कार्यक्रम नहीं देखते होंगे। अख़बार वाले भी टीवी की देखा-देखी ऐसे मंच बनाने लगे हैं। अब तो ज़िलों में भी यही होने लगा है। ऐसे कार्यक्रमों की तस्वीरों से पूरा पन्ना भर दिया जाता है। जहां जहां चुनाव है, वहां-वहां ऐसे कार्यक्रम बढ़ जाएंगे।

मुख्यधारा का मीडिया भारत के लोकतंत्र की हत्या कर चुका है। चंद अपवादों के सहारे वह पत्रकारिता का भ्रम पैदा कर रहा है। यह बात बिका हुआ पत्रकार भी मानता है और जो मजबूरी में नौकरी कर रहे हैं वो भी मानते हैं। बहुत से पत्रकार हैं जो चाहते हैं लिखना मगर लिखने नहीं दिया जाता है। आख़िर कितने पत्रकार नौकरी छोड़ सकते हैं। आप दर्शक चाहें तो इस स्थिति को बदल सकते हैं। न्यूज़ चैनल देखना बंद कर दीजिए। इससे चैनलों पर सुधार करने का दबाव बनेगा। आप भले उस सत्ता पक्ष को वोट दे आएं जिसके दबाव में पत्रकारिता का सत्यानाश हो गया है लेकिन आप एक घटिया अख़बार या चैनल को अपने पैसे से कैसे प्रायोजित कर सकते हैं?

एक सजग दर्शक के रूप में आपको तय करना है कि क्या आप नियमित अपमान कराना चाहते हैं? मेरे हिसाब से तो आपको नहीं देखना चाहिए, फिर भी आप देख रहे हैं तो ज़रा ग़ौर से देखिए। आपको पता चलेगा कि कैसे अब सारा चुनाव बीत जाता है और जनता का मुद्दा सामने नहीं आता है। सत्ता पक्ष जो मुद्दा तय करता है उसी के आस-पास डिबेट होने लगता है और चुनाव गुज़र जाता है। इस तरह आप चुनाव के समय किसी मुद्दे पर जनदबाव बनाने का मौका गंवा देते हैं। चैनल देखने के लिए आप काफी पैसे ख़र्च करते हैं। जो समय लगाते हैं उसकी भी कीमत है। इसलिए आप इस पैसे को प्रधानमंत्री राहत कोष में दे दें और जहां जहां चुनाव हो रहे हैं, वहां वहां चैनल न देखें।

मुख्यधारा का मीडिया भारत के लोकतंत्र की हत्या कर चुका है। चंद अपवादों के सहारे वह पत्रकारिता का भ्रम पैदा कर रहा है। यह बात बिका हुआ पत्रकार भी मानता है और जो मजबूरी में नौकरी कर रहे हैं वो भी मानते हैं। बहुत से पत्रकार हैं जो चाहते हैं लिखना मगर लिखने नहीं दिया जाता है। आख़िर कितने पत्रकार नौकरी छोड़ सकते हैं। आप दर्शक चाहें तो इस स्थिति को बदल सकते हैं। न्यूज़ चैनल देखना बंद कर दीजिए। इससे चैनलों पर सुधार करने का दबाव बनेगा। आप भले उस सत्ता पक्ष को वोट दे आएं जिसके दबाव में पत्रकारिता का सत्यानाश हो गया है लेकिन आप एक घटिया अख़बार या चैनल को अपने पैसे से कैसे प्रायोजित कर सकते हैं?

हिन्दी प्रदेशों के साथ बहुत धोखा हुआ है। बिहार झारखंड, यूपी, राजस्थान या मध्य प्रदेश या छत्तीसगढ़। इन प्रदेशों में उच्च गुणवत्ता वाले एक भी शिक्षण संस्थान नहीं हैं। ज़िलों में कालेज बर्बाद हैं। घटिया किस्म के शिक्षक हैं। जो आज कल राजनीति का सहारा लेकर क्लास रूम से छुटकारा पा गए हैं। ज़ाहिर है हिन्दी प्रदेश का युवा मारा मारा फिर रहा है। पहले वह कालेज से ठगा कर आता है, फिर कोचिंग में पैसे देकर ठगाने जाता है और उसके बाद सरकारी नौकरी की परीक्षा में कई साल तक ठगा जाता रहता है। उसके पास जानकारी हासिल करने के सारे रास्ते बंद हो चुके हैं। एक मीडिया था जिससे उसे कुछ पता चलता था। अब आप खुद ही उस मीडिया का मूल्यांकन कर लीजिए। हिन्दी प्रदेशों का मीडिया अपने नौजवानों के लिए अंधेरा पैदा कर रहा है। उसे पता है कि हिन्दी प्रदेश के युवा सांप्रदायिक हैं, जातिवादी हैं। उनमें युवा होने का स्वाभिमान नहीं बचा है।

मुझे नहीं पता कि चुनावी प्रदेशों के कितने नौजवान अख़बार बंद करेंगे। चैनल बंद करेंगे लेकिन मैं यह बात कहता रहूंगा। मुझे पता है कि आपको बर्बाद कर दिया गया है। आपसे कोई शिकायत नहीं है। एक सिस्टम के तहत आपकी क्षमता को कुंद किया गया है। वर्ना आप छात्रों की क्षमता को मैं जानता हूं। मौका मिले तो आप क्या नहीं कर सकते हैं। मगर नेता समझ गए हैं। इन्हें मौका मत दो। बल्कि इन्हें बर्बाद करो ताकि ख़ुद के लिए मौका बनता रहे। मुझे हिन्दी प्रदेश के युवाओं से ज़रा भी उम्मीद नहीं है। मैं जानता हूं कि वे हमेशा के लिए उलझ गए हैं। मगर उनसे नाराज़गी भी नहीं है क्योंकि मैं जानता हूं कि उनकी झमता पर किस किस ने रेत डाली है। उनमें स्वाभिमान ही नहीं बचा है। अगर स्वाभिमान बचा होता तो आज सुबह ही झारखंड की जनता अपने घर से अख़बारों को सड़क पर फेंक देती और न्यूज़ चैनलों के कनेक्शन कटवा देती। जय हिन्द।

Why is this place has great significance for Usha Uthup?

0

Kolkata: If a place can change anyone’s fortune then Trincas has been the same for playback singer Usha Uthup.

“I belong to Trincas and Trincas belong to me,” said the Padma Shri awardee singer Usha Uthup on a lazy humid September noon as she was reminiscing her 50-year-long association with the iconic night club at Park Street.

She was talking at a press met organised by Trincas for its diamond Jubilee celebration at Kolkata’s Park Street. “The chandelier and I have lived on,” she said looking up at the ceiling and smiling. It’s history.”

“I am grateful that Trincas happened to me. It is a hallowed crown. I learnt so much from the amazing musicians that we have had,” said the 72-year-old singer who started singing at the night club at the age of 22.

Talking about her journey, Usha Uthup (then Iyer) said that she was a cabaret singer. “People have many misconceptions regarding cabaret. Cabaret is a floor show. Clad in Kanjivaram saree and singing Jazz, Pop, Rock and Folk was revolutionary. But yes audience liked it,” said Uthup.

Satyajit Ray, Uttam Kumar and Supriya di (Chowdhury), Amitabh Bachchan, Sharmila Tagore and Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi used to visit. Politicians like Jyoti Babu (Basu), Somnath Chatterjee were among few. I remember Uttam Kumar and Supriya di would request me to sing Those were the days sung by Mary Hopkin. Harry Belafonte’s Matilda was quite a hit. It had created magical moments here when everyone at the audience starts singing.

She used to sing for not one but three sessions – tea session, pre-cinema session and post cinema session. “People used to throng the place. Some requesting movie songs, others retro be it Hindi or English. I learnt Hindi and added Punjabi, Bengali, Marathi and Tamil in my repertoire. No body could imagine singing Tagore’s Purano Shei diner kotha. I have broken the myth that Tagore songs cannot be sung at nightclubs,” said the singer of hit numbers like Dum Maro Dum, Shaan Se, Darling, who started her playback singing career with Navketan. As her stardom rose, so did the Trincas and the two legends were created.

The Bar and Restaurant not only played an important role in her professional front but personal front as well. She met her husband Jani Uthup, fell in love with the city and stayed on ever since.

The national awardee singer reminiscing about celebs who used to come for live music sessions at the Trincas said, “Satyajit Ray, Uttam Kumar and Supriya di (Chowdhury), Amitabh Bachchan, Sharmila Tagore and Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi used to visit. Politicians like Jyoti Babu (Basu), Somnath Chatterjee were among few. I remember Uttam Kumar and Supriya di would request me to sing Those were the days sung by Mary Hopkin. Harry Belafonte’s Matilda was quite a hit. It had created magical moments here when everyone at the audience starts singing. I am blessed that Trincas’ happened to me. It’s a trendsetter and became synonymous with the cultural heritage of our city. Kolkata is indeed the musical Mecca.”

The night club that started as a quiet tea room back in July 1959 was redesigned in 1961 for live entertainment. It witnessed superstars and celebrities from every corner of India and abroad. Live performances of musicians like Biddu Appaiah, The Trojans, Ajit Singh, The Cavaliers, Flintstones and many more coupled with classic continental and Indian food, the place became an happening place of Kolkata. Music had never left it, and to this day, has Hindi music, performed by RGB from 6 to 9 during evening, followed by Western Band (Sweet Agitation) from 9 pm onwards.

The legendary ‘Sunday Jam Sessions’ of 70’s is revived by Trincas with ‘All Day Sunday’ Music with new bands given a platform to showcase their talents which is again a hit with new guests and regulars. Music starts at 1pm and goes all day until 11.30 pm.

There will be a celebration on September 28, 29 and 30 to celebrate the twin occasion. Anand Puri of Trincas said, “More and more young people are coming and discovering the place. As a part of the celebratory offer, people can receive 15 per cent discount loyalty card to become a Trincan.”

Jharkhand police forced to slap 302 against Tabrez Ansari lynching accused

0

Ranchi: In a major development in Tabrez Ansari lynching case, Jharkhand police has filed a supplementary charge sheet against 11 accused and slapped Section 302 of Indian Penal Code (IPC) on Tuesday.

Twenty four-year-old Tabrez Ansari, a newly married man from Saraikela-Kharsawan district was returning to his home on the night of June 17 along with two of his acquaintances, when he was caught by a mob at Dhadhkidih, few kilometers away from his home over the allegations of bike theft. While two of his acquaintances flew from the spot, mob tied Tabrez with a pole and beat him mercilessly. He was not only beaten inhumanly but also forced to chant Jai Shri Ram by the lynchers. The entire incident was filmed and later circulated.

But when police came, they also did not help Tabrez either and took him to police station. Police just gave first aid to Tabrez and had sent him to jail. The family who had seen the condition of Tabrez and clicked some pictures too (see the picture), had requested police to take him to doctor, but police did not pay heed to them. On June 22, Tabrez complained sever pain inside jail, he was sent to hospital by jail authorities and where he succumbed to his injuries.

The lynching of Tabrez was even raised at United Nations (UN) and the UNSC had seek report from Jharkhand police.

In its press communiqué, Saraikela-Kharsawan police mentioned that they had asked the autopsy report from the board of doctors of AJM Hospital, which concluded, “On the basis of above main findings we opined that— 1- The fracture of bone is grievous injury caused by hard & blunt object, 2- The combined effect of fracture of bon, pale organs and heart chambers full of blood resulting into cardiac arrest.”

Along with other things, police also claimed that they have received CFL report of the video and it has been confirmed that there is no adulteration done in it.

 

Last week, Saraikela-Kharsawan police had filed charge sheet and removed Section 302 with 304 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder). After police’s charge sheet, there was massive outrage from Saraikela-Kharsawan to Ranchi and to Delhi.

Wife of Tabrez, Shahista Perween to had demanded Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) inquiry into the heinous crime.

Shahista had later also said that she will commit suicide if she will not get justice. The victim side had also prayed to the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) that as police intentionally did not mention video footage in the charge sheet so, the video should be demanded from police.

“Yes, a supplementary charge sheet has been filed against 11 accused in the case,” a senior police officer of Saraikela-Kharsawan told eNewsroom, but requested anonymity.

In its press communiqué, Saraikela-Kharsawan police mentioned that they had asked the autopsy report from the board of doctors of AJM Hospital, which concluded, “On the basis of above main findings we opined that— 1- The fracture of bone is grievous injury caused by hard & blunt object, 2- The combined effect of fracture of bon, pale organs and heart chambers full of blood resulting into cardiac arrest.”

Along with other things, police also claimed that they have received CFL report of the video and it has been confirmed that there is no adulteration done in it.

The eleven accused against whom police had dropped murder charges and again slapped it are—Bhimsen Mandal, Kamal Mahto, Sunamo Pradhan, Premchand Mahto, Sumant Mahto, Madan Nayak, Mahesh Mahli, Kushal Mahli, Satyanarayan Nayak, and Prakash Mandal.

“I am happy that administration is filing supplementary charge sheet. I hope now I will get justice. I do not want anything but justice,” Shahista reiterated to eNewsroom.

From labours constructing detention centers to Army man serving at border all face the wrath of NRC Assam process

0

Delhi: Forty-nine-year-old Pradip Kumar Saha, from Assam’s Ranopatti, cast his vote in the 1989 General Elections, but in 2002 he got listed as a D Voter. Despite having approached the Foreign Tribunal (FT) and providing all the necessary documents, his name has not made it to the National Register of Citizens (NRC) released recently in Assam.

“We are a family of 22 and only eight made it to the NRC list, while 14 members were excluded. My father has also not made it to the NRC whereas he had his passport issued in 1955. Government is saying CAB (Citizen Amendment Bill) will come to the rescue for people like us. But how can we trust politicians. They make tall promises and implement none,” rued Saha.

A sense of helpless grips 39-year-old Bassu Ali when he is asked, about his citizenship status and the possibility of him being sent to the detention centres being made in Assam. With a dejected look he states, “If I am denied of my citizenship, I will commit suicide but will never go to the detention centre.”

Daily wage labours building the detention centre. “My name hasn’t come in NRC despite having complete papers,” said Sipali Hajang who hails from Pusimatia in Assam. Sipali is a daily wage labourer at the detention centre. “I am afraid of coming here but have no option but to work for money. I don’t know they will keep me here or not,” she added

The misery began for Ali, the sole bread earner of his family when police arrested him in an alleged false case. “The police arrested me on January 26, 2014, from my residence. Following which I was sent to jail after having spent a single day in the police station. The police called me by another name – Bachchu Sheik. My lawyer also cheated me, by asking me to toe in with what the officials told me. During the interrogation when I told the officers that I was from Karbala, they told me that I was a Bangladeshi and not an Indian. I wasn’t sent off to the detention centre but put up at a small cell with 50 other individuals. I will die, I will commit suicide but will never go there,” says Ali

He claims that he has all the documents but none of the officials what to see it. “They say such documents are available at Pan shop. They say that I am a Bangladeshi. My lawyer also cheated me. When I was in jail my mother used to run the house begging.” Ali who is out on bail has 1951 legacy certificate and Voter ID but has not made it to NRC, Assam.

The tale of Ali is no different from that of Tinkonia Banaipara’s Vinita Banai. She said, “I have all the papers with me and yet my name is not there. My son’s name is there but mine is excluded. I am a daily wager and living in fear as to when I will be sent to jail. I have no money to fight my case.”

However, worse are the cases of daily wage labours building the detention centre. “My name hasn’t come in NRC despite having complete papers,” said Sipali Hajang who hails from Pusimatia in Assam. Sipali is a daily wage labourer at the detention centre. “I am afraid of coming here but have no option but to work for money. I don’t know they will keep me here or not,” she added.

Sanjay Hegde said, “Citizenship is a right to have rights, which itself has been put into questions through NRC. Descendants over generations are now asked to show papers to prove their citizenship. Absence of someone from the NRC list does not prove that someone is not an Indian citizen. To the minds of many people in Assam, all Bengali speaking Muslims are Bangladeshis which is baseless. Behind the 20 lakh people mentioned in NRC, are 20 lakh families and many more lakh people going destitute paying lawyers. This will lead to disenfranchisement and a humongous humanitarian crisis which will put the entire democracy in jeopardy.”

These are the few faces of the 19 lakh individuals in Assam who have not made it to the final NRC list and who share the same destiny – living the much-dreaded detention centres coming up in Assam.

A fact-finding team of United Against Hate (UAH), a people’s collective of individuals working to reduce the hatred mushrooming in India off late, visited Assam recently to explore the aftermath of the final list of NRC. After having spent a couple of days in Assam, they put together their findings in a report and a documentary, which they formally released during a press meet organised at Press Club, New Delhi on September 17.

The team which visited Assam included Nadeem Khan from UAH, senior journalist Prashant Tandon, journalist Sanjay Kumar and documentary filmmaker Afroz Ahmed Sahil. However, the press meet also included Ravi Nair, Supreme Court Advocates Sanjay Hegde and Fuzail Ayyubi as guest speakers.

Nair said, “People migrate for jobs all over India. These poor labourers often lack documents but now they are thinking of making this project All India. India will have to face severe criticism in the upcoming sessions of the UN Human Rights Council. Universal declaration of human rights is being violated dreadfully by this NRC project. Right to nationality is after all non-negotiable.”

Fuzail Ayyubi mentioned, “Foreign Tribunal takes away the basic identity of people. Facing FT itself is harassment. Moreover, the people sitting in the FT are not competent enough to take such major decisions about the lives of millions of people. NO Appellate authority is present within FT. There is no upper layer of appeal making this project more inhuman”.

Nadeem Khan also added that it is on record in Assam Assembly that the CM has met the FT members twice to give directions. This itself questions the unbiased judicial nature of the Foreign Tribunal.

Sanjay Hegde said, “Citizenship is a right to have rights, which itself has been put into questions through NRC. Descendants over generations are now asked to show papers to prove their citizenship. Absence of someone from the NRC list does not prove that someone is not an Indian citizen. To the minds of many people in Assam, all Bengali speaking Muslims are Bangladeshis which is baseless. Behind the 20 lakh people mentioned in NRC, are 20 lakh families and many more lakh people going destitute paying lawyers. This will lead to disenfranchisement and a humongous humanitarian crisis which will put the entire democracy in jeopardy.”

During the meet, a short documentary called “The state of Stateless in Assam” produced and directed by Afroz Ahmed Sahil, a member of the Fact-Finding Team was also screened.

Did Amit Shah mislead Lok Sabha on Farooq Abdullah’s detention?

0

Supreme Court was told on August 16 that National Conference leader and member of Lok Sabha Farooq Abdullah had been detained and was not allowed to move freely. It came during the hearing of a petition moved by MDMK chief Vaiko seeking a direction to the Union Government and Jammu and Kashmir administration to produce Farooq Abdullah before the Court. Farooq was said to have been detained, along with other political leaders, as the Modi government had moved to abrogate Article 370 of the Constitution granting special status to Jammu and Kashmir in early august. He did not attend even the monsoon session of Lok Sabha.

When some members had expressed concern at Farooq’s absence in the House, Union Home Minister Amit Shah had told Lok Sabha on August 6 that the veteran Jammu and Kashmir leader was perfectly fine and was staying away out at his own free will. He was neither under house arrest nor was he detained. “I am saying it for the fourth time, and I have the patience to say it for the tenth time; Farooq Abdullah has neither been detained nor arrested,” the Home Minister had asserted.

Amit Shah’s August 6 assertion on Farooq Abdullah in Lok Sabha amounts to a gross contempt of the House, mainly on two counts: for willfully and illegally preventing a member from attending the House in session and for deliberately and willfully misleading the House with a false statement

If what the Supreme Court was told on September 16 is true, Amit Shah’s August 6 assertion on Farooq Abdullah in Lok Sabha amounts to a gross contempt of the House, mainly on two counts: for willfully and illegally preventing a member from attending the House in session and for deliberately and willfully misleading the House with a false statement. A sad thing, however, is that the Opposition has not yet shown the signs of recovery from the jounce it had received with Narendra Modi’s coming to power in May 2014. There were several occasions when it failed to raise the issue either in the courts or in Parliament.

For instance, Narendra Modi was first sworn in as Prime Minister on May 26, 2014. The same day he got twice retired bureaucrat Nripendra Misra appointed as Principal Secretary to Prime Minister. Misra was not eligible for any appointment in the government on that day. But President Pranab Mukherjee obliged Narendra Modi and made the appointment in flagrant violation of the existing provisions of the law. Only the next day, the Modi government drafted an Ordinance. President Pranab Mukherjee again obliged Modi and promulgated the Ordinance removing illegality in the appointment of Nripendra Misra retrospectively.

It was not challenged in a court of law and the legality of the manner of appointment of Misra could not be tested. The Opposition was perhaps too stunned by Modi’s unexpectedly massive win. During the first session of Parliament, Modi went to Arunachal Pradesh and announced at a public rally a Rs 58,000 crore package for development of the North-East. Announcing a major decision outside when Parliament is in session clearly amounts to contempt of the House. In this manner went on the defiance of rules and procedures by Modi and the Opposition continued to be afflicted with inertia. There is little sign of it being recovered.

Jharkhand IAS officers tweet to make #JharkhandWithModi trend on Twitter

1

Ranchi: “Prabhat Tara Maidan is all set to welcome the honorable @PMOIndia sri @narendramodi for the launch of schemes that will redefine India 20 years from now”.

“After the creation of Jharkhand, for the first time, in Raghubar government only, schedule caste commission has been formed”.

“In the 108 Ambulance of Jharkhand, all the latest medical equipment are stalled including ventilator, basic life support system, so that patient’s life could be saved. So far, more than 2.6 lakh patients have got swift treatment”.

#JharkhandWithModi was also trending on Twitter for some time. Co-founder of Alt News, Mohammed Zubair tweeted on Thursday late night that at least 79 tweets were posted by Deputy Commissioners posted in Jharkhand. Some deputy commissioners like East Singhbhum DC (twitter handle @DCEastSinghbhum) posted 12 tweets. Besides them, the tweets with #JharkhandWithModi came from other deputy commissioners including DC Pakur, DC Chatra, DC Latehar and DC Koderma.

Above mentioned quotes are tweets, tweeted not from Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) workers or leaders, MP or MLAs, but from the handles of Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers posted in Jharkhand. The first one is from DC Ranchi. The second tweet is from DC East Singhbhum. The last one is from DC Giridih.

Tweets jharkhand ias PM narendra modi DC
IAS officers tweeting #JharkhandWithModi

Since Narendra Modi became the Prime Minister of India, in 2014, he has visited Jharkhand, many times and launched major schemes from the Tribal dominated state including Ayushman Bharat.

On September 12 too, PM Modi chose to launch farmer pension scheme—Kisan Maan Dhan Yojna from here. But, this visit of Narendra Modi was different, as apart from BJP leaders and Chief Minister of Jharkhand Raghubar Das, the Deputy Commissioners of different districts of Jharkhand were welcoming the Prime Minister, and highlighting Jharkhand government’s progress in different welfare schemes.

Tweets jharkhand ias PM narendra modi DC
Screenshot of former Chief Minister Hemant Soren’s tweet on IAS officers trending #JharkhandWithModi

#JharkhandWithModi was also trending on Twitter for some time. Co-founder of Alt News, Mohammed Zubair tweeted on Thursday late night that at least 79 tweets were posted by Deputy Commissioners posted in Jharkhand. Some deputy commissioners like East Singhbhum DC (twitter handle @DCEastSinghbhum) posted 12 tweets. Besides them, the tweets with #JharkhandWithModi came from other deputy commissioners including DC Pakur, DC Chatra, DC Latehar and DC Koderma.

The opposition party and its leaders, especially Jharkhand Mukhti Morcha (JMM) and former Chief Minister Hemant Soren has tagged IAS Association and sought their intervention and to question how officers are compromising with the constitution and betraying the country.

eNewsroom has tried contacting Deputy Commissioner, Giridih Rahul Sinha and sent a message too, but is yet to get a reply from him. Later his number was found switched off.

The officials not just tweeted to praise the PM but also forced private schools to lend their buses to ferry farmers. Such dictates were given in Bokaro too. Times of India did a story that in Ranchi, a large number of schools gave off and cancelled exam scheduled for September 12 as buses had been sent to ferry farmers and participants from various places to attend the PM’s rally.

Like Pehlu Khan, No One Lynched Tabrez Ansari

0

Ranchi: The entire episode of the mob lynching of Tabrez Ansari, a 24-year-old resident of Saraikela-Kharsawan is documented in the video which was shared by one of those present at the scene of crime. The brutality with which Ansari was mercilessly beaten for allegedly stealing a bike and later forced to chant Jai Sri Ram by Hindu extremist is still fresh in everyone’s mind. Even the Sub-divisional magistrate (SDM) report had claimed that both the police and the doctor were careless and had not treated the victim in the right manner.

This lynching case had deeply impacted the Indians, thereby leading to a widespread protest across the country. The matter was even raised at the United Nations’ Security Council (UNSC) and its Human Rights Commission (UNHRC), following which India was even asked to file a detailed report before UNSC.

However, like most of the lynching cases in India, where justice has been denied to the victim, here too, the Jharkhand police’s charge sheet now claims that Ansari had not succumbed to his injuries, but had died from a cardiac arrest.

The incident

On the night of June 17, Ansari and his two friends were returning home on a bike, when they were stopped at Dhadkidih, alleging that they had stolen a bike. Two of his accompanies escaped but Ansari got caught by the mob. He was tied to an electric pole and was not only beaten mercilessly but was even forced to chant Jai Shri Ram. Later, the police came and took Ansari to the police station. But family alleged that while Ansari had sustained severe injuries, police had only provided him with basic first aid and sent him to jail, without consulting any doctor.

“I have lost everything, my life has got ruined. Because of stress, I lost my child and now I live in tension. Please help me in getting justice,” said Shahista. This is how she starts her conversation with every new person and while talking to this reporter, she mentioned it thrice.

Shahista demanded, “I want CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation) inquiry into the murder of my husband. As police are not doing its duty. Police have changed everything in this case.”

The widow added, “I want the murders of my husband to be hanged. They should be punished severely.”

After two days, when again Ansari complained of severe pain including headache, he was sent to Sadar Hospital from Jail, but the doctor there did not treat him well and declared him dead while he was alive. When he was taken to another doctor, it was very late and Ansari succumbed to his injuries.

Ansari used to work in Pune and had returned two months before his death, for his marriage, which was solemnised on April 26, 2019.

Wife demands CBI inquiry

Shahista Perween, wife of Tabrez, who was trying to get on with her life, discovered that she was pregnant. But her stress and weak health caused miscarriage and she lost her first child. The dual loss had shattered the life of a newly married woman. Rubbing salt to her injuring is the news of the police removing murder charges from the charge sheet.

“I have lost everything, my life has got ruined. Because of stress, I lost my child and now I live in tension. Please help me in getting justice,” said Shahista. This is how she starts her conversation with every new person and while talking to this reporter, she mentioned it thrice.

While speaking to eNewsroom, Shahista demanded, “I want CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation) inquiry into the murder of my husband. As police are not doing its duty. Police have changed everything in this case.”

The widow added, “I want the murders of my husband to be hanged. They should be punished severely.”

Lawyer to challenge charge sheet

Her lawyer Altaf told eNewsroom, that court has not yet taken cognizance on the charge sheet filed by the police. “We have prayed to the court that as there are several witnesses (32) in the case which makes it a fit case of Section 302 of IPC, so police dropping 302 and making it a case of Section 304 of IPC should not be accepted by the court.”

He further said, “If the court accepts our petition then it’s fine, else we will move to High Court to challenge the charge sheet.”

The Investigation Office (IO) of the case, R Narayan said he dropped the murder charge as post-mortem report mentioned that Ansari died from cardiac arrest.

Significantly, Saraikela-Kharsawan has no fast track court and the case is yet to be taken up by the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) court.

“As soon as court will take cognizance of the case, we will pray to hear it on day to day basis,” said the lawyer.

Lynchings in Jharkhand and Pehlu Khan

So far almost two dozen lives have been lost because of mob lynching incidents in Jharkhand sometime over cattle trading, sometimes over beef-eating allegations, sometimes over child-lifting charges. Most of the victims either remain, Muslim, Dalit or Tribals. And in most cases, police remains casual towards the heinous crime while filing the charge sheet.

Going beyond Jharkhand, Phelu Khan, a dairy farmer’s case, was lynched in broad day light in Alwar, Rajasthan. This lynching was also filmed, but the court had acquitted all the six accused, thereby making many say that no one killed Pehlu Khan. Some of the accused, were even mentioned in the dying declaration of Pehlu Khan.

With the wife of Tabrez wanting a CBI inquiry, will Jharkhand chief minister Raghubar Das pay heed to her agony and listen to the plight of the 20-year-old widow?

To NRC or Not: West Bengal Resolution against NRC builds up political steam in the state

0

Kolkata: On September 7 West Bengal became the first Indian state to officially protest against the National Register of Citizens (NRC) exercise in Assam, which has left out over 19 lakh individuals in its final list. After passing the resolution, which was supported by both the Left and Congress, the ruling party even ruled out the possibility of NRC implementation in Bengal.

NRC has become an important issue not just because of the state’s proximity to Assam and its porous Indo-Bangladesh border but also because of the repeated assertions made by both the central and state BJP leader for the implementation of NRC in Bengal to weed out illegal immigrants in the state.

Bengal united against NRC

Understanding the need to take stringent steps to create a people’s movement in Bengal and other parts of the country several civil societies, voluntary organisations and Forums have been holding discussions and meets. The path for the resolution to be passed was paved by Joint Forum Against NRC, when they submitted a memorandum before the speaker of the West Bengal Assembly, expressing their demand to pass a resolution against NRC implementation in Assam on August 29. Opposition leaders too around the same time frame had also expressed a similar need.

Bose added, “The Union Home Ministry has already notified in the Gazette on July 31, 2019, that the process of house-to-house enumeration across the country for the Population Register will be undertaken between April to September 2020, under the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003. This is the initial step towards the preparation of the “National Register for Indian Citizens”. The rationale behind this exercise and the modalities of establishing the citizenship of residents must be questioned, including the provisions of the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2003.”

One of the members of the Forum, Prasenjit Bose, reacted, “The passage of the Assembly Resolution is a positive first step. The Joint Forum calls upon all the political parties in West Bengal who have supported the Assembly Resolution to build united resistance against the NRC exercise.”

Bose added, “The Union Home Ministry has already notified in the Gazette on July 31, 2019, that the process of house-to-house enumeration across the country for the Population Register will be undertaken between April to September 2020, under the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003. This is the initial step towards the preparation of the “National Register for Indian Citizens”. The rationale behind this exercise and the modalities of establishing the citizenship of residents must be questioned, including the provisions of the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2003.”

Legal implications of the resolution

Picking on the legal significance of the resolution of Faizan Mustafa, renowned jurist on constitutional law and vice-chancellor of NALSAR Hyderabad, told eNewsroom, “Citizenship falls under the purview of the centre. The state government can do little if the centre passed an amendment or direction. This type of resolutions has little legal significance.”

On being asked what would they do if the centre directs every state to have it implemented by passing the Citizen’s Amendment Bill, the TMC MP replied, “We will oppose it. We are not puppet of the central government. This entire exercise of having citizenship is a political vendetta against a certain section of the Indian society. A notification has been sent to all states to set up detention centres. We are against it and will not have it implemented here at any cost.”

However, Colin Gonsalves, senior advocate at the Supreme Court felt that this resolution has immense significance. Speaking to eNewsroom, he said, “In Assam Bengali speaking were the most affected, so the Bengal government has made a political stand when it passed this resolution, that it doesn’t stand alongside the centre in this NRC exercise in Assam. We need to understand that this resolution was against NRC exercise in Assam and not Bengal.”

Adding to that Nesar Khan , former secretary of West Bengal Assembly explained, “The resolution is like a warning to the centre. It has no legal standing. If the centre implements NRC in Bengal then the state government wouldn’t help them and would rather create obstacles.”

But Sajda Ahmed, TMC MP told eNewsroom, “The resolution passed in the Assembly is an official statement from the WB government that we are not open to NRC being implemented in our state. Even the opposition parties barring BJP have supported this move.”

On being asked what would they do if the centre directs every state to have it implemented by passing the Citizen’s Amendment Bill, she replied, “We will oppose it. We are not puppet of the central government. This entire exercise of having citizenship is a political vendetta against a certain section of the Indian society. A notification has been sent to all states to set up detention centres. We are against it and will not have it implemented here at any cost.”

She added, “The saddest part is that the poor people are not even fully aware of what NRC or CAB is all about. We are trying to create awareness among the masses regarding the same.”

Tanmay Ghosh, secretary, Bangla Sanskriti Manch, a non-governmental organisation working for Human Right issues said, “NRC is draconian. We can see its ill effects in Assam. We can’t let the same happen in Bengal. We know the BJP narrative – of illegal immigration and are aware of how it will play on the same to create pressure and have it implemented here. But we need to understand that there is no official evidence of the presence of a large number of such ‘illegal migrants’. Steps like the NRC, which affects the entire population of a state, cannot be implemented based on hearsay.”

Road Ahead

Reacting to the resolution passed, Dr Mohit Roy, senior BJP leader and convenor of BJP’s Refugee cell, said, “The resolution means nothing to us. They have done it for political mileage. But let me be very clear, given the demography of Bengal, NRC is a must for this state and BJP has resolved to implement something along the line to weed out illegal immigrants from Bengal.” He paused and then added, “There is no other alternative in Bengal.”

Reacting to same, Tanmay Ghosh, secretary, Bangla Sanskriti Manch, a non-governmental organisation working for Human Right issues said, “NRC is draconian. We can see its ill effects in Assam. We can’t let the same happen in Bengal. We know the BJP narrative – of illegal immigration and are aware of how it will play on the same to create pressure and have it implemented here. But we need to understand that there is no official evidence of the presence of a large number of such ‘illegal migrants’. Steps like the NRC, which affects the entire population of a state, cannot be implemented based on hearsay.”

He added, “Understanding the BJP narrative and intention, several forums and social activists and organisations like ours should explain to the common man across state, what NRC means and the implication of its implementation in Bengal or the enactment of the Citizen’s Amendment Bill, which they are planning to reintroduce in the coming session in the Parliament.”