Hemant Soren government takes back sedition charge slapped on 3000 anti-CAA and anti-NRC protesters

Date:

Share post:

Ranchi: Jharkhand police which had slapped sedition cases on thousands of tribals during the Pathalgadi movement under Raghubar Das tenure, has done it again. This time the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), National Register of Citizens (NRC) and National Population Register (NPR) protesters of Dhanbad district, had to face the brunt.

Police slapped a sedition case on 3000 protesters on Tuesday. They were protesting against the controversial Citizenship Amendment Act.

But, Chief Minister Hemant Soren, within 24 hours has asked for the sedition charges to be revoked. Soren, in his first cabinet meeting, had decided to take back sedition cases filed against Pathalgadi activist. However, this time, Soren, has even mentioned punishment for officers who use the draconian law in simple protest cases.

Ever since the election model code has been removed In Jharkhand, it has been witnessing a large number of protests against CAA, NRC and National Population Register (NPR). In Dhanbad only, for the past three days, a large number of people are have been staging dharna against CAA.

On Tuesday, protestors hit the street and stayed on roads for three hours. However, eye witnesses said that it was a peaceful protest and no religious sloganeering were made.

Jharkhand Dhanbad sedition caa nrc hemant soren government
Jharkhand Chief Minister Hemant Soren’s Tweet

Later, Dhanbad police slapped case against the protesters under not one but 11 sections– 143, 145, 149,  186, 188, 290, 291, 336, 153 (A), 153 (B) and 124 (A) of Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Jharkhand High Court lawyer and a resident of Dhanbad, Shadab Ansari also informed that the 3000 people who have been slapped with sedition charges had planned to mass surrender in this case just to make police officials realize their inhuman act.

However, Soren acted swiftly and by late evening through Twitter, it was announced that sedition cases against Dhanbad CAA, NRC protestors would be taken back and action would be initiated against the officer who slapped it.

In his tweet, Jharkhand Chief Minister made it clear that the law is not to instill fear among the common man but to keep them safe. “Under my leadership, the law will work to raise voice of public,” he tweeted.

Meanwhile, Supreme Court lawyer Karuna Nundy questioned why sections 153 (A) and (B) of IPC has been applied to this case.

Journalist and social activist, Mohammad Anas tweeted that all cases slapped on the protesters  should be scrapped, and not just sedition charges.

So far besides Dhanbad, Ranchi, Giridih, Hazaribagh and Lohardagga protest against CAA and NRC has taken place.

Related articles

“We Will Not Sign”: Neha Bora Rejects Peace Bond as Delhi HC Orders Disclosure of Evidence

Neha Bora has refused to sign a peace bond, calling it an attempt to curb dissent. The Delhi High Court has directed authorities to disclose the material against the AISA president and ensure natural justice before any bond order. AISA has also alleged threats against her outside Mandir Marg Police Station.

AISA President Neha Moves Delhi High Court Against Peace Bond Notice, Alleges Police Intimidation

AISA president Neha Bora has moved the Delhi High Court challenging a peace bond notice issued by Delhi Police under the BNSS. The student organisation alleges police intimidation and a crackdown on peaceful protests demanding Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation and the rollback of SIR

Shivraj Singh Chouhan’s Aggression: Is There More to His Tribal Protest Than Meets the Eye?

Shivraj Singh Chouhan’s protest against the demolition of tribal homes in Madhya Pradesh has exposed tensions with Chief Minister Mohan Yadav. Disputes over farmers’ demands and the Ladli Behna scheme have added to speculation about BJP leadership dynamics.

Congress Doubles Down on ‘Regime Change’ Calls as BJP Targets SIR Protests

The Congress has defended calls for regime change through elections as its confrontation with the BJP intensifies over the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. With P. Chidambaram and Pawan Khera challenging the BJP’s criticism, separate Supreme Court proceedings have brought electoral transparency, voter deletions and the limits of political protest into sharper focus.