Indian Americans Protest Unconstitutional, Islamophobic Hijab Ban in Karnataka

Watch | Protesters in Houston, Texas held placards saying “hijab is our constitutional right,” “stop India’s hijab ban,” “stop Islamophobia in India,” “attack on hijab is a ploy to deny education to Muslim girls,”

Date:

Share post:

Washington, DC: Indian American Muslims protested in Houston city of Texas against the Karnataka High Court’s ban on students wearing hijabs in schools, said in a press communique issued by Alliance to Stop Genocide in India.

More than a hundred people, with the women in the forefront, called on the Karnataka government to immediately stop the discrimination against Muslim girl students who are being forced to remove their hijabs.

The court’s interim order was passed after several colleges in Karnataka state barred Muslim students from entering classrooms while wearing hijab, leading to nationwide protests and international criticism.

Protesters in Houston held placards saying “hijab is our constitutional right,” “stop India’s hijab ban,” “stop Islamophobia in India”, “attack on hijab is a ploy to deny education to Muslim girls,” and “hijab ban in India is apartheid.”

“I am an Indian-American woman living in Houston. I have been watching what’s happening in your state from afar, and I am shocked and disheartened,” said one protester who spoke at the event.

She further said, “I want you to understand that Hijab is one of the most integral parts of my religion, my faith. It is not just a piece of clothing for those of us who choose to wear it, it is our very identity… We wear it just as naturally as a Sikh person wears their pagdi, a Christian wears their holy cross, a married Hindu woman wears her mangalsutra, sindoor or bichhiya. I request you to not politicize it.”

And added, “I urge you to let educational institutes be a center of learning, not a political battleground to divide communities. Please allow my Indian sisters to practice their faith as is allowed to them by the Constitution of India.”

Meanwhile, the Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC) condemns the Karnataka High Court’s disregard for the Indian constitution in its recent order, which punishes Muslim women for wearing the hijab despite the fact that their right to religious expression is codified in Article 25.

IAMC urged the court to lift this discriminatory ban and recognize that it is the right of every Indian to practice their faith without being subjected to harassment, segregation and bigotry.

Related articles

“We Will Not Sign”: Neha Bora Rejects Peace Bond as Delhi HC Orders Disclosure of Evidence

Neha Bora has refused to sign a peace bond, calling it an attempt to curb dissent. The Delhi High Court has directed authorities to disclose the material against the AISA president and ensure natural justice before any bond order. AISA has also alleged threats against her outside Mandir Marg Police Station.

AISA President Neha Moves Delhi High Court Against Peace Bond Notice, Alleges Police Intimidation

AISA president Neha Bora has moved the Delhi High Court challenging a peace bond notice issued by Delhi Police under the BNSS. The student organisation alleges police intimidation and a crackdown on peaceful protests demanding Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation and the rollback of SIR

Shivraj Singh Chouhan’s Aggression: Is There More to His Tribal Protest Than Meets the Eye?

Shivraj Singh Chouhan’s protest against the demolition of tribal homes in Madhya Pradesh has exposed tensions with Chief Minister Mohan Yadav. Disputes over farmers’ demands and the Ladli Behna scheme have added to speculation about BJP leadership dynamics.

Congress Doubles Down on ‘Regime Change’ Calls as BJP Targets SIR Protests

The Congress has defended calls for regime change through elections as its confrontation with the BJP intensifies over the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. With P. Chidambaram and Pawan Khera challenging the BJP’s criticism, separate Supreme Court proceedings have brought electoral transparency, voter deletions and the limits of political protest into sharper focus.