The way the IT department conducted surveys at NewsClick and Newslaundry are violations of the right to privacy—Digipub

The digital-only association has expressed grave concern on the seizers of phones, laptops and cloning of editors’ personal data during the IT surveys

Date:

Share post:

Kolkata: The Income Tax (IT) officials’ surveys at two news portals, NewsClick and Newslaundry in Delhi which had started around noon on September 10 and continued till midnight have alarmed the media fraternity including the Digipub News India Foundation and Editors Guild of India because of the way it was conducted.

After a 12-hour long search, which IT officials claimed was a survey, the co-founder of Newslaundry, Abhinandan Sekhri and NewsClick issued statements.

“My phone, laptop and couple of office machines were taken control of and all the data on them downloaded by the IT team,” Abhinandan said in the statement. 

“In my understanding, this (taking all data from my laptop and mobile phone) violates my fundamental right to privacy,” added Abhinandan.  

It was the second visit by the IT team to the Newslaundry office, earlier in June also, they did it.

A similar statement was issued by NewsClick editors. While searching the NewsClick office, the IT officials, bring its Editor-in-Chief Prabir Purkayastha from his residence to the office, while Prabir was advised by the doctor to remain laying on the bed to give rest to his back. 

This was the second such raid at NewsClick too, as, in February, Enforcement Directorate (ED) had conducted five days raid at the office as well as the residence of its editor-in-chief Prabir.

All these have shocked Digipub, the digital-only media association which later issued a statement and said, “Digipub is shocked by the harassment meted out by Income Tax officials to the editors of two publications. The phones and laptops of the editors were impounded and data was cloned. This violates the right to privacy. It also compromises journalistic sources. It is a cause of grave worry that the authorities have potentially gained access to confidential information that the journalists may have privy to their course of work.”

“Newsclick and Newslaundry have always spoken truth to power, frequently publishing works that is critical of the government. In a democracy, journalists have been accorded the role of playing watchdog to the institution of the state. Journalists must be allowed to carry out this vital function, without fear of intimidation and punitive action,” the statement read.

Earlier Editors Guild of India had also expressed concern on the survey and said, “The Editors Guild of India is ‘deeply disturbed’ about the Income Tax “surveys” at the offices of news websites http://NewsClick.in and http://Newslaundry.com.”

 

Related articles

BRICS Isn’t Beijing’s Game. It’s India’s Strategic Autonomy

India’s BRICS engagement is not about choosing China over the West but protecting its strategic autonomy. As the global order turns multipolar, India must retain strong ties across competing blocs while defending its independent foreign policy and ensuring that national interests, not Western approval, shape its international choices.

Eight Intelligences, One Report Card: The Flawed Machinery of Academic Merit

Howard Gardner’s multiple intelligences theory challenges the obsession with grades, but India’s education system continues to reward a narrow definition of merit. As academic pressure grows, students face mounting expectations, anxiety and mental-health struggles, raising questions about how we define intelligence, success and failure

From the Moon to the Manhole: Can India’s Tech Revolution Finally Dignify Its Sewers?

India has sent missions to the Moon, yet sanitation workers still risk their lives inside sewers. At Durgapur, CSIR-CMERI is developing mechanised cleaning technology that could replace dangerous human entry, prevent deaths and help end the generational stigma attached to manual scavenging.

Across Time Zones and Election Trails: The Sudivya Sonu I Knew

Sudivya Sonu was more than a politician I covered. He was someone I knew as a voter, journalist and friend. Across two decades, cities, elections and time zones, our conversations continued—until a final speech, a promised meeting and a sudden loss changed everything