Because of these four cities, BJP could get mandate in Gujarat

Date:

Share post:

Ahmedabad/Kolkata: Gujarat assembly polls, 2017 has been a nerve breaking one ever since the voting date was announced and election code of conduct was implemented. The political importance of this year’s assembly election was so much that when voting dates were not announced along with Himachal Pradesh as scheduled, then the election commission had to face criticism. And when the date was announced, then the ruling Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP), even delayed the winter session of the Parliament, to keep campaigning and insure win.

Now, that the verdict has been declared, it clearly shows the fight indeed was neck-and-neck, for both BJP and Congress. Despite Gujarat being the home state of both Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi, and party’s National President Amit Shah, ruling party could not cross the 100 mark, for the 182 assembly seats.

However, four districts, out of the 33—Ahmedabad, Surat, Rajkot and Vadodara got almost half seats for BJP. Ahmedabad has 21, BJP won 16, Vadodara 9 out of 10 and Rajkot 6 out of 8.

In fact, out of 16, BJP won 15 seats from India’s textile industry hub Surat. Such large number of seats from Surat comes as a surprise as there was a massive protest in the city, when the industry was taxed under Goods and Services Tax (GST). Congress during its election campaign had termed GST as Gabbar Singh Tax and it had even been widely shared on the social media, both in and outside the state.

Surat and three other districts helped BJP to retain power in Gujarat. Whereas in rural Gujarat, which has 127 seats, Congress won 71 seats and BJP could get a majority in only 56.

Senior journalist Rajdeep Sardesai also tweeted the same that how urban Gujarat saved the day for saffron brigade in its citadel.

“Fifty five seats of urban Gujarat: BJP 43, Cong 12; 127 rural seats: BJP 56, Cong 71. That is the story of #GujaratVerdict . A mirror cracked is the best way to describe it,” Rajdeep tweeted.

More than caste, development or national politics, the urban-rural divide mattered the most deciding the government, in this much hyped Gujarat election.

spot_img

Related articles

Dhurandhar Controversy Explained: Trauma, Representation, and Muslim Stereotypes

There is no moral ambiguity surrounding the Kandahar Hijack of 1999 or the 26/11 Mumbai Terror Attacks. These...

Garlands for Accused, Silence for Victim: Gita Path Assault Survivor Gets No Support

Eight days after a mob attack during Kolkata’s Gita Path event, patty seller Sheikh Riyajul remains traumatised and jobless. His Rs 3,000 earnings were destroyed, and the five accused walked free on bail. With no help from authorities or society, fear and financial pressure may force him to return.

Vande Mataram and the Crisis of Inclusive Nationalism: A Minority Perspective India Can’t Ignore

As India marks 150 years of Vande Mataram, political celebration has reignited long-standing objections from Muslims and other minorities. The debate highlights tensions between religious conscience, historical memory, and the risk of imposing majoritarian symbols as tests of national loyalty.

Bengal SIR Exercise Reveals Surprising Patterns in Voter Deletions

ECI draft electoral rolls show 58 lakh voter deletions in West Bengal. Data and independent analysis suggest non-Muslims, particularly Matuas and non-Bengali voters, are more affected. The findings challenge claims that voter exclusions under the SIR exercise primarily target Muslim infiltrators.