Sitharaman Releases White Paper Attacking UPA, But Data Tells a Different Story

Date:

Share post:

[dropcap]T[/dropcap]he Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has released a “White Paper on the Indian Economy” today, which purportedly seeks to “generate a wider, more informed debate on the paramountcy of national interest and fiscal responsibility in matters of governance over political expediency.”

The White Paper criticises the “mismanagement and short-sighted handling of the public finances during FY04-FY14”, i.e. under the UPA era. However, official data shows that when the UPA-I government took charge in 2004, the Gross Debt of the Central government was over 67% of GDP and the Gross Debt of Central and State Governments together (General Government) was almost 85% of GDP.

When the UPA era ended in 2014, Gross Central Government debt had come down to below 53% of GDP and General Government Debt to below 67%.

In the past ten years under the Modi government, Central Government debt has climbed up to 58% of GDP in FY 24 and General Government debt to 82% of GDP.

Public Debt/GDP ratio declined during the UPA era because of two reasons:

  1. GDP grew at a rate much faster than the previous regime
  2. Growth was driven by private investment, consumption and exports allowing the government to maintain moderate fiscal deficits

Public Debt/GDP ratio increased under the Modi regime because of two reasons:

  1. GDP growth rate fell, first due to successive shocks like Demonetisation, the hasty introduction of GST and finally the Covid-19 pandemic and lockdown
  2. Growth has been over-dependent upon fiscal stimulus and the government’s capital expenditure, with a slump in private investment and export growth

Unable to digest and acknowledge this simple fact, the Modi government has wasted the resources of the Finance Ministry to bring out election propaganda material ahead of the Loksabha elections, targeting the UPA government, which lost power ten years ago.

Some of the criticisms made in the White Paper regarding the UPA era, like high inflation, high current account deficit and bad debt accumulation of NPAs in public sector banks are not entirely invalid. But the people voted on them ten years ago, in 2014. What matters more today is the record of the past ten years, FY 14-FY 24.

What has the Modi government done in the past ten years? Both export and import growth have declined over the past decade, while the Indian rupee’s value has fallen from Rs. 60 per dollar in 2014 to Rs. 83 per dollar today. Inflation has risen again in the past year, with food inflation currently touching the double-digit mark. Most disturbingly, over Rs. 15 trillion of Bank NPAs, mainly owned by large corporate defaulters, have been written off by the banks in the past ten years.

Corporate tax rates have been cut down to historically low levels, affecting government revenues and widening the fiscal deficit. Yet, private investment has not taken off. Unemployment levels are at historic highs. After betraying the aspirations of the youth, the Modi regime seeks to mislead them by relentlessly pursuing divisive policies in the name of religion.

What has prospered under the Modi regime is crony capitalism, with favoured corporate houses being showered with largesse to return their favour of funding the BJP through opaque channels like electoral bonds. The ongoing saga of the Adani group stands as testimony. Rather than berating the governments of the past, the Finance Ministry would have done well to consider a White Paper on its failures and deficiencies. That would have served the people better.

Related articles

Bengal: Different Government, Same Playbook? Faizan Ahmed Case Returns to Court

The change of government in Bengal has brought little change for Faizan Ahmed’s family. After the Mamata Banerjee government sought a medical board in his case, the Suvendu Adhikari government has made a similar move before the Calcutta High Court.

You Can Crack IIT. Can You Crack Its Caste System?

IIT Bombay student Sahil Wakode’s suicide has revived questions about caste discrimination, merit and student rights in India’s elite institutions. As allegations of harassment and casteist abuse emerge, the larger concern is whether campuses meant to nurture talent are becoming hostile spaces for marginalised students

Who Will Pick Up the Phone Now? The Crisis Facing Hemant Soren After Sonu

Sudivya Sonu’s death has left more than an empty Assembly seat in Giridih. As JMM prepares for a bypoll, Hemant Soren must navigate succession, Kalpana Soren’s growing role and the party’s wider alliance politics.

What Is India’s Youth Asking For: Cultural Identity or the Right to a Future?

India’s youth have always questioned power, from the student movements of the 1970s to the Anna movement. Today, programmes in Ujjain and Indore raise a new question: is young India seeking cultural identity, political recognition or something more basic — the right to shape its future?