Diaspora condemns High Court for denying bail to Siddique Kappan

Kappan has been put in Uttar Pradesh jail for almost two years. The journalist was picked up by UP police when he was going to cover the Hathras gang rape case. However, the scribe had not written a single word but was arrested and denied bail

Date:

Share post:

Washington, DC/Kolkata: The Indian diaspora urged the Supreme Court of India to immediately intervene and bail journalist Siddique Kappan, who is in jail for twenty-two months now without even doing a report.

Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC), in its press communiqué, commended about the SC’s earlier decision, in which Muhammad Zubair, the fact-checker with AltNews got justice from the apex court.

However, IAMC has criticized the decision of the High Court and lower court to deny bail to Siddique Kappan, who has been a prisoner of conscience since his arrest on false charges two years ago in Uttar Pradesh.

On Thursday, Allahabad High Court judge Krishan Pahal said Kappan “had no work in Hathras and, therefore, his sojourn with persons (in Hathras) who do not belong to the media fraternity is a crucial circumstance going against him.” 

The press release states, “Virtually accepting the talking points of the police, the judge said Kappan’s defense that he was visiting Hathras as a journalist ‘stands nullified by the averments in the chargesheet.’ The judge also accepted the allegations that Kappan used “tainted money” to incite violence.”

“It is shocking that the Allahabad High Court has decided to deny bail to Kappan saying he had “no business” to be in Uttar Pradesh,” said Syed Ali, IAMC President. “Under India’s Constitution, all citizens have every right to travel across the country, especially as journalists whose job it is to investigate and report.” 

Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath’s government arrested Kappan in October 2020 as he traveled to Mathura city to report on the rape and murder of a Dalit girl. Since then, Kappan has been repeatedly denied judicial relief.

“It should concern us all that there is now a dangerous trend in India’s judiciary to accept the police’s version even when the trial has not been completed and the trial court is yet to rule on the prosecution’s claim against an accused,” Ali said.

“Time and again the courts have shielded Hindus calling for a genocide of Muslims, for running openly vicious and hate-filled reporting against Muslims, especially on television,” said IAMC Executive Director Rasheed Ahmed. “BJP leaders who have defamed Islam’s Prophet continue to have the protection of the court from arrest or any criminal prosecution.”

Kappan’s arrest has also been widely condemned internationally.

And mentioned, “The United States Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), an autonomous US federal commission, has named Kappan as a Victim of Freedom of Religion and Belief in India. Leading global rights-based organizations and watchdogs such as Amnesty International, Committee to Protect Journalists, and Reporters Without Borders have also flagged his case as one of outright persecution.”

Siddique had moved to the High Court after the trial court had rejected his bail application in July 2021. He has been falsely charged under the draconian Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) which is widely abused across India against Muslims, human rights defenders, and critics of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu supremacist federal government.

IAMC claimed that Kappan is also falsely accused without any evidence of raising funds to run a website and for carrying a dossier on imparting training ‘to incite violence.’ The police have also falsely accused him of being a member of the Muslim organization, the Popular Front of India (PFI), even though he only worked as a journalist with the PFI’s newspaper.

“In any case, the PFI is not a banned organization, so accusing Kappan of criminal conduct merely for alleged association with it did not stand up to legal scrutiny,” it added.

While Ahmed said, “The release of Muhammad Zubair rekindled a hope in us that not the entire judiciary system of India is ‘Modi-fied’.

Related articles

What Is India’s Youth Asking For: Cultural Identity or the Right to a Future?

India’s youth have always questioned power, from the student movements of the 1970s to the Anna movement. Today, programmes in Ujjain and Indore raise a new question: is young India seeking cultural identity, political recognition or something more basic — the right to shape its future?

BRICS Isn’t Beijing’s Game. It’s India’s Strategic Autonomy

India’s BRICS engagement is not about choosing China over the West but protecting its strategic autonomy. As the global order turns multipolar, India must retain strong ties across competing blocs while defending its independent foreign policy and ensuring that national interests, not Western approval, shape its international choices.

Eight Intelligences, One Report Card: The Flawed Machinery of Academic Merit

Howard Gardner’s multiple intelligences theory challenges the obsession with grades, but India’s education system continues to reward a narrow definition of merit. As academic pressure grows, students face mounting expectations, anxiety and mental-health struggles, raising questions about how we define intelligence, success and failure

From the Moon to the Manhole: Can India’s Tech Revolution Finally Dignify Its Sewers?

India has sent missions to the Moon, yet sanitation workers still risk their lives inside sewers. At Durgapur, CSIR-CMERI is developing mechanised cleaning technology that could replace dangerous human entry, prevent deaths and help end the generational stigma attached to manual scavenging.