National University Professor Deems ‘Bulldozer Justice’ Unlawful, Advocates for Judicial Process

Milli Council, West Bengal to reach out to educational institutions to raise awareness of the Constitution

Date:

Share post:

Kolkata: The bulldozer justice, which is a new symbol of instant justice in many states of India now, is illegal and unconstitutional, claims Dr Sarfaraz Ahmed Khan, a professor at the National University of Juridical Sciences.

Dr Khan was speaking to eNewsroom, on the sidelines of the Constitution Day celebration function organized by the All India Milli Council’s West Bengal in Kolkata.

“We have seen many bulldozer justice-related cases. Is it legal? No, it is not legal. Everyone has the right to life and personal liberty and one can be deprived of it by procedure established by law. (Art 21). In BJP leader Maneka Gandhi case the Court held that procedure should be just, fair and reasonable,” he answered on the question that bulldozer justice is just opposite to Indian judiciary system but judiciary is not seen doing enough against this practice by many states.

“When something happens, you just go and bulldoze someone’s house, is it just, fair and reasonable procedure? According to me, it is a wrong procedure and illegal. These cases should go to court and victims should get compensation under the Right to Reprisal, the State must pay.

“Unfortunately, the judgment did not come in a day and it takes time. Still, we should get the way to get justice inside the constitution only.”

Earlier, Dr Khan spoke in detail about the importance of the Constitution in India and said to the audience about the fear of a large section of society that India’s Constitution can be changed, and made meaningless.

Listen to NUJS Professor Dr Sarfaraz Ahmed Khan

Article 368 gives power to the constituent assembly, under which with a two-third majority they can amend the Constitution.

“In 1973’s Kesavananda Bharati Judgment, the Supreme Court made it clear that the Constitution can be amended but could not be changed especially its basic structure,” the law professor informed.

The Supreme Court also defined the Basic Structure of it, he added.

On the occasion, Rafay Siddiqui, an executive member of the council, promised to make a team and reach out to educational institutions to make them aware of the Constitution.

Siddiqui also informed that on Minority Rights Day, the Milli Council will hold an event on December 18.

Umar Abedin, Secretary of AIMC, Telangana delivered his speech through video call. He mentioned that it was Prophet Muhammad, who gave the first constituion to the world. He also said, “India will not run through Mann Ki Baat but from the Constitution.”

The programme was also addressed by retired IPS Zahid-ur Rahman.

Milli Council’s other members including Shahud Alam, Mohammad Nooruddin and Gulam Mohammad remained present and addressed the audience.

The event was presided over by vice-president Md Shafique Qasmi.

Related articles

Before You Can Win, You Have to Survive Filing: Allegations Against TDP Put Andhra Civic Polls Under SC Scrutiny

The Supreme Court's intervention over alleged nomination obstruction has put Andhra Pradesh's civic polls under scrutiny. The dispute has intensified tensions between the TDP-led coalition and YSRCP, raising questions about electoral fairness and opposition rights.

“We Will Not Sign”: Neha Bora Rejects Peace Bond as Delhi HC Orders Disclosure of Evidence

Neha Bora has refused to sign a peace bond, calling it an attempt to curb dissent. The Delhi High Court has directed authorities to disclose the material against the AISA president and ensure natural justice before any bond order. AISA has also alleged threats against her outside Mandir Marg Police Station.

AISA President Neha Moves Delhi High Court Against Peace Bond Notice, Alleges Police Intimidation

AISA president Neha Bora has moved the Delhi High Court challenging a peace bond notice issued by Delhi Police under the BNSS. The student organisation alleges police intimidation and a crackdown on peaceful protests demanding Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation and the rollback of SIR

Shivraj Singh Chouhan’s Aggression: Is There More to His Tribal Protest Than Meets the Eye?

Shivraj Singh Chouhan’s protest against the demolition of tribal homes in Madhya Pradesh has exposed tensions with Chief Minister Mohan Yadav. Disputes over farmers’ demands and the Ladli Behna scheme have added to speculation about BJP leadership dynamics.