Four Indian Photojournalists Win Pulitzer Prize For Covid-19 Photography

Date:

Share post:

Amid the controversy about the exact figures of Covid-19 deaths in India, four photojournalists have won the prestigious Pulitzer Prize for 2022 for their photography of Covid deaths in India. It also includes slain photographer Danish Siddiqui, killed by the Taliban militants while covering conflicts between Afghanistan and Taliban forces in 2021. All four lensmen work for the Reuters agency.

While three other photographers – Adnan Abidi, Amit Dave, and Sanna Irshad Mattoo have got it for the first time, it was second for Danish Siddiqui, posthumously.

The 38-year-old Siddiqui had won the Pulitzer in 2018 itself.

Watch the award-winning photographs at eNewsroom India‘s gallery.

Courtesy: Reuters and Pulitzer.

Related articles

गांधी द जर्नलिस्ट: आज की पत्रकारिता गांधी से क्या सीख सकती है?

कोलकाता: आज की पत्रकारिता को देखकर महात्मा गांधी क्या कहते? टेलीविजन बहसों, सोशल मीडिया, गलत सूचनाओं, एल्गोरिदम और आर्टिफिशियल...

Gandhi the Journalist: eNewsroom Conclave to Ask What Journalism Can Learn from Gandhi

eNewsroom Conclave 2026 in Kolkata will revisit Gandhi’s vision of journalism with Parambrata Chatterjee, Arfa Khanum Sherwani, Jawhar Sircar, Rasheed Kidwai and Pratik Sinha, exploring truth, public service and the media’s responsibilities in an age of algorithms, misinformation and artificial intelligence.

“Vote Rights Are Not Up for Sale”: Sr Advocate Samim Ahammed’s SIR Message

“We are fighting to restore voting rights,” said Sr Advocate Samim Ahammed at a SIR legal assistance camp in Karandighi. His remarks on Gyanesh Kumar and the Election Commission brought questions over voter rights and electoral rolls into sharp focus

‘Assalamu Alaikum, Inshaallah, Jazakallah’: Peace, Hope and Gratitude Don’t Cancel Out Your Merit

Dr Bushara Bano’s use of “Assalamu Alaikum”, “InshaAllah” and “Jazakallah” has sparked controversy. But can three expressions of faith overshadow an IPS officer’s qualifications, competitive achievements and professional record? The debate raises a larger question about identity, neutrality and merit in public service.