Democracy is being killed democratically: Opposition leaders at state level consultation on electoral democracy

Date:

Share post:

Kolkata: On the day, when Article 370 and Jammu and Kashmir bifurcation issue was being discussed across India, the West Bengal Chapter of all Indian political parties were having a brainstorming session on other recent important issue including One Nation One Election, amendments in Right To Information (RTI) Act and Electoral Bonds.

A state-level consultation on Electoral Democracy and Role of Political Parties had been organised by West Bengal Election Watch (WBEW), Association for Democratic Reform (ADR) and IMSE at Kolkata.

The leaders of political parties who participated included, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Indian National Congress (INC), CPI-ML, CPI, SUCI, Forward Block and RSP.

Significantly, ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC) did not send its representative for the consultation event. Nobody from CPM was also present, but party had conveyed earlier to the organisers that they wouldn’t be able to participate as the day was coinciding with founder of Communist Party of India – Muzaffar Ahmed’s Birth Anniversary Celebration which was being organized at their party office.

During the closed-door meeting between all major political parties of West Bengal and the civil society, which lasted for a couple of hours saw the leaders and  civil society engaging in a meaningful discussion.

The opening speech of Manoj Bhattacharjee, representing the Revolutionary Socialist Party (RSP), was fiery and besides several important questions he also mentioned about the Kashmir issue.

He said, “While RTI has been destroyed. There is so much secrecy shrouding the Kashmir issue at the moment. The central government needs to understand that decisions can’t just be imposed on the citizens. Given scenario is the best example of how democracy is being killed democratically.”

Taking on the centre’s decision to pass the UAPA Act, he said, “The present situation is no different from the declared emergency of 1975 when those questioning the government were simply put behind bars. Back then the slogan was No Daleel, No Vakeel. Today the situation is no better. In this era of a non-declared emergency, those questioning the government are branded as anti-national and now that this law has been passed anyone who questions those in authority can be branded as a terrorist.”

Congress party’s Sukhbilash Berma said about amendments in RTI, “Our party had only enacted the RTI act, we must remember that no act is perfect. But, the present government instead of making amendments to better the law, have chosen to weaken it.”

Democracy

While most of the participating party representatives were seen openly questioning the need for One Nation One Election theory, BJP West Bengal’s vice president, Joyprakash Majumdar maintained, “Most of the political parties seem to be raising this issue, there is no reason to panic. It’s not like it will be implemented today. It will happen only after much needed political discussion and debate.”

An excited Majumdar was also heard saying during his speech, “The civil society always rallies strongly behind Amartya Sen if something is said against him. But they never support other intellects. They will question about lynching and other issues but will never question the intention of Tukde Tukde Insha Allah gang.”

However, when the Tanmay Ghosh from Banga Sanskriti Manch countered him on his comment on the tukde tukde Insha Allah gang comment, he quickly said, “By that, I didn’t mean the Muslims who respect the Indian Constitution and love the nation. I didn’t mean to label any particular community.”

After the event was over, speaking to eNewsroom Dr Ujjaini Halim, State Coordinator of WBEW, said, “It was a fruitful consultation between the political parties and civil society. And it was apparent that most of the political parties, barring one, were against the One Nation One Election concept. Many also raised questions on how this policy could do away with the federal government structure of the Indian democracy.”

Related articles

What Is India’s Youth Asking For: Cultural Identity or the Right to a Future?

India’s youth have always questioned power, from the student movements of the 1970s to the Anna movement. Today, programmes in Ujjain and Indore raise a new question: is young India seeking cultural identity, political recognition or something more basic — the right to shape its future?

BRICS Isn’t Beijing’s Game. It’s India’s Strategic Autonomy

India’s BRICS engagement is not about choosing China over the West but protecting its strategic autonomy. As the global order turns multipolar, India must retain strong ties across competing blocs while defending its independent foreign policy and ensuring that national interests, not Western approval, shape its international choices.

Eight Intelligences, One Report Card: The Flawed Machinery of Academic Merit

Howard Gardner’s multiple intelligences theory challenges the obsession with grades, but India’s education system continues to reward a narrow definition of merit. As academic pressure grows, students face mounting expectations, anxiety and mental-health struggles, raising questions about how we define intelligence, success and failure

From the Moon to the Manhole: Can India’s Tech Revolution Finally Dignify Its Sewers?

India has sent missions to the Moon, yet sanitation workers still risk their lives inside sewers. At Durgapur, CSIR-CMERI is developing mechanised cleaning technology that could replace dangerous human entry, prevent deaths and help end the generational stigma attached to manual scavenging.