How Do You Kill a Case? The UP Government’s Playbook in the Akhlaq Lynching

The Dadri lynching case, which once shook the nation, is on the verge of being withdrawn by the UP government. Citing flimsy and familiar excuses, the state seeks to absolve those accused of murdering Akhlaq. The decision threatens to turn India’s justice system into a tool for protecting mobs, not victims

Date:

Share post:

Ten years.

Ten whole years since a mob dragged Mohammad Akhlaq out of his home in Dadri, beat him to death with bricks and rods because someone spread the lie that he had beef in his fridge. Forensic tests later proved it was mutton. But Akhlaq was already dead, his son Danish was fighting for life, and the country was burning with shame.

The mob was led by the son and nephew of a local BJP leader.

They were arrested, charged with murder, then quietly released on bail.

For a decade, the trial crawled at a snail’s pace, prosecution witnesses barely began to be examined, and the killers walked free among us.

And now, in 2025, the BJP government of Uttar Pradesh wakes up and decides: “Let’s just drop the entire case.”

An application under Section 321 CrPC has been filed to withdraw the murder prosecution. The reasons? “Inconsistent statements,” “no sharp weapons recovered,” “no prior enmity.”

The same tired excuses that courts routinely reject in every mob-lynching trial. These are not legal grounds; they are political cover.

This is not an oversight. This is not incompetence.

This is a blatant attempt to bury justice because the accused have the right political connections and the victims are from the “wrong” faith.

The court is not bound to accept this shameful withdrawal. The law is crystal clear.
But will the judge dare to stand up to a government that has spent years intimidating the judiciary, transferring “inconvenient” judges, and turning courts into extensions of the ruling party?

We saw what happened at the Supreme Court level, collegium battles, midnight transfers, judges afraid to even take up certain cases.

If the highest court can be brought to its knees, what chance does a district judge in Gautam Buddh Nagar have?

Mohammad Akhlaq was murdered twice:

Once by a hate-drunk mob in 2015.

And again in 2025 by a government that has decided his life was worth nothing.

If this withdrawal is allowed, every future lynching will carry a silent footnote: “Kill now, we will clean it up later.” Share this if your blood is still capable of boiling.

Tag every judge, every lawyer, every citizen who still believes India is a country of laws, not of lynch mobs and their political godfathers.

Related articles

Killed Over a Skullcap, Ignored by the System: What 405 Documented Hate Incidents Reveal About Impunity in India

A new APCR report documents 405 hate crimes and speeches across India in nine months—including 54 deaths, post-poll violence in West Bengal, and 37 per cent state actor involvement—exposing how public incitement and police inaction fuel targeted minority violence.

The Architect of Indian Minds: From Macaulay’s Clerks to Azad’s Engineers

Maulana Azad held no formal degrees, yet he built the IITs and dismantled the British system designed to produce clerks. As India debates commercialised schooling and institutional credibility in 2026, his radical republic of learning demands an urgent revisit

From Tuition Teacher to School Founder: How ‘Laddu Sir’ Built a School of 1,800 Dreamers

Topsia’s Noble Mission School is challenging the notion that talent needs expensive schooling. Founded by ‘Laddu Sir’, the school has 1,800 students and affordable ₹600 monthly fees. At its annual day, Wali Rahmani reminded parents that paying school fees is no substitute for education.

Beyond Property and Politics: Understanding the History of Waqf in India

Syed Ubaidur Rahman's *History of Waqf in India* explores the institution's Islamic foundations, historical evolution and changing legal framework, offering a wider perspective on Waqf beyond contemporary debates over property, politics and state regulation.