Bengal: Mamata’s magic stuns poll pundits, as TMC wins 29 seats

Date:

Share post:

Kolkata: The Lok Sabha elections results in Bengal has left all exit poll pundits stunned with Mamata Banerjee and her Trinamul Congress delivering its second best electoral performance since 2014. Mamata’s party which had been shown a thumbs down by poll pundits has managed to secure 29 seats, while BJP managed to win only 12 seats in Bengal.

The state which went to poll in seven phases sent out a big message to the country – ‘What Bengal thinks today, India thinks tomorrow’. The vote consolidation that the state witnessed perhaps was a resounding assurance to team INDIA that the public of Bengal is not with those indulging in politics of hate.

“The result is not surprising to me or anyone from Bengal. The groundwork of those who did the exit polls was weak. I had told eNewsroom earlier that TMC would bag 27-28 seats and that has happened,” said Professor Mohammad Reyaz of Aliah University.

Explaining why the dynamics of Bengal’s voting pattern was media communication academic Ujjwal K Chowdhury. “Bengal has voted against the politics of hate and Modi. It was not the state elections so there was no anti-Mamata voting. Also, the state has witnessed Muslim consolidation of vote. The Left-leaning as-well-as Congress-leaning Muslim voters have chosen to vote for the party that can defeat Modi,” analysed Chowdhury

Echoing the same Ujjaini Halim said, “Bengal voted for the parliament and against polarisation politics. That’s perhaps the reason other issues like state level corruption related to appointment of teachers etc didn’t impact much. The voting pattern is a replica of 2021. This was more of a voting against BJP.”

Reyaz maintained that the Exit polls in general had a bias towards BJP.

“Even Pradeep Gupta claimed that there would be a close contest. But look at the winning or lead margins – they are wide. So, where is the close contest in Bengal?” he asked.

He maintained that Mamata’s popularity and TMC cadres played a key role in the party’s victory in Bengal. “TMC’s win has established the fact that social media presence won’t help. BJP’s two sitting MPs have lost, all credit to the good campaigning by TMC. Central-federal tussle was efficiently made into an issue by Abhishek Baneerjee. Also, IPAC’s -root level management has been good,” said Reyaz.

The performance of the Left INC makes one believe that they have again failed to convince voters that they could ‘save’ Bengal. However, undeniably the Left vote percentage has increased marginally which can be considered as a positive sign for Bengal’s state politics.

“One can’t deny the fact that Mamata has again emerged as a very popular mass leader, her various schemes for women/girls contributed to this outcome,” stressed Halim.

However, Chowdhury maintained that it was too early to compare Didi with CPIM’s Jyoti Basu. “To be equated with Basu, she needs to win another state election, but we can’t deny the fact that she has the women voters in favour,” he said.

Related articles

“You Asked the Wrong Questions”: Why Activists Say ‘Godi Media’ Became Part of the Story at Kolkata Protest

As journalists alleged attacks during the Kolkata protest, activists told eNewsroom that the deeper issue was how sections of the mainstream or 'Godi Media' ignored students' demands, choosing provocative narratives over questions about repeated exam controversies and police action.

Irfan’s Story: India’s Brightest Minds Shouldn’t Need to Go Viral First

Irfan's story is about more than one remarkable student. It reveals why millions of gifted young Indians remain unseen until protest or chance brings them into view.

Modi Govt Bowed to Gen Z, So Why Is a Hate-Spewing Minister Still Protected?

Why did the BJP force Dharmendra Pradhan to resign over the NEET exam paper leak after Gen Z protests, while Vijay Shah remained a minister despite his remarks on Colonel Sofiya Qureshi?

From Global Crises to Exam Leaks: Prophet Muhammad’s Timeless Lessons on Ethical Leadership

Wars, exam leaks and institutional failures may seem unrelated, but they reveal a deeper crisis of ethical leadership. Drawing on the life of Prophet Muhammad, leadership research and contemporary events, this essay explores why integrity, wisdom and discipline remain the foundations of lasting social transformation.