India Overlooks Business, Shopping Apps But Bans Chinese Games And Beauty Filter

With Chinese investors facing rules restricting their participation in Indian companies, players in India’s flourishing tech scene have turned to Japanese conglomerate Softbank and other Western investors to fill the void. The value of venture deals in India rose to US$7.9 billion in July. But venture capital (VC) investments from mainland China plunged from US$1.2 billion in 2018 to just US$76 million in the first six months of 2021

Date:

Share post:

[dropcap]W[/dropcap]hile the Indian government is making a big show about banning Chinese apps, investors from the communist country are routing their funds into Indian IPOs and companies via neutral countries and Hong Kong. The current ban was mostly on games and beauty filters apps, leaving out business, shopping or payments.

With Chinese investors facing rules restricting their participation in Indian companies, players in India’s flourishing tech scene have turned to Japanese conglomerate Softbank and other Western investors to fill the void.

The value of venture deals in India rose to US$7.9 billion in July, according to data by research firm Preqin. But venture capital (VC) investments from mainland China plunged from US$1.2 billion in 2018 to just US$76 million in the first six months of 2021, data research firm Venture Intelligence found.

India has banned 54 more mobile applications, bringing the total tally of apps banned in the country since June 2020 to 274, according to The Indian Express.

Back in mid-2020, the move made international headlines as Chinese-owned TikTok was among the banned apps. In the meantime, prominent platforms like WeChat, Shein, Weibo, Baidu, PupG Mobile, Alipay and AliExpress have ceased to be officially available in India.

The bans are put upon apps the Indian government believes do not shield user data from the Chinese government appropriately by using Chinese servers, which is illegal under Indian law. The bans have, however, also coincided with Indian-Chinese clashes on the Ladakh/Sikkim-Tibetan border.

While the bans have mostly affected Chinese-owned apps, developers from other countries have also found themselves on the bans list if they are suspected to operate on Chinese servers, for example through Chinese stakeholders. The popular game Garena Free Fire by Singaporean company Sea Ltd. has been banned since Monday because the company is partly owned by Tencent. Sea Ltd. said it had complied with Indian law, according to Reuters.

Games like Free Fire are a very common type of app to be banned in the current Indian crackdown, as an analysis of Google Play Store data by Statista shows. With China being a huge contender in the mobile games market, almost a quarter of banned apps over the last two years have been from that category. This is only beat by 25 percent of banned apps being listed as tools, including browsers, mail programs, personalized interfaces and organizational apps. Like another commonly banned category – social media and dating at 18 percent – many of these apps have the potential to collect a large amount of personal data on their users.

Related articles

Taken From Home, Heard From Bangladesh: Bengal Man’s Family Seeks Answers

Months after Abdul Rahim was allegedly detained in Uttar Dinajpur, his family heard his voice from Bangladesh. Two phone calls brought relief that he was alive, but also raised a frightening question: how did a man taken into custody in Bengal cross the border?

Democracy or Deleted? Rahul Gandhi Takes the Voter-List Fight to the Streets

Rahul Gandhi’s confrontation with the Election Commission over SIR has moved from Parliament to the streets. As Congress expands its protests over alleged voter deletions, the BJP challenges its claims, turning the electoral-roll dispute into a wider battle over institutional credibility and democracy

When “Why?” Becomes a Threat: Is West Bengal’s Democratic Space Shrinking?

West Bengal’s recent clashes over classrooms, universities, the press and cultural institutions raise a larger question: what happens when political power enters spaces meant for independent thought? The incidents may not be connected, but together they reveal how easily institutional autonomy and dissent can come under pressure.

India Needs Journalism That Refuses to Look Away

From Gandhi’s idea of journalism as public service to today’s algorithm-driven news feeds, eNewsroom’s journey raises a vital question: who does journalism ultimately serve? At its Kolkata conclave, journalists examined why independent media must remain accountable to citizens, not power